* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Searches for NP : non-SUSY scenarios
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Higgs boson wikipedia , lookup
Super-Kamiokande wikipedia , lookup
Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Data analysis wikipedia , lookup
Business intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Higgs mechanism wikipedia , lookup
ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup
Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup
Supersymmetry wikipedia , lookup
Grand Unified Theory wikipedia , lookup
Large Hadron Collider wikipedia , lookup
Search for the Higgs boson wikipedia , lookup
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Thirteenth International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of Fundamental Interactions Searches for New Phenomena : non-SUSY scenarios Emmanuelle PEREZ DESY & CEA-Saclay, DSM / DAPNIA / Spp • Searches in well-known final states : • indirect effects • resonances • Searches in rare SM final states • Funny experimental signatures… SUSY ’05, Durham 1 23 July 2005 Searches for New Physics : why & where Mechanism of the EW symmetry breaking ? Higgs (i.e. fundamental scalar) ? Find it… structure of the Higgs sector ? solution of the hierarchy problem ? SUSY MPl ? “Little Higgs” 10 TeV ? extra dimensions no hierarchy ? no Higgs ? Dynamical breaking ? ( H ~ condensate ) extra-dim physics ? ( H ~ Gauge Field|4d ) In most scenarios, new physics is expected at the TeV scale. Also hoped for, that NP might answer some of the questions unexplained by the SM or by SM+SUSY (e.g. quantization of EM charge, particle masses etc) Various strategies to track new physics, e.g. : - high precision measurements ( need good theoretical control ) - rare decays (K & B) , LFV processes - searches at high energy colliders LEP, Tevatron, HERA Some complementarities between these different approaches and between measurements at the three high energy colliders. E. Perez 2 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Good performances of our facilities ! _ Tevatron pp, s = 1.96 TeV CDF & D0 Run I (92-96) : 110 pb-1 / exp Run II (since 01) 1 fb-1 delivered HERA ep, s = 320 GeV H1 & ZEUS until summer 2000 : 120 pb-1 / exp (mainly e+ p) 1000 ! 2005 2003-04 Analyses presented here 200-450 pb-1 of Run II data (2002 - 2004) HERA-II sample > HERA-I HERA I+II analyses : up to 200 pb-1 + LEP data ! Very relevant constraints on NP ! some final combinations are still to come + B-factories : BaBar and Belle collected 350 millions of BB pairs ! E. Perez 3 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Some news from the Standard Model… • sin2W at NuTev ? Differs by 3 from global SM analysis Not clear… theoretical uncertainty ? e.g. asymmetry in s-s, violaton of isospin in parton distributions due to QED effects ? ? • (g-2) ? Very precise measurement at BNL (0.5 ppm !) Above the SM value (2.7 ) if low energy e+e- data are used for aHAD - e+e- 4 at BaBar using ISR photons : somehow in-between e+e- & - (e+e- ) by KLOE at DANE (s 1 GeV) : confirms the other e+e- meas. … KLOE, hep-ex/0407048 Burkhardt & Pietrzyk, hep-ph/0506323 • New value of Vus : New measurements from KTeV and KLOE unitarity restored ! • sin(2) from b s penguins : WA. from charmonium modes went down (LP’05) Discrepancies seem to get smaller … E. Perez • Still discrepancies in polarisation data in B decays into vector meson when penguins are involved… could be explained by final state interactions ? Belle, PRL 94 (2005) 221804 4 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Our backgrounds for NP searches at colliders NC(Q2>400GeV2) ~ 1000 pb CC(Q2>400GeV2) ~ 25 pb Blue = not yet observed NC Tevatron tt HERA Single top CC Wbb Q2 (GeV2) WZlll LEP In this talk : From