Download Enzymes - Ústav lékařské biochemie a laboratorní diagnostiky

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Metabolic network modelling wikipedia , lookup

Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup

Glycolysis wikipedia , lookup

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide wikipedia , lookup

Photosynthetic reaction centre wikipedia , lookup

Ultrasensitivity wikipedia , lookup

Evolution of metal ions in biological systems wikipedia , lookup

Amino acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup

Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup

Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Catalytic triad wikipedia , lookup

Enzyme inhibitor wikipedia , lookup

Lactate dehydrogenase wikipedia , lookup

Enzyme wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ÚSTAV LÉKAŘSKÉ BIOCHEMIE A LABORATORNÍ DIAGNOSTIKY 1. LF UK A VFN
Enzymes
Practical lesson on medical biochemistry
General Medicine
Jiří Kraml and Jiřina Crkovská
edited by Jan Pláteník
2016/2017
In the following practical lesson the protein nature of enzymes will be demonstrated
on enzyme sucrase (invertase - EC 3.2.1.26) from yeast, and the specificity with respect to the
type of glycosidic bond will be demonstrated on enzymes amylase from saliva and yeast
sucrase.
As to the physical-chemical factors acting on the activity of enzymes, the pH
dependence of pepsin activity will be tested.
On the example of lactate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.27) the dependence of the rate of
enzyme-catalyzed reaction on the initial concentration of substrate will be demonstrated (at a
constant enzyme concentration), and also the relationship between Michaelis constant Km and
maximal velocity V will be examined.
1. Demonstration of enzyme specificity
Principle:
The action of enzymes is highly specific with respect to the substrate as well as to the
type of catalyzed reaction. In our experiment, the specificity will be demonstrated on enzyme
amylase from saliva and yeast sucrase. Amylase cleaves α-1,4-glycosidic bonds in starch
giving a mixture of oligosaccharides. Sucrase hydrolyses sucrose to glucose and fructose.
Since reducing saccharides are the resulting products in both cases, Fehling´s test can be
employed to show whether the cleavage of substrate occurred.
Theoretical background to substrate specificity:
As to substrate specificity, some enzymes exhibit very broad substrate specificity, e.g.
esterases splitting both natural and artificial esters; some have a very narrow specificity, e.g.
urease splitting only urea.
Glycosidases belong to the class of hydrolases EC 3 (subsubclass EC 3.2.1 of the
international nomenclature of enzymes). They are specific towards the type of glycosidic
bond (α-glycosidases or β-glycosidases).
Yeast sucrase, as already mentioned, is a β-fructofuranosidase and splits βglycosidic bond in sucrose. In this respect it has a specificity different from the mammalian
small intestinal sucrase, sucrose α-D-glucohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.48), which splits sucrose and
maltose and is specific towards the α-glycosidic bond.
Amylase, both of plant and animal origin, splits 1,4-α-glycosidic bonds of starch,
glycogen and polysaccharides. It does not split 1,4-β-glycosidic bonds, as in cellulose.
α-Amylase is an enzyme present in saliva and pancreatic juice of animals. It splits by
endohydrolysis 1,4-α-glycosidic bonds in starch, glycogen and polysaccharides containing 3
or more glucose units bound as 1,4-α-glycosides. Thus it is named officially 1,4-α-D-glucan
glucanohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.1). Amylose is split hydrolytically to a mixture of maltose and
glucose with hemiacetal hydroxyls released as α-anomers. Amylopectin and glycogen are
split randomly on 1,4-α-glycosidic bonds, whereas 1,6-α-bonds remain intact, thus the
resulting products are branched and unbranched oligosaccharides. Enzymatic hydrolysis of
starch passes through various stages, which can be demonstrated by the reaction with iodine.
2
