Download The case for low-cost index-fund investing for Asian investors

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Fund governance wikipedia , lookup

Early history of private equity wikipedia , lookup

Rate of return wikipedia , lookup

Mark-to-market accounting wikipedia , lookup

History of investment banking in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Investment banking wikipedia , lookup

Private equity wikipedia , lookup

Stock trader wikipedia , lookup

Environmental, social and corporate governance wikipedia , lookup

Private equity in the 2000s wikipedia , lookup

Interbank lending market wikipedia , lookup

Money market fund wikipedia , lookup

Private equity secondary market wikipedia , lookup

Mutual fund wikipedia , lookup

Socially responsible investing wikipedia , lookup

Private money investing wikipedia , lookup

Investment management wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The case for low-cost
index-fund investing
for Asian investors
Adviser brief
The cost advantages of
index investments can
translate into a long-term
performance advantage for
your clients.
This paper is based on
research by The Vanguard
Group, Inc.1
September 2016
A passive investment strategy such as
an index mutual fund or an index-based
exchange-traded fund (ETF) seeks to track
the performance of an index by mimicking
its holdings. Primarily because of their
low-cost structure, well-managed index
investments have generally offered
long-term outperformance relative
to higher-cost investments.
Advisers who index a solid portion of
their clients’ portfolios often provide their
clients lower costs, broader diversification,
minimal cash drag and, for taxable
investors, the potential for tax efficiency.
The sum of these parts can translate to a
long-term performance edge.
Understanding the zero-sum game
In the aggregate, market participants are
playing a zero-sum game. That is, half of
investor dollars outperform and the other
half underperform the market average.
A bell curve can illustrate the game (see
Figure 1), with the market return shown
as a solid black line. In reality, however,
investors pay commissions, management
fees, bid-ask spreads, admin­istrative
costs and, where applicable, taxes—
all of which combine to reduce realised
returns over time.
The aggregate result of these costs shifts
the curve to the left. A portion of the
after-cost dollar-weighted performance
continues to lie to the right of the market
return, represented by the tan region in
Figure 1. But a much larger portion is now
to the left of the solid black line meaning
that, after costs, most of the dollarweighted performance of investors falls
short of the aggregate market return. Given
the difficulty of selecting an active manager
who may consistently outperform the
market, we believe many investors are
better off using a passive approach,
minimising costs so that, over time, they
can achieve a return close to the market
average.
The zero-sum principle holds regardless
of a market’s efficiency. Even in areas
traditionally considered inefficient, such as
international stocks, our research has
shown most active managers fail to
outperform their respective benchmarks.
1 The case for low-cost index-fund investing (Harbron, Roberts and Schlanger, 2016).
Please note: Due to data limitations, data included in the following analysis is reflective of the Asia region excluding
the Japanese market. Asia ex Japan is defined as the following countries: China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia,
Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan.
Figure 1.
Investing is a zero-sum game
Half of all dollars invested will outperform the market return before costs (blue curve). After costs (brown curve), a much smaller portion
outperforms the market return (tan).
Costs shift the investor’s
actual return distribution
Underperforming assets
Market benchmark
Outperforming assets
Costs
High-cost
investment
Low-cost
investment
Source: The Vanguard Group, Inc.
Notes: For illustrative purposes only. This illustration does not represent the return on any particular investment.
Active managers frequently underperform
After accounting for funds that merged or closed during
the observed time period, it is clear that Asia ex Japan
actively managed funds, on average, fared poorly versus
their benchmarks over the past decade. Figure 2 shows
the distribution of excess returns of domestic equity and
fixed income funds, net of fees.
Note that for both asset classes, a significant number of
funds’ returns lie to the left of the prospectus benchmark,
which represents zero excess returns. A clear majority of
funds fail to outperform their benchmarks, meaning that
negative excess returns tend to be more common than
positive excess returns.
Excess returns provide additional insight
A simple percentage can tell you the ratio of active
managers who outperform a benchmark; however, it is
blind to whether the outperformance was 0.01% or
10%. Figure 2 also displays the breakdown of excess
returns by percentage point for active managers in both
equity and fixed income segments.
It bears emphasising that market cyclicality will alternately
favour or impede various market segments. As the time
period lengthens, excess returns should converge around
the average cost drag of active managers.
Benefits of including indexing
in client portfolios
If you have clients who are primarily interested in
obtaining the market return or who wish to reduce a
fund’s volatility around a benchmark, you should strongly
consider index funds and ETFs for their portfolios. Index
funds and ETFs have three key traits that make them
appealing to investors who may have tired of the vagaries
of active approaches.
Diversification. Index funds and ETFs typically are more
diversified than actively managed funds, a by-product of
the way indices are constructed. Except for index funds
that track narrow market segments, most index funds
must hold a broad range of securities to accurately track
their target benchmarks. The broad range of securities
dampens the risk associated with specific securities and
removes a component of return volatility. Actively
managed funds, on the other hand, tend to hold fewer
securities with varying degrees of return correlation.
Style consistency. An investor who desires exposure to
a particular market and selects an index fund that tracks
that market is assured of a consistent allocation. An active
manager may have a broader mandate, causing the fund
to be a “moving target” from a style point of view. Even
if a manager has a well-defined mandate, the decision to
