* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Beyond Libor: The Evolution of `Risk-Free` Benchmarks
Survey
Document related concepts
Securitization wikipedia , lookup
Systemic risk wikipedia , lookup
Trading room wikipedia , lookup
International investment agreement wikipedia , lookup
Financial literacy wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate wikipedia , lookup
Syndicated loan wikipedia , lookup
Stock trader wikipedia , lookup
Financial economics wikipedia , lookup
Land banking wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate ceiling wikipedia , lookup
Public finance wikipedia , lookup
Global financial system wikipedia , lookup
Investment fund wikipedia , lookup
Shadow banking system wikipedia , lookup
Financial crisis wikipedia , lookup
Financialization wikipedia , lookup
Investment banking wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
VIEWPOINT November 2016 AUTHORS William G. De Leon Managing Director Global Head of Portfolio Risk Management Beyond Libor: The Evolution of ‘Risk-Free’ Benchmarks Changes may be on the horizon for short-term transactions traditionally pegged to the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor). The Libor-fixing scandal that emerged during the financial crisis revealed some limitations in Libor’s use as a benchmark, including the possibility of manipulation and a declining transaction volume from which to draw reporting data. And recent regulatory efforts – predominantly money market reform – have lent some urgency to the push for the impartial evaluation and selection of an alternative “risk-free” reference rate. Current monetary policy has dramatically changed the way investors and central banks think about how money is exchanged. And given the sheer numbers of investments and contracts keyed off Libor (floating rate notes, bank loans, personal loans, swaps, etc.), the how of transitioning to a new or revised benchmark rate will be as critical as defining what the new benchmark should be. EVOLVING BENCHMARKS Jerome M. Schneider Managing Director Head of Short-Term Portfolio Management Historically, short-term markets and related instruments have relied on a set of benchmarks that emerged from the evolution of the markets themselves. For example, the federal funds rate became the benchmark for the Federal Reserve’s target rate and remained so for several decades. More recently, it was effectively replaced by the corridor rate structure of interest on excess reserves (IOER) and the Fed’s fixed-rate reverse repo program (FRRP). Libor is undergoing a similar evolution. Originally established in the mid-1980s as a proxy benchmark for average AA rated interbank funding levels, the authenticity of the underlying data has since come into question. And banks’ declining appetite for wholesale unsecured short-term funding – resulting variously from the fixing scandals, trading liabilities, reductions in repos and a rise in commercial paper issuance – has only underscored these limitations. Without sustainable trading volumes and liquidity, price discovery in unsecured short-term markets would remain uncertain and opaque. This, in turn, hurts the credibility and reliability of the benchmarks, specifically Libor, that rely on them. 2 November 2016 Viewpoint FINDING ALTERNATIVES The Fed’s specific objective for the ARRC is to consider potential “risk-free” (or nearly risk-free) alternative rate indexes that would replace Libor and offer greater breadth of observable trade activity. More specifically, this group must consider: Over the past few years, regulators and market participants have made several recommendations for ensuring that benchmarks reflect banks’ funding conditions more accurately. The UK’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) led the first substantive effort in 2012 with its “Wheatley Review,” which sought to outline specific criteria for participating banks to submit their daily Libor levels. But this was only an initial step. In the U.S., the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB) suggested further reviews of shortterm benchmark rates to ensure their authenticity and prompted the Federal Reserve to convene the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) in November 2014. The ARRC consists of representatives from major banks participating in the over-thecounter (OTC) derivatives market, their respective regulatory supervisors, and representatives from major central banks. • The migration from a (financial) credit-linked benchmark to one that is risk-free and representative of observable interdealer/ interbank market activity • Developing an alternative to the overnight indexed swap (OIS) rate referenced by derivatives contracts and central clearing parties (CCPs) Since the initial meetings in 2014, the ARRC has narrowed its list to two potential alternatives: The overnight bank funding rate (OBFR) The OBFR is a volume-weighted median average rate of both overnight fed funds and eurodollar transactions, which average $70 billion and $240 billion per day, respectively, and encompass data submitted from financial institutions beyond the scope of the Libor-submitting banks. Additionally, the OBFR would provide greater diversity of reported results. The ARRC reports that a single governmentsponsored enterprise (most likely the Federal Home Loan Bank Board) is the lender behind over 90% of overnight fed fund transactions, and half the proceeds go toward funding the Fed IOER arbitrage trades by many “Yankee bank” financial institutions. With the forthcoming higher regulatory capital requirements for foreign banks, the Fed arbitrage trade will be less profitable, and the transaction volume in the fed funds market can fall dramatically in times of stress. We believe the OBFR should prove more resilient and stable than Libor given its wider set of potential observations. The overnight Treasury general collateral repurchase agreement (GC repo) rate An index based on the GC repo rate is also viable. Although the ARRC has identified the overnight repo market as a source for a potential alternative index, it has not yet identified a specific rate to target. While there are currently several private alternatives based on the tri-party GC and general collateral financing (GCF) markets, the ARRC has expressed some preference for a rate produced by the public sector. November 2016 Viewpoint WHAT’S NEXT FOR INVESTORS? Global investors’ proactive consideration of ongoing structural changes in markets has become critical for successfully navigating the current investment paradigm. Whether it’s adapting to money market reform, stimulative monetary policy or increased