* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Oecologia - Florida State University
Survey
Document related concepts
Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Storage effect wikipedia , lookup
Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup
Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Ecology of the San Francisco Estuary wikipedia , lookup
Triclocarban wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Oecologia Oecologia (Berlin) (1984) 63: 295-299 © Springer-Verlag 1984 An experimental investigation of enhanced harpacticoid (Copepoda) abundances around isolated seagrass shoots David Thistle 1 2 Department Department t, Jeffrey A. Reidenauer 1, Robert H. Findlay 2, and Richard Waldo 1 of Oceanography, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA Summary. At a site in the Gulf of Mexico (29° 54.6' N, 81°31.4' W) off the coast of northern Florida, harpacticoid copepod abundance is significantly enhanced around isolated "plants" (technically short shoots) of the seagrass Syringodium filiforme. Using inanimate mimics of seagrass short shoots, we demonstrate, in the field, that the enhanced abundance does not result from the presence of the plant as a living entity. Our experiments reveal a two-fold increase in bacterial biomass around both short shoots and mimics; the harpacticoids appear to be responding to a local increase in their resources. We suggest that the flow field around a short shoot improves the rate of supply of oxygen and other materials to sedimentary bacteria, thereby driving the effect. Given the ubiquity of structures that have similar flow effects, localized bacterial enhancement may be common and should be considered in studies of the effects of surface structures on soft-bottom community organization. grass Syringodium filiforme. This sea grass has leaves (= blades) that are roughly circular in cross section and 10's of cm long. One or more leaves surrounded by a sheath is termed a short shoot. Short shoots are connected by a rhizome that lies 4 to 5 em below the sediment surface. Harpacticoid biology suggested three likely causes of the enhanced abundance: (1) the area immediately around a short shoot was a predation refuge (Woodin 1978, 1981), in particular, from bottom-feeding fishes; (2) the microbial food of harpacticoids was unusually abundant around the short shoot because the seagrass plant supplied nutrients; or (3) food was abundant because the plant interacted with the near-bottom flow in such a way that microbial growth was stimulated. Below, we report our investigation of these mechanisms. Locality Introduction Studies of macroinfaunal communities have historically reported patterns in the distribution of species with arguments as to their likely causes (Gray 1974). Only recently have field experiments supplemented this correlative approach, allowing the direct investigation of suspected underlying mechanisms (e.g., Woodin 1974, 1978; Peterson and Andre 1980), and only a few, controversial generalizations have appeared (e.g., Rhoads and Young 1970; Woodin 1976; Peterson 1979). Our understanding of the reasons for the localization of infaunal meiofauna species in space is even more rudimentary. Zonation patterns on beaches have been described together with their environmental correlates (e.g., Wieser 1959; Pollock 1970; Harris 1972), but for other soft-bottom habitats, few patterns are known (e.g., Heip and Engels 1977; Bell et al. 1978; Coull et al. 1979; Osenga and Coull 1983), and few field experiments have been done (e.g., Bell 1980; Thistle 1980b; Fleeger et al. 1982; Reise 1983). We seem far from any general explanation of meiofauna localization, and it seems likely that the study of many examples will be required before any generalizations emerge. Below, we present a pattern and explore its causes. The pattern involves the increased abundance of harpacticoid copepods in the vicinity of short shoots of the seaOffprint requests to.' David Thistle The site was at 1 m depth in St. George Sound, Florida, about 300 m offshore (29°54.6' N, 81°31.4' W). In this region, seagrass meadows occupy the shallow-subtidal habitats (Bittaker and Iverson, submitted). On our site, Thalassia testudinum Konig (turtle grass) dominated the shallow portion of the seagrass meadow, giving way to Syringoidum filiforme Kuntz (manatee grass) and then to un