Download De Pace et al. (2007)-Farm. Syst. Des

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup

Genetically modified food wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup

Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup

Population genetics wikipedia , lookup

Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup

Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup

Genetic testing wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Genetically modified crops wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Genetically modified organism containment and escape wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
De Pace C., M. Pasquini, A. Matere, 2007. Genetic information on crop varieties provide high
quality indicators to address agri-environmental issues. In: Farming Systems Design 2007, Int.
Symposium on Methodologies on IntegratedAnalysis on Farm Production Systems, M. Donatelli, J.
Hatfield, A. Rizzoli Eds., Catania (Italy), 10-12 September 2007, book 2 – Field-farm scale design
and improvement, pag. 155-156. ISBN 978-88-7830-474-1. PDF
Summary In farming systems aimed to sustainable crop production, the pressure of certain
activities (i.e. agrochemical distribution, crop variety choice) on the environmental media (soil,
water or air) and systems (biodiversity and landscape) is gauged by indicators such as the net
surpluses of soil nutrients and pesticide residue into the soil and crop products. Several factors
account for levels of those difficult-to-measure indicators, but the genetic pool of crop species and
varieties used for production has the major share. Mixtures of crop species and crop varieties that
withstand pathogen epidemics favour pesticide input reduction and increase crop yield per unit of
inputs compared to the monoculture of the single components. Therefore, temporal and spatial
genetic diversification in crop fields achieved through crop rotation, intercropping, variety mixture
and stacking resistance genes in one variety, is a strategy that slows down the rate of pathogen and
pest evolution, enforces host resistance, reduces pesticide use and increases the output performance
of the system compared to the mean of its components or genes. This suggests that the ’number of
components’ in intercrop, rotation, or mixture is a reliable indicator of lower pressure over the
environment. Crop varieties with durable genetic resistance to major pests and diseases reduce also
the use of fungicides and input resources.
Therefore, in a DPSIR (Driving forces-Pressure-State-Impact-Response) conceptual framework, the
“number of genes” controlling the productivity resilience of stress resistant crop varieties or an
index of the reduction of disease severity symptoms due to genetic field resistance, will be
consistent and reliable driving force indicators linked to a reduced pressure of agriculture on
environmental resources.
Evidences are provided that driving force sustainability indicators can be standardized from genetic
information on: (a) Triticum aestivum (bread wheat) response to powdery mildew disease caused by
Blumeria (syn. Erysiphe) graminis f. sp. tritici , and (b)T. turgidum var. durum (durum wheat) field
response to brown rust disease caused by Puccinia triticina.
Key words: Sustainability; indicators; genetic resistance; DPSIR; Powdery mildew; Brown rust;
Dasypyrum.