* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download What are the link`s between Thorndike`s Associationist theories and
Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup
Behavior analysis of child development wikipedia , lookup
Neuroeconomics wikipedia , lookup
Attribution (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Insufficient justification wikipedia , lookup
Cross-cultural psychology wikipedia , lookup
Social psychology wikipedia , lookup
Conservation psychology wikipedia , lookup
Process-oriented psychology wikipedia , lookup
Learning theory (education) wikipedia , lookup
History of psychology wikipedia , lookup
Verbal Behavior wikipedia , lookup
Educational psychology wikipedia , lookup
Descriptive psychology wikipedia , lookup
Social cognitive theory wikipedia , lookup
Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
What are the link's between Thorndike's Associationist theories and the Behaviorist theories of Skinner and others? How do Thorndike's, Skinner's, and Dewey's views of human nature compare? Can you give a school example of both classical and operant conditioning? Much controversy surrounded Skinner's ideas... can you imagine why? Both Thorndike and Skinner believe in a very scientific (if you will) approach to Psychology. As discussed in last weeks questions, Thorndike sees psychology as a scientific process that is to be standardized and atomized. The process of education within the realm of psychology is one that does not take under consideration the “human” aspects that Dewey factors into his explanation of educational psychology, Thorndike saw humans as just part of the equation rather than the part that solves the equation. Skinner, also, likens man to a machine in that he disassociated the mind with behavior and performance. As aforementioned, Dewey takes a much more humanist approach to psychology in that he incorporates community, adaptation and personal problem solving skills in the process of learning. We are not just parts of equations or “machines”, but we learn and do by a process of adaptation and “trial and error” which cannot be computed through formulaic means. Skinner and Pavlov, founders of Operant and Classical Conditioning respectively, are behaviorists in that they believe that our behavior is dictated by physical aspects around us rather than by our minds. In the schools we see these types of behavior control everywhere! When the classroom is loud, the teacher turns off the lights. The class is immediately quiet because they know if they quiet down quickly they get points on the board, which add up to a popcorn party. Another example is a student who gets in trouble for running in the hallway, they quickly learn that in order to avoid trouble they must walk. Skinner is somewhat controversial due to the fact that he feels freedom and free will are mere illusions. All of our actions are not dictated by our own free will and desire, but by external influences. The thought that we do not control our own actions is scary! Many would argue that Behaviorism still dominates today's schools. Do you see evidence of behaviorism in schools today? How about in your own classroom? Do you offer rewards? How about punishment? Do you try to change student behavior? How? What are the advantages and disadvantages that come from using behaviorist theory to structure school practices and environments? I see behaviorism in todays schools EVERYWHERE. Names on the board, reading contests…even in games where candy is the reward behaviorism infiltrates education. Even through my brief time student teaching, I observed teachers using candy to; encourage students to get their work in on time, to behave when they were to be observed by the principal and when they answered a question correctly during a review discussion. It is amazing that we have brought this type of psychological theory into our classrooms, for it has turned learning into something other than what it should be. We should not have to bribe or reinforce our students to do what we want, but to motivate them to WANT to learn, to WANT to pay attention because they WANT to listen and understand what is being discussed. However, the success of operant and classical conditioning are rampant in the homes of our students, so it is engrained into their minds (or actions) that they are to be rewarded when they do things correctly. For example, parents in some cases give allowance in exchange for doing the dishes and taking out the trash. Although the use of behaviorist theory can prove beneficial, it is the overuse that is dangerous. It may make a student who loves to read before reinforcement is added to only like it when rewarded. Students will begin to learn that they get candy or privileges when they do what they are told, so it begins to become about the reward opposed to the action in which they were to complete. Back to the reading example, if the student who loves to read without any external motivation, but due to intrinsic gratification, began school in a classroom where reading a book equaled a candy bar, then they would at first think “hey, this is great, I love to read anyways and now I get candy for doing what I already love!”…however with time, they become conditioned to that reward. When they get home, they begin to read less and less due to the absence of that reinforcement. In conclusion, conditioning is a tool that can be used effectively in the classroom setting, however should not be relied on totally for the mere reason that it could completely do just opposite of what the desired result is.