vegetated fine sand (graphic mean particle size = 0.155 mm) as the water deepened. We worked at the interface between S. flliforme and un vegetated sediment. This area is protected by offshore islands and shoals, so waves are small in the absence of local storms. Current velocity at 20 cm above bottom averaged 4.3 cm/s (maximum velocity = 15.6 cm/s) for 11 h of measurement (Sherman et al. 1983). Materials and methods Syringodium rhizomes that extended into otherwise unvegetated bottom bore short shoots that varied in their degree of isolation. In this study, we used short shoots having a single blade and located 5 em or more from the nearest neighboring short shoot. To determine the dimensions of such isolated short shoots, we identified 15 qualifying short shoots, chose 10 at random, and cut them off at the sediment surface. In the laboratory, we measured their lengths with a em rule and widths with the ocular micrometer of a dissecting microscope. These data were used to select dimensions for the short-shoot mimics. 296 Fig. 1. A schematic representation text for details of its construction. cated. The scale line is 1 cm of a seagrass mimic; see the The sediment surface is indi- The mimics were 28-cm-long pieces of polyethylene tubing (1.22 mm outer diameter). The top 5 em contained air and served as a float; the balance was filled with agar that had been dyed with food coloring to approximate the green of short shoots. The ends of the tubes were melted closed to seal the agar inside. All external traces of agar were removed by ultrasonic cleaning. The lowest 3 em were bound with monofilament line to a 4-cm-long glass-rod anchor. In the experiments, 6 em of the colored portion of the tube were placed below ground, leaving 17 em exposed (Fig. 1). The mimics were emplaced as if for the experiment but in an unused part of the study area to condition for one month before the start of each experiment. Our experiments were deployed according to a randomized-block design. For each block, an isolated short shoot was located. A pre-selected random arrangement was used to determine where the mimic and control should be located relative to the target short shoot. The three locations roughly paralleled the rhizome bearing the target short shoot. The mimic and control sites were chosen to be 5 em away from the nearest short shoot. The distances from the two end locations to the center location were equal within a block; among blocks, the inter-treatment distances were randomly chosen to be at least 10 cm but less that 25 cm. Blocks were at least 20 em from the body of the seagrass bed. In this region of the seagrass bed, new short shoots appear frequently while existing short shoots produce additional blades or are broken off. For these reasons, the prearranged sample locations could not always be used. For disrupted blocks where the mimic remained, new short shoots and control sites were sought that met the above criteria and preserved as much of the original randomization as possible (e.g., direction along the rhizome). One could not merely start again because the mimic constrained the location of the block. Although not strictly random, the relative positions of the treatments varied and were not in the experimenter's control; we treat them as if they had been mechanically randomized. The first experiment was designed to test the reality of the positive association of harpacticoid copepods with isolated short shoots that appeared in some preliminary data (Waldo, unpublished). The experiment ran for 11 days in August, 1981. At the time of sampling, the short shoots and mimics were clipped at the sediment surface and allowed to float away. Cores (3.5-cm inside diameter) were taken centered on the spot where each blade (mimic or short shoot) had been. Control cores were each centered on a predetermined spot. On the boat, the overlying water and top 1-cm layer from each sample were preserved in 10% formaldehyde. In the laboratory, the samples were sieved on a 0.062-mm aperture sieve. The harpacticoids were concentrated using the Barnett (1968) technique, stained with rose bengal, and sorted under a dissecting microscope; the Barnett procedure was 100% efficient (n = 6). Adults and fifth-stage copepodites were identified to working species and counted. We have begun to describe this largely new fauna formally (Thistle 