* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Quantitative trait loci associated with maximal exercise endurance in
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Biology and sexual orientation wikipedia , lookup
Skewed X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics in learning and memory wikipedia , lookup
Y chromosome wikipedia , lookup
Neocentromere wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Neurobiological effects of physical exercise wikipedia , lookup
J Appl Physiol 103: 105–110, 2007. First published April 5, 2007; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01328.2006. Quantitative trait loci associated with maximal exercise endurance in mice J. Timothy Lightfoot,1 Michael J. Turner,1 Amy Kleinfehn Knab,1 Anne E. Jedlicka,2 Tomohiro Oshimura,3 Jacqui Marzec,3 Wesley Gladwell,3 Larry J. Leamy,4 and Steven R. Kleeberger3 1 Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina-Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina; 2Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; 3Laboratory of Respiratory Biology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; and 4Department of Biology, University of North Carolina-Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina Submitted 22 November 2006; accepted in final form 2 April 2007 black population. Ways et al. (36) identified a significant QTL linked with aerobic running capacity on rat chromosome 16 and suggestive linkage on chromosome 3. Given the health implications of understanding the genetic regulation of a complex trait such as maximal exercise endurance, it is important that additional research be conducted in species that will allow the use of more powerful genetic tools. We established a foundation for such studies with our previously described strain distribution pattern of maximal exercise endurance in 10 different mouse inbred strains (26). Given earlier studies that have shown a genetic contribution to the regulation of exercise endurance, we hypothesized that several QTLs associated with maximal exercise endurance would be identified in inbred mice using progenitor strains earlier identified by their differential response to treadmill exercise. candidate genes; aerobic capacity; genotyping We earlier identified Balb/cJ and DBA/2J mice as having high exercise endurance (HEE) and low exercise endurance (LEE), respectively (26). Ten female Balb/cJ mice were bred with nine male DBA/2J mice to produce BaD2 F1 mice. We chose the Balb/cJ mice as the maternal progenitor strain because earlier studies had suggested that exercise endurance was a maternally linked characteristic (11, 24). Additionally, the number of progenitor mice used was based on the statistical power (power ⫽ 0.99) of an earlier comparison of five mice per strain (26). F1 mice were weaned at 21–28 days and crossed between 6 and 8 wk of age when the mice had reached 20 –25 g in weight. The F2 mice (n ⫽ 99; 60 female, 39 male BaD2 F2 mice) were weaned at 21–28 days and phenotyped for exercise endurance between 45 and 68 days of age. All mice were housed individually without access to running wheels (i.e., in the sedentary condition) in the same vivarium room that was maintained at 65–75°F and 20 – 40% humidity with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle. Mice were fed standard rodent chow (Harland Teklad 8604 Rodent Diet, Madison, WI; protein 24.5%, fat 4.4%, fiber 3.7%, nitrogen-free extract 48.6%) and provided water ad libitum. have shown that the maximal exercise endurance of an individual can impact all-cause mortality rates (31), mortality rates from hypertension (7), smoking-related and non-smoking-related cancers (21), and stroke (22). A tremendous amount of research has considered the modifying role of environmental factors on maximal aerobic exercise (e.g., training). It is well accepted that the variation seen in human maximal exercise endurance is due to the influence of genetic factors (3), and current estimations of the contribution of genetics to maximal exercise endurance range from ⬇51% in humans (3) to 58 –90% in mice (23, 26) to 39% in rats (18). However, the specific genes that determine an individual’s maximal exercise endurance have not been identified. Relatively few investigations of the quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with maximal exercise endurance have been conducted. Two separate human studies by Bouchard and colleagues (4, 33) have identified possible genetic linkages with sedentary aerobic capacity on chromosomes 4, 8, 11, and 14 in a white population and on chromosomes 1 and 7 in a