* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download OPTIONAL Vanska 4
Age disparity in sexual relationships wikipedia , lookup
Gender apartheid wikipedia , lookup
Sexual stimulation wikipedia , lookup
Sexual racism wikipedia , lookup
Body odour and sexual attraction wikipedia , lookup
Sexual slavery wikipedia , lookup
Human male sexuality wikipedia , lookup
Sexual ethics wikipedia , lookup
Sex and sexuality in speculative fiction wikipedia , lookup
Human mating strategies wikipedia , lookup
Gender roles in non-heterosexual communities wikipedia , lookup
Human sexual response cycle wikipedia , lookup
Rochdale child sex abuse ring wikipedia , lookup
History of human sexuality wikipedia , lookup
Erotic plasticity wikipedia , lookup
Lesbian sexual practices wikipedia , lookup
Human female sexuality wikipedia , lookup
Sexual objectification wikipedia , lookup
Exploitation of women in mass media wikipedia , lookup
Sexual attraction wikipedia , lookup
Slut-shaming wikipedia , lookup
Female promiscuity wikipedia , lookup
Gender in Magazine Advertising: Skin Sells Best Mary J. Thompson Abstract This study involves an analysis of 2007 fashion advertisements published in Gentlemen’s Quarterly (GQ) and Vogue between 1964, at the beginning of the sexual revolution, and 1994, to see if there were changes in the use of sexual attire and nudity. The analysis indicates that this use increased in GQ, as well as Vogue, suggesting that the sexual objectification of both men’s and women’s bodies increased over the forty-year period. Thompson, M. J. (2000). Gender in magazine advertising: Skin sells best. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18(3), 178-181. Key Words: sexual appeal, gender, role fluidity, border work, male body. Introduction Within the period of this study, 1964-1994, advertising gained increasing importance in shaping the standards by which successive generations will seek to live (Klassen, M.L., Jasper, C.R. and Schwartz, A.M., 1993). Advertisements showcase attitudes and ideas; the corresponding power to influence is formidable because advertising can also change values, such as those surrounding the display and meaning of the body. Nowhere is the potency of advertising more evident than in the arena of selling clothing and appearance-related commodities. The ability to convince today’s audience to desire a product often depends on sexual appeal, and feminists view this aspect of advertising as a cause for alarm (McKinnon, 1982). This study analyzes the amount or degree of sexual appeal in fashion advertising in Gentleman’s Quarterly (GQ) and Vogue between 1964, which can be described as the last year before the &dquo;sexual revolution,&dquo; and 1994, ten years after what might be characterized as the end of this revolution (in 1984).’ I was interested in examining the extend to which skin exposure, whether on male or female models, changed over this forty-year period. At the time I initiated the study, I used a theoretical framework highlighting &dquo;role fluidity&dquo; (Thompson, 1999) and changes in the &dquo;border work&dquo; (Thome, 1993) between masculine and feminine images. Since the completion of the study, several feminist authors (e.g., Bordo, 1999; Author’s Address: 3256 SFLC, Home Economics and Family Life Education, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602. 178 Faludi, 1999) have chronicled the apparent increase in the commodification and objectification of men’s bodies. Faludi (1999) notes the rise in &dquo;ornamental culture,&dquo; as highlighted by the display of men’s bodies in Calvin Klein ads beginning in 1981. A symbolic interactionist perspective would explain this rise in terms of negotiated changes in imagery and meaning (Stone, 1962; Workman, and Johnson, 1993; Nagasawa, Kaiser, and Hutton, 1995). The images conveyed by advertising have become so sophisticated and persuasive that they now organize our experiences and understandings (Kang, 1997, p. 980)-experiences and understandings, for example, that surround perceptions of gender in relation to sexiness. Seeing the world through advertisements does not necessarily induce direct changes in how men and women look in everyday life, but it does shape how individuals think men and women can and should look. Such depictions serve the social purpose of convincing perceivers that this is how men and women are, want to be, or should be (Klassen et al., 1993, p. 30). Advertisements serve to define men’s and women’s