* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 753
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
GUT-ON-CHIP: HOW TO RECAPITULATE PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL FEATURES IN VITRO Marine Verhulsel1, Anthony Simon2, Davide Ferraro1, Cécile Bureau1, Jean-Louis Viovy1, Danijela Vignjevic2 & Stéphanie Descroix1 1 Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UPMC, UMR 168, 26 Rue d’ Ulm, 75005, Paris (France) Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UPMC, UMR 144, 26 Rue d’ Ulm, 75005, Paris (France) 2 ABSTRACT This paper describes a robust in vitro model which faithfully recreates the anatomy of small intestine on a chip. We used microfabrication and hydrogel molding to replicate the main characteristics of the intestine, namely its 3D structure and composition of its extracellular matrix (ECM). In particular, biomimetic hydrogel based on collagen was molded to reproducing the intestine topography. On this scaffold, we succeed to grow a primary epithelium, which makes this system a relevant model to study intestine physiology. KEYWORDS: Intestine, hydrogel, Extracellular matrix, primary cells INTRODUCTION The small intestine achieves most of the nutrient absorption due to its characteristic morphology: a defined succession of villi and crypts that considerably increases the exchange area (human intestine presents a surface area of 300m2) . More in details, the intestinal epithelium consists of a cellular monolayer and exhibits a characteristic morphology made of villi surrounded by 5-10 crypts. Villi are finger-like structures that rise into intestinal lumen. The high renewal rate of its epithelium (approximately 4-5 days [1]) is very specific to this organ. The separation of intestinal functions into dedicated morphological subunits (proliferative cells being restricted to the crypts and differentiated/absorptive cells to the villi), makes the intestine a very attractive organ for studying the complex mechanisms that drive epithelial dynamics. In vivo studies of the intestinal epithelium allow limited control of physical, chemical and biological parameters and are challenging for imaging. Clevers’ group developed an in vitro assay in which intestinal stem cells, when seeded in a biomimetic hydrogel, spontaneously grew into organoids. Organoids are cysts with budding structures that resemble crypts but fail to reproduce villi [2]. Two groups tried to overcome this problem using microfluidics. Ingber’s team suggested that peristaltic motion could induce villi formation. Nevertheless the cell line they seeded on a porous membrane undergoing peristaltic motion only showed poor spatial organization with regards to the actual topography of the villi [3]. March’s lab succeeded to grow primary cells on microstructured villi which were made of non-physiological polymer and therefore lack cell-matrix interactions present in vivo [4]. EXPERIMENTAL We propose a new device that recapitulates the biological and physical features of the in vivo intestine. By combining micromilling (Figure 1) we obtained a brass mold that could mimic roughly intestine 3D structure (Figure 1) and combined with soft lithography techniques, we have molded collagen I into 3D sinusoidal structure of 400µm in height with a 400µm period (figure 2). We have investigating different coatings strategies based on Matrigel or laminin as coating agents to reproduce the basement membrane. 978-0-9798064-8-3/µTAS 2015/$20©15CBMS-0001 753 19th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences October 25-29, 2015, Gyeongju, KOREA Figure 1 : (i)&(ii) SEM images of the brass mold. (iii)Principle of collagen scaffold fabrication. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION We first demonstrate the biocompatibility of our biomimetic scaffold. Mixing fibroblasts with collagen prior to collagen polymerization allowed their seeding inside the matrix where they actually belong in vivo (Figure 2). Fibroblasts, together with epithelial cells, synthesize a specialized network of ECM proteins, basement membrane (BM), which separates epithelium from stroma. Since BM is essential for epithelial survival and growth, we successfully coated the collagen structure with thin and homogeneous layer of laminin, a major constituent of BM. On those structures, we have then seeded early-stage cystlike organoids which opened up, spread and successfully colonized the whole structure forming a confluent epithelium monolayer (Figure 3). The labeling of proliferative cells confirmed their location in the crypt as observed in vivo. Figure 2 : 2D projection of fibroblasts seeded in the microstructured collagen matrix. (Fibroblast nuclei labeled in red, collagen fibers in blue and green). Higher color intensity correlates to higher density of collagen fibers. Therefore the 4 spots represent the raised areas of the collagen mold 754 Figure 3: After 7 days the primary epithelial monolayer colonized the whole structure.(nuclei in blue, actin in green). CONCLUSION Our platform provides the first primary intestinal tissue with physiologically relevant geometries and microenvironment. This realistic in vitro model opens new opportunities to elucidate the main parameters driving cell proliferation, migration and differentiation that are difficult to assess in vivo. In addition, it will allow us to investigate the effects of geometry, stiffness of the matrix or role of fibroblasts in those processes. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors acknowledge EU funding (ERC CellO) REFERENCES [1] Van der Flier L. G., & Clevers H. (2009). Stem cells, self-renewal, and differentiation in the intestinal epithelium. Annual review of physiology,71: 241–60. [2] Sato T et al (2009) Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature, 459(7244), 262-5. [3] Kim HJ et al(2013) Human gut-on-a-chip inhabited by microbial flora that experiences intestinal peristalsis-like motions and flow. Lab chip, 12 (12), 2165-74 [4] Costello CM et al (2014) Synthetic small intestinal scaffolds for improved studies of intestinal differentiation. Biotechnol Bioeng, 111(6):1222-32 CONTACT * Marine Verhulsel : [email protected] 755