* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download CMS
Super-Kamiokande wikipedia , lookup
Strangeness production wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup
Light-front quantization applications wikipedia , lookup
Atomic nucleus wikipedia , lookup
Supersymmetry wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Grand Unified Theory wikipedia , lookup
Higgs boson wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Peter Kalmus wikipedia , lookup
Powder diffraction wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Higgs mechanism wikipedia , lookup
Search for the Higgs boson wikipedia , lookup
ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup
Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup
ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup
Forward PAG One of the 10 PAGs of CMS We are a genuine cross-borders PAG: Physics subjects range from QCD and EWK to Higgs and Exotica We are a across-political-boundaries PAG: (Attempt at) collaboration with TOTEM experiment FP420 R&D joint R&D project of ATLAS, CMS, LHC In CMS, becoming a PAG has brought us into the mainstream: We have already two PAS to our name: “Exclusive dilepton and Upsilon photoproduction” PAS DIF-07-001 “Single diffractive W production” PAS DIF-07-002 We contribute to the iCSA08 exercise (Dimuon spectrum) We have a (unfortunately not very up-to-date) TWIKI page: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/DiffractionAndFwdPhysics We have a hypernews forum https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/diffraction.html We meet every other week on Friday afternoon And we btw get more requests for conference talks than we can possibly fill Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 1 Forward physics Experimental definition: All processes for which particles produced At small angles and hence large Pseudorapidities provide a defining feature = 90o =0 = 10o 2.4 = 170o -2.4 = 1o 5.0 edge of coverage of central CMS/ATLAS detectors Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 2 Forward detectors CMS Hadronic Forward (HF) Hadronic Forward (HF) (3.0 < || < 5.0) (3.0 < || < 5.0) T2 Services routing: From Castor to Racks CASTOR (|| > 8.1) Patch Panels TOTEM T2 (5.2 < || < 6.6) TOTEM T2 (5.2 < || < 6.6) (|| > 8.1) Not present in start-up TOTEM T1 TOTEM T1 TOTEM: Total Cross Section, Elastic Scattering and Diffraction Dissociation at the LHC 3 Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 Forward detectors around CMS IP CMS has unprecedented calorimetric coverage, down to 6.5 for charged Particles and even more for neutral ones ATLAS cannot do this ! With FP420/Totem, CMS would also have unprecedented coverage for Detecting leading protons with momentum loss xi between 20% and 0.2% At nominal LHC optics, *=0.5m Points are ZEUS data TOTEM diffr peak FP420 xL=P’/Pbeam= 1-x Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 5 Physics with forward calorimeters and tracking detectors Proton PDF at very low x, parton evolution, saturation Particle and energy flow measurements Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 6 Saturation (Colour glass condensate) 1/x Non perturbative region Structure function F2 Low-x QCD - Saturation P momentum fraction carried by parton Qs2(x) pQCD Q2 [GeV2] • Steep rise in the gluon density at small x observed at HERA • Growth cannot continue indefinitely, would eventually violate unitarity • Growth tamed by gluon fusion: saturation of parton densities • So far not observed in pp interactions Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 7 Proton-proton collisions at low x Parton evolution The proton is a dynamic object ! Exact nature of dynamics not fully Understood: DGLAP, BFKL, saturation CMS CASTOR p rapidity p • • Partons from each proton “decelerate” and meet to produce the hard scattering subsystem (ME) Low x ↔ long parton showers → at LHC (for Q ≳ 10 GeV and η = 6): xBjorken ≳ 10-6 → xBjorken decreases by factor ~ 10 for each 2 units in rapidity Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 8 Proton pdf at low-x from Drell-Yan Forward lepton pairs Kinematic coverage of CMS Castor calorimeter reaches down to <10-6 x1 >> x2 qq → γ* → e+e− PYTHIA DY PYTHIA DY, η3 or η4 CASTOR PYTHIA DY, η3 and η4 ∈ CASTOR EHKQS: “saturated” pdf with nonlinear terms in gluon evolution CASTOR acceptance window 5.2 < ηe+,ηe− < 6.6 CTEQ5L Cross section reduced by factor 2! EHKQS First time observation of saturation in pp possible ! Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 9 Forward jets from QCD evolution x2 ≃ x1 → X can be (di-)jets in central CMS detector In BFKL-like QCD-evolution forward jets can have large pT Also possible: jet-gap-jet events Mueller-Navelet jets PYTHIA jets (MSEL=1) central dijet with pT > 60 GeV, |η| < 3 BFKL: large yield of high E forward jets ARIADNE (CDM) jets PYTHIA (DGLAP) “Jet energy” in CASTOR Sensitivity to BFKL dynamics Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 10 Measuring fwd particle and energy flow: Validation of hadronic shower models in cosmic ray physics → Models for showers caused by primary cosmic rays (PeV = 1015 eV range) differ substantially → Fixed target collision in air with 100 PeV center-of-mass E corresponds to pp interaction at LHC → Hence can tune shower models by comparing to measurements with T1/T2, CASTOR, ZDC Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 11 Physics with !(forward detectors) Hard diffraction Photon-photon physics Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 12 Forward physics: Escaping protons Elastic scattering Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 13 Diffraction in optics – Diffraction in hadron scattering p p p p o) Forward peak for =0 (diffraction peak) o) Diffraction pattern related to size of target and wavelength of beam Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 | t | ( p )2 14 Forward physics: Escaping protons Hard diffraction Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 15 Mind the gap: Selecting Gaps in the diffractive hadronic finalevent state Generated particles – energy weighted No color flow between proton and X Traditionally called “Pomeron exchange” X Diffractive sample generated with gap in –plus side 16 Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 dPDF Diffraction with a hard scale: W prod pp → p W X, W sensitive to quark component of dPDFs Rap gap based selection, i.e. no pile-up Require absence of activity in the forward calorimeters (HF 3< || < 5, Castor 5.2 < || < 6.6 ) of CMS For rap gap survival factor of S2 = 5%, arrive at O(100) evts/100pb-1 in the [n(Castor), n (HF)] = [0,0] bin S/B 20 with Castor veto Signal enhancement by ~30% due to diffractive dissociation 2 S … dPDF 100pb-1 Other hard diffraction processes possible: Dijets, heavy quarks Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 PAS DIF-07-002 17 physics: Exclusive dilepton production Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 18 physics: Exclusive dilepton production Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 19 physics: Exclusive dilepton production Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 20 physics: Exclusive dilepton production Nearly pure QED process → Absolute luminosity determination with precision of 4% is feasible → Selection via exclusivity condition in central detector + veto on CASTOR & ZDC activity → Calibration/alignment of proton taggers → rejection of 2/3 of p dissociative background with CMS fwd calorimeters pp → pp l+l− PAS DIF-07-001 ~700 events in 100 pb-1 with dominant background from p dissociative events (~200) ATLAS cannot do this ! Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 21 Vectormeson photoproduction ATLAS cannot do this ! pp pp, → PAS DIF-07-001 Possibility to measure pT2 slope: Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 22 Physics with near-beam proton taggers Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 23 Suppose you want to detect a light SM Higgs (say MH=120 GeV) at the LHC... shields color charge of other two gluons Vacuum quantum numbers “Double Pomeron exchange” SM Higgs with ~120 GeV: gg H, H b bbar highest BR But signal swamped by gg jet jet Best bet with CMS: H , where in 30 fb-1 S/√B 4.4 Central exclusive production pp pXp Suppression of gg jet jet because of selection rules forcing central system to be (to good approx) JPC = 0++ Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 24 Central exclusive Higgs production & FP420 shields color charge of other two gluons pp pHp with H (120GeV) -> bb In non-diffractive production hopeless, signal swamped with QCD dijet background Selection rule in CEP (central system is JPC = 0++ to good approx) improves S/B for SM Higgs dramatically In particular beneficial for SUSY Higgs: Production cross section considerably higher than for SM Vacuum quantum numbers “Double Pomeron exchange” dipole beam p’ detector May allow discovery of heavy SUSY Higgs bosons in LHC wedge region CP quantum numbers & CP violation in Higgs sector directly measurable from azimuthal asymmetry of protons dipole p’ detector Proton spectrometer using the LHC beam magnets: Detect