* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The case for low-cost index-fund investing for Asian investors
Fund governance wikipedia , lookup
Early history of private equity wikipedia , lookup
Rate of return wikipedia , lookup
Mark-to-market accounting wikipedia , lookup
History of investment banking in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Investment banking wikipedia , lookup
Private equity wikipedia , lookup
Stock trader wikipedia , lookup
Environmental, social and corporate governance wikipedia , lookup
Private equity in the 2000s wikipedia , lookup
Interbank lending market wikipedia , lookup
Money market fund wikipedia , lookup
Private equity secondary market wikipedia , lookup
Mutual fund wikipedia , lookup
Socially responsible investing wikipedia , lookup
The case for low-cost index-fund investing for Asian investors Adviser brief The cost advantages of index investments can translate into a long-term performance advantage for your clients. This paper is based on research by The Vanguard Group, Inc.1 September 2016 A passive investment strategy such as an index mutual fund or an index-based exchange-traded fund (ETF) seeks to track the performance of an index by mimicking its holdings. Primarily because of their low-cost structure, well-managed index investments have generally offered long-term outperformance relative to higher-cost investments. Advisers who index a solid portion of their clients’ portfolios often provide their clients lower costs, broader diversification, minimal cash drag and, for taxable investors, the potential for tax efficiency. The sum of these parts can translate to a long-term performance edge. Understanding the zero-sum game In the aggregate, market participants are playing a zero-sum game. That is, half of investor dollars outperform and the other half underperform the market average. A bell curve can illustrate the game (see Figure 1), with the market return shown as a solid black line. In reality, however, investors pay commissions, management fees, bid-ask spreads, administrative costs and, where applicable, taxes— all of which combine to reduce realised returns over time. The aggregate result of these costs shifts the curve to the left. A portion of the after-cost dollar-weighted performance continues to lie to the right of the market return, represented by the tan region in Figure 1. But a much larger portion is now to the left of the solid black line meaning that, after costs, most of the dollarweighted performance of investors falls short of the aggregate market return. Given the difficulty of selecting an active manager who may consistently outperform the market, we believe many investors are better off using a passive approach, minimising costs so that, over time, they can achieve a return close to the market average. The zero-sum principle holds regardless of a market’s efficiency. Even in areas traditionally considered inefficient, such as international stocks, our research has shown most active managers fail to outperform their respective benchmarks. 1 The case for low-cost index-fund investing (Harbron, Roberts and Schlanger, 2016). Please note: Due to data limitations, data included in the following analysis is reflective of the Asia region excluding the Japanese market. Asia ex Japan is defined as the following countries: China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Figure 1. Investing is a zero-sum game Half of all dollars invested will outperform the market return before costs (blue curve). After costs (brown curve), a much smaller portion outperforms the market return (tan). Costs shift the investor’s actual return distribution Underperforming assets Market benchmark Outperforming assets Costs High-cost investment Low-cost investment Source: The Vanguard Group, Inc. Notes: For illustrative purposes only. This illustration does not represent the return on any particular investment. Active managers frequently underperform After accounting for funds that merged or closed during the observed time period, it is clear that Asia ex Japan actively managed funds, on average, fared poorly versus their benchmarks over the past decade. Figure 2 shows the distribution of excess returns of domestic equity and fixed income funds, net of fees. Note that for both asset classes, a significant number of funds’ returns lie to the left of the prospectus benchmark, which represents zero excess returns. A clear majority of funds fail to outperform their benchmarks, meaning that negative excess returns tend to be more common than positive excess returns. Excess returns provide additional insight A simple percentage can tell you the ratio of active managers who outperform a benchmark; however, it is blind to whether the outperformance was 0.01% or 10%. Figure 2 also displays the breakdown of excess returns by percentage point for active managers in both equity and fixed income segments. It bears emphasising that market cyclicality will alternately favour or impede various market segments. As the time period lengthens, excess returns should converge around the average cost drag of active managers. Benefits of including indexing in client portfolios If you have clients who are primarily interested in obtaining the market return or who wish to reduce a fund’s volatility around a benchmark, you should strongly consider index funds and ETFs for their portfolios. Index funds and ETFs have three key traits that make them appealing to investors who may have tired of the vagaries of active approaches. Diversification. Index funds and ETFs typically are more diversified than actively managed funds, a by-product of the way indices are constructed. Except for index funds that track narrow market segments, most index funds must hold a broad range of securities to accurately track their target benchmarks. The broad range of securities dampens the risk associated with specific securities and removes a component of return volatility. Actively managed funds, on the other hand, tend to hold fewer securities with varying degrees of return correlation. Style consistency. An investor who desires exposure to a particular market and selects an index fund that tracks that market is assured of a consistent allocation. An active manager may have a broader mandate, causing the fund to be a “moving target” from a style point of view. Even if a manager has a well-defined mandate, the decision to hold a higher or lower proportion of a security