hold a higher or lower proportion of a security than the
index will lead to performance differences.
Taxes. Broad index funds and ETFs may provide a tax
advantage over actively managed funds because they
generally realise and distribute lower capital gains to
shareholders. This after-tax efficiency is particularly
beneficial within taxable accounts.2
Low-cost ETFs can add value to client portfolios
Primarily because of their low-cost structure, well-managed
index investments have generally offered long-term outper­
formance relative to higher-cost investments.
Investors have embraced ETFs over the past decade as an
efficient means to gain exposure to a broad range of asset
and sub-asset classes. ETFs offer the added advantages of
increased trading flexibility and potentially even lower
costs than traditional index funds. Vanguard ETFs™ can
provide pure, low-cost exposure to investment areas
important in setting and maintaining your clients’ overall
asset allocation strategies.
Please contact your Vanguard sales representative or visit
vanguard.com.hk to obtain additional research on indexing to
help you build lasting relationships with your clients.
Distribution of equity and fixed income funds’ excess return
Figure 2.
a. Distribution of equity funds’ excess return
1000
300
800
250
Number of funds
Prospectus benchmark
200
600
150
400
100
200
50
0
Merged/
liquidated
< –7% –7% to –6% to –5% to –4% to –3% to –2% to –1% to
–6%
–5%
–4%
–3%
–2%
–1%
0%
0% to
1%
1% to
2%
2% to
3%
3% to
4%
4% to
5%
5% to
6%
6% to
7%
> 7%
Excess returns
Active funds
fundsincome funds’ excess return
b. DistributionIndex
of fixed
150
450
Prospectus benchmark
Number of funds
400
120
350
300
90
250
200
60
150
100
30
50
1000
0
Merged/
liquidated
< –7% –7% to –6% to –5% to –4% to –3% to –2% to –1% to
–6%
–5%
–4%
–3%
–2%
–1%
0%
0% to
1%
1% to
2%
2% to
3%
3% to
4%
4% to
5%
5% to
6%
6% to
7%
Excess returns
800
600
Active funds
Index funds
300
Source: Calculations 250
by The Vanguard Group, Inc., using data as at 31 December 2015 from Morningstar, Inc., and Thomson Reuters Datastream.
400
Past
performance is no
guarantee of future results. Charts a. and b. display distribution of Asia ex Japan excess returns relative to their prospectus benchmarks for the
200
10 years ended 31 December 2015.
150
2200
Changes to the composition of an index will require the index to sell or buy shares, and the fund may be required to realise capital gains.
100
50
0
> 7%
Connect with Vanguard® > vanguard.com.hk
Vanguard Investments Hong Kong Limited
48/F, The Center
99 Queen’s Road Central,
Hong Kong
Phone: 3409 8333
Email: [email protected]
The contents of this document and any attachments/links
contained in this document are for general information only and
are not advice.
The information does not take into account your specific
investment objectives, financial situation and individual needs
and is not designed as a substitute for professional advice. You
should seek independent professional advice regarding the
suitability of an investment product, taking into account your
specific investment objectives, financial situation and individual
needs before making an investment.
The contents of this document and any attachments/links
contained in this document have been prepared in good faith.
The Vanguard Group, Inc., and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates
(collectively, the “Vanguard Entities”) accept no liability for any
errors or omissions. Please note that the information may also
have become outdated since its publication.
The Vanguard Entities make no representation that such
information is accurate, reliable or complete. In particular,
any information sourced from third parties is not necessarily
endorsed by the Vanguard Entities, and the Vanguard Entities
have not checked the accuracy or completeness of such third
party information.
This document contains links to materials which may have
been prepared in the United States and which may have been
commissioned by the Vanguard Entities. They are for your
information and reference only and they may not represent
our views. The materials may include incidental references
to products issued by the Vanguard Entities. The information
contained in this document does not constitute an offer or
solicitation and may not be treated as an offer or solicitation in
any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the
law, or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer
or solicitation, or if the person making the offer or solicitation
is not qualified to do so. The Vanguard Entities may be unable
to facilitate investment for you in any products which may be
offered by The Vanguard Group, Inc.
No part of this document or any attachments/links contained
in this document may be reproduced in any form, or referred to
in any other publication, without express written consent from
the Vanguard
Entities. Any attachments and any information in the links
contained in this document may not be detached from this
document and/or be separately made available for distribution.
This document is being made available in Hong Kong by
Vanguard Investments Hong Kong Limited (CE No. : AYT820)
(“Vanguard Hong Kong”). Vanguard Hong Kong is licensed
with the Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type
1 – Dealing in Securities and Type 4 – Advising on Securities
and Type 9 – Asset Management regulated activities, as defined
under the Securities and Futures Ordinance of Hong Kong (Cap.
571). The contents of this document have not been reviewed by
the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong.
In China, the information contained in this document does not
constitute a public offer of any investment products in the
People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”). No Vanguard fund is
being offered or sold directly or indirectly in the PRC to the
PRC public. Further, no legal or natural persons of the PRC
may directly or indirectly purchase any of Vanguard funds
or any beneficial interest therein without obtaining all prior
governmental approvals that are required by the PRC (which
includes conducting due approval or registration or filing
formalities under the PRC laws), whether statutorily or otherwise.
Persons who come into possession of this document are required
by the issuer to observe these restrictions.
In Taiwan, Vanguard funds are not registered and may not
be sold, issued or offered. No person or entity in Taiwan has
been authorised to offer, sell, give advice regarding or otherwise
intermediate the offering and sale of any Vanguard funds
in Taiwan.
© 2016 Vanguard Investments Hong Kong Limited.
All rights reserved.
CFIAB_HK 092016