* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lecture 9 - Scattering and tunneling for a delta
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Erwin Schrödinger wikipedia , lookup
Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Cross section (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Lecture 9 The delta-function potential Scattering and tunnelling Objectives Solve the Schrödinger equation for a delta function potential. Classical turning points E x1 Position, x (arb. units) A bound state x2 Potential, V(x) (arb. units) Potential, V(x) (arb. units) Bound and scattering states Classical turning point E Position, x (arb. units) x1 A scattering state Classically, if a particle is in a potential energy well it will oscillate between the two turning points x1 and x2 where V x 1 =V x 2 = E , the energy of the particle. The particle is in a bound state. Bound and scattering states II Potential, V(x) (arb. units) E Potential, V(x) (arb. units) If the particle energy exceeds V(x) on either or both sides then it cannot get trapped in a potential well and it is said to be in a scattering state. Classical turning points E x1 Position, x (arb. units) A scattering state x2 Position, x (arb. units) A classically bound state but a quantum scattering state Bound and scattering states III Depending on the shape of the potential we may find only bound states, only scattering states or a mixture of the two. In quantum mechanics there is always a non-zero probability that a particle can pass through a (finite) potential barrier so the following generalisations can be made: EV −∞ and EV ∞ → bound state EV −∞ or EV ∞ → scattering state If we assume that the potential goes to zero at infinity then we can write: E 0 → bound state, E0 → scattering state. For the infinite square well we find only bound states are solutions to the Schrödinger equation. The solutions have discrete energy levels. For the free particle we have only scattering states as solutions. The solutions are labelled by a continuous variable k. The Dirac delta function The Dirac delta function is defined as follows: x =0 if x≠0 x =∞ if x=0 and ∞ ∫ x dx=1 −∞ It is an infinitesimally narrow spike located at the origin, whose area is 1. Similarly, the function x−a is a spike located at x=a . We can write ∞ ∫ −∞ ∞ f x x−a dx= f a ∫ x−adx= f a . −∞ The delta function is zero everywhere except where x=a , when multiplied by a function f x it has the same effect as multiplying by f a . The delta function potential We will consider a potential of the form v x=− x , where is some constant. This potential has a delta function well located at x=0 . The time independent 2 2 ℏ d − x = E . Schrödinger equation becomes − 2 m dx 2 If E 0 then we will have bound states and if E 0 we will have scattering states. First consider bound states ( E0 ) in the region where x0 . Here V x=0 so we 2 d 2mE −2 m E 2 = =− = have with . 2 2 ℏ dx ℏ − x x A general solution to this Schrödinger equation is x= A e B e . But we know that is positive (because E is negative), so the A term becomes infinite as x −∞ . So we have x= B e x for x0 . Boundary conditions If we look at the area where x0 we find a general solution of the form , x= F e− x G e x which reduces to x= F e− x as G e x ∞ as x ∞ . We now have two solutions for x for x0 and x0 . We can find the solution at x=0 by noting the following boundary conditions: is always continuous. d /dx is continuous, except where V x is infinite. The continuity of tells us that F = B at x=0 . ∞ From normalisation we can find F and B: ∫ F 2 e−2 x dx=0.5 , 0 F = . The wavefunction around x=0 We need to consider the region containing the delta function potential. We will try to solve the Schrödinger equation by integrating from to − , either side of x=0 : ½ (x) ½ -x e ½ x e 0 ℏ2 d2 − dx∫ V x x dx= E ∫ x dx ∫ 2 m − dx 2 − − 0 Position, x (arb. units) Bound state wavefunction for the delta function potential The right hand side becomes zero as 0 so we have: d 2m = 2 ∫ V x xdx dx − ℏ − [ ] Bound state solutions d 2 m =− 2 0 . dx ℏ d − x ∣ =− We know that x= e for x0 so dx + d x ∣ = √ . and x= e for x0 so dx d =−2 and at x=0 0= . So dx 2m m Putting it all together gives −2 =− 2 , i.e. = 2 . ℏ ℏ 2 2 2 ℏ m =− 2 . The corresponding energy is E =− 2m 2ℏ m −m∣x∣/ ℏ x= e The wavefunction can be written as . ℏ The result of the integration is 2 There is only one bound state for any given value of . Scattering states E0 Scattering states have so the Schrödinger equation 2 d 2mE 2 m E 2 k = =− =−k with (k is real and positive). 