Download I. The background of Horney`s theory of personality

yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Object relations theory wikipedia , lookup

Construals wikipedia , lookup

Erikson's stages of psychosocial development wikipedia , lookup

Self-actualization wikipedia , lookup

Developmental psychology wikipedia , lookup

Cross-cultural psychology wikipedia , lookup

Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup

Dialogical self wikipedia , lookup

Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup

Feminist psychology wikipedia , lookup

Coping (psychology) wikipedia , lookup

Self-discrepancy theory wikipedia , lookup

Anna O. wikipedia , lookup

Psychoanalytic dream interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Face negotiation theory wikipedia , lookup

Impression formation wikipedia , lookup

Political psychology wikipedia , lookup

Oedipus complex wikipedia , lookup

Personality psychology wikipedia , lookup

One-sex and two-sex theories wikipedia , lookup

Psychoanalysis wikipedia , lookup

Freud's psychoanalytic theories wikipedia , lookup

Hidden personality wikipedia , lookup

Psychosexual development wikipedia , lookup

Karen Horney wikipedia , lookup

The background of Horney’s theory of personality
The following elements are to be considered the keys to understanding the theories of
Karen Horney concerning personality development, which starts in early childhood.
Horney’s own childhood provided a backdrop in which she developed her concepts of
basic anxiety and the neurotic needs that may exist in a person. In this chapter, Horney
deviates from Freud and develops her own theory of Self-Analysis and provides the
framework for what we call Feminine Psychology today.
The basic elements of Horney’s Feminine Psychology include:
A child needs for safety and security early in life, according to Horney. Horney
suggested early childhood trauma could unsettle the child which may cause Basic
Anxiety. This basic anxiety could become the basis of neurotic needs which
follows the child in the form of negative patterns of behavior in adulthood. The
ten neurotic needs are affection and approval, a dominant partner, power,
exploitation, prestige, admiration, achievement or ambition, self-sufficiency,
perfection, and narrow limits to life.
These ten neurotic needs create three trends in personality development. These
three trends are (A) the compliant type, (B) the aggressive type, and (C) the
detached type of personality. For the neurotic person, one of these trends
becomes the dominant way a person handles conflict and hostility. Horney was
quick to suggest that these three trends may be perceived in normal people but
become pronounced in neurotic persons. That is, conflict in a normal process we
have in life situations.
Horney believed there was a conflict between our “real self” and the “idealized
self.” The normal person understands their life goals and dreams in a realistic
manner. A neurotic person perceives the traumas of life to be a challenge to
perform perfectly, so that others will see how well they perform. This goal of
perfectionism will not be obtainable. Hence, the neurotic person will only be
frustrated as they attempt to unify their spirit. This “idealized self-image”
becomes an illusion for neurotics, and not realistic nor satisfying for the person.
The “tyranny of the shoulds”, according to Horney, is the attempt to meet the
unobtainable goals of perfectionism. Neurotics will externalize their frustrations
for their unfulfilled goals of perfectionism by projecting blame on the world and
people around them. If they blame others for their unrealized goals, then they will
not have to take internal responsibility for their own actions or choices which may
fail them.
While Freud believed, (based on his clinical interviews with women), that women
were frustrated and unhappy because they were not males. Horney took exception
to this poor image of women and their inadequacy compared to men. Horney
developed the concept of womb envy in boys to counter Freud’s concept of penis
envy for girls. Horney rejected Freud’s notion of a woman having an inadequate
superego, which comes from not being able to resolve the Oedipal Conflict as a
girl. Horney believed the Oedipal Conflict produced conflicts between the parent
and child. This may occur when the parent violates the child’s sense of security.
Freud was very angry at Horney for taking oppositional viewpoints on his psychosexual theory of childhood.
Horney became an advocate for women in their ability to have children and a
career. She recognized the issues of a woman having dignity and equality within
the workplace and the conflict this might bring in raising a family. These issues
have made more contemporary theorists re-introduce the theories of Karen
Horney, especially in the area of Feminine Psychology. Horney also recognized
that social and cultural influences can influence and even determine what a
woman should do with her life goals.
Self-realization, according to Horney, should be a life long goal. To this end,
Horney believed in the importance of continuous self-analysis, in which she
refined as a technique of therapy.
Assessment in Horney’s Theory
Horney used dream analysis and free association, but desired the therapist to
take a more active role with a patient. The therapist would present friendliness
towards the client and would sit across the patient in a chair, not lying down on an
analyst’s couch. Free association was to unveil attitudes and feelings, not to be
symbolic repressed references from infantile or childhood fantasies. This process
was used to uncover layers of attitudes, experiences, and emotions which could
reveal the person’s true self. Dreams were connected to what the patient felt
about the dream, not symbolic representation.
Research in Horney’s Theory
Horney did not agree with others, such as Freud, Jung and Adler in the note-taking
usage of verbatims in the therapy session. She used the case study method of
validating her work. Horney did attempt to use hypotheses in formulating her
opinions in the therapeutic session. Research tends to validate Horney’s theories
in relation to her three neurotic trends (Berg, Janoff-Bulman, & Cotter, 2001).
However, further research in Feminine Psychology gives conflicting conclusions
with Horney’s rejection of penis envy in women, while giving some credibility
towards poor ego development in women (Hall & Van de Castle, 1965). Research
with Horney’s culturally induced “neurotic competitiveness,” when using a selfreport inventory of this concept, found that people who score high on
competitiveness also had high factors in narcissistic behaviors and were low in
self-esteem (Ryckman, Hammer, Kaczor, & Gold, 1990).