SEVERAL RECENT STUDIES Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. T. Lightfoot, Dept. of Kinesiology, UNC-Charlotte, 9201 Univ. City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 (e-mail: [email protected]). http://www.jap.org METHODS Approvals All procedures in this protocol were reviewed and approved by the University of North Carolina-Charlotte Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conformed to the humane animal care policies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Model Used Estimation of Exercise Endurance The exercise endurance of the F2 mice was estimated using techniques described previously (26). In brief, after a 1-wk vivarium The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 105 Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.247 on June 16, 2017 Lightfoot JT, Turner MJ, Knab AK, Jedlicka AE, Oshimura T, Marzec J, Gladwell W, Leamy LJ, Kleeberger SR. Quantitative trait loci associated with maximal exercise endurance in mice. J Appl Physiol 103: 105–110, 2007. First published April 5, 2007; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01328.2006.—The role of genetics in the determination of maximal exercise endurance is unclear. Six- to nine-week-old F2 mice (n ⫽ 99; 60 female, 39 male), derived from an intercross of two inbred strains that had previously been phenotyped as having high maximal exercise endurance (Balb/cJ) and low maximal exercise endurance (DBA/2J), were treadmill tested to estimate exercise endurance. Selective genotyping of the F2 cohort (n ⫽ 12 high exercise endurance; n ⫽ 12 low exercise endurance) identified a significant quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome X (53.7 cM, DXMit121) in the entire cohort and a suggestive QTL on chromosome 8 (36.1 cM, D8Mit359) in the female mice. Fine mapping with the entire F2 cohort and additional informative markers confirmed and narrowed the QTLs. The chromosome 8 QTL (EE8F) is homologous with two suggestive human QTLs and one significant rat QTL previously linked with exercise endurance. No effect of sex (P ⫽ 0.33) or body weight (P ⫽ 0.79) on exercise endurance was found in the F2 cohort. These data indicate that genetic factors in distinct chromosomal regions may affect maximal exercise endurance in the inbred mouse. Whereas multiple genes are located in the identified QTL that could functionally affect exercise endurance, this study serves as a foundation for further investigations delineating the identity of genetic factors influencing maximum exercise endurance. 106 QTL FOR EXERCISE ENDURANCE IN MICE acclimation, the mice were oriented twice to running in a small cell suspended above a human treadmill. A shock grid was mounted at the rear of the cell (1.5 mA, 150 V) to provide stimulus for the animals to run (35). During testing, each mouse was placed in the treadmill cell and allowed 3 min of rest. The treadmill was then started at 22 m/min and increased in speed every 4 min thereafter to 28.4, 36.6, and 42.4 m/min, respectively. If the mouse completed 4 min at 42.4 m/min, the speed was held constant at 42.4 m/min, but the grade was increased 2% every 4 min thereafter. The grade of the treadmill was increased instead of further increasing the speed because it appeared in pilot testing that some mice could not biomechanically maintain running speeds above 45 m/min. The treadmill test was stopped when the mouse could not get off the shock grid within 3 s, and exercise endurance was estimated by total time that the mouse ran. This indirect measure of exercise endurance has been used as a phenotype in other rodent genetic studies (1, 6, 18, 26, 36), and running speed has been positively correlated with oxygen consumption in mice (13). Genotyping Statistics Prior to the QTL analysis, a one-way ANOVA was used to test whether sex had a significant effect on exercise endurance in the F2 mice. Simple regression also was used to test whether body weight and exercise endurance were correlated to determine if exercise endurance should be adjusted for the effects of body weight. Exercise endurance for mice in the F2 population and in the two inbred populations (DBA/2J and Balb/cJ) was compared using a one-way ANOVA with Scheffé’s post hoc analysis. Pre-QTL analyses were completed using JMP 5.1 (SAS, Cary, NC), ␣ values were set a priori at P ⬍ 0.05, and results are presented as means (SD). Methods described elsewhere (20) were used to search for potential QTLs for maximum exercise endurance in the selective subsample of F2 progeny and in the subsequent full sample set, and the results were confirmed with