Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Effect of TGF-/5 on Interferon-y-Induced HLA-DR Expression in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Karine Gabrielian,*^ Roman Osusky*^ Brian D. Sippy,X Stephen J. Ryan*~\ and David R. Hinton%%\\ Purpose. Retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells express human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR (class II) antigens when stimulated with interferon gamma (IFN-7) and may be capable of local antigen presentation. The authors examined the effect of transforming growth factorbeta (TGF-/3), a cytokine normally found in the eye, on the expression of these immunoregulatory molecules in vitro and attempted to determine the mechanism by which this cytokine acts. Methods. Human RPE cells were cultured in the presence of IFN-7 and then stained immunohistochemically for HLA-DR antigens. TGF-/?] or TGF-/?2 was added simultaneously with IFN7 or after 3 days of IFN-7 treatment. In parallel experiments, RPE cells were pretreated with 4-phorbol-12 myristate-13 acetate (PMA), staurosporine, or calphostin C before stimulation with IFN-7 or TGF-/?. Quantitative analysis was performed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Results. IFN-7 induced HLA-DR expression on RPE cells. Both TGF-/3, and TGF-/32 were able to inhibit this effect. These inhibitory effects of TGF-/3 were augmented by pretreatment with either PMA or calphostin C. Pretreatment of the cells with PMA before stimulation with IFN-7 downregulated HLA-DR expression. Staurosporine pretreatment suppressed HLA-DR expression by IFN-7-stimulated RPE cells, but this was not additive with TGF-/3. Conclusions. The authors conclude that TGF-/?i and TGF-/?2 strongly inhibit the IFN-7-induced upregulation of class II antigens on human RPE cells. The modulation of these IFN-7 and TGF-/3 effects by calphostin C, staurosporine, and PMA treatment suggests involvement of the protein kinase C pathway. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994; 35:4253-4259. Xmmunologic mechanisms are thought to be important in the progression of several retinal diseases, including uveitis and proliferative vitreoretinopathy.1'2 The human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell may play a central role in the immunologic microenvironment of the outer retina, based on its ability to synthesize and respond to a large variety of inflammatory cytokines.3'4 RPE cells are capable of expressing the From the *Doheny Eye Institute and the Departments off Ophthalmology, %Palhology, ^Neurological Surgery, and "Neurology, University of Southern California School of Medicine. Supported in part by grants EY01545 and EY03040 from the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. The University of Southern California Department of Ophthalmology is the recipient of an award from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York. Submitted for publication October 7, 1993; revised April 1, 1994; accepted July 18, 1994. Proprietary interest category: N. Reprint requests: Stephen J. Ryan, Doheny Eye Institute, 1450 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA 90033-4681. major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecule, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR in vivo,2'5 and can present antigens to T cells in vitro.6 Interferon gamma (IFN-y) induces MHC class II antigens on RPE cells in vitro and has been identified in the vitreous of patients with uveitis and proliferative vitreoretinopathy.1'7 Modulation of class II antigen expression might provide an avenue of therapy for these disorders. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-/3), a cytokine found in both normal and pathologic vitreous,8 is capable of inhibiting MHC class II antigen expression on several different cell types and can also suppress autoantigen presentation.9 Some of the effects of TGF-/3 are antagonistic to IFN-7.10 Although the mechanism of action of TGF-/? in this form of immunomodulation is unknown, it has been reported that IFN-y acts through protein kinase C (PKC) to upregu- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, December 1994, Vol. 35, No. 13 Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/iovs/933403/ on 08/10/2017 4253 4254 Investigative Ophthalmology 8e Visual Science, December 1994, Vol. 35, No. 13 late MHC class II antigens1' and that TGF-/? also exerts some of its actions through