* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download TITLE: The Integrating Assessment Modeling Community: overview
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Open energy system models wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Criticism of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Numerical weather prediction wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Atmospheric model wikipedia , lookup
TITLE: The Integrating Assessment Modeling Community: overview, structuring and interactions with the IPCC expertise The intellectual debates expressed by the Club of Rome about the “Limits to Growth” (Meadows, 1972) and the oil crisis in the 70s have given rise to energy-environment-economy (E3) models to explore the feasibility of long-term development pathways. The rise of climate change on the public agenda since the late 80s has prompted the need for quantitative assessment of mitigation strategies, in particular in view of the IPCC reports. E3 models gather different types of models, in particular IAMs (Integrated Assessment models). IAMs are simplified, stylized, numerical approaches to represent complex physical and social systems, and the most relevant interactions among the systems (e.g., energy, agriculture, the economic system). From a set of input assumptions they produce outputs in the form of quantified scenarios: energy system transitions, land use transitions, economic effects of mitigation, emissions trajectories. These scenarios are central to the work of the IPCC “Working Group III” on mitigation of climate change, and play an increasingly important part in the negotiation and elaboration of climate policies. In this paper, we investigate the conditions of the production of such scenarios and the diversity of the models behind them. These models have been developped by an heterogeneous, interdisciplinary community of research. This paper analyses the development and the evolution of this community since the early 90s and provides an overview of the main models and research teams. The climate debate fostered the rise of a new generation of models in the vein of the first global and technico-economic models developed in the 60s and 80s. A main divide in the 90s was between macro-economic models (top-down) and more engineer styles models (bottom up). Bottom-up models give the priority to a detailed description of technologies and sectoral systems, while top-down models represent macro-economic consistency but encapsulate a limited description of technologies. The gap has narrowed and an increasing number of hybrid models now combine comprehensive top-down representations of macro-economic processes with a technologically explicit bottom-up representation of energy systems. We explain this narrowing gap as a result of the structuring of the IAM community. How did these models emerge as unified – though diverse – category? How and where did the IAM community organise as such, and what is it made of? This paper stresses the role of intercomparison modeling exercises under the framework of key institutions (for instance the Energy Modeling Forum coordinated by Stanford University, European Framework projects…). It traces the development of an epistemic community which participates, through the production of socio-eoconomic scenarios, to the framing of the assessment of climate policies in group III of the IPCC. This history of the development of IAM relies on a mapping of existing models and modeling team, on interviews, as well as on an analysis of the content of the research programs conducted in these forums, the material produced (reports, articles, IPCC assessment reports in particular AR4 and 5…).