MapManager QTX (28). In brief, the phenotypic data were first checked for normality. If the data were not normally distributed, the data were then log-transformed, resulting in a normal distribution of the exercise endurance scores. These scores were subsequently analyzed for linkage using the regression approach to J Appl Physiol • VOL RESULTS Demographics and Exercise Endurance Body weight for the F2 female mice [16.33 g (SD 3.36)] was less (P ⬍ 0.001) than that for the F2 male mice [21.0 g (SD 3.10)]. Body weight of progenitor DBA/2J [n ⫽ 9 males; 15.44 g (SD 1.74)] and Balb/cJ mice [n ⫽ 10 females; 16.5 g (SD 1.72)] was significantly less (P ⬍ 0.05) than the F2 male mice but did not differ (P ⬎ 0.05) from that of the F2 female mice. Despite the difference in body weight between sexes in the F2 cohort, no significant difference was found between sexes in exercise endurance [males ⫽ 8.02 min (SD 5.86), females ⫽ 9.33 min (SD 6.90); P ⫽ 0.33], but the statistical power of this comparison was relatively low (power ⫽ 0.16). Neither body 103 • JULY 2007 • www.jap.org Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.247 on June 16, 2017 After phenotyping, the mice were anesthetized using 2– 4% inhaled isoflurane. When the animal showed no response to the paw pinch test, the heart was exposed and removed (i.e., euthanasia by exsanguination). The kidneys were then harvested, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at ⫺80°C for later genotyping. Initially, we selectively genotyped the 12 mice with the highest exercise endurance (9 females, 3 males) and the 12 mice with the lowest exercise endurance (8 females, 4 males). It has been noted that genotyping the upper 10% and lower 10% of the phenotypic distribution will capture approximately 80 – 85% of the genetic variance (8, 30). Our selectively genotyped subsample represented 24% of the total sample and the upper and lower 12% of the phenotypic strain distribution pattern. DNA extraction from the kidneys and genotyping of the selective subsample were performed as previously described (16). The primers for the polymorphic simple sequence repeats markers (i.e., microsatellites) were selected from the Mouse Genome Database (MGD) (2) and were purchased from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL). One hundred eight microsatellite markers, with an average 12.6-cM (SD 8.9) distance between them, provided coverage of the mouse genome with ⬎95% confidence (34). One primer of each pair was 32P end-labeled. After amplification, the PCR products were resolved on 6% acrylamide gels. QTL locations within the selectively genotyped subsample were then estimated using statistical procedures. All animals (n ⫽ 99) in the F2 cohort were then genotyped around the identified QTL using informative microsatellites spaced as close together as possible to increase map resolution (i.e., fine mapping). interval mapping (15). For each chromosome, the regression analyses generated F values with their associated probabilities. These probabilities were converted to logs of the odds favoring linkage (i.e., LOD scores) by logarithmic transformation [LOD ⫽ log10(1/probability)]. If the highest LOD calculated for a given chromosome exceeded a specific threshold value, a QTL was considered to be present at the position associated with that LOD score. Threshold values were obtained from permutation tests involving 10,000 separate runs in which the aerobic capacity values for each individual mouse were randomly permuted and then run through the interval mapping analysis. These permutation runs provided 5% threshold values for each chromosome as well as a 5% experiment-wise threshold value applicable across all chromosomes (37). LOD scores exceeding the chromosomewise threshold values are suggestive QTLs, whereas LOD scores exceeding the experimentwise level provide significant evidence for QTLs (19). Confidence intervals for each QTL were determined using the method of Darvasi and Soller (9). If a QTL was found on any chromosome, a test for the presence of two QTLs was conducted (20). The QTL analysis was repeated using program-determined linkage distances, as well as linkage distances from the MGD (2) and the Whitehead Institution database (10) using several different models to determine the dominance properties of identified QTLs. The models used were a “free” model where the additive and dominant components are allowed to have any value, an additive model where the dominant component is set to zero, a dominant model where a single coefficient is used for both the additive and dominant components, and a