diffractively scattered protons inside of beam pipe Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 FP420 is an R&D project that proved the feasibility of putting proton detectors at 420m from the IP Decision whether FP420 will be built in CMS expected by this summer 25 Proton taggers @ 220m and 420m from IP Beampipe s TOTEM uses Roman pot technique to approach the beam with their Si detectors FP420, because of location in cryogenic region of LHC, uses movable beampipe Extremly rad hard novel Si technology: 3-d Silicon Cherenkov timing detectors with t ~ 10 ps to filter out events with protons from pile-up Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 26 Discovery potential of CEP of Higgs H b, W, b, W, CEP may be the discovery channel for MSSM Higgs: Heavy Higgs states decouple from gauge bosons, hence preferred search channels at LHC not available But large enhancement of couplings to bb, at high tan Detailed mapping of discovery potential for pp→p + H,h + p CEP Higgs may also open door to discovery of an NMSSM Higgs in channel h aa 4 which would be unique at the LHC Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 27 Summa Summarum Monika Grothe, Woekshop on high energy photon processes, CERN, April 2008 28 Topics in the fwd PAG cover QCD – EWK – Higgs – Exotica Technically, our analyses replicate in part what other groups do (e.g. W selection from EWK, jets from QCD, etc) We look at corners of the phase space that the mainstream usually doesn’t look at: for example low pT end of the DY spectrum, quiet detector, etc Most of our topics are prime start-up topics For example J. Hollar is now leading the iCSA08 dimuon analysis In the next years the only area in CMS where additional detector construction may happen (FP420) Finally, already before FP420 upgrade, CMS has a fwd physics program that ATLAS cannot match Monika Grothe, Woekshop on high energy photon processes, CERN, April 2008 29 Extra Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 30 Cross sections and production rates Rates for L = 1034 cm-2 s-1: (LHC) • Inelastic pp reactions: • bb pairs • tt pairs 109 / s 5 106 / s 8 /s • W e n150 / s • Z ee 15 / s • Higgs (150 GeV) • Gluino, Squarks (1 TeV) • Diffraction • Elastic scattering 0.2 / s 0.03 / s 2.5 108 / s 2.2 108 / s ~50% of the total cross section ! Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 31 A new way to probe the proton Double Pomeron exchange (DPE): Single diffraction (SD): X Near-beam detectors central CMS apparatus IP IP rap gap IP Near-beam detectors X central CMS apparatus Near-beam detectors In diffractive events look at the proton constituents through a lens that filters out all parton combinations except those with the vacuum quantum numbers If X = anything: Measure fundamental quantities of soft QC IP p p If X includes jets, W’s, Z’s, Higgs (!): p p Hard processes, calculable in perturbative QCD. 2-gluon exchange: Measure proton structure, QCD at high parton densities, discoveryofphysics LO realisation vacuum quantum numbers in QCD Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 32 Forward physics at nominal LHC optics The CMS+TOTEM (+FP420) joint program: Carry out a program of diffractive and forward physics as integral part of the routine data taking at CMS, i.e. at nominal beam optics and up to the highest available luminosities. This program spans the full lifetime of the LHC. CERN/LHC 2006-039/G-124 Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 33 Photon-mediated processes: Exclusive μμ production x(di-muons) - x(true) known rms ~ 10-4 Calibration process both for luminosity and energy scales of near-beam detectors Striking signature: acoplanarity angle between leptons Allows reco of proton x values with resolution of 10-4, i.e. smaller than beam dispersion Expect ~300 events/100 pb-1 after CMS muon trigger Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 34 Low-x QCD: Forward Drell-Yan Sensitivity to saturation: saturated PDF Gives access to low-xBJ quarks in proton in case of large imbalance of fractional momenta x1,2 of leptons, which are then boosted to large rapidities CASTOR with 5.3 ≤ || ≤ 6.6 gives access to xBJ~10-7 Measure angle of electrons with T2 Pdf’s known at large xBJ, hence can extract pdf’s at low xBJ DY pairs suppressed in saturated PDF Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 35 Summary and Outlook (II) Still an opportunity for an original contribution to the LHC detectors ! possible upgrade RP220 with Si detectors possible addition SLHC Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 36 Side