* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Vaccines - UCLA Health
Immune system wikipedia , lookup
Common cold wikipedia , lookup
Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup
Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup
Social immunity wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup
Monoclonal antibody wikipedia , lookup
Globalization and disease wikipedia , lookup
Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup
Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Whooping cough wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup
Infection control wikipedia , lookup
Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Henipavirus wikipedia , lookup
Herd immunity wikipedia , lookup
Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup
Childhood immunizations in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup
Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup
Immunocontraception wikipedia , lookup
A Vaccine for HIV: 31% There? African American HIV University May 19, 2014 Otto Yang, M.D. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, UCLA Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, UCLA AIDS Healthcare Foundation Short Version of This Lecture: No Why We Still Need a Vaccine Why We Still Need a Vaccine A Vaccine: Still the Best Long Term Solution • Drug treatments: expense, infrastructure for delivery and monitoring, treatment fatigue, toxicities, resistance • Behavior-based prevention: human nature, cultural issues • Vaccines: capacity for global impact (e.g. smallpox, polio), limited requirements for infrastructure and adherence The News: RV144 RV144: Mission Accomplished? • Placebo-controlled study of 16,000 people • Novel combination of two vaccines for cellular and humoral immunity • 31% protection “A job well done”? Objectivity? PI of CHAVI ($300,000,000 consortium) PI of the $105,000,000 study …. But where are the real numbers??? ITT: 76/7325 (1.04%) Vs 56/7347 (0.86%) PP: 50/6002 (0.83%) Vs 36/5874 (0.61%) mITT: 74/7325 (1.01%) Vs 51/7347 (0.69%) This would have “confused everybody” Pre-Test Probability? Pre-Test Probability? Cellular Immune Component Humoral Immune Component RV144 was a test of a T-cell vaccine that failed to make T cell responses paired with an antibody vaccine that failed to make protective antibody responses So the vaccine somehow worked through a new and unintended mechanism??? How Did We Get Here? 300 Years Earlier…. Virus Vaccine Technology: Empiricism • 1700s: Cowpox mimic of smallpox (Jenner and others) • 1950s: Killed virus (Salk) and live attenuated virus (Sabin) • 1970s: Subunit (Hilleman) • Common theme: Recapitulate infection • Protective mechanism: Who cares? Virus Vaccine Technology: Empiricism • 1700s: Cowpox mimic of smallpox (Jenner and others) • 1950s: Killed virus (Salk) and live attenuated virus (Sabin) • 1970s: Subunit (Hilleman) • Common theme: Recapitulate infection • Protective mechanism: Who cares? Successful Vaccines Mimic Naturally Successful Immunity Immune Response Infection MIMICKED BY VACCINE (LAG) First Exposure Subsequent Exposure Naturally Immunity Is Unsuccessful in HIV-1 Infection Acute Infection (Flu-Like Illness) Immune Response Infection Progression to AIDS and Death Asymptomatic Phase (LAG) Classical vaccine strategies that mimic natural immunity are therefore unlikely to work, because First Infection Subsequent Exposure Exposure natural immunity fails in HIV-1 infection. Back to the Basics…. Vaccines generate immune “memory” What memory responses work against HIV? • B Lymphocytes- Neutralizing Antibodies • CD8+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTLs) • CD4+ Helper T Lymphocytes (HTLs) Adaptive Immunity in a Nutshell • Adaptive immune cells (B and T lymphocytes) recognize non-self through specific receptors (BCRs and TCRs) • Receptors are generated through random genetic recombinations (about 1015 different TCRs are possible) • Self-reactive receptors are weeded out • Binding of the receptor causes a cell to mature and divide • Immune responses are generated by natural selection (clonal expansion) Adaptive Immunity in a Nutshell Y Y Y CTL HTL Y VIRUS Y Y Y Y B Y Y Y Y Antibodies? • The virus surface has the Env protein that is used by the virus to bind cells to infect them • Antibodies can bind Env and interfere with this process Hope for Antibodies? Antibodies Don’t Control HIV-1 in Infected Persons Johnston and Fauci, NEJM 2007, 356:2073-2081 Difficulties Making Neutralizing Antibodies CD4 binding pocket is hidden in a deep crevice Envelope is heavily coated with sugars CCR-binding region is covered until engagement with CD4 Fusion domain is covered until CCR5 engagement Envelope sequence is highly variable Willey et al, Trends in Microbiology 2008, 16:596-604 Neutralizing Abs NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO YES http://www.niaid.nih.gov/about/yearinreview/advances/scientificfindings/Pages/RecentSuccessesinDevelopinganHIVVaccine.aspx + CD8 Cellular Immunity: Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes CTL Release of Cytolytic Granules and Cytokines; Signals for Apoptosis Infected Cell Antigen-Driven Proliferation (Clonal Expansion) CTL Recognition of Infected Cells CTL Infected Cell HLA-I Epitope Motifs And Specificity Pathogen protein sequence Epitope Epitope Two different HLA-I molecules: Different epitopes CTLs in HIV-1 Infection • Temporal associations with changing viremia • HLA-I associations with disease progression • GWAS studies mainly map to HLA-I • Major factor in HIV-1 sequence evolution in vivo • SIV-macaque model: CD8+ T cell depletion in vivo leads to sharply increased viremia • In vitro studies of HIV-1-specific CTL: Potent antiviral activity (cytolysis) HIV-1-Specific CTLs Partially Control Infection Acute Infection (Flu-Like Illness) Immune Response Infection Asymptomatic Phase Infection Progression to AIDS and Death Setpoint Viremia Determines Disease Progression 100 0 0 (Weeks) (Years) CTLs determine setpoint, setpoint determines disease progression, thus the rationale for CTL-based vaccines to prevent disease if not prevent infection 20 20 A “Good” CTL Vaccine :STEP Trial Failure of CTLs? The hope… The reality Vaccine: 24/741 Control: 21/762 VL 40k versus 37k Once Is Was Not Enough Vaccine: 27/1250 Placebo: 21/1244 VL similar CTL-Based Vaccines That Mimic Nature Won’t Work • Cope with the genetic diversity of HIV-1 • Generate CTL responses at mucosal sites • Access the HLA-I pathway to elicit CTL responses against HIV-1 sequences Mimicking HIV: Giving CTLs the Same Choices HIV Vpu Rev Tat Vif Gag Pol Env Nef Vpr Step Vaccine Gag Nef Pol HVTN505 Vaccine Gag Env Pol The High Mutation Rate of HIV-1 Is a Huge Barrier to Immune Control • Both antibodies and CTLs work by using receptors to bind sequences in HIV • Each day, about 10 billion viruses are made in a person • Each virus has an average of 1 random mutation in its 9600 base RNA sequence • EVERY possible single or double mutation combination is made daily in vivo Overwhelming Problem of HIV-1 Diversity From Korber, et al., British Medical Bulletin 2001: 58; 19-42. Focus Immunity on Constrained Sequences, Rather Than Delivering Entire Proteins? OO Yang, PLoS One 2009, 4:e7388. The Need for Speed Haase, Nature 2010, 464:217 Speed of Remembering a Vaccine O Yang, Unpublished DNA Gag/Env/Nef rAd5 Gag/Env/Nef Is There a Way to Vaccinate Constantly??? CTL and Chronic CMV Piggyback Ride on CMV Questions?