well-known processes to rare & very rare processes WZ+ZZl,ll,llll,ll E. Perez 5 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 d / (d)SM A lot to learn from “bread & butter” @ colliders First simple example : E.g. DIS as the golden process to study the structure of matter : (at HERA, Q2max 105 GeV2) Rq < 10-18 m assign a finite size to the EW charge distributions. f(Q ) = 1 2 < r2 > 6 2 Q 2nd “generic” example : assume Q2 (GeV2) that the scale of NP is large, parameterize the effects of NP as a four-fermion interaction : _ _ e ,q 4 ( ei ei )( qj qj ) L= i, j i , j = L,R Typical bounds > 5 – 20 TeV Next slides : examples of model-dependent constraints E. Perez 6 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Dileptons, , DIS & Extra Dim. Scenarios Interference of KK exchange with SM processes (ee, , , DIS) • Large extra-dim (AADD) : tower of gravitons G(k) q q , Z l G(k) l - ee & at LEP : MS > 1.34 TeV - DIS at HERA : MS > 0.82 TeV DY, QCD “fake” DY D0 Run II + Run I, ee & : MS > 1.43 TeV D0 Run II Prelim, 200 pb-1 SM SM + signal, Mc = 500 GeV E. Perez ee Most stringent collider bound: Tevatron 2 fb-1 : MS up to 2 TeV QCD bckgd At high mass : e.g. ll, at Tevatron : Effective coupling : A / MS4 (not a direct probe of MD) D0, hep-ex/0506063 Negative interference • Gauge bosons in “internal” extra-dim : MC = 1/R// ~ mass of V(1) qq , Z, (1), Z(1) ee LEP & low energy Mc > a few TeV Mc > 1.12 TeV 7 First dedicated search at a collider SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Examples of dilepton resonances • New heavy gauge boson Z ’, e.g. models with L-R symmetry or E6 GUT inspired • (Color-singlet) technirho in Technicolor models • Kaluza-Klein gravitons in some extra-dim. models q _ q cotan • ZH - Intrinsic width of new particles usually small compared to the detector resolution - At high mass acceptances do not depend too much on the spin (typically ~ 50% for ee) “Little Higgs” CDF II Prelim, 200 pb-1 D0/CDF, from Mll and ~ 200 pb-1 Z’H ee E. Perez above 600 GeV Still good agreement with SM in 450 pb-1 First constraints (direct) on “Little Higgs” models ! (although “minimal” models predict heavier ZH, 2-6 TeV) BR(e) < ~ 30 fb from ee X BR() < ~ 40-80 fb from X BR() < ~ 1 pb from X ~ 100 evts above 200 GeV 8 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Recent Z’ searches Limits & sensitivities on Z ’ bosons often expressed in : • SSM : Z ’ couples to fermions like the SM Z CDF Prelim, 450 pb-1, e+e• E6 inspired models : Z ’ = Z sin6 + Z cos6 • Recent Tevatron searches for Z’ use both Mee and cos(*) (cf LEP sensitivity via AFB) E6 Z’ models Adding cos(*) to 25% more L ! M(Z’SSM) > 845 GeV (LEP : 1.8 TeV) X BR(e) < 30 fb @ 800 GeV APV E6 models : direct bounds from Tevatron better than the indirect LEP bounds Indirect bounds from LEP much more model dependent • New models tested, beyond E6 M. Carena et al, PRD70 (2004) 093009 - Relax GUT relations for gZ’ - Classify models according to the U(1)’ charges of fermions : E. Perez 9 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Dilepton & diboson resonances : RS gravitons “Localized gravity” on a “brane” at d 0 from our brane; propagation of gravity in the extra dim is exponentially damped due to the (tuned) space-time metric PRL 83 (1999) 3370; Randall & Sundrum models; “usual” version : n=1, Rc Planck length Graviton propagate in extra dim Kaluza-Klein modes In localized gravity : Spin 2 resonance First direct constraints on Randall-Sundrum models ! G(k) heavy, G(1) TeV Coupling of G(k) to SM fields TeV Coupling k/MPl (determined by some model param, k/MPl 0.1) brings a large sensitivity to RS gravitons since large branching PRL 83 (1999) 4690 785 GeV D0 (, ee, ) : for M > 500 GeV, X BR() < 18 fb E. Perez Main bckgs in : D0, hep-ex/0505018 0 - jets - genuine , dominates at high masses 10 (1) mass 05, 23 /(GeV) 07 / 05 GSUSY’ Z from a long-lived particle ? Look at the Z resonance itself… but in events where the Z decay vertex is displaced, e.g. in Z Use of the silicon devices to measure the transverse dca of tracks; apply tight track quality criteria. Could come from a 4th generation b’ : If m(b’) < m(top) : b’ bZ via loop decay Acceptance depends mainly on c(b’) Complements earlier searches : - b’ bZ, negligible lifetime, b-tag - low mass b’ via FCNC (b’ b, bg) Analysis not optimised for the b’ hypothesis i.e. constraints are quite model-independent. E. Perez 11 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 W l, DIS and new W’ bosons q _ q WR e, e R q WR R q’ s-channel W production at Tevatron and t-channel exchange in DIS at HERA : very clean experimental signatures Look for new W’ boson, e.g. WR Same signature as W exchanged provided that R is light and stable • Tevatron : ET and ET thresholds ~ 25 GeV, ~ 45% Likelihood fit of the MT distribution : *BR(W’ e) < 50 – 100 fb for M > 500 GeV For gL = gR : M(W’) > 788 GeV e- e+ E. Perez • HERA : polarised eL,R beam since 2003 CC(e,SM) ~ (1 Pe) Extrapolations to Pe = 1 consistent with no WR (not competitive with Tevatron bounds, but nice “textbook” plot !) 12 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 DIS, Zjj, Wjj: Leptoquarks Apparent symmetry between the lepton & quark sectors ? Exact cancellation of QED triangular anomaly ? • LQs appear in many extensions of SM • Scalar or Vector color triplet bosons • Carry both L and B, frac. em. charge LQ decays into (lq) or (q) : HERA (unknown) Yukawa coupling l-q-LQ TEVATRON eq q llqq lqq qq NC DIS CC DIS Z/DY + jj QCD W + jj W/Z + jj QCD ZEUS, PRD 68 (2003) 052004 NC DIS E. Perez ee 13 • HERA : resonant peak, ang. distr. • Tevatron : highest ET events PRD 71, 071104 (2005) Z/DY+jets 05, 23(GeV) / 07 / 05 ST = ETe1 + ETe2+ SUSY’ ETjets Existing Bounds on 1st Generation LQs = BR( LQ eq ) e 1 1 0.5 0.5 0 Run II bounds D0 241 CDF 235 208 D0 (ejj) 176 CDF (ejj) CDF 117 For = 4 em 0.3 : HERA rules out LQ masses < 290 GeV @ 95 % CL = BR (LQ eq) D0 Run II + D0 Run I : M > 256 GeV for =1 =1 H1, hep-ex/0506044 D0, PRD 71, 071104 (2005) CDF, hep-ex/0506074 • Tevatron probes large masses for large (LQ eq) independently of • HERA better probes LQs with small provided that not too small Complementarity of both facilities NB : at HERA, e+ / e- + polarisation could help in disentangling the LQ quantum nbs E. Perez MLQ (GeV) 14 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Second and Third Generation Leptoquarks So far, LQ2,3 with M > 100 GeV can be probed exclusively at the Tevatron ! • Search for LQ2 in Run II data : + at least 2 jets : bckgd = only DY+jets ~ no bckgd at the end while ~ 20% • Search for LQ3 b : one e or , the other had. Same analysis as RPV stop b Total acceptance ~ a few % D0 Prelim., 300 pb-1 SM bckgd DY + jets M > 129 GeV … New physics might couple mainly to 3rd gene fermions Combined with MLQ > 251 GeV for = 1 D0 Run I : E. Perez 15 More sensitivity expected by using b-tagging techniques SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Searches in radiative processes • + E at LEP sets strong constraints on large extra-dim (ADD) : (also branons) Coupling of G(k) to SM fields 1 / MPl G(k) stable ! May be copiously produced n=2 : MD > 1.5 TeV n=4 : MD > 0.9 TeV 1 / MPl compensated by huge multiplicity of states CDF, PRL 94 (2005) 101802 • Searches for singly produced excited fermions, e.g. e* e , search for a (e) resonance - Z/DY + at Tevatron q , Z e - radiative Bhabha at LEP - radiative DIS, QED Compton q e* at HERA For f/ = 1/M(e*) : E. Perez M(e*) > 250 GeV 16 LEP & HERA : all decay modes considered SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Multilepton