* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Notes
Hologenome theory of evolution wikipedia , lookup
Objections to evolution wikipedia , lookup
Genetics and the Origin of Species wikipedia , lookup
Sociocultural evolution wikipedia , lookup
Unilineal evolution wikipedia , lookup
The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex wikipedia , lookup
State switching wikipedia , lookup
Jewish views on evolution wikipedia , lookup
Hindu views on evolution wikipedia , lookup
Creation and evolution in public education in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to evolution wikipedia , lookup
Transitional fossil wikipedia , lookup
Acceptance of evolution by religious groups wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Creation and evolution in public education wikipedia , lookup
Punctuated equilibrium wikipedia , lookup
“Evidence from Biology” Psalm 139:13,14 Biology, a word derived from two Greek words, bios ("life") and logos ("word") is "the study of life." Some biology textbooks affirm that evolution is “random and undirected” and “without plan or purpose” and that Darwin gave biology a “sound scientific basis by attributing the diversity of life to natural causes rather than supernatural creation.” Microevolution- evolutionary change within a species or small group of organisms. No one seriously doubts microevolution. Macroevolution- major evolutionary transition from one type of organism to another. This widely accepted theory has numerous scientific challenges. I. Irreducible Complexity. Irreducible Complexity- the argument that certain biological systems cannot evolve by successive small modifications from pre-existing functional systems through natural selection. The single cell is an exquisitely designed molecular machine that led Bruce Alberts, President of the National Academy of Sciences to remark, “We have always underestimated cells…The entire cell can be viewed as a factory that contains an elaborate network of interlocking assembly lines…” Biochemist Michael Behe “The tiny acid-driven motor that powers bacterial flagellum- a propeller-like device consists of 40 protein parts including a rotor, a stator, bushings and a drive-shaft. The absence of any one of these parts would result in a complete loss of function. That is, the motor is irreducibly complex-it is a single system composed of several wellmatched, interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning. Behe states “no irreducibly complex system that is missing a part, is by definition nonfunctional. Darwin wrote “If it can be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely breakdown.” Biochemist and author Michael Behe stated “molecular evolution is not based on scientific authority. There is no publication in the scientific literature that describes how molecular evolution of any real, complex, biochemical system either did occur, or even might have occurred….molecular evolution has never addressed the question of how complex structures came to be. In effect, the theory of Darwinian molecular evolution has not published, and so it should perish.” James Shapiro, a biochemist at the University of Chicago, also admits that there are no detailed Darwinian accounts for the evolution of any fundamental biochemical or cellular system, only a handful of wishful speculations.” Stephen Jay Gould, an atheist and Harvard professor, “Classical science, with its preferences for reduction to a few controlling factors of causality, was triumphantly successful for relatively simple systems like planetary motion and the periodic table of the elements. But irreducibly complex systems- that is most of the interesting phenomena of biology, human society and history-cannot be so explained. We need new philosophies and models…” Behe states that “To a person who does not feel obligated to restrict his search to unintelligent causes, the straightforward conclusion is that many biological systems were designed. They were designed not by chance or necessity; rather, they were planned.” II. Information-bearing DNA. Digital Information-bearing, information processing DNA is strong evidence of Intelligent Design. Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, said that “DNA is like a computer program, but far, far more advanced than any software we’ve ever created.” We have an estimated 10 trillion cells in our bodies, each of which contains DNA. If you were to line up all of the DNA packed into your body’s cells, it would stretch from the Earth to the Sun and back 100 times, according to the National Human Genome Research Institute. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize winning co-discoverer of DNA “An honest man armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to almost be a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going.” III. The Fossil Record. “Cambrian Explosion”- a term that refers to the appearance and rapid diversification of most major living animal body plans (phyla) in the fossil record within a relatively short period in evolutionary history. “The number of intermediate varieties (should) be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such graduated organic chain ; and this, perhaps is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory.” – Charles Darwin Paleontologist Allen Raup of the Field Museum of Natural History, which houses one of the largest fossil collections in the world, said: “We are now about 120 years after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million fossil species, but the situation hasn’t changed much. The record of evolution is still surprisingly jerky and, ironically, we have even fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin’s time.” Atheist Harvard professor Stephen Jay Gould said “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology.” Niles Eldridge of the American Museum of Natural History says, “When we do see the introduction of evolutionary novelty, it usually shows up with a big bang, and often with no firm evidence that the fossils did not evolve elsewhere. Evolution cannot forever be going on somewhere else. Yet that’s how the fossil record has struck many a forlorn paleontologist looking to learn something about evolution.” Nobel Prize winning physicist Robert Laughlin of Stanford University, whose research into what properties make life possible (and who is not an advocate of Intelligent Design) writes “Much of the present day biological knowledge is ideological. A key symptom of ideological thinking is the explanation that has no implications and cannot be tested. I call such logical dead ends anitheories because they have exactly the opposite effect of real theories: they stop thinking rather than stimulate it. Evolution by natural selection, for instance, which Darwin conceived as a great theory has lately come to function as an antitheory called upon to cover up embarrassing experimental shortcomings…- your protein defies the law of mass actionevolution did it! Your complicated mess of chemical reactions turns into a chicken- evolution! The human brain works on logical principles even computers cannot emulate? Evolution did it!”