Download Beyond Libor: The Evolution of `Risk-Free` Benchmarks

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Securitization wikipedia , lookup

Systemic risk wikipedia , lookup

Trading room wikipedia , lookup

International investment agreement wikipedia , lookup

Financial literacy wikipedia , lookup

Interest rate wikipedia , lookup

Syndicated loan wikipedia , lookup

Stock trader wikipedia , lookup

Financial economics wikipedia , lookup

Land banking wikipedia , lookup

Interest rate ceiling wikipedia , lookup

Public finance wikipedia , lookup

Global financial system wikipedia , lookup

Investment fund wikipedia , lookup

Shadow banking system wikipedia , lookup

Financial crisis wikipedia , lookup

Financialization wikipedia , lookup

Investment banking wikipedia , lookup

Libor wikipedia , lookup

Investment management wikipedia , lookup

Interbank lending market wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
VIEWPOINT
November 2016
AUTHORS
William G. De Leon
Managing Director
Global Head of Portfolio
Risk Management
Beyond Libor: The Evolution
of ‘Risk-Free’ Benchmarks
Changes may be on the horizon for short-term
transactions traditionally pegged to the London
Interbank Offered Rate (Libor).
The Libor-fixing scandal that emerged during the financial crisis revealed some limitations
in Libor’s use as a benchmark, including the possibility of manipulation and a declining
transaction volume from which to draw reporting data. And recent regulatory efforts
– predominantly money market reform – have lent some urgency to the push for the
impartial evaluation and selection of an alternative “risk-free” reference rate.
Current monetary policy has dramatically changed the way investors and central banks
think about how money is exchanged. And given the sheer numbers of investments and
contracts keyed off Libor (floating rate notes, bank loans, personal loans, swaps, etc.), the
how of transitioning to a new or revised benchmark rate will be as critical as defining what
the new benchmark should be.
EVOLVING BENCHMARKS
Jerome M. Schneider
Managing Director
Head of Short-Term
Portfolio Management
Historically, short-term markets and related instruments have relied on a set of
benchmarks that emerged from the evolution of the markets themselves. For example, the
federal funds rate became the benchmark for the Federal Reserve’s target rate and
remained so for several decades. More recently, it was effectively replaced by the corridor
rate structure of interest on excess reserves (IOER) and the Fed’s fixed-rate reverse repo
program (FRRP).
Libor is undergoing a similar evolution. Originally established in the mid-1980s as a proxy
benchmark for average AA rated interbank funding levels, the authenticity of the underlying
data has since come into question. And banks’ declining appetite for wholesale unsecured
short-term funding – resulting variously from the fixing scandals, trading liabilities,
reductions in repos and a rise in commercial paper issuance – has only underscored these
limitations. Without sustainable trading volumes and liquidity, price discovery in unsecured
short-term markets would remain uncertain and opaque. This, in turn, hurts the credibility
and reliability of the benchmarks, specifically Libor, that rely on them.
2
November 2016 Viewpoint
FINDING ALTERNATIVES
The Fed’s specific objective for the
ARRC is to consider potential
“risk-free” (or nearly risk-free)
alternative rate indexes that would
replace Libor and offer greater
breadth of observable trade
activity. More specifically, this
group must consider:
Over the past few years, regulators
and market participants have made
several recommendations for
ensuring that benchmarks reflect
banks’ funding conditions more
accurately. The UK’s Financial
Services Authority (FSA) led the
first substantive effort in 2012 with
its “Wheatley Review,” which
sought to outline specific criteria
for participating banks to submit
their daily Libor levels.
But this was only an initial step. In
the U.S., the Financial Stability
Oversight Council (FSOC) and the
Financial Stability Board (FSB)
suggested further reviews of shortterm benchmark rates to ensure
their authenticity and prompted
the Federal Reserve to convene the
Alternative Reference Rates
Committee (ARRC) in November
2014. The ARRC consists of
representatives from major banks
participating in the over-thecounter (OTC) derivatives market,
their respective regulatory
supervisors, and representatives
from major central banks.
• The migration from a (financial)
credit-linked benchmark to one
that is risk-free and representative
of observable interdealer/
interbank market activity
• Developing an alternative to the
overnight indexed swap (OIS)
rate referenced by derivatives
contracts and central clearing
parties (CCPs)
Since the initial meetings in 2014,
the ARRC has narrowed its list to
two potential alternatives:
The overnight bank funding rate
(OBFR)
The OBFR is a volume-weighted
median average rate of both
overnight fed funds and eurodollar
transactions, which average $70
billion and $240 billion per day,
respectively, and encompass data
submitted from financial
institutions beyond the scope of
the Libor-submitting banks.
Additionally, the OBFR would
provide greater diversity of
reported results. The ARRC
reports that a single governmentsponsored enterprise (most likely
the Federal Home Loan Bank
Board) is the lender behind over
90% of overnight fed fund
transactions, and half the proceeds
go toward funding the Fed IOER
arbitrage trades by many “Yankee
bank” financial institutions.
With the forthcoming higher
regulatory capital requirements for
foreign banks, the Fed arbitrage
trade will be less profitable, and the
transaction volume in the fed
funds market can fall dramatically
in times of stress. We believe the
OBFR should prove more resilient
and stable than Libor given its
wider set of potential observations.
The overnight Treasury general
collateral repurchase agreement
(GC repo) rate
An index based on the GC repo
rate is also viable. Although the
ARRC has identified the overnight
repo market as a source for a
potential alternative index, it has
not yet identified a specific rate to
target. While there are currently
several private alternatives based
on the tri-party GC and general
collateral financing (GCF)
markets, the ARRC has expressed
some preference for a rate
produced by the public sector.
November 2016 Viewpoint
WHAT’S NEXT FOR INVESTORS?
Global investors’ proactive
consideration of ongoing
structural changes in markets has
become critical for successfully
navigating the current investment
paradigm. Whether it’s adapting to
money market reform, stimulative
monetary policy or increased bank
capital and liquidity requirements
under Basel, market participants
must balance the search for returns
with stability while navigating the