Starch gives with iodine a dark-blue color, polysaccharide split products – dextrins are stained
violet (amylodextrin), purple or red (erythrodextrin), the shorter ones do not give a reaction
with iodine at all (achrodextrin). At the same time the amount of reducing sugars in the
hydrolytic mixture increases.
β-Amylase is an enzyme of plant origin, contained also in malt, and splits 1,4-αglycosidic bonds from the non-reducing end of polysaccharide chain. Thus amylose gives
practically quantitatively maltose, released as anomer β- , leading to optical inversion in
polarimetry. The enzyme is systematically designated as 1,4-α-D-glucan maltohydrolase (EC
3.2.1.2). Amylopectin (and glycogen) are split from the non-reducing ends as well, up to the
1,6-α- branching, the 1,6-α-bonds remaining intact. Dextrin originated from enzymatic
hydrolysis of amylopectin by β-amylase is called limit-dextrin. Neither animal α-amylase
nor plant β-amylase can split 1,6-α- or 1,4-β-glycosidic bonds.
γ-Amylase (glucoamylase) is a membrane bound enzyme in brush borders on the
surface of enterocytes of the small intestinal mucosa. It is relatively thermostable
(thermostable maltase) and splits polysaccharides, and still better maltose from the nonreducing end on the 1,4-α-bonds, releasing β-glucose. (Its official name is 1,4-α-D-glucoside
glucohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.20). It appears that γ-amylase has a slight specificity also to 1,6-αbonds in isomaltose, amylopectin and glycogen. In oligosaccharides released in the small
intestine by digestion of starch and glycogen by α-amylase these bonds are split by
isomaltase subunit of sucrase-isomaltase complex of the brush-border, named oligosaccharide α-glucohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.10 (oligo-1,6-glucosidase). Sucrase-isomaltase
complex of the brush border is originally synthesized as a single polypeptide chain; the
subunits originate secondarily, by proteolytic action of other proteases secreted into the
intestinal lumen, and have a high degree of homology in their primary structures. The gene of
the precursor pro-sucrase-isomaltase apparently evolved by duplication of a single ancestral
gene. Both subunits split maltose (representing about 80% of maltase activity of smallintestinal mucosa), moreover sucrase splits sucrose and the isomaltase activity is specific for
the bonds 1,6-α- (isomaltose, dextrins).
Reagents:
1) Starch solution 10 g/l (1 g of starch is shaken or heated with water; pour the resulting
suspension slowly to 100 ml of boiling water, keep boiling 2-3 minutes)
2) Sucrose 10 g/l (daily fresh)
3) Physiological solution (NaCl 9 g/l)
4) Yeast sucrase
5) Fehling′s solution I: copper sulfate 70 g/l
6) Fehling′s solution II: sodium hydroxide 250 g/l
sodium potassium tartrate 350 g/l
7) Lugol solution: iodine 13 g/l and potassium iodide 25 g/l
3
Procedure:
a. Collect about 1 ml of your own saliva to a test tube, and shake with 9 ml of physiological
solution. This will serve as a preparation of amylase.
b. Number four long glass tubes with a marker and pipette the following volumes into them:
Tube No
1
2
3
4
Starch
5 ml
-
5 ml
-
Sucrose
-
5 ml
-
5 ml
Amylase
1 ml
1 ml
-
-
Sucrase
-
-
1 ml
1 ml
c. Incubate the tubes for 30 minutes at 37 °C (thermo block).
d. Prepare Fehling′s reagent: in a beaker combine about 10 ml Fehling I (CuSO4) with an
equal amount of Fehling II [sodium potassium tartrate (Seignett′s salt) with NaOH].
e. Use Fehling′s test to detect where the cleavage of substrate occurred: Take four new long
test tubes, mark them 1-4 and put about 1 ml of Fehling′s reagent to each tube. Add
several drops of the reaction mixtures from the corresponding original tubes, and place the
tubes to a boiling water bath. Read the result after several minutes of heating. Green,
orange or red color due to formation of Cu2O indicates presence of reducing compounds.
f. Take the rest of incubation mixtures in the original tubes 1 and 3 (where starch was used)
and perform a test for starch using Lugol solution (pre-diluted with water: 4 drops/10 ml
of water).