this pathway.12 This study was initiated to determine whether TGF-p could regulate IFN-y-induced MHC class II antigen expression on human RPE cells and to determine whether this action is mediated through the PKC pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS Isolation and Culture of Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Retinal pigment epithelial cells were isolated from adult human eyes after donor death. The tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed, informed consent was obtained, and institutional human experimentation committee approval was granted. After the eyes were cut circumferentially through the sclera approximately 2 mm posterior to the ora serrata, the vitreous was aspirated, and the retina was gently separated from the RPE layer. The eyecup was washed with Eagle's minimal essential medium (EMEM; Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA) and incubated at 37°C with 0.05% trypsin and 0.02% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Tryp-EDTA; Irvine Scientific). After 1 hour, the Tryp-EDTA solution was aspirated from the eyecup and replaced with standard medium (EMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gemini Bioproducts, Calabasas, CA), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 fj,g/m\) (Irvine Scientific), and amphotericin B (2.5 /xg/ml) (Irvine Scientific). The RPE cells, released by gentle pipetting, were cultured at 37°C in a humidified incubator saturated with 5% CO2 and 95% air. After 4 to 5 weeks, when the cells had reached confluence, they were trypsinized and passaged. Fifty percent confluent cells (passages 4 to 8) were used for all experiments. Cells were grown either in EMEM with 10% FBS or in defined media with 0.5% bovine serum albumin. Cells were grown on 4-well or 8-well chamber slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and screened immunohistochemically for contaminating cells. More than 95% of the cells were positive for pancytokeratin, indicating epithelial origin. No cells positive for factor VIII (endothelial cells) oranti-CDll (macrophages) were found. IFN-y and TGF-/3 Studies Retinal pigment epithelial cells were treated with IFNy (Collaborative Biochemicals, Bedford, MA) alone for 24 or 72 hours; IFN-y plus TGF-/?! (Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA) for 72 hours; IFN-y plus TGF-/?2 (Genzyme, Cambridge, MA) for 72 hours; IFN-y for 72 hours, plus TGF-/?! for the next 48 hours; IFN-y for 72 hours, plus TGF-/?2 for the next 48 hours; TGF- /?! alone for 24, 48, or 72 hours; TGF-/32 alone for 24, 48, or 72 hours. Protein Kinase C Studies The PKC pathway was tested by pretreating the RPE cells with 4-phorbol-12 myristate-13 acetate (PMA; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), staurosporine (BoehringerMannheim, Indianapolis, IN), and calphostin C (L. C. Service, Woburn, MA). PMA pretreatment was for 15, 30, 60, or 120 minutes, or for 12 hours. Calphostin C and staurosporine pretreatment was for 1 hour. After each pretreatment, the cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline and then were exposed to IFN-y and TGF-/5. MHC Class II Antigen Immunocytochemistry Immunoperoxidase staining was performed on adherent RPE cells grown on multiwell chamber slides by the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method, as described by the manufacturer (Vector, Carpenteria, CA),13 using primary mouse monoclonal antibody against HLA-DR (Becton-Dickinson). The percentage of positively stained RPE cells was calculated. An irrelevant isotypic (IgG2a) primary antibody control (anti-/?l, Coulter Immunology, Hialeah, FL) showed no background staining. Direct-Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting Analysis Retinal pigment epithelium cells were detached from the flask with EDTA (Ca2+- and Mg2+-free) and were counted with a Coulter counter (Coulter Immunology). Cells were washed once with Hanks' balanced salt solution containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin and 0.01% sodium azide. They were incubated with 20 fi\ of 3% goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) for 15 minutes and then with 20 /A of mouse monoclonal anti-HLA-DRfluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (GenTrack, Plymouth, PA) for 30 minutes on ice. The cells were washed with buffer, fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis (FACStar Plus; Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). An