* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Tibetan Alpine Tundra Responses to Simulated Changes in Climate
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Tibetan Alpine Tundra Responses to Simulated Changes in Climate: Aboveground Biomass and Community Responses Author(s): Yanqing Zhang and Jeffrey M. Welker Source: Arctic and Alpine Research, Vol. 28, No. 2 (May, 1996), pp. 203-209 Published by: INSTAAR, University of ColoradoINSTAAR, University of Colorado Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1551761 Accessed: 19/10/2010 12:13 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=instaar. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. INSTAAR, University of Colorado is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Arctic and Alpine Research. http://www.jstor.org Arctic and Alpine Research, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1996, pp. 203-209 Tundra to Simulated inClimate: Tibetan Responses Changes Alpine Biomass andCommunity Responses Aboveground Abstract Yanqing Zhang Departmentof Ecology, Northwest PlateauInstituteof Biology, The Chinese Academyof Sciences, Xining, 810001, P. R. China.Present address:Departmentof Rangeland Resources,Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-5230, U.S.A. Jeffrey M. Welker NaturalResourceEcology Laboratory and the Departmentof Rangeland EcosystemScience, ColoradoState University,Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, U.S.A. Presentaddressand reprintrequests:Departmentof RangelandEcology, Universityof Wyoming,Laramie,Wyoming82071, U.S.A. High-elevation ecosystems are predicted to be some of the terrestrial habitats most sensitive to changing climates. The ecological consequences of changes in alpine tundra environmental conditions are still unclear especially for habitats in Asia. In this study we report findings from a field experiment where an alpine tundra grassland on the Tibetan plateau (37'N, 101oE) was exposed to experimental warming, irradiance was lowered, and wind speed reduced to simulate a suite of potential changes in environmental conditions. Our warming treatment increased air temperatures by 5oC on average and soil temperatures were elevated by 3'C at 5 cm depth. Aboveground biomass of grasses responded rapidly to the warmer conditions whereby biomass was 25% greater than that of controls after only 5 wk of experimental warming. This increase was accompanied by a simultaneous decrease in forb biomass, resulting in almost no net change in community biomass after 5 wk. Lower irradiance reduced grass biomass during the same period. Under ambient conditions total aboveground community biomass increased seasonally from 161 g m-2 in July to a maximum of 351 g m-2 in September, declining to 285 g m-2 in October. However, under warmed conditions, peak community biomass was extended into October due in part to continued growth of grasses and the postponement of senescence. Our findings indicate that while alpine grasses respond favorably to altered conditions, others may not. And, while peak community biomass may actually change very little under warmer summers, the duration of peak biomass may be extended having feedback effects on net ecosystem CO2 balances, nutrient cycling, and forage availability. Introduction High-elevation and high-latitude ecosystems are predicted to be some of the terrestrialhabitats most sensitive and vulnerable to changing climates (Chapin et al., 1992; Korner, 1992; Grabherret al., 1994). These ecosystems are composed of slowgrowing plants and are dominatedby soils which can be high in organic matter(Billings, 1987; Bowman et al., 1993). Both plant growth and possibly organic matter decomposition are expected to increase under warmer climates, though the relative balance between the two and whether these habitats are carbon sources or sinks for CO2are still unclear (Oechel et al., 1993; Brooks et al., 1995). A suite of abiotic conditions may be modified as weather patterns and regional climates change altering biospheric and atmospheric processes in tundra ecosystems (Maxwell, 1992; Shaver et al., 1992; Jonasson et al., 1993; Grabherret al., 1994; Larigauderie and K6rner, 1995). For instance, warmer air temperatures will likely alter the flux of water from these ecosystems to the atmosphere drying soils and contributing to increased cloud formation. Simultaneously, warmer conditions may increase plant growth, primary production and carbon sequestration, so long as cloud cover is not affected and other factors such as water or nutrients do not limit photosynthesis and growth (Haag, 1974; Bowman et al., 1993; Wookey et al., 1995). The ecological consequences of changes in tundra environmental conditions will be manifested in a host of processes ? 