* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download ZimanyiSchool2008novlong
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Grand Unified Theory wikipedia , lookup
Light-front quantization applications wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Search for the Higgs boson wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup
Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup
Peter Kalmus wikipedia , lookup
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Atomic nucleus wikipedia , lookup
Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup
Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Large Hadron Collider wikipedia , lookup
ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup
ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup
HIGH challenges in LOW energy HADRON physics G. Vesztergombi Zimanyi School Budapest, 25 November 2008 OUTLINE AA -Landscape -STAR plans pp,pA -Static quarks -High pT below 20 GeV -NA61 -CBM -QGP in pp -Barion versus parton propagation AA pp,pA Science 21 November 2008: Vol. 322. no. 5905, pp. 1224 – 1227 Ab Initio Determination of Light Hadron Masses S. Dürr,1 Z. Fodor,1,2,3 J. Frison,4 C. Hoelbling,2,3,4 R. Hoffmann,2 S. D. Katz,2,3 S. Krieg,2 T. Kurth,2 L. Lellouch,4 T. Lippert,2,5 K. K. Szabo,2 G. Vulvert4 More than 99% of the mass of the visible universe is made up of protons and neutrons. Both particles are much heavier than their quark and gluon constituents, and the Standard Model of particle physics should explain this difference. We present a full ab initio calculation of the masses of protons, neutrons, and other light hadrons, using lattice quantum chromodynamics. Pion masses down to 190 mega–electron volts are used to extrapolate to the physical point, with lattice sizes of approximately four times the inverse pion mass. Three lattice spacings are used for a continuum extrapolation. Our results completely agree with experimental observations and represent a quantitative confirmation of this aspect of the Standard Model with fully controlled uncertainties. Latest in LATTICE QCD PENTA ? All baryonic states listed in PDG can be made of 3 quarks only * classified as octets, decuplets and singlets of flavour SU(3) * Strangeness range from S=0 to S=-3 A baryonic state with S=+1 is explicitely EXOTIC • Cannot be made of 3 quarks •Minimal quark content should be qqqqs , hence pentaquark •Must belong to higher SU(3) multiplets, e.g anti-decuplet observation of a S=+1 baryon implies a new large multiplet of baryons (pentaquark is always ocompanied by its large family!) important Searches for such states started in 1966, with negative results till autumn 2002 [16 years after 1986 report of PDG !] Searches were for heavy and wide states Motivation for new measurements below s = 20 GeV Practically no high or medium Pt data between Einc = 24 and 200 GeV Mysterious transition around 80-90 GeV: convex versus concave spectra Energy threshold for Jet-quenching? Emergence of Cronin-effect in pA interactions is completely unknown energy dependence centrality dependence particle type dependence particle correlations Production of Upsilon (9.5 GeV) particles near the threshold. Beier (1978) NA49 (CERN) results at 158 FODS (IHEP) at 70 GeV RA+A/p+A CRONIN-effect removed by p+A baseline NEW !!! Pb+Pb, 0-12.7% most central p+Pb reference preliminary WA98 and NA49 data presented in QM'06 by Gianluca USAI's plenary talk NA61 Study of Hadron Production in Hadron-Nucleus and Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions at the CERN SPS SPOKESPERSON: Marek GAZDZICKI SPOKESPERSON: Gyoergy VESZTERGOMBI GLIMOS: Beam: Approved: Status: Zoltan FODOR (Technical coordinator) 21-FEB-07 Preparation CERN Greybook 2008 Benchmark NA49 pp at E = 158 GeV Events Energy 2 106 158 > 3 GeV/c 100 30 events/spill > 4 GeV/c 1 > 5 GeV/c 0.01 Estimates with the assumption 1011 proton/sec 109 interaction/sec 1 day=1014 158 5 109 5 107 5 105 CBM Perspectives 10-1 10-2 90 5 108 5 105 20 day=2 1015 90 1010 107 104 10-3 10-6 10-10 107 10 Suppression 1 day=1014 Suppression 20 day=2 1015 45 10-3 500 0 For symmetric nuclei max energy 90/2 assumed Special requirements for Y-> e+e- and high pT Extremely high intensity - Pile-up Segmented multi-target - Relaxed vertex precision Straight tracks - High momentum tracks DREAM: 109 interactions/sec QGP in pp? Átlag pT (Van Hove) Részecskeszám (Van Hove) Multiplicity Single FIRE-BALL = QGP? A (AB)* B Double FIRE-BALL = Factorization? B* A B A* BARION propagation through the NUCLEUS A N** N* A* N A** Npart = 3+1 HADRON PROPAGATION Ncoll = 3 Npart/2 = (13+12)/2 =12.5 Ncoll = (36+28)/2 = 32 HADRON PROPAGATION (Some diffractive binary collisions included) PHENIX Ncoll Au-Au =1 Npart Au-Au= 1 200 GeV Npart d-Au =Ncoll d-Au Earlier Cronin-effect at higher energies: 2 -> 1 GeV/c Pizero smaller Cronin-effect.