irrelevant mouse monoclonal FITC-labeled isotypic (IgGi) control (FITC-CD4, Dako, Carpinteria, CA) was also used and showed no difference from a no primary control in both unstimulated and IFN-7 stimulated cells (results not shown). RESULTS Modulation of HLA-DR Expression Control unstimulated RPE cells maintained in either 10% FBS or defined media were negative for HLA-DR Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/iovs/933403/ on 08/10/2017 Effect of TGF-/3 on HIA-DR Expression in RPE Cells 4255 f FIGURE l. Immunoperoxidase staining for HLA-DR. (a) Control RPE cells do not express HLA-DR antigens, (b) RPE cells stimulated with 500 U/ml of IFN-y for 3 days show intense staining, (c) TGF-^i (50 ng/ml) added for 48 hours after 3 days of IFN-y stimulation show a significant decrease in the amount and intensity of HLA-DR-positive cells, (d) PMA pretreatment for 1 hour was additive with the effect of TGF-/?i, decreasing significantly the amount and intensity of positively stained cells. HLA-DR = human leukocyte antigen-DR; RPE = retinal pigment epithelial; IFN — interferon; TGF = transforming growth factor; PMA = 4-phorbol-12 myristate-13 acetate. surface antigens, as were cells treated with TGF-/3, and TGF-/32 alone and cells pretreated with PMA, calphostin C, or staurosporine. Treatment of RPE cells with various concentrations of IFN-y for 1 day resulted in weak HLADR staining of only a few cells, which is consistent with other published data.14 We, as well as others, have found maximal HLA-DR expression after 3 days of incubation with IFN-y and followed this protocol for all experiments.6 The maximal inhibitory effect for TGF-/3 in modulating histocompatibility antigens on other cell types was reported to be after 48 hours,15 which is why we choose 48 hours as the minimal length of incubation. Treatment of RPE cells with IFN-y for 3 days in either 10% FBS or in defined media resulted in the upregulation of HLA-DR antigens in a dose-dependent manner, with an increase in both the intensity of staining and the percentage of positive cells. Fifty units per milliliter of IFN-y induced expression of HLA-DR antigens in the presence of 10% FBS on 91% ± 2.9% of cells; 500 U/ml, 95% ± 1.6%; and 1,000 U/ml, 98% ± 1.0%. After combined stimulation of the cells with IFN-y plus TGF-/?] or TGF-/?2> the number and intensity of positively stained cells was dramatically decreased in a dosedependent manner (Fig. 1), with the more prominent effect induced by TGF-/?2. Table 1 shows the results of stimulation with 50 U/ml of IFN-y plus TGF-/?, or TGF/?2 (10, 50, and 100 ng/mt each) for 3 days. Results of FACS analysis of one of the experiments are shown in Figure 2. After 3 days of incubation in 50 U/ml of IFN-y, cells were incubated for an additional 2 days in media with TGF-/?,; mean fluorescence of stimulated RPE cells was reduced in a dose-dependent manner after the addition of TGF-/?. Modulation of PKC Pathway Pretreatment of the RPE cells with PMA, with subsequent incubation with IFN-y, resulted in a time-dependent downregulation of HLA-DR antigen, with the Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/iovs/933403/ on 08/10/2017 Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, December 1994, Vol. 35, No. 13 4256 TABLE l. Percentage of HLA-DR-Positive Cells After Combined Treatment of RPE with IFN-y 50 U/ml and Different Concentrations of TGF-/?i and TGF-/32 Concentration of TGF-fi 0 (IFN-y Alone) 10 ng/ml 50 ng/ml 100 ng/ml 91 ± 2.9 91 ± 2.9 65 ± 7.9* 56 ± 4.3f 18.4 ± 2.1f 3.6 ± 1.5f 8.1 ± 2.1f 1.5 ± 1.6f TGF-/?, TGF-/?2 The percentage of HLA-DR positive cells after simultaneous incubation with IFN-y, TGF-/?1? and TGF-/?2 was compared with the percentage of positive cells after incubation with IFN-y alone (chisquare test). * P < 0.005; -\P< 0.0001. most prominent effect seen after 1 to 2 hours of PMA incubation (Fig. 3). The addition of PMA to the RPE cells treated for 3 days with IFN-y did not alter significantly the intensity or number of positively stained cells, compared to the controls. Pretreatment of RPE cells with 0.1 fjM PMA for 1 hour and further incubation of these cells with IFN-y (50 U/ml) plus TGF-^i and/or TGF-& (50 ng/ml) resulted in a significant decrease in inten- a b c d A 1 240 480 720 960 A 240 480 720 sity and in the number of positively stained cells compared with the cells incubated with TGF-/?, and/or TGF-& alone (PMA + IFN-7 + TGF-/?!, 8.6% ± 2.3%, P < 0.01; PMA + IFN-7 + TGF-/?2, 0.8% ± 0.3%, P < 0.0002) (Figs. Id, 3). Table 2 shows that pretreatment of cells with staurosporine (10 nM or 100 nM) for 1 hour and further incubation with IFN-7 alone (50 U/ml) decreased significantly the number of HLA-DR-positive cells; the intensity of staining was also significantly decreased. Subsequent treatment with TGF-/?! (50 ng/ml) did not enhance the effect of staurosporine. Pretreatment of IFN-7-treated (50 U/ml) cells with calphostin C also caused significant inhibition of HLA-DR antigens compared to the controls. Calphostin C in concentrations of 1 nM and 10 nM appeared to have an additive effect with that of TGF-/3 in downregulating HLA-DR antigens. DISCUSSION Many pathologic processes in the eye are influenced by cytokines and growth factors produced by immune 960 FIGURE 2. FACS analysis for HLA-DR of RPE cells incubated with 50 U/ml IFN-7 and TGF-/5, (50 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml) (a) Negative control cells without stimulation. A similar profile was obtained using an irrelevant (anti-CD4) isotypic antibody control for HLA-DR on unstimulated and IFN-y-stimulated cells, (b) Positive control cells incubated with IFN-7 for 3 days, (c) Cells incubated with IFN-7 for 3 days and/ or TGF-/3 (50 ng/ml) for 4 days show moderate reduction in HLA-DR staining from positive control, (d) Cells incubated with IFN-7 for 3 days and then with TGF-/3 (100 ng/ ml) for 48 hours show marked reduction in HLA-DR staining. FACS = fluorescence activated cell sorting; RPE = retinal pigment epithelial; IFN = interferon; TGF = transforming growth factor; HLA-DR = human leukocyte antigen-DR. TCF* IFN-y IFN -Y 3. The percentage of HLA-DR positive cells identified immunohistochemically under different conditions of IFN-7 stimulation and PKC inhibition. HLA-DR = human leukocyte antigen-DR; IFN = interferon; PKC = protein kinase C. FIGURE Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/iovs/933403/ on 08/10/2017 4257 Effect of TGF-/3 on HLA-DR Expression in RPE Cells TABLE 2. Percentage of HLA-DR-Positive Cells After Pretreatment for 1 Hour With Staurosporine or Calphostin C, Followed by Incubation With IFN-y or TGF-P for 3 Days Staurosporine + IFN-y Calphostin C + IFN-y + TGF-pl Calphostin C + IFN-y + TGF-pl 92.6 ± 3.6* 75.7 ± 27f 24.7 ± 6.11 49.1 ± 7.4J 55.7 ± 7.3§ 65 ± 8.8§ 24.5 ± 6.86|| 13.9 ± 5.3|| 32.1 ± 6.91 4.3 ± 1.5H 5.2 ± 2.5H 11.5 ± 3.5|| Staurospine Dosage (nM) 0 1 10 100 IFN^y (control) IFN^y + TGF-P (control) 91 ± 2.9 18 ± 4.0 The percentage of HLA-DR positive cells following pretreatment with calphostin C and/or staurosporine and then stimulated with IFNy (50 U/ml) was compared with the percentage HLA-DR positive cells following incubation with IFN-y alone. The data obtained from cells pretreated with the above mentioned drugs and combined treatment with IFN-y and TGF-/3, (50 ng/ml) was compared with the percentage of positive cells following simultaneous treatment with IFN-y and TGF-/3, but without pretreatment (chi-square test). * P = 0.87; t P < 0.009; %P< 0.0001; § P < 0.0006; || P a 0.1; H P < 0.02. effector and inflammatory cells. Recently, it was proposed that RPE cells may act as immune competent cells by expressing MHC class II antigens, 116 by their ability to present antigens to T cells,6 and by synthesizing various immunomodulating factors such as IL-6,3 M-CSF,17 TGF-/?lf and TGF-&. 18 ' 19 The crucial role of class II antigen expression in inflammatory eye disease is emphasized by studies showing that administration of anti-la monoclonal antibodies to rats altered significantly the course of experimental autoimmune uveitis, resulting in less ocular inflammation, diminution or elimination of local la expression, and a delay in onset of autoimmune uveitis.20 Recent evidence suggests that IFN-y may be important in regulation of the ocular immune microenvironment. 5 ' 8 IFN-y modulates MHC class II antigens on RPE cells in vitro6 and on ocular cells in vivo21 and is present within the eye during certain inflammatory conditions. 