* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download that Mary helped George
Sentence spacing wikipedia , lookup
Chinese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup
Integrational theory of language wikipedia , lookup
Context-free grammar wikipedia , lookup
Distributed morphology wikipedia , lookup
Morphology (linguistics) wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive semantics wikipedia , lookup
Dependency grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sloppy identity wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Construction grammar wikipedia , lookup
Preposition and postposition wikipedia , lookup
Focus (linguistics) wikipedia , lookup
Determiner phrase wikipedia , lookup
Musical syntax wikipedia , lookup
Probabilistic context-free grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup
Antisymmetry wikipedia , lookup
S YNTAX
I NTRODUCTION
In the previous chapter, we moved from the
general categories and concepts of traditional
grammar, to more specific methods of describing
the structure of phrases and sentences.
In earlier approaches to syntax, there was an
attempt to produce an accurate description of the
sequence of ordering of elements in a sentence.
In more recent approaches, work in syntax
attempted to account for the type of agreement
we observe in the structure of sentences.
W HAT
IS SYNTAX ?
Syntax is the study of the structure and
components within a sentence.
That means that syntax deals with the
concept of what are acceptable sentential
arrangements in a language.
Syntax does not deal with meaning.
e.g. Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.
G ENERATIVE
GRAMMAR
Generative grammar was originated by
Noam Chomsky.
It deals with linguistic structure of a
language in mathematical terms.
Generative grammar defines the
syntactic structure of a language
CONT.,
Generative grammar proposes that a set
of explicit, finite rules that can produce all
(infinite) and only well formed sentences
in a language.
It reveals the basis of two other
phenomena:
1. Superficially different sentences but
closely related.
2. superficially similar sentences but actually
different.
D EEP AND SURFACE
STRUCTURES
Consider the following examples:
Charlie broke the window
The window was broken by Charlie
C ONT.,
surface structure
deep structure
the different syntactic
abstract level of
forms of sentences in
English
structural organization
in which elements
determining structural
interpretation are presented
S TRUCTURAL A MBIGUITY
Annie wacked a man with an umbrella
This is a structurally ambiguous sentence:
it has two distinct underlying interpretations that has
to represented differently in deep structure.
Try to guess these two meanings!
The grammar will have to be capable of showing the
structural distinction between these underlying
representations.
R ECURSION
Recursion means that we can use the same type of
rule (e.g. PP) with an endless number of words.
on the table
in the bag
at the door
We must also be able to put sentences inside
sentences:
Mary helped George
Kathy knew that Mary helped George
S YMBOLS USED IN SYNTACTIC
DESCRIPTION
1. Abbreviations of syntactic categories:
S
sentence
NP noun phrase
‘Consists of’
2.
NP
3.
4.
5.
etc..
Art N
( ) ‘ optional constituent’
Only one of the elements enclosed inside the
brackets must be selected.
Note: refer to the symbols on pgs. 89-90
T REE
DIAGRAMS
P HRASE
STRUCTURE
RULES
We can look at tree diagrams as a way to
generate a very large number of other sentences
with similar structures.
We can use phrase structure rules to represent
the information of the tree diagram in a different
way:
NP
Art
N
NP
Art N
M ORE ON PHRASE
STRUCTURE RULES
S
NP VP
NP
VP
V NP (PP) (Adv)
PP
Prep NP
{Art (Adj) N, Pro, PN)
L EXICAL
RULES
Phrase structure rules generate structures.
In order to turn this structure into recognizable English, we
also need lexical rules: Which words can be used in the
same spot.
PN
{Mary, George}
V
N
{girl, dog, boy}
Adj
{small, crazy}
Art
{a, the}
prep
{near, with}
Adv
{recently, yesterday}
Pro
{it, you}
{followed, helped, saw}
CONT.,
C OMPLEMENT
PHRASES
Cathy knew that Mary helped George
that= complementizer (C) = introducing
complement phrase (CP)
that Mary helped George= CP
CP
C S
“A complement phrase consists of a complementizer
and a sentence.”
CONT.,
From the same sentence, the CP comes after a V (knew)
This means that we are using the CP as part of a VP (knew
that Mary helped George).
Now, we have a new rule, “A verb phrase consists of a
verb and a complement phrase.”
or, VP
V CP
CONT.,
T RANSFORMATIONAL
RULES
Phrase structure rules represent ‘deep’ structurealways generate structures with fixed word order.
Mary saw George recently
Recently Mary saw George
Transformational rules= take a specific part and attach
it in another place
You will help Cathy
Will you help Cathy?
CONT.,
T IME
FOR EXERCISES !!
1.Draw a labeled tree diagram for the following
English phrases.
a. Stuffed chickens
b. in the dark night
c. Met a friend
CONT.,
2. Draw phrase structure trees for the following
sentences:
The puppy found the child
The ice melted
The hot sun melted the ice.
The house on the hill collapsed in the wind.
The boat sailed up the river.
A girl laughed at the monkey.
George saw a dog with Mary
CONT.,
In what way are these sentences ambiguous?
We met an English history teacher
Flying planes can be dangerous
The parents of the bride and groom were waiting
outside
The students complained to everyone that they
couldn’t understand.
Thank you!