* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Are Stocks Expensive? - Zevin Asset Management
Early history of private equity wikipedia , lookup
Socially responsible investing wikipedia , lookup
Investment fund wikipedia , lookup
Financial crisis wikipedia , lookup
Market sentiment wikipedia , lookup
Hedge (finance) wikipedia , lookup
Day trading wikipedia , lookup
Efficient-market hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Stock market wikipedia , lookup
2010 Flash Crash wikipedia , lookup
Short (finance) wikipedia , lookup
Securities fraud wikipedia , lookup
Stock exchange wikipedia , lookup
INVESTMENT COMMENTARY April 28, 2014 Are Stocks Expensive? Are stocks over-priced? There’s the easy answer (yes), the complicated answer (it’s a little more difficult), and the real answer (it depends). But perhaps we should ask a better question. Stock valuations are always a key consideration for investors. Following a year when stock indices in the U.S. rose by more than 30% and continue to trade at new record highs, while the U.S. economy has not yet recovered from the financial crisis six years ago, it is natural for there to be concern about stocks being too expensive. The Easy Answer The Complicated Answer One valuation measure compares the cost of buying a share of the S&P 500 index to the average annual earnings from the previous ten years. Using this metric, stocks are expensive. The average price of the S&P index over the past 130 years was $16.50 while today’s price is $25.44 (see chart). Not surprisingly though, stocks have rarely sold at this average. A brief look at the chart shows stocks have tended to stay either above or below the average for extended periods of time. As a result, this measure provides only a very rough guide for the relative cost of stocks. Indeed stocks have been expensive on this measure for the past 20 years covering three bull markets and two bear markets with only a brief six month exception during the depths of the recent financial crisis. Of course, investors buy companies for what they are expected to earn in the coming ten years, not for what they have earned over the past ten years. Looking at historical average earnings is a simplification intended as a guide for the more difficult task of forecasting future earnings. Looking forward just one or two years, most investors expect the earnings of the companies in S&P 500 index to be larger than they have ever been. Using these expected future earnings as a measure, stocks do not look so expensive. The S&P 500 index is trading near a level where each dollar of earnings expected in less than two years costs a little over $14.50. However, even this analysis is just the beginning; the value of a stock today is based on the earnings for the next few years and all the earnings stretching as far into the future as the company survives. A company’s earnings far into the future will in part be determined by management decisions, and also by many factors well outside the control of management. Technological advancement, competition, interest rates, inflation, political events, GDP growth, (and more impactful, GDP decline) and many more considerations are all influential in determining future earnings. And finally, how much those future earnings are worth today is determined by how quickly earnings grow, by current and future interest rates, inflation rates, and the corresponding discount rate used to measure future earnings in today’s dollars. So what will the future growth, inflation, and interest rates look like? Can we buy this future stream of earnings at an attractive price today? Are stocks expensive? The Real Answer Naturally, as with any other question about the future, the answer is “it depends.” It is possible the economy grows between 2%-3% over the next few years, as many investors expect. With still low inflation and still historically low interest rates, companies could continue to buy back shares and increase margins, profitability, earnings and dividends rapidly with sales growing only modestly. This outlook looks very similar to the past four years where corporate sales grew 4% per year while dividends grew 11% per year. If this pace of growth continues for the next few years and then moderates towards the pace of growth in the economy, the outlook for stocks is to outperform government bonds, but not do as well as stocks have averaged in the 20th century. We would anticipate the stocks we hold in client portfolios to do as well or better than the global stock market index if this relatively benign scenario unfolds. Yet, it goes without saying that any forecast of the future is highly uncertain and risks abound to this relatively calm outlook. At the moment Japan is treading a dangerous course in raising the value-added tax while its domestic economy is still weak. In China the plan to transition the economy towards more household consumption and less investment is challenged by high debt levels and entrenched political interests. Europe has stabilized but remains haplessly incapable of solving their underlying structural problems. Territorial disputes and the threat of armed conflict simmer in Ukraine, the Middle East and in Asia. In the U.S., fiscal policy continues to slow the ongoing recovery. We worry that a policy misstep or escalation of any of these situations could ripple through the world economy. Of course, future developments will impact growth, inflation, interest rates, and other things determining stock prices so the outlook for stock prices depends on this uncertain course of events. A Better Question Over the past 142 years, stocks have returned on average 8.8%, though the average hardly tells the story. Recessions, panics, financial crisis, wars, politics, recovery, euphoria and much more have all been complicit in sending stocks on a far wilder path of great gains and painful losses. The past twenty years, during which stocks also averaged a return of 8.9%, is a ready reminder that stock returns are rarely average. Investors had the chance to lose half their money twice during this recent period. However, it does beg the question, what is the chance of stocks once again suffering serious losses? Turning to history as a guide again, it seems foolish not to think that sometime in the next decade, stocks may once more fall by 50%. Given this potential for large losses, it certainly seems prudent to invest with this in mind. Outlook The market is an abstraction because we don’t actually invest directly in the entire market. We invest in individual stocks which themselves are also something of an abstraction. Stocks represent an ownership share in very real underlying companies. Companies, much like our children’s lemonade stands, mix labor, capital, technology, opportunity and hope, all with the aim of generating profit. Our aim is to acquire shares in companies that are well managed, wellcapitalized, have good technology and attractive market opportunities and make those investments at a price that will grow along with the profits of the company. We are finding some good companies that are addressing the changing energy market in the U.S. by improving energy efficiency and introducing alternative energy technologies; in the technology space with companies involved in the still young and promising development of mobility, data and commerce on the internet; and with consumer companies from housing to retailing. While we are optimistic about the investment prospects of the companies, we also prepare as best we can for events outside their control which can dramatically alter the development of the business or the value of our investment. As mentioned earlier, at the moment most of the sources for this outside risk are centered in the economic transitions taking place in China and Japan, in the political and social transitions needing to take place in Europe and in the conflicts taking place in an increasing number of regions. For this reason, we are continuing to shift our investments towards U.S. companies. We have also increased the holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds as further protection in the event of adverse developments in one or more of these regions. Dan Thorn Senior Securities Analyst Dan Thorn is a Senior Securities Analyst at Zevin Asset Management. Dan has a broad range of experience as an investment analyst over the past decade. Prior to earning his MBA and the CFA designation, Dan was a farmer and welder.