1980a), but many species are without names. The second experiment was designed to detect differences in bacterial biomass and metabolic status among the three treatments. The experimental design followed that described above. It was done in August, 1983, and was sampled as follows. After a blade was clipped, a small (I-em diameter) core was emplaced next to the stub and stoppered. A 3.5-cm inner diameter core was then emplaced centered on the stub, stoppered, and the assembly removed from the sediment. On the boat, 14 microliters of filtersterilized sea water containing 0.1 microcurie/ml of[1_14C]labeled sodium acetate (56 microcuries/micrornole, ew England uclear Corp., Boston, MA) were injected into the sediment in the large core through a self-sealing silicone port 0.5 em below the sediment surface. After a 10-minute incubation, the top l-cm layer of sediment was sampled (omitting the piece of either mimic or short shoot that occurred in the layer). The reaction was then stopped by placement of the sample in a solution of chloroform and methanol (1: 2). In the laboratory, the samples were analyzed for the incorporation of acetate into bacterial phospholipid (as a measure of growth (White et al. 1979)) and into the bacterial storage polymers beta-hydroxyalkanoates (as a measure of stored as opposed to anabolized carbon (Findlay and White 1983)). The top l-cm layer was taken from the small core and placed in chloroform: methanol (1: 2) and transported to the laboratory for the determination of muramic acid as a measure of bacterial standing stock (Findlay et al. 1983). Eight blocks were sampled, but because of field and laboratory losses only 5 could be analyzed for acetate uptake. In our use of the analysis of variance, we examined plots of the residuals between observed and estimated values for evidence of violations of the assumptions of the ANOV A model. We were able to transform successfully all data sets that were initially in violation. The a posteriori Newman-Keuls procedure (Hicks 1973) was used. In all tests, the 95% experiment-wise significance level was used. Results The results of the first experiment confirmed the pattern that had appeared in the preliminary data. That is, we ana- 297 Table 1. The per-core abundance treatments of harpacticoid copepods in the Block Short shoot Mimic Control 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 54 69 47 59 64 72 43 34 84 53 36 49 59 45 41 37 47 25 43 35 41 30 16 23 Mean 55.25 50.5 32.5 Table 2. The concentration of muramic acid (nanomoles per gram dry weight of sediment) in the treatments Block Short shoot Mimic 1 8 5.24 12.84 10.37 27.14 13.67 20.14 6.12 12.26 10.56 9.84 8.05 21.54 24.38 10.05 6.32 10.52 3.13 9.32 6.67 10.23 3.83 8.05 4.62 8.90 Mean 1348 12.66 6.84 2 3 4 5 6 7 Table 3. The ratio of 14C-acetate incorporation to its incorporation into beta-hydroxyalkanoates Block 1 ·2 3 4 5 Mean Control into phospholipid Short shoot Mimic Control 0.49 0.38 0.31 0.34 0.40 0.46 0.48 0.62 0.30 0.56 0.31 0.32 0.19 0.25 0.32 0.38 0.48 0.28 Iyzed total harpacticoid abundance in 8 blocks of three treatments (plant, mimic, control) (Table 1) using a randomized-blocks, two-way analysis of variance (Sokal and Rohlf 1969), with treatments fixed and blocks random. There was a significant main effect. The a posteriori test revealed that plant and mimic means differed significantly from control means but did not differ significantly from each other. The abundances of the 21 harpacticoid species found were sufficiently low that we used the nonparametric analog of the randomized-block analysis of variance, the Friedman analysis of variance by ranks, and the distribution-free multiple comparisons test based on it (Hollander and Wolfe 1973) to test for differences among treatments at the level of harpacticoid species. The treatments could not be shown to differ for any species even at a single-test alpha level of 0.05. However, species abundances among treatments tended to parallel the pattern found for total harpacticoid abundance. To investigate this possibility, we treated species as replicates (Jumars 1975) asking if those that were reasonably abundant (mean per-core abundance > 1.0) tended to be more abundant in both plant and mimic sarn- pies than in the control samples when the abundance of each species was summed over blocks. Of the 10 species that were abundant