* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download File - Kevin Wilcox
Renewable resource wikipedia , lookup
Ecosystem services wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Biogeography wikipedia , lookup
Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Ecological resilience wikipedia , lookup
Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup
Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Perovskia atriplicifolia wikipedia , lookup
Conservation biology wikipedia , lookup
Operation Wallacea wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Plant diversity and ecosystem function Chapter 13 Why do we care about biodiversity? Chapin III et al. 2000 How does biodiversity affect ecosystem function (or vice versa)? Physiological constraints Evolutionary processes Regional species pool Abiotic factors Habitat selection Dispersal abilities Biotic factors Interspecific competition Herbivory Facilitation, mutualism From Morin (2011) Local community structure Historical events Ecosystem function • Productivity • Nutrient retention • Soil CO2 flux Diversity HIGH LOW • Alpha: # species at the local scale • Beta (β): Difference between communities, species turnover • Gamma (γ): # species at regional scale α: VS. β: VS. γ=βxα Whittaker 1960 How many species can be lost before ecosystem function is impacted? Loreau et al. 2001 How many species can be lost before ecosystem function is impacted? • Tilman and Downing (1996) • Grassland in Minnesota • Looked at drought resistance of plant communities with different levels of richness How many species can be lost before ecosystem function is impacted? • Naeem et al. (1994) Ecotron, UK • 9, 15, and 31 species treatments – distributed among trophic levels High diversity communities consumed more CO2 and were more productive (greater light interception) Naeem et al. 1994 Ways in which biodiversity can affect ecosystem function • Productivity - how much carbon is assimilated • Stability - how much productivity fluctuates under different environmental conditions • Invasibility - indirectly affects ecosystem processes Biodiversity and Productivity • Scale dependant • Potential Mechanisms – Productivity and size correlate (Oksanen 1996) – Resource / energy constraints (Preston 1962, Wright et al. 1993) – Competition and dominant species (Grime 1973) – “Paradox of enrichment” (Rosenzweig 1971) – Reordering causes short term diversity losses Biodiversity and Productivity - Neutral Oksanen 1996 Journal of Ecology Biodiversity and Productivity – “Paradox of enrichment” • With fertilization, productivity is generally increased, but species richness declines • Speculated to be due to changes in which species is dominating the system Stevens and Carson 1999 Biodiversity and Productivity Diversity (H’) Knapp et al. 2002 Biodiversity and Productivity Loreau et al. 2001 Found positive relationship between species richness and productivity in US and across Europe Biodiversity and Productivity – “It depends” Adler et al. 2011 Biodiversity and Productivity - Scale Mittelbach et al. 2001 On a regional scale, productivity and diversity were correlated in many more systems than at smaller scales Biodiversity and Productivity Hector et al. 1999 The number of functional groups were shown to be more important than species richness (in this study at least) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Stability • Dynamic stability – System returns to its “original” state after small perturbations – Robert May (1973) thought that increased diversity would actually lead to decreased dynamic stability – New theoretical models suggest that increased diversity will not increase dynamic stability but might not decrease it either. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Stability • Stability - How much does a system differ from one year to the next (usually in terms of productivity)? – Coefficient of variation – Stability – signal to noise ratio Cv = σ/µ Stability = µ /σ Biodiversity and Ecosystem Stability Coefficient of variation Tilman et al. 1996 Signal to noise ratio Tilman et al. 2006 Biodiversity and Invasion Kennedy et al. 2002 Biodiversity and Invasion • Native richness can be positively correlated with exotic species richness • Observational pattern – No causation • Resource rich vs. resource poor • Beta diversity Stohlgren et al. 1999 Biodiversity and Invasion • Environmental heterogeneity can influence invasion (Davies et al. 2005) • Suggests beta diversity may be just as, if not more important in controlling exotic species Photo credit: Koerner, S. Biodiversity and Invasion • Invasive species can then have drastic effects on ecosystems – Reductions in biodiversity – Drastic changes to soil nutrient cycling (Ehrenfeld 