Evaluation: Indicate to the table in your lab report where the cleavage of the substrate
occurred using symbols + (substrate cleaved) or − (substrate not cleaved).
2. Demonstration of dependence of enzyme activity on pH
Principle and theoretical background:
The influence of pH will be demonstrated on the example of pepsin. There are
different forms of active pepsin which differ depending on species and are also named
differently. All of them belong to the subsubclass of aspartate endopeptidases (EC 3.4.23),
i.e. they possess in their active sites two aspartate residues mutually oriented towards the
opposite partner, which participate in the acid base catalysis, and have an acidic pH optimum.
Due to their similarities they constitute so called peptidase family A1 (EC 3.4.23.1, EC
3.4.23.2, EC 3.4.23.3). The originally described properties of human pepsin correspond to the
porcine enzyme named pepsin A (EC 3.4.23.1), which is formed in acidic medium of gastric
lumen by limited proteolysis from the inactive precursor – pepsinogen A, product of
zymogenic cells of gastric mucosa located mainly in fundus. The proteolysis proceeds at pH
lower than 5 as an intramolecular reaction (autoactivation), or due to active pepsin itself
(autocatalysis). At pH higher than 2 the released peptides remain bound to pepsin and act as
inhibitors of pepsin activity. This inhibition is removed at pH below 2.
4
Human pepsin A has 5 molecular forms. It represents the main pepsin activity in the
gastric juice of vertebrates and its specificity is directed to hydrophobic (Leu), preferentially
aromatic (Phe) amino acid residues before and after the split bond (endohydrolysis). Pepsin B
(EC 3.4.23.2) is formed by a similar mechanism as pepsin A, but from pepsinogen B, and
compared to pepsin A it has a low proteolytic activity to hemoglobin as substrate, however,
splits gelatin very efficiently. It is produced mainly in pylorus. Pepsin C (EC 3.4.23.2) is
named in humans as gastricsin and is formed from the precursor progastricsin, which is
secreted in gastric fundus, antrum and in proximal duodenum. It splits by endohydrolysis
preferentially peptide bonds after the amino acid residue Tyr, is less specific than pepsin A
and has a high activity against hemoglobin as substrate.
For pepsin A the pH optimum depends on substrates: for egg albumin it is 1.5, for
casein it is 1.8 and for hemoglobin the value is 2.3. Gastricsin has pH optimum for
hemoglobin as substrate 3.2.
In the present exercise the proteolytic action of pepsin will be demonstrated on eggwhite proteins as substrate.
Reagents:
1) Pepsin solution 10 g/l
2) Hydrochloric acid 0.1 mol/l
3) Egg-white suspension (boiled egg-white is homogenized in physiological solution – final
protein concentration about 300 g/l)
Procedure:
Measure the following volumes (shake the egg white suspension before use!):
Tube No
1
2
3
4
Final pH
1.2
1.5
2.5
control
Pepsin
ml
2.0
2.0
2.0
-
HCl
ml
4.0
2.0
0.2
2.0
Distilled water
ml
-
2.0
3.8
4.0
Egg-white
ml
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Incubate the tubes for 10 minutes at 37 °C (thermo block). Read the results after each minute
during the first 5 minutes of incubation, and again 5 minutes later when the 10 minutes
incubation is complete.
Interpretation:
The egg-white suspension is cloudy and digestion with pepsin makes the solution
clearer. Evaluate visually the appearance of solution in the tubes and write the results to the
table in your lab report. Use the symbols + for complete clarification, ± for partial
clarification and − for persistent turbidity.
The optimal pH is in the test tube with the clearest solution.
5
3. Effect of substrate concentration on the rate of enzyme catalyzed
reaction: the Michaelis constant
Principle:
The rate of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction is defined as the amount of product formed
per unit of time:
∆ [P ]
∆t
The rate depends on the availability of substrate, i.e. on substrate concentration.
Unless the substrate is in great excess, the reaction velocity decreases with time as the