enough to consider, 9 showed this pattern. This result is unlikely to have occurred by chance (exact two-tailed binomial probability=0.02). The second experiment tested for differences in the bacterial community around isolated short shoots, mimics, and controls. The biomass (muramic-acid) data are given in Table 2). The analysis of variance revealed a significant main effect. The a posteriori test showed that muramic-acid levels near short shoots and mimics differed from those around controls but not from each other. We also investigated bacterial metabolic status. Findlay and White (in preparation) have shown that the metabolic status of bacterial communities can be assessed by examining the ratio of carbon incorporated into cell membrane (phospholipid) to carbon incorporated into storage polymers (beta-hydroxyalkanoates). When cells have carbon available but are stressed because other materials are in short supply (e.g., inorganic nutrients and terminal electron acceptors), storage polymers accumulate; this condition is described as unbalanced growth, i.e., the accumulation of cellular carbon without the corresponding increase in cell numbers. When the stress is relieved, balanced growth can resume and the population grows rapidly (Nickels et al. .1979). In our data (Table 3), short-shoot means and mimic means did not differ significantly from each other but did differ significantly from the control mean. The direction of the difference was toward the production of cell membrane and away from production of storage polymers. Discussion The results of the comparison of short-shoot and control treatments in the first experiment confirmed our expectations based on the preliminary data; harpacticoids were more abundant around isolated short shoots than in unvegetated sediment at a comparable distance from the body of the sea grass bed. On the average, the abundances in control samples were 59% of those in short-shoot samples (Table 1). The response cannot be attributed to a dramatic concentration of individuals of one or a few species about the short shoots. Rather, it appears to be a general tendency of all the abundant species. The natural history of this association suggested several potential causes. Harpacticoid copepods are small (approximately 1 mm in body length), mobile crustaceans that feed on microbes (Hicks and Coull 1983, and contained references). In the laboratory, they move into sediments rich in their food organisms and away from food-poor sediments (Gray 1968; Ravenel and Thistle 1981), suggesting that local concentrations of harpacticoids could arise in nature from patchiness in the distribution of microbes (Gray 1968). Seagrasses excrete dissolved organic carbon (penhale and Smith 1977) that sedimentary bacteria are capable of utilizing (Moriarty and Pollard 1982). If sea grass exudates enhance the local food available to harpacticoids, the vicinity of a short shoot could be relatively attractive to harpacticoids. Microbial abundances could be elevated around isolated short shoots for a different reason. Eckman and Nowell (in press) report that structures comparable to isolated short shoots interact with the near-bottom flow. One consequence is the local thinning of the layer of viscous fluid 298 at the sediment surface, allowing better exchange across the interface (Jumars and Nowell 1984). The improved exchange could stimulate microbial growth (and attract harpacticoids) in a variety of ways. In particular, it could improve the rate of supply of oxygen which tends to be depleted in sediments (Revsbech et al. 1980; Revsbech et at 1983), thereby stimulating aerobic bacterial growth. Harpacticoid dispersion patterns are not likely to arise from interspecific competition given the size of harpacticoids and their trophic position (Dayton and Hessler 1972; Hicks and Coull 1983) or from modest differences in granulometry (Gray 1968; Ravenel and Thistle 1981), but patterns may be caused by predators in the way that abundances of several macroinfaunal species have been shown to be enhanced around the large, robust tubes formed by the polychaete Diopatra cuprea (Woodin 1978, 1981). For harpacticoids generally, juvenile fishes are potent predators (Feller and Kaczynski 1975; Sibert et al. 1977; Sheridan 1979). In north-Florida seagrass meadows, harpacticoids are heavily preyed upon by fishes (Stoner 