1996 Regents of the Universityof Colorado 0004-0851/96 $7.00 including shifts in primary production (Bowman et al., 1993; Walkeret al., 1994), trace gas fluxes (Brooks et al., 1995), plant and soil mineral nutrition (Nadelhoffer et al., 1991; Shaver and Chapin 1991), reproductiveplant biology (Wookey et al., 1993, 1994), leaf carbon isotope discrimination (Welker et al., 1993), as well as changes in species dominance (Walker et al., 1994). However, it is unclear whether all these processes are sensitive to short-termchanges in environmental conditions in all tundra habitats or whether multiple years of climate change are necessary to elicit detectable alterations in plant performance and species abundance. To date, most studies of alpine tundra responses to in situ changes in climate, using field manipulations, have been confined to sites in North America and in Western Europe (Kirner, 1992; Chapin et al., 1995; Kennedy, 1995; Welker et al., 1995) without the consideration of the extensive alpine tundra in Asia, and in particular,western China. In this study we report findings from a field experiment where alpine tundra on the north eastern side of the Tibetan plateau, Qinghai Province, China was exposed to experimental warming using polyethylene greenhouses (Havstromet al., 1993; Wookey et al., 1993), irradiancewas lowered using shade cloth (Chapin and Shaver, 1985) and wind speed at the ground was lowered with short side fences. Our initial studies have been directed towards identifying short-term responses to simulated environmentalchange focusing on abovegroundbiomass of the three dominant life forms and community compositional attributes. Y. ZHANGANDJ. M. WELKER/ 203 TABLEI Methods andMaterials FIELD SITE Xia (1989) and Cincottaet al. (1992) give complete details of the vegetation and geography of our study site, so here we present only a brief overview. Our researchsite is located near the Haibei Alpine Meadow Ecosystem Research Station (37?N, 101oE) at an elevation of 3250 m. The field site is located in the foothills of Mt. Lenglongling in the eastern part of the Qilian Mountains, 160 km northwestof Xining. The vegetation of our site is typical of a Kobresia humilis meadow (Zhou et al., 1987; Yang et al., 1989; Zhang and Zhou, 1992) with associated species such as Elymus nutans intermixed with herbaceous forbs. Snow covers these tundrasites for 8 mo between October and late May and permanent snow cover occurs at 4200 m with treeline occurringat approximately2950 m. SETUP EXPERIMENTAL Our study was initiated in June 1991 and the first season was completed in October 1991. Four treatmentswere implemented in June:(1) Minigreenhouses(G) were used to warm air temperatureand subsequentlysoil temperaturesusing a design similar to Havstromet al. (1993) and Wookey et al. (1993). The greenhouses covered an area 2 X 5 m with a center height of 80 cm. The frame was constructedof narrow (8.0 mm) steel tubing and clear polyethylene plastic film (0.1 mm) was used as a cover. A 400-cm2 hole was cut into the top of the tent to facilitate rainfall entry into these plots. (2) Solar irradiance(S) was reducedby 30% using shade cloth to simulate increases in cloudiness (Chapin and Shaver, 1985). Shade cloth was placed across a frame similar to the one used for the minigreenhouses. (3) Wind speed at the ground level was reduced by placing 20 cm high side fences (SF) aroundthe entire plot. (4) Control (C) plots had only the steel frame across the top of the 2 X 5 m area. A completely randomizeddesign was used to establish the 16 treatmentplots consisting of four treatments(G, S, SF, C) replicatedfour times. TE MONITORING MICROCLIMA Air temperature,relative humidity, and wind speed were measuredat 20 cm above the soil surface in the center of the experimentalplots using a thermometer,humidity sensor and an anemometer.Soil temperaturewas measuredat 5, 10, and 15 cm depths using soil thermometersand soil moisturewas measured using tensiometers(Soil Moisture Corp., Calif., U.S.A.). Absolute vapor density was calculated using the average air temperaturesand averagerelativehumidities.All parameterswere measured over the entire growing season in the four differenttreatments. Measurementswere taken to assess both daily changes in abiotic conditions and taken periodically over the course of the summerto examine seasonal patterns.Daily patternsof abiotic conditions were measured in the treatmentplots being recorded every 2 h between 0800 and 2000 h from 3-5 August. Seasonal patterns were based on measurementstaken at 0800, 1400, and 2000 every 10 d between July and October.No observations were made at night and thus our estimates of greenhouse effects on temperatureare likely an over estimationof the daily averages as at night when there is no irradiance,temperaturedifferencesbetween ambientand warmedconditionswould be minimal as reportedby Wookey et al. (1993) and Welker et al. (1995). 