* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Supplementary material Recruitment of a myosin
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Green fluorescent protein wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Supplementary material S1 Recruitment of a myosin heavy chain kinase to actin-rich protrusions in Dictyostelium Paul A. Steimle, Shigehiko Yumura, Graham P. Côté, Quint G. Medley, Mark V. Polyakov, Brian Leppert, and Thomas T. Egelhoff Current Biology 1 May 2001, 11:708–713 Supplementary materials and methods Figure S1 DNA methods and cell maintenance We fused GFP to the amino-terminus of the MHCK A coding region by using the vector pDXA-GFP2 [S1]. An EcoRI site was engineered by PCR at codon 2 of the MHCK A coding region. This allowed the entire MHCK A gene to be inserted at the corresponding site of pDXA-GFP2. The resultant construct relied on the native MHCK A codon for translation termination. We subjected all PCR-derived segments to DNA sequence analysis to confirm the correct final sequence. The FLAG epitope-tagged version of MHCK A was generated by transferring the insert from the GFP fusion into the vector pTX-FLAG [S1]. Both constructs were introduced into the Ax2 cell line via electroporation as described previously [S2]. Dictyostelium cells were maintained in HL5 [S3] in plastic petri dishes. Cells expressing GFP or FLAG fusions to MHCK A were grown in medium supplemented with 10 g/ml G418 (Geneticin; Gibco). For chemoattractant response studies with GFP-MHCK A, cells were differentiated to the aggregation stage as described previously [S4]. Detergent-insoluble cytoskeleton assays Triton-resistant cytoskeleton analysis was performed with aggregation stage cells. Cells (4 ⫻ 107 cells/ml) in suspension culture were first incubated for 2 hr in starvation buffer (20 mM MES [pH 6.8], 0.2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgSO4) and then were exposed to 100 nM cAMP (final concentration) that was applied from a syringe pump every 6 min for 4–6 hr. We then brought the cells to a basal stimulatory state by adding caffeine (100 M final concentration) to the cell slurry and then incubating them for 30 min. Subsequently, the cells were stimulated with 100 M cAMP, and at indicated times after stimulation, aliquots of cells were lysed by the addition of an equal volume of 20 mM TES (pH 6.8), 1% Triton-X-100, 2 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM EGTA. Triton-resistant cytoskeletal pellets were collected by centrifugation, suspended in 2⫻ sample buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis with an antiMHCK A polyclonal antibody [S5]. The relative amount of actin and myosin associated with pellets was determined by densitometric analysis of the scanned Coomassie-stained gels. Likewise, the amount of pelletassociated MHCK A was quantified by densitometry of developed Western blots. The MHC null cell line HS1 [S6] was used for similar experiments assessing MHCK A distribution behavior in the absence of myosin. Microscopy Conventional immunomicroscopy was performed with either Ax2 parental cells or with FLAG-MHCK A cells. All cells were fixed in ⫺15⬚C ethanol containing 1% formaldehyde for 5 min and then rinsed with PBS. The fixed cells were incubated with a previously described anti-MHCK A monoclonal antibody [S7] or with the commercial anti-FLAG epitope monoclonal antibody M2 (Sigma). Actin staining was performed with tetramethylrhodamine-labeled phalloidin. After 30 min of rinsing with PBS, FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies were incubated for 1 hr. For Figures 1a and 1c, cells were processed for microscopy by the agar overlay method [S8]. For all other fixed-cell microscopy images (Figure 2a in the main text and Figure S1), no agar overlay was used. In a number of additional experiments, similar localization has been observed regardless of which fixation method was used. Immunostained samples were observed with a Zeiss Axiovert microscope/ confocal laser system. An oil immersion Plan-Neofluor 100x objective lens (NA 1.3) was used for image collection. Further assessment of cell responses to chemoattractant in the presence of latrunculin A (Lat-A). It was noted that GFP-MHCK A acquired a granular cytosolic appearance when cells were stimulated with cAMP in the presence of Lat-A. To determine whether this might represent active recruitment to cytosolic structures of some sort, we tested the behavior of a construct that has the actin binding domain (ABD) of ABP-120 fused to GFP (GFP-ABD-120). This construct was previously shown to have a persistent cortical localization due to its association with cortical F-actin [S9]. In our tests, GFP-ABD-120 was cortically localized in developed Ax2 cells and remained so when cells were stimulated with cAMP (left panels). Pretreatment with Lat-A to disassemble cortical F-actin caused GFPABD-120 to become diffuse and cytosolic in distribution (upper right panel). As with GFP-MHCK A, stimulation with cAMP in the presence of Lat-A induced a granular fluorescence pattern, suggesting reorganization of the GFP-ABD-120 protein into particulate structures of some sort. Ax2 cells expressing GFP alone did not display a granular appearance when they were stimulated with chemoattractant (not shown). We speculate that the granular appearance of these two distinct GFP constructs (ABD-120 versus MHCK A) upon chemoattractant stimulation may represent loci within the cells where transient F-actin polymerization may be occurring briefly despite the presence of Lat-A. S2 Supplementary references S1. Levi S, Polyakov M, Egelhoff TT: Green fluorescent protein and epitope tag fusion vectors for Dictyostelium discoideum. Plasmid 2000, 44:231-238. S2. Knecht D, Pang KM: Electroporation of Dictyostelium discoideum. Methods Mol Biol 1995, 47:321-330. S3. Sussman M: Cultivation and synchronous morphogenesis of Dictyostelium under controlled experimental conditions. Methods Cell Biol 1987, 28:9-29. S4. Parent CA, Blacklock BJ, Froehlich WM, Murphy DB, Devreotes PN: G protein signaling events are activated at the leading edge of chemotactic cells. Cell 1998, 95:81-91. S5. Kolman MF, Egelhoff TT: Dictyostelium myosin heavy chain kinase A subdomains. Coiled-coil and WD repeat roles in oligomerization and substrate targeting. J Biol Chem 1997, 272:16904-16910. S6. Ruppel KM, Uyeda TQ, Spudich JA: Role of highly conserved lysine 130 of myosin motor domain. In vivo and in vitro characterization of site specifically mutated myosin. J Biol Chem 1994, 269:18773-18780. S7. Futey LM, Medley QG, Côté GP, Egelhoff TT: Structural analysis of myosin heavy chain kinase A from Dictyostelium. Evidence for a highly divergent protein kinase domain, an amino-terminal coiled-coil domain, and a domain homologous to the -subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:523-529. S8. Fukui Y, Yumura S, Yumura TK: Agar-overlay immunofluorescence: high-resolution studies of cytoskeletal components and their changes during chemotaxis. Methods Cell Biol 1987, 28:347-356. S9. Pang KM, Lee E, Knecht DA: Use of a fusion protein between GFP and an actin-binding domain to visualize transient filamentous-actin structures. Curr Biol 1998, 8:405-408.