1980). If fishes were less likely to feed on sediment near a short shoot than on unvegetated sediment, then one would expect the enhanced abundances observed. In our experiments, we sought to determine the relative importance of these several potential contributors to enhanced harpacticoid abundances around short shoots. In the first experiment, the mean number of harpacticoids did not differ between short shoots and non-living mimics. We take this result to mean that the effect is caused by the short shoot as a structure, not as a living entity, and that stimulation of microbes by plant exudates is not important to the effect. The remaining hypotheses are a flow-induced effect and a predation-refuge effect. Cages cannot be used to distinguish these alternatives because cages alter near-bottom water motion (Virnstein 1977; Eckman 1979; Dayton and Oliver 1980; Hulberg and Oliver 1980). We have used an asymmetry in the predictions of the two hypotheses to begin to distinguish between them. The flow hypothesis predicts that the microbial food resource of harpacticoids should be more favorable around plants and mimics than in control areas, whereas the refuge hypothesis predicts no such difference. The results of the second experiment show that the vicinities of both plants and mimics are areas of enhanced bacterial standing stocks and that the metabolic state of the bacteria differs among the treatments. In the controls, incorporation into carbon stores dominates; around short shoots and mimics, incorporation into cell membrane is relatively enhanced. This pattern is that expected if the enhanced fluid shear around short shoots and mimics were thinning the viscous sublayer and improving exchange. It seems clear from these results that bacterial growth is enhanced around short shoots. Given the attraction of harpacticoids to their bacterial food (Gray 1968; Ravenel and Thistle 1981), it is plausible that their concentration about short shoots is caused in this way. However, we recognize that the predation-refuge hypothesis is not refuted by these data and may also participate in the effect. Two secondary hypotheses also require discussion. First, the above-ground portion of the mimics acquired an organic coating during their conditioning that appeared to be similar to that covering short shoots. Any exuded materials could have affected both short-shoot and mimic treat- ments, in particular, causing the observed increase in bacteria abundance. Second, if predation on harpacticoids were reduced in the immediate vicinity of a short shoot, then the enhanced harpacticoid abundances observed would be expected. The implied increase in harpacticoid feeding could stimulate microbial growth as has been shown for other predators on microbes (Hargrave 1970; Morrison and White 1980). However, flume experiments have shown that unfouled tubes similiar to ours caused local increases in sedimentary microbial abundances in a system where no metazoans were present (Eckman 1984). Apparently, neither fouling nor harpacticoid predation need be invoked to explain the enhanced bacterial standing stocks we observed. We conclude that the presence of a structure creates favorable conditions for microbial growth. Given the information about fluid-dynamic effects near structures, we suspect that these phenomena, via their effects on the bacteria, drive the localization of harpacticoid abundance around isolated short shoots. Finally, relatively isolated, cylindrical structures comparable to seagrass short shoots are not rare in the sea bed. Many polychaete tubes and foraminiferan tests are in this size range (1-2 mrn diameter) and extend into the nearbottom water (Thistle 1979; DeLaca et al. 1980; Carey 1983), and the same flow patterns can be expected to occur around them as around short shoots. We predict that the supply of bacteria near these structures will be enhanced and that these locations will be favored by bacteria consumers. For example, this effect could explain the attractiveness of small tubes to macrofaunal larvae observed by Gallagher et al. (1983). In fact, the effect may be even more widespread. That is, modest increases in the diameter of a structure should not greatly alter the flow pattern (Eckman and Nowell, in press), so organisms the size of the Diopatra cuprea that Woodin (1978, 1981) studied, for example, may also