8'22 Our data are consistent with those of others 5 in that IFN-y treatment of human RPE cells for 3 days induced HLA-DR expression in a dose-dependent manner. A 24-hour incubation of RPE cells with IFN-y resulted in weak staining of occasional cells, but the effect after a 72hour incubation was strong. This suggests that HLADR expression is a long-term event that is regulated at the transcriptional level.23 The effects of IFN-y cannot be considered in isolation because in vivo IFN-y is present along with other cytokines and growth factors that can either augment or block its effect. For example, the vitreous of patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy contains increased amounts of TGF/?2 along with IFN-y.8 Our results demonstrate that both TGF-/3, and TGF-/?2 are able to downregulate IFN-y-induced HLA-DR expression on RPE cells in a dose-dependent manner; however, TGF-/?2 was more potent than was TGF-/?!. It has been suggested that RPE cells are the most likely ocular cells to synthesize TGF-/?! and TGF-/52, and they also possess binding proteins for both TGF-/5] and TGF-/?2,18 suggesting that RPE cells can also be regulated by exogenous TGF-/?. In fact, RPE cell effects, such as RPE-mediated gel contraction or proliferation, may be modulated by incubation with TGF-/?.24'25 There are indications that, in other cell types, IFNy may induce MHC class II antigens through activation of the PKC pathway,23 whereas TGF-/3 may be acting, in part, by PKC inhibition. 26 It has also been proposed that transcriptional regulation of HLA-DR antigen is modulated by PKC.27 Attempts to induce class II expression on RPE cells by drug modulation of PKC expression in the absence of IFN-y failed when the protocols used were those that had induced HLADR on other cell types.14 Treatment of RPE cells with PMA and the relatively specific PKC inhibitor calphostin C before stimulation with IFN-y reduced significantly the number of HLA-DR-positive cells and was additive with the effect of TGF-/3] and TGF-/32. Staurosporine's effect was not additive with TGF-/?, most likely because staurosporine is not specific for PKC, but it can influence other signal transduction pathways, such as cAMP,28 which may also modulate PKC activity.29'30 PMA can act as either an inhibitor or an activator of the PKC cascade, depending on its dose, incubation period, and target cells.31 The minimal dose of phorbol ester that can cause downregulation of PKC varies from cell type to cell type and has not been studied in RPE cells. In this study, PMA (0.1 fjM, 1 fjM) probably inhibited the PKC pathway in IFN-y stimulated RPE cells because its effect was similar to that of calphostin C and staurosporine. We suggest that the TGF-/? effect in this study may be due to involvement of the PKC pathway, but we cannot rule out that TGF-/3 may act by a parallel mechanism synergistic with the effect of the PKC pathway. TGF-P is known to inhibit certain PKC-mediated events, such as PKC-mediated DNA synthesis in some cells.30 It is also known that phorbol esters regulate TGF-/0 gene expression in appropriate target cells32 and that they modulate some of the actions of TGF^ 33-36 I f Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/iovs/933403/ on 08/10/2017 4258 Investigative Ophthalmology 8c Visual Science, December 1994, Vol. 35, No. 13 the possible mechanisms of the additive effect of PMA and TGF-P in downregulation of HLA-DR expression. Although it has been demonstrated that TGF-/? stimulates phosphoinositol metabolism and translocation of PKC from cytosol to membrane in different cells,36 it has been reported that translocation of PKC does not necessarily indicate activation.35 A major function of PKC is related to immediate negative feedback control.31 TGF-/3 may prolong the activated state of PKC and induce production of endogenous TGF-/3.37 PMA could prolong the TGF-/? effect by upregulating either endogenous TGF-/? or independently inhibiting PKC, resulting in an additive effect with TGF-/3 in downregulation of HLA-DR antigens.38 There are at least seven isoforms of PKC, each of which has its own specificity.3940 It is not well known, though, how IFN-y, TGFP, or HLA-DR relates specifically to each isoform. Possible specificity of each cytokine for specific isozymes might explain this complex interaction. These reports show that TGF-/3 may have differing actions, depending on its concentration and type of target cells,31 and may act differently in vivo than in vitro. In summary, our results show that TGF-/5i and TGF-/?2 act to inhibit IFN-y-induced upregulation of HLA-DR expression by human RPE cells. The complex interaction between TGF-/3 and IFN-y may directly involve the PKC cascade, although it is not clear whether the TGF-/3 effect was due solely to