* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Local Parity Violation in Strong Interactions
Antiproton Decelerator wikipedia , lookup
Casimir effect wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Strangeness production wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup
Quantum vacuum thruster wikipedia , lookup
ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup
ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup
Proc. 25th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics (2009) 000–000 25th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky, Montana, USA February 1–8, 2009 Local Parity Violation in Strong Interactions Dhevan Gangadharan1 1 UCLA, Los Angeles, California [email protected] Abstract. Local parity violation of the strong interactions have been proposed to occur in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC[1]. Parity-odd states are produced locally in a heavy-ion collision by means of a vacuum transition via instantons and sphalerons. Manifestation of the parity-odd state is made with the help of a very large but brief magnetic field caused by the spectator nuclei of a non-central collision. The experimental signature for a P-odd state has been shown to be dynamical charge separation with respect to the reaction plane. Recent experimental techniques used to look for parity violation with the STAR detector at RHIC as well as estimates on background contamination to the correlation function used are discussed here. Keywords: local, parity, violation PACS: 25.75.Ag 1. Theory Introduction The hot and dense regions created in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC are predicted to allow for certain non-trivial vacuum transitions. In general, all non-trivial vacuum transitions can be classified by their winding number and all vacuum configurations can be classified by the Chern-Simons number, NC S[2]. It is pointed out by Kharzeev et al.[1] that all non-zero NC S states lead to a non-conservation of the axial current which in turn leads to parity violation of the strong interactions. Positive and negative NC S are equally probable though, and lead to opposite experimental signatures. Thus, taken together or looked at from a global perspective–large distance scale where many independent vacuum transitions are summed together– parity is still conserved. It is only at the local level–small distance scale–where parity is violated. Parity violation of this sort is thus local in nature. Realization of a P-odd state in a heavy-ion collision is made with the help of a very large but brief magnetic field. The magnetic field can be understood as arising 2 Dhevan Gangadharan from the spectator nuclei in a non-central heavy-ion collision. The spectator protons are charged and are moving relativistically and thus provide a magnetic field just by ordinary electro-dynamics. It has been shown that the interaction of this magnetic field with the P-odd state can further induce an electric field oriented parallel to the magnetic field[1]. The sign of the orientation is linked with the sign of NC S and thus fluctuates event-by-event. It is then clear that the resulting experimental observable will be charge-separation relative to the reaction plane. This is the so-called Chiral Magnetic Effect. Figure 1 illustrates this idea. Fig. 1. The Chiral Magnetic Effect 2. Detector and Data Used For a review of results using data from the STAR detector at RHIC the reader is directed to Sergei Voloshin’s Quark Matter 2009 presentation[3]. Here, model predictions and simulations are presented. Various cuts were imposed on all data-sets. The location of the primary vertex along the beam line was required to be within 30cm of the TPC center to ensure good particle tracking. A lower pt cut of .15 GeV/c was imposed to remove tracks which bend too much in STAR’s magnetic field and never leave the TPC. An upper pt cut of 2 GeV/c was also applied since the Chiral Magnetic Effect is a low-pt effect. An eta cut |η| < 1 was applied for similar reasons. Finally, at least 15 TPC hit-points were required as well as the ratio of hit-points to maximum number of hit-points > .52 for track quality assurance. Local Parity Violation 3 3. Correlation function A three particle correlation function has been proposed[4] to look for charge-separation relative to the reaction plane: < cos(φa + φb − 2φc ) > (1) < cos(φa + φb − 2φc + 2ΨRP − 2ΨRP ) > (2) which can be rewritten as and under the assumption that particle c is only correlated with particles a and b through the ΨRP equation 2 can further be written as < cos(φa + φb − 2ΨRP ) > v2c (3) v2c where is the elliptic flow of particle c. Finally, with the help of a double-angle trigonometric identity equation 3 can be rewritten as: < cos(φa −ΨRP ) cos(φb −ΨRP )−sin(φa −ΨRP ) sin(φb −ΨRP ) > v2c = (v1a v1b −aa ab )v2c (4) where v1 =< cos(φ − ΨRP ) > and a =< sin(φ − ΨRP ) > are Fourier coefficients of the azimuthal particle distribution. The first term is sensitive to directed flow of particles a and b. However, with the symmetric η range chosen, the first term should vanish. The second term is sensitive to the Chiral Magnetic Effect. Both terms are sensitive to non-flow which cancels out in the subtraction. One should also notice that this correlator is P-even since the Fourier coefficients v1 and a effectively appear squared in equation 4. It is thus susceptible to P-even fluctuations in addition to the P-odd fluctuations of the Chiral Magnetic Effect. The value of this correlator is studied in the cases where particles a and b are of the same-charge and when they are of unlike charge. If particles a and b are chosen to be of the same-charge and both undergo the Chiral Magnetic Effect it is clear that the correlator will be driven more negative. If they are chosen to be of opposite-charge then the correlator will be driven more positive. 4. Results Obtained With Models A theoretical prediction for the same-charge correlations in Au+Au 130 GeV collisions[5] is presented in figure 2. The y-axis shows the value of −(a+ a+ + a− a− )/2 which represents the same-charge contribution to equation 4 scaled by v2c and with the first term vanishing. The x-axis shows the collision centrality. Although not plotted, the opposite-charge correlations would indeed be positive instead of negative as it is for the same-charge correlations. We therefore take the simultaneous feature of positive opposite-charge correlations and negative same-charge correlations increasing with centrality in the data as possible evidence for local strong parity violation. It should also be noted that figure 2 represents only one of many possible theoretical outcomes for this effect due to various theoretical uncertainties such as the vacuum transition rates. 4 Dhevan Gangadharan 〈-a+-a+-〉 A Theoretical Prediction ×10-3 -0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 -0.6 -0.7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 % Most Central Fig. 2. A theoretical prediction To access possible signal contamination from P-even sources like jets and resonances we also study the value of the correlator (Eq. 3) with an explicitly known reaction plane in various Au+Au 200 GeV heavy-ion simulations are presented in figure 3. None of these simulations incorporate P-odd transitions. As can be seen below, in none of these simulations do we simultaneously observe positive oppositecharge correlations and negative same-charge correlations. 5. Conclusions Local parity violation of the strong interactions has been predicted to occur in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC. A correlation function directly sensitive to P-odd fluctuations has been presented. A theoretical prediction for this correlator as well as its value in various heavy-ion simulations have been presented as well. We observe that the known P-even physical processes built into these simulations can not reproduce the expected P-odd results. Acknowledgments I would like to thank Dmitri Kharzeev for many beneficial discussions on this subject. Local Parity Violation 5 Fig. 3. Simulations References 1. K. Fukushima, D. Kharzeev and H. Warringa, Phys. Rev. D 78 2008 074033. 2. D. Diakonov, Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys 51 2003 173-222. 3. S. Voloshin, Talk presented at Quark Matter 2009, Knoxville, TN. March 30th – April 4th, 2009; to be published in the proceedings by Journal of Physics G. 4. S. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C, 70 2004 057901. 5. D. Kharzeev, L. McLerran and H. Warringa, Nucl. Phys. A 803 2008 227.