204 / ARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH Abiotic conditions from the four treatments between July and October 1991 GreenControl house Treatments Mean air temperature (QC) Mean soil temperature (?C) Side fence 12.38 17.78 14.33 12.91 5 cm 10 cm 15 cm 12.79 12.29 12.19 16.07 15.14 13.95 13.85 12.76 12.74 12.44 12.06 12.10 4.00 12.00 6.00 5.80 10 cm 14.80 21.07 30.39 14.94 Vapor density (g m-3) Soil suction (Kpa) Shade ATTRIBUTES VEGETATION We quantifiedplant height, species frequency,and species cover along with abovegroundplant biomass. Abovegroundbiomass was measuredusing double sampling whereby ocular estimates were coupled to destructive harvest in 0.1 m2 plots (Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg, 1974; Cook and Bonham, 1977). Double sampling was used because of the limited treatment applicationarea and this techniquepreserved the area for sampling in later years. Correlationsbetween estimates and actual abovegroundharvests were highly significant(r2 = 0.92, p < 0.01) as measuredeight differenttimes over the course of the growing season. Clipped vegetation was sorted into live and dead and then pooled by life form into grasses, sedges, and forbs. Green tissue was then oven dried at 600C for 48 h and weighed. Aboveground biomass was tested for significant harvest date and treatmenteffects using analysis of variance techniques for a completely randomizeddesign (SAS Inc., 1988). Differences between treatments were considered significant when p < 0.05 (SAS Inc., 1988). Mean separationsfor aboveground biomass within each harvest date were conducted using Duncan's multiple range test. Species importancevalues, an index of community attributes,were calculated using the cover, composition and frequencydata collected from for each species in the four treatmentsusing permanent0.5 x 0.5 m quadrants (Mueller-Domboisand Ellenberg, 1974). Results The greenhousetreatmentincreased mean air temperatures by 20% from 12.4 to 17.80C over the course of the growing season (Table 1). Warmerair temperaturessubsequentlyresulted in higher soil temperaturesat 5, 10, and 15 cm with the largest increase in soil temperatureat 5 depth cm. where the average temperaturewas 3.3?Chigher undergreenhouse(G) as opposed to ambient (C) conditions (Table 1). The mean vapor density was also increasedunderwarmertemperaturesof the greenhouse from 4 to 12 g m-3 while soil suction was essentially the same between all treatmentplots, except for under shaded (S) conditions, were soil suction was consistently higher indicatinglower soil water content. The shade treatment,while reducing irradiance, also resultedin a slight increasein temperaturesand a IVC increase in soil temperatureat 5 cm. The shade treatmenthad no effect on soil temperaturesat 10 cm or 15 cm nor did the shade treatmentalter the vapor densities. Side fences had no effect on ambient air temperaturesand subsequentlyno effect on soil temperatures. Daily air temperaturesof all four treatmentsreached their maxima at 1400 h, though soil temperaturesat 5 cm lagged - -0 oa ,30 40 - . S20- 300 20- Eio E S10- '20 10 8 10 14 12 16 18 20 b 24- 10 20 31 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 31 10 20 30 10 20 30 20 20- E 16 - 4 128801 10 1 12 12 114 4 16 16 18 18 20 20 10 w 10- 15 0 20 9 15 c 20 o 2251 U) 0 30 (35 40- 35 c 30 10 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time of day D-O Control Shading 20 31 July 0-0 - 10 20 30 10 August 20 30 September Control A-A Shading Greenhouse V-V Side fence "- GreenhouseV--v Sidefence FIGURE 1. Mean daily air temperature (?C), 5 cm soil temperature (?C), and 10 cm soil suction (kPa) between 3 and 5 August 1991 at Haibei Alpine Meadow Ecosystem Research Station. behind reaching their peak at 1600 h or at 1800 h as measured in early August 1991 (Fig. la, lb). Soil water was generally constant over the course of the day with a slight decrease in the late afternoon under ambient conditions but rose progressively during the afternoonunder warmedconditions (Fig. Ic). Overall, soil water suctions were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the shaded plots than in the other three treatments. Seasonal patterns of abiotic conditions indicate that the air temperatures were consistently higher in the greenhouses (G) and that after 10 August, temperaturesgradually declined until late September(Fig. 2a). These trends in air temperatureare also manifested in the seasonal pattern of soil temperatures. The greenhouses had the largest effect on soil temperaturesin late July, and continued to result in elevated temperaturesthrough the end of September (Fig. 2c). Seasonal soil temperaturesin control and treatment plots tracked air temperatureswith soil temperaturesin control plots varying from a high of 150C in July to a low of 50C