Download Abstract

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Quantum decoherence wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Basil Hiley wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia , lookup

Density matrix wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

Quantum dot wikipedia , lookup

Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Coherent states wikipedia , lookup

Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup

Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Bell test experiments wikipedia , lookup

Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Quantum group wikipedia , lookup

Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup

Max Born wikipedia , lookup

Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup

Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup

Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

Quantum cognition wikipedia , lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
RECOVERING QUANTUM LOGIC WITHIN A NONCONTEXTUAL EXTENSION OF
QUANTUM MECHANICS
Claudio Garola1
Scholars often think that standard (sharp) quantum logic is specific of quantum mechanics and characterizes
it. We present a procedure which allows us to recover classical and non-classical logical structures as
concrete (theory-dependent) logics formalizing the notion of verification within physical theories expressed
by means of languages whose logical structure is classical. By applying this procedure we recover a
classical logic and a standard quantum logic as concrete logics associated with classical and quantum
mechanics, respectively. Moreover, we show that standard quantum logic can be recovered also at a
macroscopic non-quantum level if the notion of verification is suitably restricted with respect to the notion
adopted in classical mechanics. These conclusions support the general idea that some non-classical logics
can coexist without conflicting with classical logic (global pluralism), because they formalize metalinguistic
notions that are not alternative to the classical notion of truth as correspondence [1]. Nevertheless, in the case
of quantum mechanics our result is obtained in a purely formal way, because it introduces extensions of
physical properties that have no interpretation according to the orthodox interpretation of this theory. Such a
lack of interpretation follows from contextuality, which implies non-objectivity of physical properties and
raises many unsolved problems (in particular, the objectification problem of the quantum theory of
measurement). We have therefore proposed an ESR (extended semantic realism) model, which restores
objectivity of physical properties by reinterpreting quantum probabilities as conditional on detection rather
than absolute and embodying the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics into a broader noncontextual (hence local) framework [2, 3]. If this model is accepted, the extensions of physical properties
mentioned above acquire a physical interpretation. Moreover, the predictive success of quantum mechanics
is explained, but in some cases (in particular, if proper mixtures are considered) the predictions of the two
theories are substantially different, which suggests new possible experiments to check which theory is
correct. It is also interesting to observe that several local finite models for the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger
experiment can be extracted from the ESR model and converted into the local "toy" models supplied by
Szabó and Fine for the same experiment, thus proving the consistency of our general proposal with some
previous significant but very specific results in the literature [4].
[1] Garola, C. and Sozzo, S. (2013). Recovering Quantum Logic within an Extended Classical Framework.
Erkenn. 78, 399–419.
[2] Garola, C. and Sozzo, S. (2012). Extended Representations of Observables and States for a Noncontextual Reinterpretation of QM. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 075303–075315.
[3] Garola, C. and Persano, M. (2013). Embedding Quantum Mechanics into a Broader Noncontextual
Theory. Found. Sci., DOI 10.1007/s10699-013-9341-z.
[4] Garola, C., Persano, M., Pykacz, J. and Sozzo, S. (2013). Finite Local Models for the GHZ Experiment.
Int. J. Theor. Phys., DOI 10.1007/s10773-013-1851-5.
.
Department of Mathematics and Physics of the University of Salento and INFN Section of Lecce. Via
Arnesano, 73100 Lecce, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
1