2003) – Can change disturbance regimes (D’antonio and Vitousek 1992, Mack and D’antonio 1998) Exercise 1 • Dependent variable: Aboveground biomass (productivity) • independant variable: Species richness • Come up with a hypothesis Questions: 1. Describe the relationship between the number of plant species and plant biomass 2. How does the relationship between biomass and species richness change over time? 3. How does it stay the same? 4. How do the error bars change the way you interpret these results? Fargione and Tilman 2004 Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology (TIEE) Sampling effect hypothesis • With random assembly: – Higher diversity results in a higher chance that there will exist a dominant species in the community, thus increasing productivity. Loreau et al. 2001 Exercise 2 • Dependant variable: % plots exceeding biomass of the monoculture plots • Independent variable: Species richness • Articulate hypothesis (Sampling effect) 1. Do the data support or reject the hypothesis? Does the answer depend on the year? 2. Why might a diverse plot contain more biomass than even the highest monoculture plot? Why might two species be better than one when it comes to biomass production? Fargione and Tilman 2004 Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology (TIEE) References • Adler, P. B., E. W. Seabloom, E. T. Borer, H. Hillebrand, Y. Hautier, A. Hector, W. S. Harpole, L. R. O’Halloran, J. B. Grace, T. M. Anderson, and others. 2011. Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness. science 333:1750–1753. • Chapin III, F. S., E. S. Zavaleta, V. T. Eviner, R. L. Naylor, P. M. Vitousek, H. L. Reynolds, D. U. Hooper, S. Lavorel, O. E. Sala, S. E. Hobbie, and others. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242. • D’Antonio, C. M., and P. M. Vitousek. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annual review of ecology and systematics 23:63–87. • Davies, K. F., P. Chesson, S. Harrison, B. D. Inouye, B. A. Melbourne, and K. J. Rice. 2005. Spatial heterogeneity explains the scale dependence of the native-exotic diversity relationship. Ecology 86:1602–1610. • Ehrenfeld, J. G. 2003. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503–523. • Grime, J. P. 1973. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242:344–347. • Hector, A., B. Schmid, C. Beierkuhnlein, M. Caldeira, M. Diemer, P. Dimitrakopoulos, J. Finn, H. Freitas, P. Giller, J. Good, and others. 1999. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286:1123–1127. • Kennedy, T. A., S. Naeem, K. M. Howe, J. M. Knops, D. Tilman, and P. Reich. 2002. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417:636–638. • Knapp, A. K., P. A. Fay, J. M. Blair, S. L. Collins, M. D. Smith, J. D. Carlisle, C. W. Harper, B. T. Danner, M. S. Lett, and J. K. McCarron. 2002. Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland. Science 298:2202–2205. • Loreau, M., S. Naeem, P. Inchausti, J. Bengtsson, J. Grime, A. Hector, D. Hooper, M. Huston, D. Raffaelli, B. Schmid, and others. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. science 294:804–808. • Mack, M. C., and C. M. D’Antonio. 1998. Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends in Ecology \& Evolution 13:195–198. References • May, R. M. 1973. Time-delay versus stability in population models with two and three trophic levels. Ecology:315–325. • Mittelbach, G. G., C. F. Steiner, S. M. Scheiner, K. L. Gross, H. L. Reynolds, R. B. Waide, M. R. Willig, S. I. Dodson, and L. Gough. 2001. What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82:2381–2396. • Naeem, S., L. J. Thompson, S. P. Lawler, and J. H. Lawton. 1994. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368:21. • Oksanen, J. 1996. Is the humped relationship between species richness and biomass an artefact due to plot size? Journal of Ecology 84:293–295. • Preston, F. W. 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: Part I. Ecology 43:185–215. • Rosenzweig, M. L., and others. 1971. Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171:385–387. • Stevens, M. H. H., and W. P. Carson. 1999. Plant density determines species richness along an experimental fertility gradient. Ecology 80:455–465. • Stohlgren, T. J., D. Binkley, G. W. Chong, M. A. Kalkhan, L. D. Schell, K. A. Bull, Y. Otsuki, G. Newman, M. Bashkin, and Y. Son. 1999. Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecological Monographs 69:25–46. • Tilman, D., and J. A. Downing. 1996. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Ecosystem management: selected readings 367:363–365. • Tilman, D., P. B. Reich, and J. M. Knops. 2006. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441:629–632. • Whittaker, R. H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs 30:279–338.