roles and the nature of situations in which they find themselves (Albrecht, Chadwick, and Jacobson, 1987). To the extent that advertising serves as a mirror of society (Cunningham, 1992; Kuhn, 1985; Williamson, 1978), it can also denote societal changes (Belk and Pollary, 1985). Clothing and appearance symbols may be reconstructed in less traditional and less dualistic paradigms, for example, as gender boundaries blur or shift. This process of reconstruction can be described as one of &dquo; role fluidity&dquo; across gender ’The study also analyzed changes in the amount of tailored/traditional and casual/unisex advertisements over this forty-year period. However, the present paper focuses only on the issue of sexual display. Such fluidity may emerge from cultural ambivalences about what it means to appear masculine or feminine (Davis, 1992). The literature documents the ways in which women’s bodies, in particular, serve the function of sexual display, but little research is available to document changes in the display of men’s bodies. categories (Thompson, 1999). Review of Literature A number of authors have studied the sexual content in often with the expectation that such content advertising, increased in relation to the more liberal views on sex associated with the sexual revolution between 1964 and 1984 (Bordo, 1999, p. 129). Sexton and Haberman (1974) measured the extent to which women were presented as sex objects in 1,827 advertisements in Good Housekeeping, Look, Newsweek, Sports Illustrated, and TV Guide between 1961 and 1971. They concluded that there was a 15% increase in the use of women as sex objects over this ten-year period. In contrast, Soley and Kurzbard (1986) studied 1,698 advertisements in general interest (Time and Newsweek), women’s (Cosmopolitan and Redbook), and men’s (Playboy and Esquire) magazines and found little evidence of an increase in sexual appeals between 1964 and 1984. However, there were important variations among the portrayals; men’s and women’s magazines showed sexually dressed and undressed models with greater frequency than the general interest magazines, and more female than male models were suggestively clad, partially clad, or nude. Similarly, Solely and Reed (1988) did not find an inin the percentage of advertisements between 1964 and 1984, but they did find an increase in the number of sexual elements within advertisements. Again, female models in 1984 were more likely than male models to be portrayed as nude or partially nude. Ferguson, Kreshel, and Tinkham (1990) found that the sexual objectification of women even applied to Ms. Magazine, with its policy against sexist advertising. They found a 52% increase in the number of women portrayed as sex objects between 1973 and 1987. Klassen, Jasper, and Schwartz (1993) used Goffman’ss (1979) system of gendered &dquo;frame analysis&dquo; to study 3,500 advertisements in Ms., Playboy, and Newsweek which were overwhelming portrayed in traditional poses. However, they also found that traditional role depictions of women and men in these magazines decreased over the period of the study, to a greater extend than in Ms. magazine. Kang (1997) also used Goffman’s (1979) frame analysis system to analyze Vogue, Mademoiselle, and McCall’s magazines. Comparisons between 250 ads in 1978 and 250 in 1991 revealed that women in 1991 were more often portrayed as sex symbols. This study suggested that fashion advertising in the 1990s became more sexually explicit and provocative. In a more comprehensive study on the roles and dress of women, Paff and Lakner (1997) analyzed ads in Good Housekeeping and Vogue between 1950 and 1994. They analyzed 375 ads from 25 issues of each magazine, and found that women were still characterized in predominantly feminine roles and that their dress was more femicrease nine than masculine over the period of the study. In the 1980s and into the 1990s, the popular press included articles on sexually explicit content and nudity in advertising. Comments found in Newsweek (March 11,1985 and September 15, 1986), Art Direction (1989), Forbes (January 22, 1990), The New York Times (October 4, 1993), and other periodicals all reinforced the belief that sex sells products, and a woman’s body traditionally has done it better than a man’s. Skin appears to sell in any type of magazine and to any segment of American society (LaTour and Henthome, 1993; Severn, Belch, and Belch, 1990). In the late 1990s, writers began to address