inhibition of this pathway or due, in part, to additional mechanisms. Detailed studies of the role of PKC and its different isoforms in RPE cells, the relationship with their target proteins, and the alteration by different immunomodulating and inflammatory cytokines may be of vital importance in understanding the biochemical basis and potential therapy of inflammatory ocular disease. Key Words 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. histocompatibility complex, cytokine, protein kinase C, PMA, calphostin C 13. Acknowledgments The authors thank Dr. Thomas E. Ogden and Ann Dawson for their editorial assistance; Verna M. Hailey for her secretarial assistance; and Dr. Rayudu Gopalakrishna for his expert advice and comments. References 1. Broekhuyse RM, Rademakers AJJM, Van Vugt AHM, Winkens HJ. Autoimmune responsiveness to retinal IRBP, S-antigen and opsin in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Exp Eye Res. 1990;50:197-202. 2. Chan CC, Detrick B, Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG, Fujikawa LS, Hooks JJ. HLA-DR antigens on retinal 14. 15. 16. pigment epithelial cells from patients with uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986; 104:725-729. Planck SR, Dang TT, Graves D, Tara D, Ansel JC, Rosenbaum JT. Retinal pigment epithelial cells secrete interleukin-6 in response to interleukin-1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sri. 1992;33:78-82. Elner VM, Strieter RM, Elner SG, Baggiolini M, Lindley I, Kunkel SL. Neutrophil chemotactic factor (IL-8) gene expression by cytokine-treated retinal pigment epithelial cells. AmJPathol. 1990; 136:745-750. Detrick B, Newsome DA, Percopo CM, Hooks JJ. Class II antigen expression and gamma interferon modulation of monocytes and retinal pigment epithelial cells from patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1985; 36:201-211. Percopo CM, Hooks JJ, Shinohara T, Caspi R, Detrick B. Cytokine-mediated activation of a neuronal retinal resident cell provokes antigen presentation. / Immunol. 1990; 145:4101-4107. Wakefield D, Lloyd A. The role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of inflammatory eye disease. Cytokine. 1992;4:l-5. Limb GA, Little BC, Meager A, et al. Cytokines in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Eye. 1991;5:686-693. Schluesener HJ. Transforming growth factors type (3\ and /?2 suppress rat astrocyte autoantigen presentation and antagonize hyperinduction of class II major histocompatibility complex antigen expression by interferon-y and tumor necrosis factor-a. J Neuroimmunol. 1990;27:41-47. Dunham DM, Arkins S, Edward CK III, Dantzer R, Kelley KW. Role of interferon-y in counteracting the suppressive effects of transforming growth factor-/32 and glucocorticoids on the production of tumor necrosis factor-a. J Leukoc Biol. 1990;48:473-481. Gumina RJ, Freire-Moar J, DeYoung L, Webb DR, Devens BH. Transduction of the IFN-y signal for HLADR expression in the promonocytic line THP-1 involves a late-acting PKC activity. Cell Immunol. 1991; 138:265-279. Ohtsuki M, Massague J. Evidence for the involvement of protein kinase activity in transforming growth factor-/? signal transduction. Mol Cell Biol. 1992; 12:261265. Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H. Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: A comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures. / Histochem Cytochem. 1981;29:577-580. Baudouin C, Fredj-Reygrobellet D, Jambou D, Gastaud P, Lapalus P. HLA DR and DQ expression on human retinal pigment epithelial cells in vitro. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990; 228:86-89. Czarniecki CW, Chiu HH, Wary GHW, McCabe SM, Palladino MA. Transforming growth factor-/? t modulates the expression of class II histocompatibility antigens on human cells. JImmunol. 1998; 140:4217-4223. Baudouin C, Brignole F, Bayle J, Fredj-Reygrobellet D, Lapalus P, Gastaud P. Class II histocompatibility antigen expression by cellular components of vitreous Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/iovs/933403/ on 08/10/2017 Effect of TGF-/3 on HLA-DR Expression in RPE Cells 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 4259 29. Nishizuka Y. Studies and perspectives of protein kiand subretinal fluid in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. nase C. Science. 1986;233:305-312. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:2065-2072. 