have these effects associated with them. Acknowledgements. We are grateful for the assistance of these individuals: M. Butterworth, E. Gregor, K. Sherman, M. Trexler. The work was improved by discussions with D. Meeter and K. Sherman. The following criticized the manuscript: K. Cannan, F. Dobbs, J. Guckert, P. Jumars, R. Iverson, A. Nowell, K. Sherman, A. Thistle. We thank these individuals for their kind help. Florida State University provided the computer resources. The work was supported by Office of Naval Research contract N00014-82-C0404. This paper is contribution 1005 of the Florida State University Marine Laboratory. References Barnett PR (1968) Distribution and ecology of harpacticoid copepods of an intertidal mud flat. Tnt Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol Hydrogr 53: 177-209 Bell SS (1980) Meiofauna-macrofauna interactions in a high salt marsh habitat. Ecol Monogr 50: 487-505 Bell SS, Watzin MC, Coull BC (1978) Biogenic structure and its effect on the spatial heterogeneity of meiofauna in a salt marsh. J Exp Mar Bioi EcoI35:99-107 Carey DA (1983) Particle resuspension in the benthic boundary layer induced by flow around polychaete tubes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40 (Suppl. 1): 301-308 Coull Be, Bell SS, Savory AM, Dudley BW (1979) Zonation of meiobenthic copepods in a southeastern United States salt marsh. Estuarine Coastal Mar Sci 9: 181-188 Dayton PK, Hessler RR (1972) Role of biological disturbance in maintaining diversity in the deep sea. Deep-Sea Res 19: 199-208 299 Dayton PK, Oliver JS (1980) An evaluation of experimental analyses of population and community patterns in benthic marine environments. In: Tenore KR, Coull BC (eds) Marine benthic dynamics. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp 93-120 DeLaca TE, Lipps JH, Hessler RR (1980) The morphology and ecology of a new large agglutinated Antarctic foraminifer (Textulariina: Notodendroiddidae nov.). Zool J Linn Soc 69:205-224 Eckman JE (1979) Small-scale patterns and processes in a softsubstratum, intertidal community. J Mar Res 37 :437-457 Eckman JE (1984) Flow perturbation by a protuding animal tube affects rates of sediment microbial recolonization. EOS 64: 1042 Eckman JE, Nowell ARM (1984) Boundary skin friction and sediment transport about a protruding animal-tube mimic. Sedimentology (in press) Feller RJ, Kaczynski VW (1975) Size selective predation by juvenile chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) on epibenthic prey in Puget Sound. J Fish Res Board Can 32:1419-1429 Findlay RH, White DC (1983) Polymeric beta-hydroxyalkanoates from environmental samples and Bacillus megaterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 45: 71-78 Findlay RH, Moriarty DJW, White DC (1983) Improved method of determining muramic acid from environmental samples. Geomicrobiol J 3: 133-150 Fleeger JW, Whipple SA, Cook LL (1982) Field manipulations of tidal flushing, light exposure and natant macrofauna in a Louisiana salt marsh: Effects on the meiofauna. J Exp Mar Bioi Ecol 56:87-100 Gallagher ED, Jumars PA, Trueblood DD (1983) Facilitation of soft-bottom benthic succession by tube builders. Ecology 64:1200-1216 Gray JS (1968) An experimental approach to the ecology of the harpacticoid Leptastacus constrictus Lang. J Exp Mar Bioi Ecol 2:278-292 Gray JS (1974) Animal-sediment relationships. Oceanogr Mar Bioi Ann Rev 12: 223-261 Hargrave BT (1970) The effect of deposit-feeding amphipods on the metabolism of benthic microflora. Limnol Oceanogr 15:21-30 Harris RP (1972) Horizontal and vertical distribution of the interstitial harpacticoid copepods of a sandy beacb. J Mar Bioi Assoc UK 52:375--387 Heip C, Engels P (1977) Spatial segregation in copepod species from a brackish water habitat. J Exp Mar Bioi Ecol 26: 77-96 Hicks CR (1973) Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York Hicks GRF, Coull BC (1983) The ecology of marine meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods. Oceanogr Mar Bioi Ann Rev 21: 67-175 Hollander M, Wolfe DW (1973) Nonparametric Statistical Methods. Wiley, ew York Hulberg LW, Oliver JS (1980) Caging manipulations in marine soft-bottom communities: The importance of animal interactions and sedimentary habitat modifications. Can J Fisb Aquat Sci 37: 1130-1139 Jumars PA (1975) Methods for measurement of community structure in deep-sea