Download PHYS6510/4510 Quantum Mechanics I Fall 2012 HW #5

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Natural computing wikipedia , lookup

Computational chemistry wikipedia , lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Post-quantum cryptography wikipedia , lookup

Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Molecular dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup

Quantum group wikipedia , lookup

Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical physics wikipedia , lookup

Uncertainty principle wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
PHYS6510/4510
Quantum Mechanics I
Fall 2012
HW #5
Due to the grader at 5pm on Friday 9 Nov 2012
(1) A particle of mass m moves along one of two “paths” through space and time connecting
the points (x, t) = (0, 0) and (x, t) = (D, T ). One path is quadratic in time, i.e. x1 (t) = 21 at2
where a is a constant. The second path is linear in time, i.e. x2 (t) = vt where v is a constant.
The correct classical path is the quadratic path, that is x1 (t).
a. Find the acceleration a for the correct classical path. Use freshman physics to find the
force F = ma = −dV /dx and then the potential energy function V (x) in terms of m,
D, and T . Also find the velocity v for the linear (i.e. incorrect classical) path.
�
�
�
b. Calculate the classical action S[x(t)] = 0T 12 mẋ2 − V (x) dt for each of the two paths
x1 (t) and x2 (t). Confirm that S1 ≡ S[x1 (t)] < S2 ≡ S[x2 (t)], and find ∆S = S2 − S1 .
c. Calculate ∆S/h̄ for a particle which moves 1 mm in 1 ms for two cases. The particle is
a nanoparticle made up of 100 carbon atoms in one case. The other case is an electron.
For which of these would you consider the motion “quantum mechanical” and why?
(2) Modern Quantum Mechanics, Problem 2.28. The history of flux quantization is quite
fascinating. The original discovery can be found in B. S. Deaver and W. M. Fairbank,
“Experimental Evidence for Quantized Flux in Superconducting Cylinders”, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 7(1961)43. The flux quantum worked out to be hc/2e, but it was later appreciated
that the charge carriers were Cooper pairs of electrons. See also articles by Deaver and others
in “Near Zero: new frontiers of physics”, by Fairbank, J. D.; Deaver, B. S., Jr.; Everitt, C.
W. F.; Michelson, P. F.. Freeman, 1988.
(3) Modern Quantum Mechanics, Problem 2.32.
(4) Modern Quantum Mechanics, Problem 3.2.
(5) Modern Quantum Mechanics, Problem 3.3. Interpret the action of “dividing by a matrix”
as multiplication (on the right) by the inverse of that matrix.
(6) Modern Quantum Mechanics, Problem 3.4.