bank capital and liquidity requirements under Basel, market participants must balance the search for returns with stability while navigating the shifting tectonic plates of the investment landscape. We view regulators’ continued push for a more resilient shortterm benchmark based on robust and observable contributing data as a necessary step in this evolution of modern global financial markets – and while not a quick fix, we believe it will eventually result in a stronger and more resilient financial system that benefits issuers and investors alike. “The financial, legal and operational considerations during the transition from Libor will likely be considerable.” While the formal results of the ARRC’s effort and the eventual implementation of its benchmark recommendations are still a few years away, it is never too early for investors to begin considering how the changes will affect them. We believe the key will be planning for the transition: The financial, legal and operational considerations during the transition from Libor will likely be considerable, and investors will need to understand the composition of the new benchmark to protect their interests during the process. 3 48376 Newport Beach Headquarters 650 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 +1 949.720.6000 Amsterdam Hong Kong London Milan Munich New York Rio de Janeiro Singapore Sydney Tokyo Toronto Zurich pimco.com blog.pimco.com CMR2016-1115-225714 All investments contain risk and may lose value. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision. This material contains the opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. PIMCO provides services only to qualified institutions and investors. This is not an offer to any person in any jurisdiction where unlawful or unauthorized. | Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, 650 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 is regulated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. PIMCO Investments LLC, U.S. distributor, 1633 Broadway, New York, NY, 10019 is a company of PIMCO. | PIMCO Europe Ltd (Company No. 2604517), PIMCO Europe, Ltd Amsterdam Branch (Company No. 24319743), and PIMCO Europe Ltd - Italy (Company No. 07533910969) are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS) in the U.K. The Amsterdam and Italy branches are additionally regulated by the AFM and CONSOB in accordance with Article 27 of the Italian Consolidated Financial Act, respectively. PIMCO Europe Ltd services and products are available only to professional clients as defined in the Financial Conduct Authority’s Handbook and are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. | PIMCO Deutschland GmbH (Company No. 192083, Seidlstr. 24-24a, 80335 Munich, Germany) is authorised and regulated by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) (Marie-Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt am Main) in Germany in accordance with Section 32 of the German Banking Act (KWG). The services and products provided by PIMCO Deutschland GmbH are available only to professional clients as defined in Section 31a para. 2 German Securities Trading Act (WpHG). They are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. | PIMCO (Schweiz) GmbH (registered in Switzerland, Company No. CH-020.4.038.582-2), Brandschenkestrasse 41, 8002 Zurich, Switzerland, Tel: + 41 44 512 49 10. The services and products provided by PIMCO (Schweiz) GmbH are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication but contact their financial adviser. | PIMCO Asia Pte Ltd (501 Orchard Road #09-03, Wheelock Place, Singapore 238880, Registration No. 199804652K) is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as a holder of a capital markets services licence and an exempt financial adviser. The asset management services and investment products are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is unauthorised. | PIMCO Asia Limited (Suite 2201, 22nd Floor, Two International Finance Centre, No. 8 Finance Street, Central, Hong Kong) is licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission for Types 1, 4 and 9 regulated activities under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. The asset management services and investment products are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is unauthorised. | PIMCO Australia Pty Ltd ABN 54 084 280 508, AFSL 246862 (PIMCO Australia) offers products and services to both wholesale and retail clients as defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (limited to general financial product advice in the case of retail clients). This communication is provided for general information only without taking into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investors. | PIMCO Japan Ltd (Toranomon Towers Office 18F, 4-1-28, Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan 105-0001) Financial Instruments Business Registration Number is Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No. 382. PIMCO Japan Ltd is a member of Japan Investment Advisers Association and The Investment Trusts Association, Japan. Investment management products and services offered by PIMCO Japan Ltd are offered only to persons within its respective jurisdiction, and are not available to persons where provision of such products or services is unauthorized. Valuations of assets will fluctuate based upon prices of securities and values of derivative transactions in the portfolio, market conditions, interest rates and credit risk, among others. Investments in foreign currency denominated assets will be affected by foreign exchange rates. There is no guarantee that the principal amount of the investment will be preserved, or that a certain return will be realized; the investment could suffer a loss. All profits and losses incur to the investor. The amounts, maximum amounts and calculation methodologies of each type of fee and expense and their total amounts will vary depending on the investment strategy, the status of investment performance, period of management and outstanding balance of assets and thus such fees and expenses cannot be set forth herein.| PIMCO Canada Corp. (199 Bay Street, Suite 2050, Commerce Court Station, P.O. Box 363, Toronto, ON, M5L 1G2) services and products may only be available in certain provinces or territories of Canada and only through dealers authorized for that purpose. | PIMCO Latin America Edifício Internacional Rio Praia do Flamengo, 154 1o andar, Rio de Janeiro – RJ Brasil 22210-906. | No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO is a trademark of Allianz Asset Management of America L.P. in the United States and throughout the world. ©2016, PIMCO.