macrobenthos. Mar Bioi 30: 245-252 Jumars PA, Nowell ARM (1984) Fluid and sediment dynamic effects on marine benthic communities. Am Zoo I (in press) Moriarty DJW, Pollard PC (1982) Diel variation of bacterial productivity in seagrass (Zostera capricornii beds measured by rate of thymidine incorporation into DNA. Mar Bioi 72: 165--173 Morrison SJ, White DC (1980) Effects of grazing by estuarine gammaridean amphipods on the microbiota of allochthonous detritus. Appl Environ Microbiol 40: 659-671 ickels JS, King JD, White DC (1979) Poly-P-hydroxybutyrate accumulation as a measure of unbalanced growth of the estuarine detrital micro biota. Appl Environ Microbiol 37: 459-465 Osenga GA, Coull BC (1983) Spartina alterniflora Loisel root structure and meiofauna abundance. J Exp Mar Bioi Ecol 67:221-225 r Penhale PA, Smith WO Jr (1977) Excretion of dissolved organic carbon by eelgrass (Zostera marina) and its epiphytes. Limnol Oceanogr 22: 400-407 Peterson CH (1979) Predation, competitive exclusion, and diversity in the soft-sediment benthic communities of estuaries and lagoons. In: Livingston RJ (ed) Ecological processes in coastal and marine systems. Plenum, New York, pp 233-264 Peterson CR, Andre SV (1980) An experimental analysis of interspecific competition among marine filter feeders in a soft-sediment environment. Ecology 61: 129-139 Pollock LW (1970) Distribution and dynamics of interstitial Tardigrada at Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA. Ophelia 7: 145-166 Ravenel WS, Thistle D (1981) The effect of sediment characteristics on the distribution of two subtidal harpacticoid copepod species. J Exp Mar Bioi Ecol 50:289-301 Reise K (1983) Experimental removal of lugworms from marine sand affects small zoobenthos. Mar Bioi 74: 327-332 Revsbech NP, Sorensen J, Blackburn TH, Lombolt JP (1980) Distribution of oxygen in marine sediments measured with microelectrodes. Limnol Oceanogr 25:403-411 Revsbech NP, Jorgensen BB, Blackburn TH, Cohen Y (1983) Microelectrode studies of photosynthesis and Oz, HzS, and pH profiles of a microbial mat. Limnol Oceanogr 28: 1062-1074 Rhoads DC, Young DK (1970) The influence of deposit-feeding organisms on bottom sediment stability and community trophic structure. J Mar Res 28: 150-178 Sberidan PF (1979) Trophic resource utilization by tbree species of sciaenid fishes in a northwest Florida estuary. ortheast GulfSci 3:1-15 Sherman KM, Reidenauer JA, Thistle D, Meeter DA (1983) Role of a natural disturbance in an assemblage of marine free-living nematodes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 11 :23-30 Sibert J, Brown rr, Healey MC, Kask BA, Naiman RJ (1977) Detritus-based food webs: exploitation by juvenile chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta). Science 196: 649-650 Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco Stoner AW (1980) Feeding ecology of Lagodon rhomboides (pisces: Sparidae): Variation and functional responses. Fish Bull 78:337-352 Thistle D (1979) Harpacticoid copepods and biogenic structures: Implications for deep-sea diversity maintenance. In: Livingston RJ (ed) Ecological processes in coastal and marine systems. Plenum, New York, pp 217-231 Thistle D (1980a) Enhydrosoma (Copepoda, Rarpacticoida): An update and two new species. Trans Am Microsc Soc 99:384-397 Thistle D (1980b) The response of a harpacticoid copepod community to a small-scale natural disturbance. J Mar Res 38:381-395 Virnstein RW (1977) The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic infauna in Chesapeake Bay. Ecology 58:119-217 White DC, Davis WM, ickels JS, King JD, Bobbie RJ (1979) Determination of the sedimentary biomass by extractible lipid phosphate. Oecologia (Berlin) 40: 51-62 Wieser W (1959) Tbe effect of grain size on the distribution of small invertebrates inhabiting the beaches ofPuget Sound. Limnol Oceanogr 4:181-194 Woodin SA (1974) Polychaete abundance patterns in a marine soft-sediment environment: The importance of biological interactions. Ecol Monogr 44: 171-187 Woodin SA (1976) Adult-larval interactions in dense infaunal assemblages: Pattern of abundance. J Mar Res 34:25-41 Woodin SA (1978) Refuges, disturbance, and community structure: A marine soft-bottom example. Ecology 59: 274-284 Woodin SA (1981) Disturbance and community structure in a shallow water sand flat. Ecology 62:1052-1066 Received February 28, 1984