* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download SCHEMAS - SFU.ca
Navajo grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sanskrit grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Irish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Japanese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Udmurt grammar wikipedia , lookup
Proto-Indo-European verbs wikipedia , lookup
Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Agglutination wikipedia , lookup
Chichewa tenses wikipedia , lookup
Germanic weak verb wikipedia , lookup
French grammar wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lithuanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ukrainian grammar wikipedia , lookup
English clause syntax wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Morphology (linguistics) wikipedia , lookup
Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Continuous and progressive aspects wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Germanic strong verb wikipedia , lookup
Latin conjugation wikipedia , lookup
Grammatical aspect wikipedia , lookup
Old Norse morphology wikipedia , lookup
Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup
Hungarian verbs wikipedia , lookup
Old English grammar wikipedia , lookup
Macedonian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Russian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Turkish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Tense–aspect–mood wikipedia , lookup
Spanish verbs wikipedia , lookup
Italian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek verbs wikipedia , lookup
Swedish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Grammatical tense wikipedia , lookup
English verbs wikipedia , lookup
Bulgarian verbs wikipedia , lookup
LECTURE: SCHEMAS - INFLECTION John D. Alderete, Linguistics 323, Simon Fraser University Goals: this lecture is an introduction to inflectional morphology, providing a number of concepts and terms for describing this type of morphology, how paradigms are constructed in tables and rows, and the categories of the most common inflectional dimensions (number, gender, case, tense, aspect, modality). It will provide some of the necessary empirical foundations for motivating word schemas. Keywords: inflectional category, inflectional dimension, paradigm construction, number, gender, case, tense, aspect, mood, voice markings, dependent verbs Reading: Understanding Morphology 5.1 TALKING ABOUT INFLECTIONS Definitions • inflectional category, a morphological distinction made to mark a grammatical function (see prior lecture), e.g., singular, masculine • inflectional dimension, a classification system for a set of inflectional categories, e.g., number, gender, case, tense, aspect, modality Example: /-s/ marks the inflectional categories ‘third person, singular, present tense’ in He walk-s. Dimensions: Categories: Example: walk-er is the derived noun, formed by adding the derivational suffix /-er/. CONSTRUCTING PARADIGMS Assumption: inflectional paradigms represent dimensions as columns or rows, hence usually two dimensional (though more dimensions possible with more tables) Task: produce a three-dimensional paradigm for the verb be based on tense (present, past), person (1 2 3), and number (sg, pl); use the two-table format employed in the book Conventions: subscript notation feature value notation 1 INFLECTIONAL DIMENSIONS FOR NOUNS Definitions: • number, marks that indicate the quanitities of entities referred to by a NP • • gender (morphological), marks that are arbitrary, but relate to the natural sex of an NP, e.g., Old English wīf (neuter), la lune ‘moon’ (feminine) case, marks that indicate how an NP is used in a sentence (syntactic sense of ‘grammatical function’) Illustration: Old English personal pronouns Dimensions: Categories: Case distinctions: Illustration: Modern English personal pronouns Question: which of the inflectional dimensions were still retained in present day English? 2 Question: which of the inflectional categories were retained in pronouns? Elsewhere? INFLECTIONAL DIMENSIONS FOR VERBS Definitions: • deixis (meta-term), system of orienting and identifying participants in discourse • • • • • • number, marks quantities expressed by logical subjects (rarely objects) of a sentence person, deictic inflectional dimension that orients the speaker relative to the addressee and other participants not addressed tense, deictic inflectional dimension that relates the speaker’s time of utterance to the time of the content of the utterance aspect, verbal aspectual dimension that describes the internal temporal structure of an event or state modality (cf. mood), deictic inflectional dimension that relates the proposition expressed by the utterance to the speaker’s attitude or mental state dependent verbs (also: nonfinite verbs), verbs that are subordinate to a ‘main verb’, and have a host of language particular syntactic properties Illustration: two major verb classes in Modern English Finite Non-finite (=dependent) Present: write, write-s Infinitive: (to) write Past: wrote Present participle: writ-ing Past participle: writt-en Gerund: writ-ing Question: what are the major differences between finite and non-finite verbs? • Finite verbs: can be tensed/show tense distinction, may occur in isolation • Nonfinite ‘dependent’ verbs: contextually dependent, tense determined by context 3 Illustration: tense/aspect distinctions in write Present: I write Present progressive: I am writing Present perfect: I have written Present perfect progressive: I have been writing Past: I wrote Past progressive: I was writing Past perfect: I had written Past perfect progressive: I had been writing Future: I will write Future progressive: I will be writing Future perfect: I will have written Future perfect progressive: I will have been writing Questions: what tense inflectional categories are expressed? Which categories are expressed by means of a morphological process, and which are expressed by a modal? Question: which aspectual categories are expressed, and how are they formalized? Question: what modalities are expressed in English, and how are they formalized? 4 Illustration: verb paradigms in Old English Question: which forms are finite and which are nonfinite? Question: what tense categories are expressed in the morphology and how? 5 Question: what aspectual categories are expressed in the morphology and how? Question: what modality categories are expressed in the morphology and how? Illustration: weak versus strong verbs Question: how does marking of verbal categories differ in two above classes? 6