events at HERA Events with 2 leptons in final state. Mainly produced via Cross-section when both leptons are central, PT1 > 10 GeV, PT2 > 5 GeV : ~ 0.6 pb H1 data 94-00 : excess of 2e+3e events at high M12 = mass of two highest PT e No such excess seen in ZEUS HERA-I data The H1 evts are not consistent with e H++ (e) ee(e) 209 pb-1 H1 ( 115 pb-1) 2e, M12 > 100 GeV 3 / 0.30 0.04 3e, M12 > 100 GeV 3 / 0.23 0.04 H1, EPJ C31 (2003) 17 (H1 prelim.) H1 Prelim., HERA I+II obs. / exp. H1 94-00 data expt selection H1 analysis extended to include 03-05 data Extended to other 2l & 3l topologies : Now ee, , e, eee, e are considered • no new 2e / 3e evt at M12 > 100 GeV (but one high mass 3e event …) • one e evt at M > 100 GeV, one at Me > 100 GeV 2l + 3l E. Perez E. Perez Altogether, at PT > 100 GeV : Nobs = 4, Nexp = 0.81 0.14 17 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 W Production at HERA Main SM contribution for single W production at HERA : HERA I : excess (H1) of observed evts at high PTX w.r.t. SM expectation PTX H1, PLB 561 (2003) 241 (W prod) 1 pb e p l + jet + PT,miss H1 prelim 94-05, ep, 211 pb-1 H1 ep data, 118 pb-1 Combined e & PTX > 25 GeV 11 / 3.4 0.6 Such evts are still observed in HERA II H1 data… PTX > 25 GeV e channel channel Combined e & H1 94-05 211 pb-1 11 / 3.2 0.6 6 / 3.2 0.6 17 / 6.4 1.1 ZEUS 99-05 106 pb-1 1 / 1.5 0.18 But still do not show up in ZEUS data… • no new evt in H1 HERA II data • new ZEUS analysis : close to H1 cuts • ZEUS & H1 expectations agree… • no significant excess in H1 e-p data (53 pb-1) E. Perez 18 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 HERA events with isolated lepton + PT,miss H1 Preliminary, 211 pb-1 obs. / exp. PTX > 25 GeV e channel channel Combined e & Electrons, 98-05 53 pb-1 2 / 0.9 0.2 0 / 0.9 0.2 2 / 1.8 0.3 Positrons, 94-04 158 pb-1 9 / 2.3 0.4 6 / 2.3 0.4 15 / 4.6 0.8 A “leptoquark-like” interaction, e.g. RpV SUSY e+ d stop ? (was not supported by HERA-I data alone) Wait for more e- data… • Non SM W production in e ? Most likely smthg should have been seen at LEP… • New physics in q ? D0, hep-ex/0503048 But NP might not be W seen in W if q’ is a b, NP e.g. FCNC coupling to the top quark ? q q’ u q q’ E. Perez NP W t ET (GeV) W production at Tevatron agrees with SM… 19 _ b tu W+ SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 FCNC couplings to the top quark ? FCNC couplings tq, tqZ (tqg) where q = u,c can be searched for in single top prod. at LEP & HERA, in t qV decays in tt pairs at Tevatron. Possible explanation of “the H1 events” ? H1 @ HERA-I : 5 (3e + 2) of the “isolated lepton evts” appear top-like ! exp. = 1.31 0.22 H1, EPJ. C33 (2004) 9 ZEUS, PLB 559 (2003) 153. To explain the “H1 events” as FCNC top production : need ~ 0.4 pb (tu ~ 0.2 in the fig.) Not excluded by CDF & LEP. Not inconsistent with ZEUS HERA-I modulo little + (-) fluct. in H1 (ZEUS) tu ~ 0.2 would lead to (single top, FCNC) of ~ O(1 pb) at Tevatron NB : getting close to observe SM single top at Tevatron ! Future HERA & Tevatron sensitivities D0, hep-ex/0505063 E. Perez 20 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Other searches for NP in the top sector Pair-production of top at Tevatron Run II: ~ 7 pb _ • Searches for t t resonances • Tests of the (V-A) nature of the tbW vertex : t l b W from t decays are mainly longitudinal (f0 = 70%). Rest has =-1 (f-1 = 30%). Fit to cos(*) yields : f+1 < 0.25 @ 95% CL | R | < 1.05 Yields to (my interpretation) : if the tbW vertex is : t [ (1 + R) – (1 - R) 5 ] b W (more stringent bounds from b s but model dependent) • Constraints on R = (t b W) / (qW) • Flavor anomaly in dilepton tt ? By comparing the number of tt candidates with 0, 1 or 2 b-tags. Excess in e, not stat. significant (yet…) E. Perez 