* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download methods - Proceedings of the Royal Society B
Evolutionary history of plants wikipedia , lookup
Plant reproduction wikipedia , lookup
Tree crown measurement wikipedia , lookup
Ornamental bulbous plant wikipedia , lookup
Plant morphology wikipedia , lookup
Plant stress measurement wikipedia , lookup
Tree volume measurement wikipedia , lookup
Plant evolutionary developmental biology wikipedia , lookup
METHODS Qualitative trait measurements Trait measurements and scores were based on methods and results of Bond et al (2004) for New Zealand plants that resisted ratite browsing. The resistance of stems to the tugging action of bird browsing was simulated by applying a force of ~10 kg to five or more lignified lateral branches (i.e. new green shoots were avoided) usually on five or more individuals of a species. This measures the breaking load of the branch structure, rather than tensile strength of the stem material (force per unit area required to break a material), since branches often broke at a node. Branches with a breaking load < 10 kg were shown to be vulnerable to loss from the tugging action of bird browsers (Bond et al. 2004). Plants with low breakages (<20% of branches tested) were assigned a value of 1 for ‘tensile strength’ vs. 0 for >80% breakages. We measured the spring-like extension of branches when a browser tugs as lateral displacement of a branch when pulled with a force of ~10 kg. Branches that extended 50 cm or more from their resting position were scored as 1 indicating high lateral displacement vs. 0 for <15 cm. Wide-angled branching can thwart bird browsers by contributing to the springiness of a shoot and, when a shoot is detached, by exceeding gape width preventing ingestion. A wide angle was defined as >70o from a lower order branch. A score of 1 was assigned where most (>50%) of the side branches on a terminal 50 cm shoot were wide-angled.). Leaf, rather than leaflet, dimensions were measured for compound leaves since browsers would be likely to pluck off whole leaves than individual leaflets. Leaf size (0.67 x length x breadth) was ranked as follows: 0-60 mm2 = 1, 61-120 = 0.7, 121-240 = 0.5, 241-480 = 0.3, >480 mm2 = 0. All traits listed in Table 1 were scored from 0 to 1 where 1 represents trait values most similar to New Zealand divaricates and/or the ‘anti-ratite’ syndrome described by Bond et al. (2004). Intermediate values (usually 0.5) were assigned in cases where trait scores fell mid-way between definitions for 0 and 1. Quantitative trait measurements on heteroblastic samples Juvenile and adult branches, each 50 cm long, were collected from the same plant. We measured the total length of all stems on the sample shoot together with the total length of all shoots < 3 mm in diameter. The angle of branching of five side shoots from the main stem was measured with a protractor (Atkinson 1992; Kelly 1994). We measured the breaking load of side shoots by clamping a vice grip attached to a dynamometer onto a lignified shoot (avoiding current year's growth). The equipment was pulled slowly until structural failure or until the maximum capacity of the dynamometer (10 kg) had been reached. We discarded trials where twigs broke at the clamp. Failures were often structural, at the branch joints, rather than in the shoot material of the internodes. The stem diameter at the break was measured. Leaf length and breadth were measured on at least five fully expanded leaves and leaf area was taken as 0.67 x length x breadth. Leaf, rather than leaflet dimensions were measured for compound-leaved plants.