the ways in which men’ss bodies have become, and have been used, to sell commodities as well (Bordo, 1999; Faludi, 1999). Yet there is almost no research that systematically documents the changes in the sexual portrayals of men’s bodies. My study extends previous research by including an analysis of male, as well as female models, in advertising. Method magazines of Vogue and two issues of GQ were selected for the years of 1964, 1974, 1984, and 1994. The sampling process controlled for seasonal and other variations in fashion magazine advertising content. In each issue chosen, all half and full-page advertisements in both Vogue and GQ were collected. The combined advertisements by years were 391 for 1964; 466 for 1974, 574 for 1984; and 576 for 1994. The total was 2,007 half and/or full-page advertisements. The advertisements were kept separate for each fashion magazine and were then divided into two groups for each respective magazine: (1) those using female models, and (2) those using male models. Two men and two women who had been trained in content analysis charting and coding procedures worked independently to code the ads. As part of a larger study, the classification system included an analysis of traditional/tailored clothing and casual/unisex clothing. The present paper focuses on the category of &dquo;sexual appeal.&dquo; This was operationalized in terms of the following descriptors: reveal- Two randomly ing, nude, disclosing, clinging, showing, divulging, displaying, exposing, exhibiting, or baring. The category included the display of cleavage or large pectorals in the chest area, skin on the body, muscularity, complete nudity, or plunging necklines. Also classified in this category were styles emphasizing the groin area, visible bras (or no bras) and other lingerie, and those baring the legs from the upper thigh to the feet (e.g., slit skirts; tennis, aerobic, or exercise wear; and swimsuit and basketball attire). To determine internal consistency or stability of measuring over time, a reliability check was done on the advertisements coded by one of the women and one of the men. Advertisements coded from a single issue of one magazine were compared. The inter-rater reliability was .85. The final results reviewed to see if raters differed on the If there were disagreements as to placement of the advertisement in a particular category, the majority decision prevailed. were categorization. 179 Data Analysis and Findings Overall, 80 GQ ads and 178 Vogue ads were placed in the sexual appeal category for the period of the study. These represented 9.3% of the 861 GQ ads and 14% of the 1,273 Vogue ads analyzed. Table 1 provides a breakdown of these by year, indicating an overall increase in sexually explicit fashion ads over time. No sexually explicit images of men were found in GQ before 1984, when 37 were found in the ads sampled. This finding is consistent with Faludi’ss (1999) discussion of the influence of the more revealing data Calvin Klein ads in 1981. The increase continued in 1994, when there were 43 &dquo;sexual appeal&dquo; images of men. In contrast, the dramatic increase in women’s &dquo;sexual appeal&dquo; images in Vogue occurred between 1964, when there were only four, and 1974, when there were 53. This increase coincides with the influence of the sexual revolution-an influence that apparently applied only to women’s bodies until the 1980s. There was a reduction in the number of sexual appeal ads between 1974 and 1984 in Vogue, but a large increase in 1994. Table 1. Increase in &dquo;Sexual Appeal&dquo; Clothing Ads: 1964-1984 References Albrecht, S. L., Chadwick, B. A. and Jacobson, C. K. (1987). Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Beck, A. and Pollary, R. W. (1985). Images of ourselves: The good life in twentieth century advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 887-897. Bordo, S. (1999). The male body: A new look at man in public and private. NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Conant, J. (1986, September 15). Sexy does it. Newsweek, 108, pp. 62-64. Cunningham, P. A. (1992). Response to forum: Gendered appearances in twentieth-century popular media. Dress, 19, pp. 90-92. Davis, F. (1992). Fashion, culture, and identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Faludi, S. (1999). Stiffed: The betrayal of the American NY: William Morrow and Company, Inc. J. Ferguson, H., Kreshel, P. J., and Tinkham, S. F. (1990). In MS: Sex role portrayals of women in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 19, 40-51. Foltz, K. (1985, March 11). A kinky new Calvinism. Newsweek, 105, pp. 65. Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisement. NY: Harper & Row. Huberman, J. (1989). Cleavage. Art Direction, 40(12), pp. man. 54-56. Naked bodies. The New York Times, pp. D8. Kang, M. E. (1997). The portrayal of women’s images in magazine advertisements: Goffman’s gender analysis revisited. Sex Roles, 37, 979-996. Klassen, M. L., Jasper, C. R. and Schwartz, A. M. (1993). Men and women: Images of their relationships in magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising Research, March/April, 30-39. Kuhn, A. (1985). The power of the image: Essays on representation and sexuality. NY: Roultedge. LaTour, M. S., and Henthorne, T. L. (1993). Female nudity : Attitudes toward the ad and the brand, and implications for advertising strategy. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10, 25-32. Levine, J. (1990, January 22). Marketing: Fantasy, not flesh. Forbes, 145, pp. 118-120. McKinnon, C. (1982). Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: An agenda for theory. Signs, 7, 515-541. Nagasawa, R. H., Kaiser, S. B., and Hutton, S. S. (1995). Construction of an SI Theory of fashion: Part 2. From discovery to formalization. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 13, 234-244. Paff, J. L. and Lakner, H. B. (1997). Dress and the female gender role in magazine advertisements of 1950-1994: A content analysis. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 26, 29-58. Severn, J., Belch, G. E., and Belch, M. A. (1990). The effects of sexual and nonsexual advertising appeals and information level on cognitive processing and communication effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19, 14-22. Janofsky, M. (1993, October 4). Discussion This study documents the increase in sexual appeal clothing in GQ and Vogue between 1964 and 1994. This increase occurred earlier in Vogue (between 1964 and 1974), suggesting that the impact of the sexual revolution was more easily assimilated into the display of women’s as compared to men’s bodies. The first sexually explicit imagery involving men’s bodies was found in GQ in 1984, a few years after Calvin Klein introduced such clothing styles for men. It is interesting to note that there were actually more explicit men’s (37) than women’s (24) ads in 1984, but by 1994 the number of explicit women’s ads more than doubled those of men’s. Overall, the number of sexual appeal images were higher in Vogue than in GQ, consistent with the more traditional objectification of women’s bodies. However, it is noteworthy that sexual objectification has not been restricted to women’s bodies in the last 15 years, at least. This finding may be interpreted in terms of &dquo;role fluidity&dquo; (Thompson, 1999) pertaining to sexual display. It seems that a renegotiation of gender boundaries has occurred, to the extent that dominant, capitalist culture at the end of the twentieth century is unlikely to limit sexual objectification to women’s bodies. If, indeed, men’s bodies, too. 180 sex sells, then it appears to sell well on Sexton, D. E., and Haberman, P. (1974). Women in magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising Research, 41-46. 14, Soley, L., and Kurzbard, G. (1986). Sex in advertising: A comparison of 1964 and 1984 magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 15, 46-54. Solely, L. and Reed, L. N. (1988). Taking it off: Are models in magazine ads wearing less? Journalism Quarterly, 65, 960-966. Stone, G. (1962). Appearance and the self. In A. M. Rose, (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes: An interactionist approach, (pp. 86-118). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Thompson, M. J. (1999). The effects of Confucianism and on the role choices of Chinese peasant in Shandong Province, China: 1930-1980. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young Uni- communism women versity). Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Williamson, J. (1978). Decoding advertisements: Ideology and meaning in advertising. London: Marion Bovars. Workman, J. E. and Johnson, K. K. P. (1993). Cultural aesthetics and the social construction of gender. In S. J. Lennon & L. D. Bums (Eds.), Social science aspects of dress: New directions. International Textiles and Apparel Association (ITAA) Special Publication, No. 5, (pp. 993-110). Monument, CO. 181