recessive model where the additive and dominant components are the same coefficient, but with opposite signs. Additionally, the data were checked for sex or breeding cross-direction differences in the phenotype to control for possible inflation of the LOD scores on the nonautosomal X chromosome (5). Sex-specific QTL effects were tested by first assigning a code for each sex (males ⫽ 1, females ⫽ 2). A whole genome scan was then run as before but with multiple regression of exercise endurance on the interaction of the genotypic values with sex. Threshold values again were estimated by permutation tests, and chromosomes with significant LOD values were assumed to contain a QTL whose effects differed in the two sexes. For those chromosomes, separate QTL runs were made for males and for females, and new chromosomewise and experimentwise threshold LOD values were obtained for significance testing. In all QTL analyses, if the P value resulting from the comparison of the LOD score with the calculated specific threshold value was less than 0.05, but greater than 0.01, the QTL was considered “suggestive.” If the P value was less than 0.01 but greater than 0.001, the QTL was classified as “significant,” and if less than 0.001, considered “highly significant.” These analyses and classification of P values follow the standardized nomenclature from Lander and Kruglyak (19). QTL FOR EXERCISE ENDURANCE IN MICE 107 Fig. 1. Individual mice and group averages of exercise duration by progenitors (Balb/cJ, n ⫽ 10; DBA/2J, n ⫽ 9) and F2 offspring (n ⫽ 99). Open circles are data from individual mice; closed squares are strain average with SD bars. Some individual data points may be hidden where similar results were found for multiple mice. *Significantly different from Balb/cJ (P ⬍ 0.05). weight (r2 ⫽ 0.0007) or age when phenotyped (r2 ⫽ 0.063) correlated with exercise endurance. Mean exercise durations for DBA/2J and Balb/cJ mice (Fig. 1) were similar to those noted previously (26), where Balb/cJ mice ran significantly longer (P ⫽ 0.005) than DBA/2J mice. Exercise duration for the BaD2 F2 [8.82 min (SD 6.51)] animals was not significantly different from the LEE DBA/2J mice [4.82 min (SD 3.07), P ⫽ 0.08] but was significantly less than the HEE Balb/cJ mice [14.06 min (SD 8.15), P ⫽ 0.02, power ⫽ 0.81]. The frequency distributions of exercise duration in the F2 mice were shifted toward the DBA/2J parental average (Fig. 2) and exhibited significant skewness [1.67 (SD 0.24)] and kurtosis [3.101 (SD 0.49)]. The application of the Shapiro-Wilk (W ⫽ 0.847, P ⬍ 0.0001) and the KomogorovSmirnov (D ⫽ 0.147, P ⬍ 0.01) tests for normality indicated that the distribution was not normal; thus the exercise endurance data were log-transformed for the QTL mapping analysis. DISCUSSION It is now generally accepted that genetic factors account for a significant portion of the variance in maximal exercise endurance in humans (3), mice (23, 26), and rats (18). This study has extended these basic studies and identified two chromosomal regions (EE8F and EEX) linked with maximal exercise endurance in mice. Interestingly, despite no significant difference in maximal exercise endurance by sex in our data, our linkage analysis identified a sex-linked QTL (EE8F) that could indicate that exercise endurance, at least in this model, is a hormonally influenced characteristic. Our QTL findings provide a foundation to identify the specific genes and regulating factors that control maximal exercise endurance in mammals. Investigators have used both human and rat models in previous attempts to identify the chromosomal regions linked with maximal exercise endurance. Bouchard et al. (4) phenotyped 481 Caucasian subjects using a volitional fatigue cycle ergometer protocol. The autosomal chromosomes were then genotyped using 289 microsatellite markers with an average spacing of 11 cM. The investigators found four significant QTL Mapping Results Selective mapping. The 12 highest endurance mice [endurance ⫽ 22.8 min (SD 6.3)] and the 12 lowest endurance mice [endurance ⫽ 1.77 min (SD 0.7)] were selectively genotyped. The body weights of the 12 highest and 12 lowest endurance mice were not different [HEE ⫽ 19.5 g (SD 0.89) vs. LEE ⫽ 17.8 g (SD 0.89), P ⫽ 0.18]. Because there were no sex differences in phenotype and because the maternal progenitors all derived from Balb/cJ (i.e., no breeding cross-direction differences in phenotype), the LOD scores from the X-chromosome were not adjusted (5). Results of the selective QTL mapping for exercise endurance in the 12 highest and 12 lowest endurance mice revealed