Download EM Corporate Bonds – Cheap Again

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Securitization wikipedia , lookup

Private equity secondary market wikipedia , lookup

United States housing bubble wikipedia , lookup

Financial economics wikipedia , lookup

Interest rate ceiling wikipedia , lookup

Stock trader wikipedia , lookup

Syndicated loan wikipedia , lookup

Land banking wikipedia , lookup

Market (economics) wikipedia , lookup

Investment management wikipedia , lookup

Interbank lending market wikipedia , lookup

Credit rationing wikipedia , lookup

Investment fund wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
EM Corporate Bonds – Cheap Again
October 2015
As of September 30, 2015, the yield of non-investment grade corporate emerging market bonds was 9.4%, and the
spread over treasuries was 790 basis points. The spread of the JPM Corporate Emerging Markets Bond Index Broad
(CEMBI Broad), a dollar denominated index that is nearly 70% investment grade rated, widened by about 161 basis
points to 485 basis points over the last five months. Neither of these are records, although they are above historical
averages. Spreads nearly reached five-year highs in December 2014 as Russian, Ukrainian, and energy producing
borrowers sold off in reaction to oil prices and the armed conflict. Though Russia recovered, this summer, the punching
bag became Brazil, with special ire focused on Petrobras, the nation’s largest corporation and the emerging markets
largest corporate borrower.
We believe much of the concern over Brazil is justified as the economy has entered recession and will likely experience
negative growth into 2016. On Petrobras, S&P downgraded the company’s credit rating to BB on September 10, 2015
giving it “junk” status earlier than many investors expected. Selling associated with ETFs, index funds, investment grade
funds, and disaffected investors took prices on the company’s ten-year bonds from 97.06 at the end of June to 73.00 at
the end of September. Petrobras is an indebted company, but it dominates the county’s energy sector and still generates
annual revenues exceeding $100 billion. At over 11.0% yield investors were equating it to CCC rated companies.
Perhaps more interesting from an investor perspective was the sell-off in other Brazilian and Latin American corporate
bonds. For the quarter, Brazilian corporate bonds declined 16.9%, Colombians were down 11.0%, Mexican -3.4%, and
Peruvian -3.1. Latin America supplanted Central and Eastern Europe (Russia) as the cheapest region in the emerging
market corporate space. (see graph below). In addition, bonds rated below investment grade across all emerging
markets reached spreads that are close to record wide over the last six years and cheap relative to U.S. high yield. (see
graph)
With lots of negative news and deteriorating sentiment around emerging markets related to the financial implications of
lower commodity prices, currency devaluations and slower economic growth, might there be any value in those markets?
We have repeatedly argued that poor liquidity has exaggerated price moves in many riskier segments of the market.
When investors decide to lighten their positions, the absence of liquidity causes prices in many bonds to gap lower. A
transition like the one experienced by Petrobras can be particularly painful. This security, held by many investment grade
holders, had to be sold when it went to “junk.” Petrobras was included in most major indexes, including the Barclays
1
Credit Index, Merrill’s corporate indexes and J.P. Morgan’s emerging market indexes. The firm constituted 5.71% of the
JPM CEMBI Broad Investment grade sub-index (about $28.5 billion of bonds) and became a 9.04% constituent of the
high yield sub-index upon transition at month-end. Given the size of the exposures that had to change hands, with no
market stabilizing mechanism, the price collapse was understandable. But if Petrobras and many other emerging market
corporations are not going to default, then the yields they offer appear to be compelling opportunities.
J.P. Morgan follows emerging market default rates and provides forecasts. Through the third quarter of 2015 the
corporate emerging market default rate was 2.5% which was in line with the 2.3% rate for the U.S. high yield market. At
mid-year the bank forecast a default rate of 5.4% for 2015, which was lowered to 4.3% as of September 30 because the
Eastern European (Ukraine) default experience was lower than expected. While some commodity related companies will
likely encounter difficulties, it is unlikely entities with strong export businesses will default. Furthermore, spreads of nearly
800 basis points discount a healthy default rate. JPM offered the following table in a report dated October 5, 2015.
Year-to-date defaults versus forecasts
Default Rate
2010
2011
2012*
2013
2014
2015YTD
2015F
Asia
Emerging Europe
Latin America
ME & Africa
Total EM
1.7%
1.7%
1.8%
0.4%
1.6%
0.0%
0.6%
0.9%
0.0%
0.5%
2.3%
4.7%
2.7%
0.2%
2.9%
1.0%
1.9%
7.9%
0.0%
3.6%
1.4%
3.5%
4.9%
4.1%
3.3%
2.2%
3.7%
2.2%
2.3%
2.5%
3.3%
6.2%
3.9%
5.1%
4.3%
Source: JP Morgan "EM Corporate Strategy” Presentation: Fundamentals remain negative vs. supportive technicals, with Brazil remaining the swing factor ‐ October 5, 2015. *Excludes US$5,2 bn in BTAS Recovery Notes issued in 2010 restructuring Emerging markets and other risky sectors suffered fund outflows during the summer. Given the pessimism engendered
by lower commodity prices and devaluing currencies, it is not surprising investors grew cautious. We speculate that the
selling may have included some sovereign wealth funds, which would explain the magnitude of the moves in some
securities. If this is correct, another reason for optimism is that the technical selling pressure after Petrobras’ downgrade
will likely subside. Late September and early October economic data came in below expectations and many economists
believe the Fed may now delay a rate hike into early 2016. With low interest rates, the spread from emerging market
corporate bonds offers a compelling carry opportunity.
2
At GIA Partners, credit is in our DNA. We are a bottom-up credit manager who has managed credit portfolios in virtually
every part of the world’s fixed income markets as well as through some of the most severe credit events in history.
Additionally, our investment team has the distinction of being among the first to recognize and actively invest in global
high yield and emerging markets debt.
We have a thorough understanding of fixed income investments and their role in a globally diversified portfolio, which has
rewarded our clients throughout market cycles.
Gloria Carlson
Director, Sales and Marketing
212 893-7835
[email protected]
Arnold West
Director, Institutional Sales
212 893-7815
[email protected]
GIA Partners, LLC (“GIA”) is an SEC registered investment adviser.
This material is for information purposes only. It does not constitute an offer to or a recommendation to purchase or sell any shares in any security.
Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks and expenses of any strategy or product carefully before investing.
Past Performance: The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance is not an indication of future performance
provides no guarantee for the future and is not constant over time. The value of an investment may fluctuate and may be worth more or less than its
original cost when redeemed. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted.
Forecasts and Market Outlook: The forecasts and market outlook presented in this material reflect subjective judgments and assumptions of the
investment manager and unexpected events may occur. There can be no assurance that developments will transpire as forecasted in this material.
3