in late Septemberwhile temperaturesin the greenhouses varied from a high of 190C in mid-July and early August to a low of 80C in late September. Aboveground biomass was initially similar among all treatments for forbs, sedges and grasses (Fig. 3a). Within 5 wk after the warming treatments were implemented, grass biomass was significantly higher in the warmed as compared to control conditions (Fig. 3b). Conversely, grass biomass was significantly reduced during this same period under shaded conditions (Fig. 3b). Reductions of wind using side fences (SF) had no significant effect on grass, sedge or forb biomass (Fig. 3b). By September, grass biomass differences between control and warmed plots were nonsignificantthough forb biomass was FIGURE 2. Seasonal progression of the mean air temperature ('C), 5 cm soil temperature(?C), and 10 cm soil suction (kPa) from July to Septemberin 1991 at Haibei Alpine Meadow Ecosystem Research Station. significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the greenhouses (G) as opposed to control conditions (C) (Fig. 3c). Lower irradiancehad a significant effect on grass growth and in September,grass biomass was 36% less in shaded (S) as opposed to control conditions. Forb biomass was slightly higher in side-fenced areas as compared to control conditions. Between Septemberand Octobergrass in control plots started to senesce and biomass began to decline (Fig. 3c, 3d). However, under warmed (G) conditions, grass biomass was significantly (p < 0.01) higher in warmed as opposed to control conditions in October which postponed community senescence (Fig. 3d). This prolonged growth, or postponed senescence during the fall in warmed plots occurred as the greenhouses maintained warmer air and soil temperaturesthan ambient conditions (Fig. 2). Biomass of grasses and forbs were slightly lower under shaded (S) conditions in October, while sedge biomass was significantly (p < 0.05) higher under these same reduced irradiance conditions (Fig. 3d). Total community aboveground biomass in all four treatments was not significantly different in July and total aboveground biomass in warmed conditions, as compared to ambient conditions, was not significantly higher until October (Table 2). However, lowered irradiance(S) resulted in a 23% decrease in total community biomass within 5 wk of treatmentapplications. Total biomass under reduced irradiance(S) continued to be the lowest over the course of the season reaching a maximum of only 80% of the peak biomass under ambient conditions (Table 2). Species importancevalues as a measure of community level responses are presented in Table 3. Under reduced radiation(S) Y. ZHANGANDJ. M. WELKER/ 205 200 , E 200 150 - 150- U E o S100 b a 0E o aaaa a bb a E 100 a aa a aaa o Grasses Sedges a Forbs Grasses Sedges July " - August 200 - 0- 50 10 150 o 200 50 b aI150"- o Forbs a Control E 0 FIGURE 3. The aboveground biomass of grasses, sedges, and forbs in control, greenhouses, shaded, and side fenced treatment plots sampled in July, August, September, and October 1991. Superscripts of the different letters denote biomasses which were significantly different (p < 0.05) for each individual sampling date. Shading reductions in Elymus and Festuca were associated with increases in Stipa and Scirpus which dramaticallyaltered the composition and structureof these plant communities. Changes in community composition and structure under warmer conditions (G) were manifested by lower importance values for Poa and Kobresia with correspondingincreases in importance values for Stipa and Oxytropis (Table 3). Discussion Total maximum abovegroundbiomass at our Tibetan alpine tundra site ranged from 161 to 351 g m-2 under ambient conditions (Table 2). These ranges in biomass are similar to the peak aboveground biomass at other alpine tundra sites such as on Niwot Ridge, Colorado, U.S.A., where the intercommunity aboveground biomass in different vegetation types ranges from 71 to 309 g m-2 (Walker et al., 1994). Our environmental manipulations simulating climate warming resulted in warmer air and soil temperaturesbetween 1 and 5'C, which is within the ranges of increase reportedfor higher elevations in Western Eu- rope over the past 15 yr (Rozanski et al., 1992; Grabherret al., 1994) and is within the ranges predictedfor tundrahabitatsunder a doubling of CO2 over the next 50 yr (Maxwell et al., 1992). The season long average increases are also similar to those accomplished in other tundra experimental warming treatments though our lack of nighttime measurementsmeans our averages are slightly higher than those actually experienced by plants and soil in these treatmentplots (Chapin and Shaver, 1985; Wookey et al., 1993; Parsons et al., 1994; Kennedy, 1995; Welker et al., 1995). However, most importantly, higher temperatures were maintained in