two potential QTLs, one on chromosome 8 in females only and one on chromosome X in all mice. The significant QTL on chromosome X (designated Exercise Endurance on chromosome X; EEX) was located at 59.6 cM, 6 cM beyond the DXMit121 marker, and achieved a LOD score J Appl Physiol • VOL Fig. 2. Frequency distribution of exercise duration in BaD2 F2 population. Values on the x-axis are midpoint of each interval. Interval widths were determined by dividing total range of data by 10 intervals resulting in an interval distance of 3.3 min. Average exercise distance is indicated for Balb/cJ (closed square) and DBA/2J (closed circle) parental strains as well as the F2 population (closed triangle) within the distribution. 103 • JULY 2007 • www.jap.org Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.247 on June 16, 2017 of 2.45. A suggestive (LOD score ⫽ 2.21) QTL in females (designated Exercise Endurance on chromosome 8 in females; EE8f) was found on chromosome 8 at 42.1 cM, 6 cM beyond the D8Mit359 marker. Fine mapping. All 99 F2 animals were genotyped for fine mapping. Thirteen microsatellite markers surrounding the two QTLs were used for fine mapping and were spaced an average of 2.08 cM (SD 1.51) apart. Significant segregation distortion was present in the markers surrounding the QTL for chromosome X; thus QTL analysis methods that allow for segregation distortion were used (27). From this analysis, our previous selective-genotype QTLs were confirmed. Significant linkage with exercise endurance for all mice was found at 57.9 cM (DXMIT31) on chromosome X (EEX; Table 1). Further suggestive linkages were found for D8MIT359 (36.1 cM; EE8F) in the female mice (using both additive and recessive models) and in the region of the chromosome X from 53.6 to 56.8 cM (DXMIT121, DXMIT5, DXMIT236) in all mice using all statistical models. 108 QTL FOR EXERCISE ENDURANCE IN MICE Table 1. Strongest suggestive QTL for exercise endurance from fine mapping Chr/Marker Location LRS Score LOD Score %Variance P Value CI, cM a d D8MIT359F DXMIT121 DXMIT5 DXMIT236 DXMIT31 36.1cM 53.7cM 54.6cM 56.8cM 57.9cM 5.6* 9.8* 9.8* 9.7* 10.4† 1.19 2.13 2.13 2.10 2.26 9 9 9 9 10 0.02311 0.00733 0.00733 0.00766 0.00562 107 57 57 57 54 0.28 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 ⫺0.15 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01 Chr/Marker, chromosome and marker designation of microsatellite; Findicates quantitative trait locus (QTL) found in female mice only; Location, linkage map location of marker from Whitehead Institution database (10); LRS, likelihood ratio statistic; LOD, logarithmic odds; %Variance, the amount of total trait variance explained by a QTL at this location; CI, the size of the 95% confidence interval for a QTL of this strength; a, additive genotypic value; d, dominance genotypic value. Permutation test ⫽1 cM at 10,000 permutations. Specific threshold values: *suggestive ⫽ 3.8 LRS (0.90 LOD), †significant ⫽ 10.2 LRS (2.21 LOD). No interactions present. J Appl Physiol • VOL in these animals. Otherwise, there do not appear to be explanations for the variation we observed given that the mice in this study were tested at the same time of year as our strain screen mice and were housed in similar circumstances and in the same location, and the testing was conducted in a similar fashion by the same technicians using the same equipment as was used in the earlier study (26). Li et al. (25) have noted that although an estimated 60% of the F2 mouse mapping experiments in the literature used fewer than 300 individuals, smaller cohorts of mice decrease the chances of finding any but the strongest QTLs. Although our sample size was relatively small, our observed effect size was large as there was a 12.9-fold difference in maximal exercise endurance between the two selectively genotyped groups. In addition, the homology of our QTLs with those reported by Ways et al. (36) and Bouchard and colleagues (4) further strengthens the validity of our QTLs. As noted in the consensus statement by the Complex Trait Consortium, “there is no single ‘gold standard’ for the identification of a QTL. . .rather, there should be a predominance of evidence that supports its identity” (29). Thus, given that our genotyping plan in these inbred mice theoretically captured 80 – 85% of the variability in the cohort (8, 30), we are confident that these results significantly add to the currently sparse literature investigating the underlying genetic regulating mechanisms of exercise endurance and provide a further foundation for the identification of candidate genes linked to exercise