30. Kawase T, Orikasa M, Suzuki A. Phorbol ester-like acJaffe GJ, Peters WP, Roberts W, et al. Modulation of tion of staurosporine on the cAMP response to prostamacrophage colony stimulating factor in cultured huglandin E2 in two macrophage-like cell lines at distinct man retinal pigment epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res. differentiation stages. Cell Signal. 1992;4:479-485. 1992;54:595-603. 31. Kageyama M, Mori T, Yanagisawa T, Taira N. Is stauroTanihara H, Yoshida M, Matsumoto M, Yoshimura N. sporine a specific inhibitor of protein kinase C in inIdentification of transforming growth factor-/? extact porcine coronary arteries? / Pharmacol Exp Ther. pressed in cultured human retinal pigment epithelial 1991;259:1019-1026. cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:413-419. 32. Wager RE, Assoian RK. A phorbol ester-regulated riboGaudric A, Glacet-Bernard A, Clement G, Falquerho nuclease system controlling transforming growth facL, Barritault D, Coscas G. Transforming growth factor tor 01 gene expression in hematopoietic cells. Mol beta dans le vitre de patients presentant une proliferaCellBiol. 1990; 10:5983-5990. tion epiretinienne. Ophtalmologie. 1990;4:51-52. 33. Takaishi K, Kawata S, Ito N, Tamura S, Shirai Y, Tarui Wetzig R, Hooks JJ, Percopo CM, Nussenblatt R, Chan S. Effects of phorbol ester on cell growth inhibition CC, Detrick B. Anti-la antibody diminishes ocular inby transforming growth factor /3l in human hepatoma flammation in experimental autoimmune uveitis. Curr cells lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990; 171:91Eye Res. 1988; 7:809-818. 96. Hamel CP, Detrick B, Hooks JJ. Evaluation of la ex34. Blumberg PM. Protein kinase C as the receptor for pression in rat ocular tissues following inoculation the phorbol ester tumor promoters: Sixth Rhoads mewith interferon-gamma.£x/>£))ei&5. 1990;50:173-182. morial award lecture. Cancer Res. 1988; 48:1-8. Hooks JJ, Detrick B. Immunoregulatory functions of 35. Robertson PL, Markovac J, Datta SC, Goldstein GW. interferon. In: Torrence PF, ed. Biological Response Transforming growth factor beta stimulates phosphoiModifiers: New Approaches to Disease Intervention. New nositol metabolism and translocation of protein kinase C in cultured astrocytes. Neurosci Lett. 1988; 93: York: Academic Press; 1985:57-75. 107-113. Fabre JW. Regulation of MHC expression. Immunol 36. GrabarekJ, Ware JA. Protein kinase C activation withLett. 1991; 29:3-8. out membrane contact in platelets stimulated by bryLeschey KH, Hackett SF, Singer JH, Campochiaro PA. ostetm. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268:5543-5549. Growth factor responsiveness of human retinal pig37. Van Obberghen-Schilling E, Roche NS, Flanders KC, ment epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Sporn MB, Roberts AB. Transforming growth factor 1990;31:839-846. 01 positively regulates its own expression in normal Raymond MS, Thompson JT. RPE-mediated collagen and transformed cells. / Biol Chem. 1988;263:7741gel contraction: Inhibition by colchicine and stimula7746. tion by TGF-beta. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990; 31: 38. Kim SJ, Denhez F, Kim KY, Holt JT, Sporn MB, Rob1079-1086. erts AB. Activation of the second promoter of the Fan XD, Goldberg M, Bloom BR. Interferon-y-intransforming growth factor-/3l gene by transforming duced transcriptional activation is mediated by progrowth factor-/3l and phorbol ester occurs through tein kinase C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:5122the same target sequences. / Biol Chem. 1989; 264: 5125. 19373-19378. Johns LD, Babcock G, Green D, Freedman M, Sriram 39. Ono Y, Fujii T, Ogita K, Kikkawa U, Igarashi K, NishiS, Ransohoff RM. Transforming growth factor-/?, difzuka Y. The structure, expression, and properties of ferentially regulates proliferation and MHC class-II anadditional members of the protein kinase C family. / tigen expression in forebrain and brainstem astrocyte Biol Chem. 1988;263:6927-6932. 40. Sekiguchi K, Tsukuda M, Ase K, Kikkawa U, Nishizuka primary cultures. Brain Res. 1992;585:229-236. Y. Mode of activation and kinetic properties of three Tamaoki T. Use and specificity of staurosporine, UCNdistinct forms of protein kinase C from rat brain. J 01, and calphostin C as protein kinase inhibitors. MethBiochem. 1988; 103:759-765. ods Enzymol. 1991;201:340-347. Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/iovs/933403/ on 08/10/2017