* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Photoelectric Effect
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Planck's law wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
Rutherford backscattering spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Wheeler's delayed choice experiment wikipedia , lookup
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Ultrafast laser spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
The Photoelectric Effect R.L.Griffith,M.R.Levi,D.Cartano ABSTRACT According to the photon theory of light, the maximum kinetic energy, KEmax , of photoelectrons depends only on the frequency of the light, and is independent of the intensity. In contrast, the classical wave model of light predicted that KEmax would depend on light intensity. A PASCO scientific h/e apparatus was used to study the photon theory of light versus the wave theory of light. The apparatus was used in combination with the PASCO mercury vapor light source. The light was than placed incident onto a special fluorescent material and the stopping potential was measured with a standard volt meter. With the stopping potential measured we are able to to make a plot and acquire the slope of the line, with the slope we are able to calculate the experimental value for h, planck’s constant and compare it to the theoretical value. The work function φ will also be acquired and compared to the theoretical value. The wave theory of light will also be tested by changing the intensity of the light that is incident on the special fluorescent material, to determine if the stopping potential is independent of the intensity of light. We acquired 1.52(first order) and 13.87(second order) percent error for the trial on the relationship between energy, wavelength, and frequency. We acquired 3.05(first order) and 14.16(second order) percent error for the work function. Subject headings: Electromagnetic wave-particle duality, photoelectric effect 1. Introduction photoelectric effect in his quantum model using Upon exposing a metallic surface to electromagnetic radiation that is above the threshold frequency, the photons are absorbed and current is produced. No electrons are emitted for radiation with a frequency below that of the threshold. By conservation of energy, the energy of the photon is absorbed by the electron and, if sufficient, the electron can escape from the material with a finite kinetic energy. A single photon can only eject a single electron, as the energy of one photon may only be absorbed by one electron. The electrons that are emitted are often termed photoelectrons. In 1901 Max Planck proposed his law of radiation, which stated that an oscillator has discrete set of possible energy values. The energy lost or gained by the oscillator is emitted or absorbed as a quantum of radiant energy, the magnitude is expressed by the equation E = hf E = hf = KEmax + φ (2) where KEmax is the maximum kinetic energy of the photon and φ is the work function of the material. Relating the kinetic energy with the stopping potential yields KEmax = eV (3) where e is the charge of one electron which is 1.602 × 10−19 and V is the stopping potential. Therefore, using Einstein’s equation hf = V e + φ (4) when solve for the stopping potential, the equation becomes µ ¶ µ ¶ φ h f− V = e e (1) (5) ³ ´ ¡ ¢ where he is the slope of the line and φe is the y intercept. From these two values we are able to determine the accuracy of this experiment. where E is the energy, h is planck’s constant which is 6.626 × 10−34 J · S, and f is the frequency of the electromagnetic radiation. Einstein applied Planck’s theory and explained the 1 2. 2.1. Method Spectral line Color Yellow Green Blue Violet Ultra Violet Model SE-9589 AP-9368 OS-9286 AP-9369 Procedure This experiment consisted of two different trials. The first part is performed investigates the maximum energy of the photoelectrons by relating it to the intensity of the light. The yellow spectral line was used with a transmission filter. The transmission filter was used to regulate the intensity of the incident light upon the detector and the stopping potential was measured. The second part of this experiment investigates the maximum energy of photoelectrons as a function of frequency of the light. The different spectral lines were incident on the detector at 100 percent intensity and the stopping potential was measured. A complete description of the procedure can be found in the Los Angeles City College Physics 103 lab manual. 3. Data and Calculations First order spectral line wave length frequency stopping potential nm x1014 Hz volts 578 5.18672 .711 546.074 5.48996 .847 435.835 6.87858 1.477 404.656 7.40858 1.705 365.483 8.20264 1.918 Second order spectral line Yellow 578 5.18672 .643 Green 546.074 5.48996 .718 Blue 435.835 6.87858 1.287 Violet 404.656 7.40858 1.448 Ultra Violet 365.483 8.20264 1.663 Measured quantities Equipment Used Equipment Digital voltmeter h/e Apparatus Mercury vapor light source h/e Apparatus accessory kit 2.2. 3.1. Fig. 1.— frequency vs. stopping potential, first order. Results and Discussion The frequency and the wavelength of each color is acquired using table in Fig. 10 on page six of the lab manual. They are the same for the first order and second order measurements. The slope and y intercept were acquired using IDL’s linear fit routine LINFIT. From equation 5 and knowing the slope of the line, the experimental value for Planck’s constant h can be measured. Also from equation 5 we are able to determine the work function φ for the material, comparing the experimental values to theoretical values we are able to determine the error in this experiment. The wave vs. quantum model was also tested using a variable transmission filter. The yellow spectral line was used for this trial, the time required for the volt meter to return to the original recorded voltage was measured to prove Planck’s hypothesis. A summary of the data is given in the following tables. Fig. 2.— frequency vs. stopping potential, second order. 2 Graph first second Graph first second Graph first second Graph first second Analysis 4. Calculation for h e(Coulumbs) Slope 1.602 × 10−19 4.199 × 10−15 1.602 × 10−19 3.563 × 10−15 Error Measurement Theory(J · s) Exp.(J · s) 6.626 × 10−34 6.727 × 10−34 6.626 × 10−34 5.707 × 10−34 Work Function φ y-intercept(y) φ = e(y)(J) -1.455 2.331 × 10−19 -1.212 1.942 × 10−19 Error Measurement Theory(eV) Exp.(eV) 1.412 1.455 1.412 1.212 h = e × slope 6.727 × 10−34 5.708 × 10−34 % error 1.52 13.87 φ (eV) 1.455 1.212 % Error 3.05 14.16 Conclusion This lab was conducted to test Planck’s quantum model to the wave model of electromagnetic waves. The first trial was conducted to test wether the intensity of light affected the KEmax . The classical wave model of light predicted that KEmax would depend on light intensity. The observed outcome showed that this was not true and that the quantum model is the correct model to use. We observed that changing the intensity with a Variable transmission filter, only affected the time it took to reach the required stopping potential. The second trial was conducted to test how the change in frequency of the light affected the stopping potential of the photoelectrons. We observed that as the frequency increased, the stopping potential also increased, and that the frequency is proportional to the stopping potential, as stated in equation 5. The errors acquired showed that Planck’s quantum model can be used to predict the behavior of photon energy and their effects on photoelectrons. The possible explanation for the amount of time it took to reach the required stopping potential in the first trial can be explained by the probability that a photon(of appropriate energy) made contact with an electron was a lot smaller for lower intensity light than it was for the higher intensity light. Based on our lab results this experiment supports the quantum model of light and is in opposition to the classical wave model. REFERENCES Los Angeles City College Lab Manual Physics 103. This 2-column preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. 3