endurance. Identification of candidate genes in the past has been speculative, consisting primarily of searching for known genes in the QTL region that are involved in the basic physiological regulating mechanism(s) of the phenotype of interest. Due to the multifactorial nature of exercise endurance control and because the number of genes located in each QTL region is large, candidate gene lists generated from any species are often quite lengthy (see discussion in Refs. 4, 32, 36). Similarly, a large number of candidate genes that could be involved in the regulation of maximal exercise endurance are located within 15 cM of the QTLs identified in this study; however, discussion of any of these “candidate genes” from the genes located within the identified QTL without further corroborating evidence such as microarray results would be speculative at best. Thus the future challenge is to narrow the identified QTLs to a more manageable size, thus enabling the pursuit of more precise identification of the location and identity of genes involved in the regulation of exercise endurance (17). While not its primary function, the identification of QTLs also provides a means for investigating the validity of potential 103 • JULY 2007 • www.jap.org Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.247 on June 16, 2017 QTLs linked with maximal exercise endurance (4q12, 61.658 cM; 14q21.3, 49.255 cM; 8q24.12, 128.157 cM; and 11p15.1, 21.174 cM) and an additional 21 regions that were suggestive of QTL linkage. Rico-Sanz and colleagues (33) extended this work and using similar methods genotyped 862 subjects of white and black ethnicity. They reported “promising linkage” of sedentary V̇O2 max on chromosome 11 (11p15.1) in the white subjects and four suggestive QTLs for V̇O2 max for the black subjects on chromosomes 1 and 7 (1p31, 7q32, 7q36, 7q36) but no significantly linked QTLs. Ways and colleagues (36) identified three QTLs linked with exercise endurance in an F2 rat model (n ⫽ 224) derived from Copenhagen (COP) and DA inbred progenitors. On chromosome 16, they found significant linkage of exercise endurance with D16Rat17, suggestive linkage with D16Rat55, a marker located 30 cM distal to D16Rat17, and suggestive linkage with D3Rat56 on chromosome 3. Maximal exercise endurance is a complex trait regulated by many genetic and environmental factors. While this study has identified two QTLs associated with exercise endurance, including one that suggests a sex influence, it is probable that no studies have identified all of the QTLs that play a role in the regulation of maximal exercise endurance. However, one of the strengths of genetic/QTL studies is the conserved gene synteny among species that allows the comparison of identified genetic loci in multiple models. Thus the exercise endurance QTLs and nearby markers can be compared directly to similarly identified QTLs and markers derived from other species (e.g., humans or rats). For example, the significant D16Rat17 exercise endurance QTL identified by Ways et al. (36) is homologous to our mouse EE8F QTL. While none of the mouse exercise endurance QTLs identified in the present study were homologous with the significant human QTLs reported by Bouchard’s group, EE8F is homologous with two “potentially useful” linkages that Bouchard et al. identified on human chromosome 13 (D13S787; 13q12.11) and chromosome 22 (D22S274, 22q13.2) (4). At this time, no comparisons between our EEX QTL and the results of either Bouchard et al. (4) or Ways et al. (36) are possible since neither investigation reported results from chromosome X. The strength of any QTL investigation is determined by multiple factors; three of the most important are the variability of the phenotype, the effect size, and the population size. While the variance of the exercise endurance of the F2 population was larger than the variances observed in our earlier inbred strain screen study (26), we had anticipated a larger variance in the F2 animals vs. the inbred strains given the heterozygous genome QTL FOR EXERCISE ENDURANCE IN MICE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank J. Moser, M. Belles, J. Reavis, A. Lowe, and M. Lindley for work in exercise testing, V. McGlosson for animal husbandry skills, and the generous support of Dr. Laura Schrum and her laboratory. GRANTS This study was supported by University of North Carolina Internal Grant (J. T. Lightfoot), American Physiological Society Research Career Enhancement Award (J. T. Lightfoot), National Institutes of Health Grants AR-050085 (J. T. Lightfoot, A. M. Kleinfehn, M. J. Turner, and L. J. Leamy) and AG-022417 (M. J. Turner), and the National Institute of Environmental Health Science Division of Intramural Research (S. R. Kleeberger, T. Oshimura, J. Marzec, and W. Gladwell). REFERENCES 1. Barbato JC, Koch LG, Darvish A, Cicila GT, Metting PJ, Britton SL. Spectrum of aerobic endurance running performance in eleven inbred strains of rats. J Appl Physiol 85: 530 –536, 1998. 