2 2 ℏ dx ℏ becomes ikx −ikx The general solution for x0 is x= Ae Be . At this point we cannot eliminate either the A or B term. ikx −ikx For x0 we have x= Fe G e and at x=0 can write AB= F G . x is continuous so we Differentiating x we find that d d =ik F e ikx −G e−ikx for x0 , so ∣+=ik F −G and dx dx d d =ik A e ikx− B e−ikx for x0 , so ∣ =ik A− B . dx dx d =ik F −G− A B . So dx Scattering states II Going back to our previous integration of the Schrödinger equation, we have the d 2 m =− 2 0 . For the scattering states 0= A B and we results that dx ℏ 2 m m ik F −G− AB =− AB = have . Let , divide by ik and collect the A 2 2 ℏ ℏ k and B terms on one side and we get F −G= A12i − B 1−2i . What do the terms in the Schrödinger equation solution represent? Ae Be V(x) ikx -ikx ikx Fe -ikx Ge 0 x 0 Aeikx represents a wave incident from the left and Feikx is a wave travelling from the potential well to the right. Suppose Ge-ikx is zero, then Be-ikx represents a wave reflected from the potential well, moving to the left. Reflection and transmission We put G=0 and solve the two equations AB= F G and . F −G= A12i − B 1−2i . The results are B= i 1 A . A and F = 1−i 1−i We can define reflection and transmission coefficients, R and T, which are the probabilities of reflection and transmission from the potential well. 2 2 i −i ∣F∣ ∣B∣2 1 T = = and , and RT =1 . R= 2 = = 2 2 2 ∣A∣ 1 ∣A∣ 1−i 1i 1 In terms of energy we can write: R= 1 1 T = and . 1 2 ℏ 2 E / m 2 1 m 2 / 2 ℏ 2 E T and R versus If we plot T and R versus we find that when =0 tends towards, but does not equal, zero. T =1 , but as increases T Tunnelling Notice that if the sign of is reversed, i.e. we have a potential barrier instead of a well, the reflection and transmission coefficients are unchanged. Even if the potential is much larger than E there is a non-zero probability that the particle can cross the potential barrier. This is the effect known as tunnelling. It can also be seen that if the particle energy is greater than there is still a chance that the particle will be reflected from the potential barrier. Neither of these phenomena exist in classical mechanics. The wavefunctions we have derived are not normalisable and so do not represent physically realisable states. To solve this problem we must use the approach taken for free particles and add together a combination of stationary states. Scattering matrices We can construct solutions to the Schrödinger equation to the left and right of the potential well by making use of the superposition theorem. ikx −ikx To the left of the well we have x= Ae Be and to the right we have 2 m E ikx −ikx k = x= Fe G e with . ℏ In the region containing the potential well we can write x=C f x D g x where f x and g x are two linearly independent solutions. Going back to our image of reflection and transmission from the potential well we see that B can be written in terms of A and G i.e. B=S 11 AS 12 G . Similarly, S S 12 F =S 21 A S 22 G with S = 11 . S is known as the scattering matrix. S 21 S 22 We can find the amplitudes of the reflected and transmitted waves using B =S A . F G Scattering matrices II If there is no wave incident from the right then G=0 and we can write 2 2 ∣B∣ ∣F∣ 2 Rl = 2 =∣S 11∣ and T l = 2 =∣S 21∣2 . ∣A∣ ∣A∣ Similarly, when A=0 and the wave is incident from the right we have 2 2 ∣F∣ ∣B∣ 2 Rr = 2 =∣S 22∣ and T r = 2 =∣S 12∣2 . ∣G∣ ∣G∣ i 1−i S = So, using the results from before have 1 1−i 1 1−i i 1−i and = m ℏ2 k . We can use the scattering matrix to find the energy of the bound states. To do this we make the substitution k →i and look for terms in the S matrix which blow up. Bound states from S matrix For our delta potential we want to use the S matrix to find the energy of the bound state(s). For a bound state A=G =0 . Let’s look at the S12 term first: S 12 = 2 1 . 1−i ℏ k 1 S = = Substitute for : 12 . 1−i m /ℏ 2 k ℏ 2 k −i m 2 2 iℏ ℏ → 2 Put k=i : S 12 = 2 . i ℏ −i m ℏ −m m This blows up when ℏ 2 =m , so = 2 . ℏ 2m E √−2 m E =i , so = We know that k= √ ℏ ℏ 2 m −2 m E m = Therefore , i.e. E =− 2 , which is the same result as before. 2 ℏ ℏ 2ℏ The scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) The tunnelling current is kept constant via a feedback loop and the vertical deflection of the tip is used to measure the surface topography. Atomic resolution can be achieved. STM images I Surface of Ni (110) Cu surface Images courtesy of IBM STM images II Fe atoms on Cu. The ring has a radius of 7.13 nm. Fe atoms on Cu (111) SQUID magnetometer Cooper-pairs of electrons tunnel through the Josephson junction, which is an insulator. The junction can switch ten times faster than a semiconductor. SQUID devices can measure the magnetic fields from living organisms. The SQUID is one of the most sensitive measurement devices known. Conclusions A delta function potential contains one bound state. The probability of an incident wave being able to pass through a delta function potential barrier is non-zero, even if the energy of the wave is less than the height of the barrier. Classical mechanics cannot predict the existence of tunnelling, but the effect is real and has many applications.