remark: Rapidity gap survival probability • Proton and anti-proton are large objects, unlike pointlike virtual photon • In addition to hard diffractive scattering, there may be soft interactions among spectator partons. Fill rapidity gap & slow down outgoing protons Hence reduce the rate of diffractive events. • Quantified by rapidity gap survival probability. •Diffractive PDFs: probability to find a parton of given x under condition that proton stays intact – sensitive to low-x partons in proton F2D hard scattering without and with rescattering effects jet jet dPDF CDF data Closely related the IPtodPDF underlying event at the LHC Predictions based on HERA diffractive PDFs Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 37 Inclusive SM Higgs production with H->WW* Two most important production channels Higgs boson likes mass Decays preferably into the heaviest particle kinematically possible Discovery potential already with ~1fb-1 for M(H) ~ 2M(W) Vector-Boson Fusion VBF channel could profit from CASTOR calorimeter Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 38 VBF SM Higgs production with H->WW* May profit from CASTOR which extends detector coverage to angles smaller than 1o Higgs Decay Tag jets Contributes significant discovery potential In addition, may provide evidence for spin-0 Higgs, leptons prefer small 1o 10o Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 90o 170o 179o (non-linear scale) 39 Benefits from Castor calorimeter for Higgs Extends CMS calorimetric coverage in the very fwd direction, to below 1o wrt beam axis Benefits for Higgs searches: Provides handle on effect of underlying events/multiple parton-parton interactions Use in Vector Boson Fusion channels for detecting forward tag jets W Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 40 CMS + TOTEM (+ FP420) CMS IP T1/T2, Castor ZDC RPs@150m RPs@220m possibly detectors@420m TOTEM: An approved experiment at LHC for measuring tot & elastic, at same IP as CMS TOTEM aims at start-up on the same timescale as CMS Expression of wish of CMS + TOTEM to carry out a joint physics program, with joint CMS+TOTEM data taking given to LHCC: “Prospects for diffraction and forward physics at the LHC” CERN LHCC 2006-039 G124, CMS note 2007-02, TOTEM note 06-5 Possible addition FP420: Proposal to install high precision silicon tracking and fast timing detectors close to the beams at 420m from the CMS IP Proposal currently under scrutiny in CMS If approved, could be installed in 2010 after LHC start-up Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 41 Forward instrumentation around CMS IP CMS central detector Hadronic Forward (HF) CASTOR IP 5 T1 Zero Degree Calorimeter (ZDC) T2 RP 147 RP 220 FP 420 IP 5 CMS: blue Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 TOTEM: green 42 The CMS CASTOR calorimeter • • • • • • • extends the coverage to 5.2 < η < 6.6 enhances the hermiticity of CMS! 14.37 m from the interaction point octogonal cylinder with inner radius 3.7cm, outer radius 14cm and total depth 10.5 λI signal collection through Čerenkov photons transmitted to PMTs through aircore lightguides W absorber & quartz plates sandwich, with 45° inclination with respect to the beam axis electromagnetic and hadronic sections 16 seg. in φ, 14 seg in z no segmentation in η Currently funding available only for CASTOR on one side of IP If LHC allows, installation of 1/2 CASTOR on one side of IP 07/2008 Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 43 The CMS Zero Degree Calorimeter • • • • • 140 m from interaction point in TAN absorber Thungsten/quartz Čerenkov calorimeter with separate e.m. (19 X0) and had.(5.6 λI) sections em: 5-fold horizontal seg had: 4-fold seg in z Acceptance for neutrals (γ, π0, n) from η > 8.1 (100% for η > 8.4) Ready for 2008 run Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 44 TOTEM T1 & T2 tracking detectors 3m Test Beam Cathode Strip Chambers (CSC) Mounted in front of HadronForward calorimeter of CMS 3.1 < | < 4.7 5 planes with 3 coordinates/plane 6 trapezoidal CSC detectors/plane Resolution ~ 0.8mm Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) Mounted in front of CASTOR 5.3 < | < 6.5 10 planes formed by 20 GEM semi-circular modules Radial position from strips, , from pads Resolution strip~70m Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 45 Multiplicity and ETitel flow measurements Can differentiate between certain MC tunes to describe underlying event with CASTOR/T2 Can differentiate between MC models for cosmic rays with CASTOR/T2/ZDC Monika Grothe, UW meeting May 29 2008 46