2. Blake J, Richardson J, Bult C, Kadin J, Eppig J; Mouse Genome Database Group. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): the model organism database for the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 113–115, 2002. 3. Bouchard C, Daw EW, Rice R, Perusse L, Gagnon J, Province MA, Leon AS, Rao DC, Skinner JS, Wimore JH. Familial resemblance for V̇O2 max in the sedentary state: the HERITAGE family study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30: 252–258, 1998. 4. Bouchard C, Rankinen t Chagnon YC, Rice T, Perusse L, Gagnon J, Borecki I, An P, Leon AS, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH. Genomic scan for maximal oxygen uptake and its response to training in the HERITAGE Family Study. J Appl Physiol 88: 551–559, 2000. 5. Broman KW, Sen S, Owens SE, Manichaikul A, Southard-Smith EM, Churchill GA. The X chromosome in quantitative trait locus mapping. Genetics 174: 2151–2158, 2006. 6. Bünger L, Renne U, Dietl G. Sixty generations selection for an index combining high body weight and high stress resistance in laboratory mice. Proc World Congr Genet Appl Livestock Prod 19: 16 –19, 1994. J Appl Physiol • VOL 7. Church T, Kampert J, Gibbons L, Barlow C, Blair S. Usefulness of cardiorespiratory fitness as a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men with systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 88: 651– 656, 2001. 8. Darvasi A, Soller M. Selective genotyping for determination of linkage between a marker locus and a quantitative trait locus. Theor Appl Genet 85: 353–359, 1992. 9. Darvasi A, Soller M. A simple method to calculate resolving power and confidence interval of QTL map location. Behav Genet 27: 125–132, 1997. 10. Dietrich WF, Miller J, Steen R, Merchant MA, Damron-Boles D, Husain Z, Dredge R, Daly MJ, Ingalls KA, O’Conner TJ, Evans CA, DeAngelis MM, Levinson DM, Kruglyak L, Goodman N, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Hawkins TL, Stein L, Page DC, Lander ES. A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome. Nature 380: 149 –152, 1996. 11. Dionne FT, Turcotte L, Thibault MC, Boulay MR, Skinner JS, Bouchard C. Mitochondrial DNA sequence polymorphism, V̇O2 max, and response to endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23: 177–185, 1991. 12. Evans RM, Barish GD, Wang YX. PPARs and the complex journey to obesity. Nat Med 10: 355–361, 2004. 13. Fernando P, Bonen A, Hoffman-Goetz L. Predicting submaximal oxygen consumption during treadmill running mice. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 71: 854 – 857, 1993. 14. Gayagay G, Yu B, Hambly B, Boston T, Hahn A, Celermajer D, Trent R. Elite endurance athletes and the ACE I allele—the role of genes in athletic performance. Hum Genet 103: 48 –50, 1998. 15. Haley CS, Knott SA. A simple regression technique for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69: 315–324, 1992. 16. Kleeberger SR, Levitt RC, Zhang LY, Longphre M, Harkema J, Jelicka A, Eleff SM, DiSilvestre D, Holroyd KJ. Linkage analysis of susceptibility to ozone-induced lung inflammation in inbred mice. Nat Genet 17: 475– 478, 1997. 17. Kleeberger SR, Schwartz DA. From quantitative trait locus to gene: a work in progress. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 15: 804 – 805, 2005. 18. Koch LG, Meredith TA, Fraker TD, Metting PJ, Britton SL. Heritability of treadmill running endurance in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R1455–R1460, 1998. 19. Lander E, Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet 11: 241–247, 1995. 20. Leamy LJ, Routman EJ, Cheverud JM. Quantitative trait loci for earlyand late-developing skull characters in mice. Am Nat 153: 201–214, 1999. 21. Lee CD, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness and smoking-related and total cancer mortality in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34: 735–739, 2002. 22. Lee CD, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness and stroke mortality in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34: 592–595, 2002. 23. Lerman I, Harrison BC, Freeman K, Hewett TE, Allen DL, Robbins J, Leinwand LA. Genetic variability in forced and voluntary endurance exercise performance in seven inbred mouse strains. J Appl Physiol 92: 2245–2255, 2002. 