substrate is consumed in the reaction and its concentration lowers. In further consideration,
we will work with initial velocity - v0, i.e. the reaction rate in first minutes of the reaction
when the substrate has not yet become significantly consumed and the effect of time is
negligible.
The relationship of the initial velocity on substrate concentration follows MichaelisMenten equation:
reaction rate
Vmax × S
Km + S
maximal velocity (in unlimited availability of substrate)
substrate concentration
Michaelis constant
v
Vmax
S
Km
=
=
Mathematically the relationship has a form of rectangular hyperbola (graph I on p. 11).
The Michaelis constant is a very important term introduced by this equation. It is
defined as the concentration of substrate required to achieve half the maximum velocity
of the enzyme reaction. By definition it is expressed in units of concentration. It does not
depend on concentration of the enzyme in reaction mixture and remains constant for a given
couple enzyme-substrate. Therefore, the Michaelis constant is actually a measure of the
affinity of the enzyme to the substrate. The lower the value the higher is the affinity.
In the present experiment the preparation of lactate dehydrogenase (L-lactate: NAD+oxidoreductase, EC 1.1.1.27) will be used. Lactate will serve as a substrate, which is
converted in the presence in NAD+ as the coenzyme of lactate dehydrogenase (LD) to
pyruvate.
CH3-CHOH-COOH + NAD+
← →
CH3-CO-COOH + NADH + H+
This reaction represents the final stage of glycolysis. Lactate dehydrogenase has 5 isoenzymes
(LD1 – LD5) and their distribution in the body reflects the metabolic specialization of
individual organs, e.g. LD1 prevails in the heart, whereas LD5 is dominant in skeletal muscle.
The latter form prevails also in the liver. Individual isoenzymes may be separated e.g. by
electrophoresis, which enables an organ-specific diagnosis. In our experiments the preparation
of lactate dehydrogenase will serve for demonstration of quantitative relationship between the
enzyme and the substrate (L-lactate). The task will be to follow the influence of various
concentrations of substrate (S) on the initial velocity (v0). Therefore the substrate
concentration will range between 12.5 – 200 mmol/l, whereas the dilution of the enzyme
solution will remain constant.
6
The estimation of initial velocity v0 is based on the photometry of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone of pyruvic acid, originating by the reaction of the oxo- group of pyruvate with the
free amino group of dinitrophenylhydrazine in acidic medium (simultaneously the low pH
stops the enzymatic reaction). From this reaction 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone results, which
after alkalization gives a brown-orange color suitable for photometric estimation at 505 nm.
NO 2
COOH
C
O + H 2N NH
CH3
COOH
Condensation
NO 2
C
N NH
NO2
NO2 + H2O
CH3
2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine
Pyruvic acid
2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone of pyruvic acid
Reagents:
1)
2)
3)
4)
Rat liver homogenate (contains lactate dehydrogenase)
Sodium lactate solution 0.6 mol/l
TRIS-HCI 0.05 mol/l buffer, pH 8.5 containing 1 mg/ml of bovine serum albumin
NAD+ solution 3 mmol/l in TRIS-HCl buffer (same as above). Prepare daily fresh!
5) 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) solution in HCl 1 mol/l.
fresh!
Prepare daily
6) NaOH 0.4 mol/l
Procedure:
a. Prepare working solutions of sodium lactate by serial dilution of the 0.6 mol/l stock as
follows (solution from the preceding tube is used for each next dilution):
Tube No
Lactate
TRIS-HCl
buffer
Final lactate
concentration
mol/l
ml
ml
mol/l
1
0.6000 (from stock)
1.0
-
0.6000
2
0.6000 (from stock)
1.0
1.0
0.3000
3
0.3000 (from tube 2)
1.0
1.0
0.1500
4
0.1500 (from tube 3)
1.0
1.0
0.0750
5
0.0750 (from tube 4)
1.0
1.0
0.0375
b. Prepare a set of 6 marked test tubes and proceed according to the following table:
N.B.: Numbers of test tubes correspond to the numbers of working concentrations of
lactate in the table above.
The tube No 6 serves as a blank; it receives the lowest lactate concentration and the