21 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Wbb production at Tevatron • Enhanced Wbb production ? may occur from - WH followed by H bb - technicolor resonances (T TW, T bb) 1 b-tagged jet, sample of ~ 100 events Search for a mass peak in M(jj) & M(Wjj) Sensitivity getting close to theo. predictions. • Run I CDF data : excess of W + 2,3 jets where both a secondary vertex and a soft lepton are found in one jet (“superjets”) Similar analysis carried out on Run II data, W e or D0, PRL 94 (2005) 152002 Dominant SM contributions from Wbb ( ~ 3 pb), tt & single top, mistags No excess observed in the “doubly-tagged” jet sample in Run II data. E. Perez 22 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Very rare processes : B decays Probe very rare processes : better have a huge lumi… e.g. B-factories. Tevatron also probes very rare decays, e.g. Bs,d Branchings as low as a few 10-8 can be observed. Known that b s (~ 3 X 10-4) is a sensitive probe to NP. Eg SUSY, top couplings, … Recent observation of b d (5) ! Belle, hep-ex/0506079 Large bckgd (continuum & b s) Look in exclusive modes B+ +, B0 0, B0 . Simultaneous fit assuming isospin relations BR(B / + ) = + 0.14 1 . 34 +- 0.34 31 - 0 10 0. X 10-6 . Consistent w/ CKM … Constraints on FCNC top coupling t-u- ? E. Perez 23 t Vtb tu • u * Vtd SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Lepton Flavor Violation • New results (BaBar) on and e : BR( ) < 6.8 x 10-8 BR( e ) < 1.1 x 10-7 (hep-ex/0502032) (prelim.) BR ~ 10-40 in SM but could be much enhanced beyond SM NB : 200 M of ee evts ! e.g. constrains a particle coupling both to (l) and to (l), l=e,, hl hl < 0.18 (MH/1 TeV)2 (my interpretation) Similar constraints from e and e (latter : BR < 1.2 x 10-11, MEGA Coll.) Example for a doubly-charged Higgs: • Searches for LFV B-decays : eg Bd e : BR(Bd e) < 1.7 10-7 Belle, PRD 68 (2003) 111101 _ 23 b Bounds on ed b / M2LQ LQ e.g. case of Pati-Salam LQs where = S(MLQ) : M > 46 TeV d 11 e Such exchanges are also probed in DIS : Several examples where DIS constraints are competitive with those from rare B decays ZEUS, hep-ex/0501070 E. Perez 24 ZEUS bounds on eq q / MLQ2 in units of TeV-2, for LQ types ed b eb s SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 Exotic experimental signatures Rich detector capabilities ! search for particles which behave in an exotic way : Charged quasi-stable particles : will look like anomalous . Large mass implies : • a fraction of them will have low =v/c D0 Run II Preliminary i.e. reach our muon detector “late” 390 pb-1 Use timing information from det. to reco e.g. allows to set a limit on stable charginos : M(, “stable”, gaugino-like) > 174 GeV MC signal CDF, hep-ex/0503004, 292 pb-1 0 HL HR 133 GeV 4 10 (1-)/ • Large energy loss by ionisation exploit the dEdx measurement e.g. with cuts for a doubly-charged Higgs, no candidate while ~ 40% m ~ 34 n2 >> e eg = nhc/4 Magnetic monopoles M : - exploit the large energy loss (CDF Prelim.) H1, DESY 04-240 - Eloss could be so large that M may stop in the beam-pipe ! EPJC xxx (2005) E. Perez Upper bounds on pp & ep (MM) as a function of M massSUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05 25 Conclusions The search for new physics is a very active field. Tevatron & HERA are working very well, the experiments might “see” something in the near future ! Constraints set on many models, often the most stringent up to date. e.g. Z’ and W’ above ~ 750 GeV Leptoquarks > ~ 250 GeV (Tevatron) > ~ 290 GeV (HERA, coupling of EM strength) Randall-Sundrum gravitons > 780 GeV (coupling 0.1) Complementarity between the experiments. “Puzzling” events observed at HERA by H1. Clarification (or discovery ?) should come soon with the increasing HERA-II luminosity. E. Perez 26 SUSY’ 05, 23 / 07 / 05