shifting tectonic plates of the
investment landscape.
We view regulators’ continued
push for a more resilient shortterm benchmark based on robust
and observable contributing data
as a necessary step in this evolution
of modern global financial markets
– and while not a quick fix, we
believe it will eventually result in a
stronger and more resilient
financial system that benefits
issuers and investors alike.
“The financial, legal and
operational considerations
during the transition
from Libor will likely
be considerable.”
While the formal results of the
ARRC’s effort and the eventual
implementation of its benchmark
recommendations are still a few
years away, it is never too early for
investors to begin considering how
the changes will affect them. We
believe the key will be planning for
the transition: The financial, legal
and operational considerations
during the transition from Libor
will likely be considerable, and
investors will need to understand
the composition of the new
benchmark to protect their
interests during the process.
3
48376
Newport Beach Headquarters
650 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
+1 949.720.6000
Amsterdam
Hong Kong
London
Milan
Munich
New York
Rio de Janeiro
Singapore
Sydney
Tokyo
Toronto
Zurich
pimco.com
blog.pimco.com
CMR2016-1115-225714
All investments contain risk and may lose value. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an
investment decision.
This material contains the opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material
has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a
recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained
from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.
PIMCO provides services only to qualified institutions and investors. This is not an offer to any person in any jurisdiction
where unlawful or unauthorized. | Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, 650 Newport Center Drive, Newport
Beach, CA 92660 is regulated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. PIMCO Investments LLC, U.S.
distributor, 1633 Broadway, New York, NY, 10019 is a company of PIMCO. | PIMCO Europe Ltd (Company No. 2604517),
PIMCO Europe, Ltd Amsterdam Branch (Company No. 24319743), and PIMCO Europe Ltd - Italy (Company No.
07533910969) are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf,
London E14 5HS) in the U.K. The Amsterdam and Italy branches are additionally regulated by the AFM and CONSOB in
accordance with Article 27 of the Italian Consolidated Financial Act, respectively. PIMCO Europe Ltd services and products
are available only to professional clients as defined in the Financial Conduct Authority’s Handbook and are not available to
individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. | PIMCO Deutschland GmbH (Company No. 192083,
Seidlstr. 24-24a, 80335 Munich, Germany) is authorised and regulated by the German Federal Financial Supervisory
Authority (BaFin) (Marie-Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt am Main) in Germany in accordance with Section 32 of the
German Banking Act (KWG). The services and products provided by PIMCO Deutschland GmbH are available only to
professional clients as defined in Section 31a para. 2 German Securities Trading Act (WpHG). They are not available to
individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. | PIMCO (Schweiz) GmbH (registered in Switzerland,
Company No. CH-020.4.038.582-2), Brandschenkestrasse 41, 8002 Zurich, Switzerland, Tel: + 41 44 512 49 10. The
services and products provided by PIMCO (Schweiz) GmbH are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on
this communication but contact their financial adviser. | PIMCO Asia Pte Ltd (501 Orchard Road #09-03, Wheelock Place,
Singapore 238880, Registration No. 199804652K) is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as a holder of a
capital markets services licence and an exempt financial adviser. The asset management services and investment products
are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is unauthorised. | PIMCO Asia Limited (Suite
2201, 22nd Floor, Two International Finance Centre, No. 8 Finance Street, Central, Hong Kong) is licensed by the Securities
and Futures Commission for Types 1, 4 and 9 regulated activities under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. The asset
management services and investment products are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is
unauthorised. | PIMCO Australia Pty Ltd ABN 54 084 280 508, AFSL 246862 (PIMCO Australia) offers products and
services to both wholesale and retail clients as defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (limited to general financial product
advice in the case of retail clients). This communication is provided for general information only without taking into account
the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investors. | PIMCO Japan Ltd (Toranomon Towers Office 18F,
4-1-28, Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan 105-0001) Financial Instruments Business Registration Number is Director of
Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No. 382. PIMCO Japan Ltd is a member of Japan Investment
Advisers Association and The Investment Trusts Association, Japan. Investment management products and services offered by
PIMCO Japan Ltd are offered only to persons within its respective jurisdiction, and are not available to persons where
provision of such products or services is unauthorized. Valuations of assets will fluctuate based upon prices of securities and
values of derivative transactions in the portfolio, market conditions, interest rates and credit risk, among others. Investments
in foreign currency denominated assets will be affected by foreign exchange rates. There is no guarantee that the principal
amount of the investment will be preserved, or that a certain return will be realized; the investment could suffer a loss. All
profits and losses incur to the investor. The amounts, maximum amounts and calculation methodologies of each type of fee
and expense and their total amounts will vary depending on the investment strategy, the status of investment performance,
period of management and outstanding balance of assets and thus such fees and expenses cannot be set forth herein.|
PIMCO Canada Corp. (199 Bay Street, Suite 2050, Commerce Court Station, P.O. Box 363, Toronto, ON, M5L 1G2) services
and products may only be available in certain provinces or territories of Canada and only through dealers authorized for that
purpose. | PIMCO Latin America Edifício Internacional Rio Praia do Flamengo, 154 1o andar, Rio de Janeiro – RJ Brasil
22210-906. | No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without
express written permission. PIMCO is a trademark of Allianz Asset Management of America L.P. in the United States and
throughout the world. ©2016, PIMCO.