our warmed plots into October and may partially explain the extended growing season observed for grasses. Grass and forb biomass productionwas especially sensitive to warmer conditions (Fig. 3). Grass abovegroundbiomass was 25% greater under warmer conditions after only 5 wk of warming while forb biomass decreased by 30% (Fig. 3b). Differences in abovegroundgrass biomass between warmer and control conditions were diminished by September when grass biomasses were not significantly different (Fig. 3c). However, it appearsthat community senescence, which usu- TABLE 2 Total aboveground biomass (g m-2) from the four treatments in July, August, September, and October 1991 Date Control Greenhouse Shade Side fence 3 Jul. 161.16 157.52 145.86 164.00 + + + ? 10.23a 7.13a 7.51a 9.25a 1 Aug. 269.36 252.37 206.69 247.30 + 17.57a + 16.57a + 17.63b + 10.80a Differencesbetweenthe treatmentswithineach monthat p < 0.05 are noted by differentletters. 206 / ARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH 2 Sept. 351.36 1 15.55a 334.61 1 13.97a 278.93 ? 13.78b 370.08 1 6.45a 2 Oct. 285.68 + 346.19+ 266.21 1 300.80 - 5.49b 11.81a 10.63b 5.07b TABLE3 The importance value of dominant plant species between four treatmentplotsa Plant species Elymus nutans Festuca ovina Poa pratensis Koeleria cristata Stipa aliena Kobresia humilis Carex scabriostris Scirpus distigmaticus Saussurea superba Gentiana aristata Oxytropis ochrocephala Trigonella ruthenica Taraxacum mongolicum Potentilla bifurca Aster flaccidus Oxytropis caerulea Potentilla anserina Gentiana straminea aC-control; G-greenhouse; C G S SF 52.05 35.05 21.12 26.32 22.29 19.65 12.62 15.10 24.16 8.15 16.17 8.69 8.67 10.50 15.34 11.87 8.83 14.65 54.07 39.08 14.53 17.63 29.01 6.55 10.14 10.72 30.61 10.11 34.95 16.33 10.93 10.20 9.25 13.55 8.74 8.86 23.80 23.64 27.99 18.22 31.74 18.66 14.04 35.22 27.18 22.13 15.82 8.01 9.48 9.02 8.62 11.23 8.67 21.62 56.09 33.42 20.04 23.86 21.21 23.85 13.32 16.54 21.13 10.01 26.33 7.75 9.19 13.94 5.71 8.40 16.91 14.88 S-shade; SF-side fence. ally starts in September, was postponed until sometime in October under warmer (G) conditions as evidenced by no decline in abovegroundcommunity biomass between Septemberand October (Table 2). This postponing of senescence and subsequently an extension of the growing season under warmed conditions, resulted in part because peak grass biomass was not realized until early October amounting to 177 g m-2 (Fig. 3d). The ability of the grass life form at our site to exhibit a rapid, positive response to warmer conditions and to extend the season of growth is likely the result of (1) the existence of a large leaf area at the time of treatment application, (2) the inherent physiological capacity of grasses to alter patterns of resource allocation (Welker et al., 1985, 1987; Welker and Briske, 1992), (3) their morphological and demographic capacity to elongate fall tillers (Briske and Butler, 1989), and (4) the ability to grow when environmentalconstraintsare temporallyremoved (Sala et al., 1992).Grasses at other tundrasites have also exhibited an ability to respond rapidly to simulatedchanges in climate as exemplified by Calamagrostis biomass increases in the subarctic at Abisko, Sweden under warmer conditions (Parsons et al., 1995). The grass growth response reportedby Parsons et al. (1995), in what is typically a dwarf shrub dominatedecosystem, was due in large part to an extensive, preexisting network of underground Calamagrostis meristems, capable of rapid shoot extension and leaf development up through the dwarf shrub understory. The shift in alpine tundracommunity biomass characteristics whereby maximum biomass is maintained into the autumn is different from what might be observed in arctic tundradominated by deciduous dwarf shrubs. Prolonged growth of many arctic plants in autumn is unlikely due to photoperiodic cues which control senescence (Murry and Miller, 1982). Thus, even if conditions in arctic tundrawere warmer in fall, the ability of many dominant life forms to either produce new fall foliage or continue expansion of existing leaf and shoot biomass is limited by life history traits.And while graminoids, such as Eriophorum may constitute a large fraction of the biomass in these systems (Shaver et al., 1992), extended growth in fall under warmertemperaturesmay be unlikely due to the low solar angles in autumn. The ability of grasses to utilize favorable conditions at the end of the season is a trait similar to that observed for other tundra lifeforms such as evergreen shrub species (Karlsson, 1985; Welker et al., 1995). For instance, Welker et al. (1995) have found evidence that Dryas octopetala, a wintergreen species, has the capacity to exhibit net carbon assimilation at the end of the season under warmer,wetter,and fertilized conditions when plants in