* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download tendering exercise for investment management
Survey
Document related concepts
Rate of return wikipedia , lookup
Beta (finance) wikipedia , lookup
Internal rate of return wikipedia , lookup
Private equity wikipedia , lookup
Private equity secondary market wikipedia , lookup
Stock selection criterion wikipedia , lookup
Investor-state dispute settlement wikipedia , lookup
International investment agreement wikipedia , lookup
Early history of private equity wikipedia , lookup
Land banking wikipedia , lookup
Investment banking wikipedia , lookup
History of investment banking in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Fund governance wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Investment Committee Report on selection of Investment Manager F 2008 24 BIRKBECK University of London Finance and General Purposes Committee 4 March 2009 REPORT OF THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE ON THE SELECTION OF INVESTMENT MANAGER FOR ACTIVE INVESTMENT FUND MANAGEMENT At its May 2008 meeting, the Investment Committee agreed to carry out a tendering exercise for active investment management with a view to changing our current investment management contract with Legal & General, who provide a passive investment management service. Legal & General were appointed on 1 August 2001 to invest in various tracker funds. Whilst not dissatisfied with L&G's performance, the Committee strongly believe that active stock selection and active asset allocation, as well as investment in a wider range of asset classes to lower risk, is what is required in the current economic climate. Terms of reference and a detailed tender specification were drawn up and 8 investment firms were invited to tender. They were Baillie Gifford, Cazenove, Legal & General, Maia Capital, Newton, Rathbone Brothers, Sarasin and Schroders. All 8 firms submitted written proposals. The Committee held a special meeting in October 2008 to evaluate the proposals and agreed a short list comprising Baillie Gifford, Cazenove, Newton and Sarasin to take forward to the interview stage. These 4 firms were invited to make short formal presentations which would be followed by a detailed question and answer session. The Committee also requested that Legal & General be asked to submit a further written proposal to elaborate on their earlier proposal for a combination of active and passive investment management. While Legal & General were not required to give a formal presentation, the Investment Committee did take the opportunity for a detailed question and answer session with the L&G manager at its regular meeting on 26 November. The Committee was of the opinion that the internal structure of L&G does not authorise the investment manager to give active investment advice and therefore for that reason a change from L&G was deemed necessary. Each of the 4 firms presenting were asked to address specific issues either during their presentation or during the subsequent question and answer session. The presentations were held on 21st and 23rd January 2009. The following is a summary of the conclusions reached by the Committee on each of the 4 firms: Baillie Gifford is an old established fund manager based in Edinburgh with a long established track record. The management of the Fund is owned by the partners. They proposed that Birkbeck's funds should be invested in a Diversified Growth Fund. This is a new Fund which aims to deliver annual returns of at least 3.5% better than the return from cash over a 5 year rolling period with a lower risk than equities. The Fund is currently more than 50% invested in Bonds including high yield Corporate Bonds and Investment Grade Bonds. At this stage, the main investor in the Fund is the Baillie Gifford Pension Fund (which they pointed out demonstrated the partners' personal commitment). Currently the size of the Fund is only £12m, hence Birkbeck would be the second largest investor in the Fund. The Committee rejected the proposal because of the lack of a track record for this Fund and our potential dominance of it as well as uncertainty as to Baillie Gifford’s expertise in bond markets. Cazenove is an independent asset management business tracing its origins back to 1823. They manage £2.4bn of assets on behalf of over 600 Charities including many universities. Portfolio mandates are bespoke to clients needs and are managed on a segregated or pooled basis. Pooled Funds are invested in a broad range of charity commission authorised Common Investment Funds across all the major asset classes. Cazenove proposed a multi-asset portfolio for the College where asset allocation is actively managed on both a strategic and tactical basis. The annual expected gross return is 6.7% with 9.6% volatility. The Committee felt that the presentation was vague and the investment strategy unclear and, therefore, rejected the proposal. Newton Investment Management Limited was founded in 1978 and is wholly owned by The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Newton has £34.6bn under asset management and is the largest charity manager in the UK with 415 charity clients with a combined charity portfolio of £3.2bn. Newton proposed their Absolute Intrepid Fund for the College. This Fund is an unconstrained, actively managed multi-asset strategy with a targeted return of 4% above LIBOR over rolling 5 year periods. Since 1 April 2004 to 31 December 2008, the Fund achieved a gross annual return of 13.07% with 9.28% volatility. The Committee was impressed by Newton for a number of reasons: the extensive range of charity clients, which included several universities as well as some Colleges of the University of London; the clear, thorough and thoughtful processes within the organisation; the application of in-house research using 24 analysts; the strategy and the performance of the Absolute Intrepid Fund since inception. The Committee was unanimous in its recommendation that Newton should be the College's preferred choice of investment manager. Sarasin are specialists in charity fund management with approximately 185 charity and notfor-profit clients and £2bn of charity funds under asset management. Their asset allocation strategy is based on global thematic equity selection. Sarasin proposed a target return strategy for the College which sought to achieve an annual gross return of RPI+3.5% over a three year rolling basis. Sarasin invited committee members to visit their offices in order to gain a fuller understanding of their investment strategy and operational process. The Committee agreed that 2 of its members should accept the invitation. That meeting made clear many aspects that were unclear during the presentation but it was felt that there were still too many uncertainties to recommend appointment. Investment Committee recommends to F&GPC the appointment of Newton Investment Management Limited as the College's Investment Manager.