* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download explanation
Survey
Document related concepts
Bremsstrahlung wikipedia , lookup
Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup
Electric charge wikipedia , lookup
Monte Carlo methods for electron transport wikipedia , lookup
Photoelectric effect wikipedia , lookup
ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Author: G. Francesco Tartarelli E-mail: [email protected] Movie: 15 minutes in the life of the electron Movie Clip From 14:36 To 17:36 Director: Luis Mariano Sesé Sánchez, José Antonio Tarazaga Blanco Film Studio: UNED (Spain) Advanced level If we take a glass of water and we imagine to divide it in parts smaller and smaller (which in practice becomes soon impossible) we can ask ourselves what’s the smallest part we can get and that we can still call water. The answer is known: the smallest part is what is called a molecule of water. If we divide a molecule in smaller parts what we get is not water anymore. But can we really divide water in smaller parts? The answer is yes. The water molecule is made of two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen, as everybody knows: H2O. Neither hydrogen nor oxygen has anything to do with water anymore; for example, in normal temperature and pressure conditions they are both gases. If we want to continue our journey deeper in the structure of matter we can still ask ourselves: can we divide an atom in smaller parts? The answer is yes, again. Each atom is made by a central heavy part called nucleus and by smaller particles, called electrons, that somehow move around the nucleus. Can we subdivide the electrons and the nucleus further? Not the electrons. We finally get to a true elementary particle: the electron is indivisible. Up to today there is no indication at all that electrons could be subdivided further. This is not true for the nucleus. The nucleus is a composite object made of particles called protons and neutrons. The only exception is the hydrogen nucleus, which is composed by one single proton. The story is already complicated but it complicates even further because neither the protons nor the neutrons are elementary particles. They are made by three smaller particles each, which are called quarks, Quarks, as electrons, are true elementary particles. But let’s stop here and take a look at the atom. How the nucleus and the electrons are arranged inside the atom? A major advancement in these studies is due to the work done by Ernest Rutherford and collaborators in the period going from 1906 to 1913. In 1906 Rutherford was studying the scattering of alpha particles (helium nuclei, made by two protons and two neutrons) through thin metal (gold, silver) foils (about 4 m thick, not enough to stop alpha particles), observing the spread of the beam on a phosphorescent zinc sulfide screen. As expected a small scattering angle was observed with most of the particles going through the foil directly (depending on the thickness and material of the foil). However, in 1909, two Rutherford’s collaborators, Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden observed in such an experiment that in few occasions alpha particles were scattered wih a scattering angle of more than 90 o (that’s to say they were scattered backward). This was an unexpected and surprising result. The scattering between the alpha particles and the target is a Coulomb scattering: this means that it is due to the Coulomb forces between the charged alpha particles and the charges inside the target atoms. At that time it was thought that the atom followed Thomson’ s model which considered an atom as made of a sphere of uniform positive charge in which the negative electrons were embedded (like raisins in a cake). The small deflections of alpha particle trajectories usually observed were explained like the result of many random collisions between the incident beam and the atomic charges. This model, however, could not explain the rate of large scattering angle observed, even summing several alpha particle-atom collisions. Rutherford showed that the way to interpret the data would be to imagine the atom as made of a small region of space (the nucleus) where basically all the atom mass is concentrated carrying a positive charge surrounded by the electrons moving around the nucleus. Large angle deflections would be explained by repulsion of alpha particles by the 1 nucleus. This is more or less what happens in collisons between billiard balls. If you throw a ball against another ball of the same mass which is at rest, there is no way the incident ball will be scattered by more than 90o. You need a target ball with a much higher mass then the incident ball to have such a large deflection. Using this model Rutherford derived the mathematical expression of the cross section for such a scattering and was able to successfully match the data obtained by Geiger and Marsden. Let’s consider the simplest atom, the hydrogen atom. The nucleus is made of a single particle carrying a positive charge, the proton. If we consider the radius of the proton charge we get a value of the order of 10-15 m = 1 fm. The mass of the proton is about 900 MeV. The hydrogen atom has a single electron which occupies a space having a radius of about half an Angstrom (1 Angstrom = 10-10 m) around the nucleus. The electron is an elementary particle: it has no internal structure, it is pointlike and it has a mass of 0.5 MeV. It is clear from this figures that the mass of the hydrogen atom is the mass of the nucleus while the dimension of the atom is determined by the radius at which we can still find the electron charge. This means that the atom is basically empty being the dimension of the nucleus a factor of 105 smaller than the size of the atom. These last considerations also holds for heavier atoms, that’s to say atoms with an higher number of protons (and electrons). However, the hydrogen atom is peculiar in the sense that all other atoms have the nucleus made not only by protons but also by neutrons. Neutrons carry no electrical charge and have a mass very close to that of protons. How are the electrons distributed around the nucleus? One of the most successfull theories was the one proposed by Niels Bohr in 1915. It assumed that electrons are rotating around the nucleus in circular orbits. For its similarity with the solar sistem it was also called the „planetary model“ of the atom. However there are clear differences. First of all the orbits in the atoms are not planar and also the force keeping the electron on his orbit is not the gravitational force but the Coulomb attractive force between the nuclues and the electron(s). But there is also a much more striking difference. Let’s consider the hydrogen atom as an example as it is very simple. What was discovered by Bohr studying the atomic spectra is that the atom cannot take any energy value: it can only assume some discrete values. One says that the energy is quantized. This implies that only some orbit radii are allowed. The electron energies are given by the formula: E=-13.6 eV/n2 where n is an integer number. The lowest energy level (n=1, radius closest to the nucleus) corresponds to the hydrogen ground state and has an energy of E=-13.6 eV. Next level has an energy of 3.4 eV (first excited level) and so on. As the quantum number n increases the energy levels get closer together. Despite its initial success, however, the Bohr model (and successive modifications) has problem in explaining some observations including the spectra of atoms with several electrons. The problem is due to the fact that particles like electrons or protons are quantum objects and their behaviour inside an atom obeys the laws of quantum mechanics. In this sense the Bohr model was a hybrid model: it incorporates some new concepts like the quantization of energy but still uses classical concepts to describe the motion of electrons inside the atom. Based on the de Broglie relation p=h/, we have to assume that particles have also a wave nature (and vice versa). If we can neglect these effects for everyday objects, we cannot do this for electrons inside atoms. One of the main consequences is that we have to abandon the idea of an electron as a localized particle described in classical mechanics, for example, by a position vector and think it more as a wave. This has several consequences; one of this is that we cannot specify the trajectory of an electron like we do for a planet around a star or a billiard ball. We can only say what is the probability to find an electron in a certain region of space. For example, for a hydrogen atom there is spherical region around the nucleus where it is likely to find an electron: more likely the electron will be close to the nucleus and the probability to find it at a certain radius from the nucleus decreases with the distance from the nucleus. These regions are called orbitals and replace the more common concept of 2 orbits. All this might appear strange. However, the concepts of quantum mechanics have been proved to be true by countless experiments. The fact is that our common sense is driven by everyday experience based on the properties of macroscopic objects. When we approach the atomic world and the world of elementary particles we have to be ready to think in a different way. 3