24. Lesage R, Simoneau JA, Jobin J, Leblanc J, Bouchard C. Familial resemblance in maximal heart rate, blood lactate and aerobic power. Hum Hered 35: 182–189, 1985. 25. Li X, Quigg RJ, Zhou J, Xu S, Masinde G, Mohan S, Baylink DJ. A critical evaluation of the effect of population size and phenotypic measurement on QTL detection and localization using a large F2 murine mapping population. Genet Mol Biol 29: 166 –173, 2006. 26. Lightfoot JT, Turner MJ, DeBate KA, Kleeberger SR. Interstrain variation in murine aerobic capacity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: 2053– 2057, 2001. 27. Lorieux M, Perrier X, Goffinet B, Lanaud C, Leon DGd. Maximumlikelihood models for mapping genetic markers showing segregation distortion 2 F2 populations. Theor Appl Genet 90: 81– 89, 1995. 28. Manly RHC KF Jr, Meer JM. Map Manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping. Mamm Genome 12: 930 –932, 2001. 29. Members of the Complex Trait Consortium. The nature and identification of quantitative trait loci: a community’s view. Nat Rev 4: 911–916, 2003. 30. Moore KJ, Nagle DL. Complex trait analysis in the mouse: the strengths, the limitations and the promise yet to come. Annu Rev Genet 34: 653– 686, 2000. 103 • JULY 2007 • www.jap.org Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.247 on June 16, 2017 candidate genes influencing exercise endurance that have not been determined through genetic mapping studies. For example, there has been much investigation regarding the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genes (14), mitochondria synthesis genes (38), and the peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor (PPAR) genes (12) in regulating exercise endurance. These genes (ACE, PPAR, and mitochondrial synthesis) are not found in QTL regions thus far associated with exercise endurance in humans (4, 33), rats (36), or mice (present study). Since most investigators agree that the heritable regulation of maximal exercise endurance is likely polygenic, it is probable that genes within and external to the identified QTLs participate in this system. Therefore, the use of a variety of techniques that provide evidence for the involvement of specific genes as well as further work narrowing the involved chromosomal areas need to be completed before meaningful candidate gene investigations can commence. In summary, we developed, phenotyped, and genotyped F2 mice derived from Balb/cJ (high exercise endurance) and DBA/2J (low exercise endurance) progenitors. Significant linkage of maximal exercise endurance for all mice was found on chromosome X (EEX; 57.9 cM) and a suggestive linkage was found in the female mice on chromosome 8 (EE8F; 36.1 cM). EE8F was homologous to exercise endurance QTLs found in the rat (D16Rat17) and human models (D13S787 and D22S274). These data provide a foundation for further study of possible candidate genes located within each QTL region that influence exercise endurance. 109 110 QTL FOR EXERCISE ENDURANCE IN MICE 31. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med 346: 793– 801, 2002. 32. Rankinen T, Bray MS, Hagberg JM, Perusse L, Roth SM, Wolfarth B, Bouchard C. The human gene map for performance and health-related fitness phenotypes: the 2005 update. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38: 1863–1888, 2006. 33. Rico-Sanz J, Rankinen T, Rice T, Leon AS, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Rao DC, Bouchard C. Quantitative trait loci for maximal exercise capacity phenotypes and their responses to training in the HERITAGE Family Study. Physiol Genomics 16: 256 –260, 2004. 34. Silver LM. Mouse Genetics: Concepts and Applications. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995. 35. Swallow TG JG Jr, Carter PA, Zhan WZ, Sieck GC. Effects of voluntary activity and genetic selection on aerobic capacity in house mice (Mus domesticus). J Appl Physiol 84: 69 –76, 1998. 36. Ways JA, Cicila GT, Garrett MR, Koch LG. A genome scan for loci associated with aerobic running capacity in rats. Genomics 80: 13–20, 2002. 37. Workman M, Leamy L, Routman E, Cheverud J. Analysis of quantitative trait locus effects on the size and shape of mandibular molars in mice. Genetics 160: 1573–1586, 2002. 38. Wu H, Kanatous SB, Thurmond FA, Gallardo T, Isotani E, BasselDuby R, Williams RS. Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle by CaMK. Science 296: 349 –352, 2002. Downloaded from http://jap.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.247 on June 16, 2017 J Appl Physiol • VOL 103 • JULY 2007 • www.jap.org