control conditions have ceased gaining carbon, which is made possible in part by its evergreen nature. In addition, Karlsson (1985) found that 20% of the carbon acquired by the evergreen dwarf shrub, Vacciniumvitis-idaea occurredin spring and in autumn,before leaf emergence or after leaf senescence in the deciduous species, Vaccinium uliginosum. Thus, evergreen dwarf shrubs are also a tundralife form which due to their inherent life history characteristicscan respond to changes in environmental conditions which occur in spring, and fall (Wookey et al., 1993; Welker et al., 1995). The opportunisticbehavior of grasses we observed was not evident for forbs. During the initial 5-wk period forb biomass was reduced under warmer conditions while grass biomass was increasing (Fig. 4b). The opposite response for forbs may have been due in part to the grasses out-competing forbs for water, nutrients and or light. However, the overall community level response was that total biomass was not different between warmed (G) and control (C) conditions after 5 wk of experimental applications (Table 2). This observation of similar community biomass undermodified environmentalconditions is consistent with the observationsof Chapin and Shaver (1985). These authors found that arctic tundra total community production (currentyears growth) in perturbedand in control plots remained the same. This inherent buffering was achieved because some species or life forms increased growth while others exhibited reduced growth.They concluded that conditions favorable for one species or life form are less favorable for others, though the total community or ecosystem productionchanges annuallyvery little (Chapin et al., 1995). This attributeof tundra ecosystems may be the result of the inherently low nutrientlevels available to plants in tundra which constrains system level primary production (Shaver et al., 1992). The one life form in our study which appeared to be the least responsive to simulated climate warming were the sedges, consisting primarilyof Kobresia humillis. The lack of significant increases in biomass until the end of the first season underwarmer or shaded conditions indicates that this life form has a relatively low sensitivity to temperatureand irradiance. However, other sedges, such as Kobresia myosuroides on Niwot Ridge, Colorado, exhibits an increase in biomass underelevated nutrient availability (Bowman et al., 1993). This would suggest that while the warmerconditions in soils under our minigreenhouses may have elevated soil mineralization and increased nutrient pools available to plants (Jonasson et al., 1993; Robinson et al., 1995) the increases were either not sufficient to alter Kobresia growth, or that Kobresia root uptake rates are low, and its ability to compete for soil nutrients with grasses is low (Black et al., 1994; Falkengren-Grerup,1995). Even though soil nutritionmay have been alteredunder warmed conditions, the ability of sedges at our site to acquire these resources in a competitive setting appears to be limited, in part due possibly to resource capture by soil microbes (Jackson et al., 1989; Schimel et al., 1989). However, in future years changes in rooting patternsmay enable this species to capitalize on changes in soil resources. In conclusion, our findings suggest that Tibetan alpine grasses are predisposed to rapid increases in biomass under simulated climate warming due in part to their inherent life history Y. ZHANGAND J. M. WELKER/ 207 traits.In addition,the ability of grasses to produce tillers late in the season underwarmerconditionsextends the periodof carbon gain and extends the period in which the community exhibits maximumabovegroundbiomass. We find that sedges at our site are insensitive in the short term to changes in environmental conditions, while forbs may decrease at the expense of grass biomass. Increases in cloudiness over the Tibetan alpine tundra would likely result in lower abovegroundbiomass, but if accompanied by higher rainfallthe effects may be counter-acting.The extension of peak community biomass into the autumnmay in the long term have cascading effects on net ecosystem CO2fluxes, nutrientcycling, and forage availabilityto grazers. Acknowledgments We thank Dr. PremindaJacob and Chen Bo for assistance in the field and Dr. Andy Parsons for assistance with graphics and for reviewing an earlierversion of the manuscript.Research was supportedby Haibei Alpine Meadow Ecosystem Station900318, the Biosphere Program, U. S. State DepartmentGrant 1753-900561 and in part by U.S. InternationalTundraExperiment (USITEX)(NSF/OPP-9321730)awardedto JMW.We also wish to thanktwo reviewers for their helpful comments and critique of an earlier version of the manuscript. References Cited Billings, W. D., 1987: Constraintsto plant growth, reproduction and establishmentin