enzyme is added after DNPH to prevent its function.
Keep 20 sec intervals between the individual additions of the enzyme and DNPH.
7
Tube No
1
2
3
4
5
6
-
-
-
-
-
Lactate 0.6 mol/l
(ml) 0.2
Lactate 0.3 mol/l
(ml)
-
0.2
-
-
-
-
Lactate 0.15 mol/l
(ml)
-
-
0.2
-
-
-
Lactate 0.075 mol/l
(ml)
-
-
-
0.2
-
-
Lactate 0.0375 mol/l
(ml)
-
-
-
-
0.2
0.2
NAD+
(ml) 0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Pre-incubate approximately 5 min at 37° C in thermo block
Enzyme (liver homogenate)
(add in 20 sec. intervals)
(ml) 0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
-
Mix and incubate exactly 15 min. at 37° C in thermo block
DNPH
(add in 20 sec. intervals)
(ml) 0.5
Enzyme (liver homogenate)
(ml)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
-
-
-
-
0.1
5.0
5.0
-
Allow to stand 15 minutes at room temperature
NaOH
(ml) 5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Mix the contents of tubes thoroughly and after 5 minutes measure the
absorbances at 505 nm against the blank (tube 6)
Results:
Write the results to the table in your lab report form.
8
Evaluation - estimation of the Michaelis constant:
Two graphical methods and one numerical are offered for the estimation of Michaelis
constant. Perform all three of them using your experimental results in order to obtain the
value of Michaelis constant for lactate dehydrogenase and lactate.
A. Double reciprocal plot (Lineweaver-Burke)
When 1/v is plotted against 1/S, a linear function is obtained (see graph II on p. 11).
The intercept of the function with x-axis represents -1/Km, while intercept with y-axis gives
1/Vmax.
1
v
=
Km
Vmax
×
1
S
+
1
Vmax
Plot 1/v (1/A505) against 1/S as in graph II, fit a straight line and obtain Km
and Vmax from the intercepts.
The reaction rate v can be plotted directly as A505, because this value is directly related
to the amount of product formed in nanomoles. It is also possible to read the amount of the
product in nanomoles from a calibration graph and convert to the rate v expressed in
nanokatals (nanomoles per second). In each pair one student can plot the graph as the
relationship between 1/A505 and 1/S, whereas the other student can plot the values on the y
axis as 1/v in nanomoles of the product formed per 1 second (nkatals). Comparing the graphs,
both students can verify that the value of Km (expressed as molar concentration of lactate)
obtained in both ways of plotting is identical and does not depend on the units chosen for the
reaction rate.
B. Direct linear plot (Eisenthal, Cornish-Bowden)
Plot v (A505) against substrate concentration S as in graph I (page 11) and fit a
rectangular hyperbola.
Then mark each S value onto the x-axis (horizontal) and the corresponding v onto the
y-axis (vertical). Connect these two points by a straight line. Repeat the process for each pair
of points. Hence n lines are obtained for n pairs of points.
If the data fit equation of rectangular hyperbola exactly, all the lines intersect in one
point whose distance from x-axis is Vmax and the one from y-axis is -Km.
In practice when data contain measurement errors, a number of different intersections
are obtained. The coordinates of each intersection provide estimates of Km and Vmax; the
medians of these estimates are the best-fit values of Km and Vmax.
Note: If the data are ordered according to their numerical values, the median can be found as
the middle one of an odd-numbered data set or the mean of the middle pair in an evennumbered data set.
9
C. Numerical method
The Michaelis constant can be calculated directly from the results using mathematical
description of hyperbolic function. Your experimental data represent a set of values of v
(A505) and corresponding substrate concentrations S:
v1
S1
v2
S2
v3
S3
v4
S4
v5
S5
Taking any two pairs of corresponding values, e.g. v1 S1 and v2 S2, the Michaelis constant
can be calculated from the equation:
Km = S1
v2 − v1
× S2 
(v1 × S2) − (v2 × S1)
Calculate Km for all possible pairs of corresponding values v and S and then find a median
value (see above) from these results.
10
11