* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 1 What is Evolution? What causes evolution? What is natural
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup
Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup
Dual inheritance theory wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive evolution in the human genome wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
The Selfish Gene wikipedia , lookup
Natural selection wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
BIOL2007 Evolutionary Genetics course website: http://ucl.ac.uk/~ucbhdjm/courses/ (searching for “BIOL2007 timetable” on Google is easier!) What causes evolution? What is Evolution? a) Natural selection b) Mutation c) Genetic drift, or neutral, random evolution e) Migration, or gene flow Darwin: “descent with modification” A change in morphology, ecology, behaviour, physiology Change must be genetic This lecture: simple examples of evolution by natural selection Modern, genetic definition: “evolution is change in gene frequencies between generations” What is natural selection? The peppered moth Biston betularia “a consistent bias in survival or fertility between genotypes within generations” Selection often causes evolution, but may also prevent evolution (e.g. stable polymorphism) Evolution does not require selection (e.g. drift -important: > 95% of genome maybe "junk"!) However, many interesting types of evolution involve natural selection Left: form typica (left, and carbonaria (right) on lichen-covered trunk in Dorset. Right: on soot-covered tree near Birmingham A flow diagram for evolution by ns Selection against recessive allele Selection AGAINST recessive allele (= selection FOR dominant allele) Random mating Suppose there is “viability selection” (i.e. survival affected) so that … Offspring genotypes in Hardy-Weinberg ratios Natural selection Offspring after selection So now you can write an evolution computer program! Numerical vs. analytical theory Genotypes AA Aa aa Total Relative fitness, W 1 1 1-s - Genotype frequencies before selection (Hardy-Weinberg law) p2 2pq q2 1 2pq q2(1-s) <1 Rel. frequencies p2 after selection in this simple model, s is the “selection coefficient” (≈ fraction dying) 1 BIOL2007 – SELECTION AND THE SINGLE GENE SELECTION AGAINST RECESSIVE ALLELE (EQUIVALENT TO SELECTION FOR DOMINANT ALLELE) Suppose there is viability selection so that … Genotypes AA Aa aa Total Relative fitness, W 1 1 1-s Frequencies before selection (Hardy-Weinberg law) p2 2pq q2 1 Relative genotype frequencies after selection p2 2pq q2(1-s) ≠1 Frequencies should sum to 1! Therefore, need to divide by “mean fitness,” W = p 2 + 2 pq + q 2 (1 − s ) = 1 − sq 2 Genotype frequencies after selection p2 1 − sq 2 WHAT IS THE NEW FREQUENCY OF THE A ALLELE 2 pq 1 − sq 2 q2 (1-s) 1 − sq 2 (p’)? p’ = new frequency of AA + ½ new frequency of Aa p' = p 2 + 12 2 pq p 2 + pq p( p + q) p2 1 2 pq p + = = = = 2 2 2 2 2 1 − sq 2 (1 − sq ) 1 − sq 1 − sq 1 − sq 1 − sq 2 WHAT IS THE RATE OF EVOLUTION PER GENERATION? We need to know the CHANGE OF GENE FREQUENCY, ∆p (obtained by subtracting old gene frequency from the new gene frequency). p p − p(1 − sq 2 ) spq 2 ∆p = p'- p = −p= =+ 1 − sq 2 (1 − sq 2 ) 1 − sq 2 This is the basic equation for all of evolution by natural selection! 1 The basic equation for evolution Natural selection at a dominant gene spq 2 ∆ p = p '- p = + ≈ spq 2 1 − sq 2 (if s is small) In words: Dominance vs. recessives We can now answer the question: How fast do populations respond to natural selection? Answer: ∆p = spq 2 1 − sq 2 (p is frequency of A, q is freq. a) 2 If p is small, ~0.01 or less, q → 1; q → 1 : ∆p ≈ If p is large, so that q ≈ 0.01 or less, sp , i.e. RAPID 1− s p → 1 : ∆p ≈ sq 2 , i.e. very SLOW 1 (q2 is a square of a very small number is itself even smaller!) The change in gene frequency per generation is proportional to spq2 RESULT: Selection for/against a DOMINANT gene at low frequency is RAPID (∝ p) Selection for/against a RECESSIVE gene at low frequency is SLOW ((∝ q2) …. many new single genes for resistance (melanism, insecticide resistance and so on) are dominant! The speed of evolution (the rate of gene frequency change per unit time) p time (generations) rare gene recessive More generally … Complications – many! Overlapping generations Many different kinds of selection fertility selection sexual selection Dominance not complete AA Aa aa 1 1–hs 1–s Non-random mating inbreeding mate choice Multiple genes … &c &c…. rare gene dominant But the basic principle remains the same! (from a programme written by a former B242 student, Wei-Chung Liu, available from the B242 website) Take-home points Evolution to a geneticist: a change in gene frequencies. Natural selection: a consistent bias favouring some genotypes over others. Evolution can occur in the absence of natural selection, via genetic drift or neutral evolution. Natural selection can stabilize the status quo; zero evolution. Further reading FUTUYMA, DJ 2005. Evolution. Chapter 12:270-280. For readings on examples, see: Science Library: View BIOL2007 or B242 Teaching Collection by going to eUCLid; use Keyword, Basic Search, All Fields: B242. Evolution at a single dominant gene: rate can be predicted If selected, dominant alleles evolve quickly when rare, slowly when common; recessive alleles evolve slowly when rare, quickly when common. We can estimate selection coefficients (s), fitnesses (W=1-s) and predict rates of evolution from data on survival or fecundity. Mathematical theory makes evolution a predictive science 2 ESTIMATING SELECTION 1) Change of gene frequencies per generation; result of selection, estimate ∆p; e.g. peppered moth; JBS Haldane estimated s = 0.5. 2) Distortion of Hardy-Weinberg ratios - problems? see next lecture 3) Comparison of birth or death rates between individuals W = RELATIVE fitness MOST DIRECT METHOD USING METHOD 3 TO ESTIMATE SELECTION IN PEPPERED MOTH e.g. survival in a field experiment on the peppered moth A) Central Birmingham number released number recaptured proportion recaptured relative fitness, W typica carbonaria 18 140 0.125 0.288 0.43 1.00 number recaptured 67 32 proportion recaptured 0.411 0.225 relative fitness 1.82 1.00 144 486 B) Dorset wood number released typica 163 carbonaria 142 (W, the other way round) 1.00 2.30 SUMMARY OF FITNESSES: typica City Wood Wcc 0.43 1.82 carbonaria WCc 1 1 WCC 1 1 (Wc = 1 - sc) selection coefficient against c sc +0.57 -0.82 HOW FAST WILL CARBONARIA INCREASE IN FREQUENCY in a city? ∆p = spq2/(1-sq2); suppose p = 0.5 to start with: = 0.57 x 0.5 x 0.52 / (1 - 0.57x0.52) = 0.08, or 8% per generation.