arctic environments.Arctic and Alpine Research, 19: 357-365. Black, R. A., Richards,J. R., and Manwaring,J. H., 1994: Nutrient uptake from enriched microsites by three Great Basin perennials.Ecology, 75: 110-122. Bowman, W. D., Theodose, T. A., Schardt,J. C., and Conant,R. T., 1993: Constraintsof nutrientavailability on primaryproduction in two alpine tundracommunity.Ecology, 74: 20852097. Briske, D. D. and Butler, J. L., 1989: Density-dependentregulation of rametpopulationswithin the bunchgrassSchizachyrium scoparium:interclonalversus intraclonalinterence.Journal of Ecology, 77: 963-974. Brooks, P. D., Williams, M. W., Walker,D. A., and Schmidt, S. K., 1995: The Niwot Ridge snow fence experiment:Biogeochemical responses to changes in the seasonal snowpack. In Tonnessen, K., Williams, M. W., and Tanter,M. (eds.), Biogeochemistry of Seasonally Snow-CoveredCatchments(Proceedings of a Boulder Symposium, July 1995). International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication 228, 293302. Chapin,E S., Shaver,G. R., Giblin, A. E., Nadeloffer,K. J., and Laundre,J. A. 1995. Responses of arctictundrato experimental and observed changes in climate. Ecology, 76: 694-711. Chapin, E S., Jefferies, R. L., Reynolds, J. E, and Svoboda, J., 1992: Arctic plant physiological ecology in an ecosystem context. In Chapin,E S., Jefferies, R. L., Reynolds, J. E, Shaver, G. R., and Svoboda, J. (eds), Arctic Ecosystemsin a Changing Climate: An Ecophysiological Perspective. San Diego: Academic Press, 441-452. Chapin, E S. and Shaver, G. R., 1985: Individualisticgrowth response of tundraplant species to environmentalmanipulations in the field. Ecology, 66: 564-576. Cincotta, R. P., Zhang, Y. Q., and Zhou, X. M., 1992: Transhumant alpine pastoralismin northwesternQinghaiprovince:An evaluation of livestock population response during China's agrarianeconomic reform.Nomadic People, 30: 3-25. Cook, C. W. and Bonham, C. D., 1977: Techniquesfor vegetation measurementsand analysis for pre- and post-mining inventory. Science Series No.28, Range Science Department, Colorado State University. 208 / ARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH Falkengren-Grerup,U., 1995: Interspecies differences in the preferenceof ammoniumand nitratein vascularplants. Oecologia, 102: 305-311. Grabherr.G., Gottfried,M., and Pauli, H., 1994: Climate effects on mountainplants. Nature, 369: 448-450. Haag, R. C., 1974. Nutrient limitations to plant production in two tundra communities. Canadian Journal of Botany, 52: 103-116. Havstrom,M., Callaghan,T. V., and Jonasson, S., 1993: Differential growth responses of Cassiope tetragona, an arctic dwarf-shrub,to environmentalperturbationsamong threecontrastinghigh and subarcticsites. Oikos, 66: 389-402. Jackson,L. E., Schimel, J. P., and Firestone,M. K., 1989. Shorttermpartitioningof ammoniumand nitratebetween plantsand microbes in an annual grassland.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 21: 409-415. Jonasson, S., Havstrom,M., Jensen, M., and Callaghan, T. V., 1993: In situ mineralizationof nitrogen and phosphorus of arctic soils afterperturbationssimulatingclimate change. Oecologia, 95: 179-186. Karlsson,P. S., 1985: Effect of waterand mineralnutrientsupply on a deciduous and evergreen dwarf shrub: Vacciniumuliginosum L. and V. vitis-idaea L. Holarctic. Ecology, 8: 1-8. Kennedy, A. D., 1995: Simulated climate change: are passive greenhousea valid microcosnfor testing the biological effects of environmental perturbation?Global Change Biology, 1: 29-42. Korner,Ch., 1992. Response of alpine vegetation to global climate change. In: InternationalConferenceon LandscapeEcological Impactof ClimateChange. Lunteren,The Netherlands, Catena Verlag, Supplement,22: 85-96. Larigauderie,A., and KSrner,Ch., 1995. Acclimation of leaf dark respirationto temperaturein alpine and lowland plant species. Annals of Botany, 76: 245-252. Maxwell, B., 1992: Arctic climate: Potential for change under global warming. In Chapin, E S., Jefferies, R. L., Reynolds, J. E, Shaver,G. R., and Svoboda, J. (eds), Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate:An EcophysiologicalPerspective. San Diego: Academic Press, 11-34. Mueller-Dombois,D. and Ellenberg,H., 1974: Aims and Methods of VegetationEcology. New York:John Wiley. 