than the index will lead to performance differences. Taxes. Broad index funds and ETFs may provide a tax advantage over actively managed funds because they generally realise and distribute lower capital gains to shareholders. This after-tax efficiency is particularly beneficial within taxable accounts.2 Low-cost ETFs can add value to client portfolios Primarily because of their low-cost structure, well-managed index investments have generally offered long-term outper formance relative to higher-cost investments. Investors have embraced ETFs over the past decade as an efficient means to gain exposure to a broad range of asset and sub-asset classes. ETFs offer the added advantages of increased trading flexibility and potentially even lower costs than traditional index funds. Vanguard ETFs™ can provide pure, low-cost exposure to investment areas important in setting and maintaining your clients’ overall asset allocation strategies. Please contact your Vanguard sales representative or visit vanguard.com.hk to obtain additional research on indexing to help you build lasting relationships with your clients. Distribution of equity and fixed income funds’ excess return Figure 2. a. Distribution of equity funds’ excess return 1000 300 800 250 Number of funds Prospectus benchmark 200 600 150 400 100 200 50 0 Merged/ liquidated < –7% –7% to –6% to –5% to –4% to –3% to –2% to –1% to –6% –5% –4% –3% –2% –1% 0% 0% to 1% 1% to 2% 2% to 3% 3% to 4% 4% to 5% 5% to 6% 6% to 7% > 7% Excess returns Active funds fundsincome funds’ excess return b. DistributionIndex of fixed 150 450 Prospectus benchmark Number of funds 400 120 350 300 90 250 200 60 150 100 30 50 1000 0 Merged/ liquidated < –7% –7% to –6% to –5% to –4% to –3% to –2% to –1% to –6% –5% –4% –3% –2% –1% 0% 0% to 1% 1% to 2% 2% to 3% 3% to 4% 4% to 5% 5% to 6% 6% to 7% Excess returns 800 600 Active funds Index funds 300 Source: Calculations 250 by The Vanguard Group, Inc., using data as at 31 December 2015 from Morningstar, Inc., and Thomson Reuters Datastream. 400 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts a. and b. display distribution of Asia ex Japan excess returns relative to their prospectus benchmarks for the 200 10 years ended 31 December 2015. 150 2200 Changes to the composition of an index will require the index to sell or buy shares, and the fund may be required to realise capital gains. 100 50 0 > 7% Connect with Vanguard® > vanguard.com.hk Vanguard Investments Hong Kong Limited 48/F, The Center 99 Queen’s Road Central, Hong Kong Phone: 3409 8333 Email: [email protected] The contents of this document and any attachments/links contained in this document are for general information only and are not advice. The information does not take into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation and individual needs and is not designed as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek independent professional advice regarding the suitability of an investment product, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation and individual needs before making an investment. The contents of this document and any attachments/links contained in this document have been prepared in good faith. The Vanguard Group, Inc., and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, the “Vanguard Entities”) accept no liability for any errors or omissions. Please note that the information may also have become outdated since its publication. The Vanguard Entities make no representation that such information is accurate, reliable or complete. In particular, any information sourced from third parties is not necessarily endorsed by the Vanguard Entities, and the Vanguard Entities have not checked the accuracy or completeness of such third party information. This document contains links to materials which may have been prepared in the United States and which may have been commissioned by the Vanguard Entities. They are for your information and reference only and they may not represent our views. The materials may include incidental references to products issued by the Vanguard Entities. The information contained in this document does not constitute an offer or solicitation and may not be treated as an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the law, or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation, or if the person making the offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so. The Vanguard Entities may be unable to facilitate investment for you in any products which may be offered by The Vanguard Group, Inc. No part of this document or any attachments/links contained in this document may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written consent from the Vanguard Entities. Any attachments and any information in the links contained in this document may not be detached from this document and/or be separately made available for distribution. This document is being made available in Hong Kong by Vanguard Investments Hong Kong Limited (CE No. : AYT820) (“Vanguard Hong Kong”). Vanguard Hong Kong is licensed with the Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 1 – Dealing in Securities and Type 4 – Advising on Securities and Type 9 – Asset Management regulated activities, as defined under the Securities and Futures Ordinance of Hong Kong (Cap. 571). The contents of this document have not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. In China, the information contained in this document does not constitute a public offer of any investment products in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”). No Vanguard fund is being offered or sold directly or indirectly in the PRC to the PRC public. Further, no legal or natural persons of the PRC may directly or indirectly purchase any of Vanguard funds or any beneficial interest therein without obtaining all prior governmental approvals that are required by the PRC (which includes conducting due approval or registration or filing formalities under the PRC laws), whether statutorily or otherwise. Persons who come into possession of this document are required by the issuer to observe these restrictions. In Taiwan, Vanguard funds are not registered and may not be sold, issued or offered. No person or entity in Taiwan has been authorised to offer, sell, give advice regarding or otherwise intermediate the offering and sale of any Vanguard funds in Taiwan. © 2016 Vanguard Investments Hong Kong Limited. All rights reserved. CFIAB_HK 092016