547 pp. Murry,C. and Miller, P. C., 1982. Phenological observationsof majorplant growth forms and species in montaneand Eriophorum vaginatum tussock tundrain central Alaska. Holarctic Ecology, 5: 109-116. Nadelhoffer,K. J., Giblin, A. E., Shaver,G. R., and Laundre,J. A., 1991: Effects of temperatureand substratequality on element mineralizationin six arctic soils. Ecology, 72: 242-253. Oechel, W. C., Hastings, S. J., Vourlitis,G., Jenkins,M., Riechers, G. and Grulke,N., 1993: Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystem from a net carbondioxide sink to a source. Nature, 361: 520-523. Parsons, A. N., Welker, J. M., Wookey, P. A., Press, M. C., Callaghan,T. V., and Lee, J. A., 1994: Growth responses of four sub-arctic dwarf shrubs to simulated climate change. Journal of Ecology, 82: 307-318. Parsons, A. N., Press, M. C., Wookey, P. A., Welker, J. M., Robinson,C. H., CallaghanT. V., and Lee, J. A., 1995: Growth and reproductiveoutput of Calamagrostis lapponica in response to simulated environmentalchange in the subarctic. Oikos, 72:61-66. Robinson, C. H., Wookey, P. A., Parsons, A. N., Potter,J. A., Callaghan,T. V., Lee, J. A., Press, M. C., and Welker,J. M., 1995: Responses of plant litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralisationto simulated environmentalchange in a high arctic polar semi-desert and a subarctic dwarf shrub heath. Oikos, 74: 503-512. Rozanski, K., Araguis-Aragufs, L., and Gonfiantini,R., 1992: Relation between long-termtrendsof oxygen-18 isotope composition of precipitationand climate. Science, 258: 981-985. Sala, O. E., and Lauenroth,W. K. and Parton,W. J. 1992. Longterm soil water dynamics in the shortgrass steppe. Ecology, 73: 1175-1181. SAS InstituteInc., 1988: SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03. Ed. SAS Inst. Inc. Cary, NC. Schimel, J. P., Jackson, L. E., and Firestone, M., 1989: Spatial and temporal effects on plant-microbialcompetition for inorganic nitrogen in a California annual grassland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 21: 1059-1066. Shaver, G. R. and Chapin, E S., 1991: Production:biomassrelationships and element cycling in contrastingarctic vegetation types. Ecological Monographs, 61: 1-31. Shaver, G. R., Billings, W. D., Chapin, E S., Giblin, A. E., Nadelhoffer, K. J., Oechel, W. C. and Rastetter, E. B., 1992: Global change and the carbon balance of arctic ecosystems. Bioscience, 42: 433-441. Walker,M. D., Webber,P. J., Arnold, E. H., and Ebert-May,D., 1994: Effects of interannualclimate variationon aboveground phytomass in alpine vegetation. Ecology, 75:393-408. Welker,J. M., Rykiel, E. J., Briske, D. D., and Goeschel, J. D., 1985: Carbon import among vegetative tillers within two bunchgrasses:assessment with carbon-11 labelling. Oecologia, 67: 209-212. Welker,J. M., Briske, D. D., and Weaver,R. W., 1987: Nitrogen15 partitioningwithin a three generation tiller sequence of the bunchgrasSchizachyriumscoparium:response to selective defoliation. Oecologia, 74: 330-334. Welker, J. M. and Briske, D. D., 1992: Clonal biology of the temperate caespitose graminoid Schizachyriumscoparium: A synthesis with reference to climate change. Oikos, 56:357365. Welker,J. M., Wookey, P., Parsons, A. P, Callaghan,T. V., Press, M. C., and Lee, J. A., 1993: Leaf carbon isotope discrimination and demographicresponses of Dryas octopetala to water and temperaturemanipulations in a high arctic polar semidesert, Svalbard. Oeclogia, 95: 463-749. Welker, J. M., Svoboda, J., Henry, G., Molau, U., Parsons, A. N., and Wookey, P. A., 1995: Response of two Dryas species to ITEX environmental manipulations:A synthesis with circumpolar comparisions. In: Proceedings from the 6th International Tundra Experiment (ITEX). Ottawa, Canada. April 1995. Abstract. Wookey, P. A., Parsons, A. N., Welker, J. M., Potter, J., Callaghan, T. V., Lee, J. A., and Press, M. C., 1993: Comparative responses of phenology and reproductivedevelopment to simulated environmental change in sub-arctic and high arctic plants. Oikos, 67: 490-502. Wookey, P. A., Welker, J. M., Parsons, A. N., Press, M. C., Callaghan, T. V., and Lee, J. A., 1994: Differential growth, allocation and photosynthetic responses of Polygonum viviparum to simulated environmentalchange at a high arctic polar semi-desert. Oikos, 70: 131-139. Wookey, P. A., Robinson, C. H., Parsons, A. N., Welker,J. M., Press, M. C., Callaghan, T. V., and Lee, J. A., 1995: Environmental constraints on the growth, photosynthesis and reproductive development of Dryas octopetala at a high arctic polar semi-desert, Svalbard. Oecologia, 102: 478-489). Xia, W. P., 1988: A brief introductionto the fundamentalcharacteristics and the work in Haibei Research Station of Alpine Meadow Ecosystem. Proceedings of the International Symposium of an Alpine Meadow Ecosystem. Bejing: Academic Sinica, 1-10. Yang, E T., Wang, Q. J., and Shi, Sh. H., 1989: Seasonal and annual biomass dynamics of Kobresia humilis meadow. Proceedings of the InternationalSymposiumof an Alpine Meadow Ecosystem. Beijing: Academia Sinica, 71-80. Zhang, Y. Q. and Zhou, X. M., 1992: The quantitativeclassification and ordination of Haibei Alpine Meadow. Acta Phytooecological et Geobotanica Sinica, 1:36-42. Zhou, X. M., Wang, Zh. B., and Du, Q., 1987: Qinghai Vegetation. Qinghai People Press. Ms submittedJune 1994 Revised ms submittedJune 1995 Y. ZHANGAND J. M. WELKER/ 209