Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Monoclonal antibody wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 wikipedia , lookup
Transformation (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup
Proteases in angiogenesis wikipedia , lookup
Growth Inhibition of a Human Tumor Cell Strain by 5-Fluorouraeil, 5-Fluorouridine, and 5-Fluoro-2'deoxyuridine—Reversal Studies* MARVINA. RICH,JANICEL. BOLAFFI,JOSEPHE. KNOLL,f LORETTACHEONG,ANDMAXWELLL. EIDINOFF (Division of Biophysics, Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Center, New York, N.Y.) The inhibitory effect of 5-fluorouracil (FU), 5-fluorouridine (FUR), and 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUDR) on tumor and microbial growth has been recently reported by Heidelberger, Duschinsky, and co-workers (4, 9, 11, 12, 23). Tracer studies demonstrated that these compounds se lectively depressed the incorporation of labeled precursors into the thymine moiety of nucleic acids (6, 9-11). In the experiments reported be low, the mechanism of growth inhibition by these compounds was studied with H.Ep. #1 cells grown in tissue culture. Differences in the ability of selected compounds to reverse the growth inhibition by these fluorinated pyrimidines were measured to test the pos sibility of a single primary site of growth inhibi tion. The effect of FUDR on the utilization of isotopically labeled precursors for nucleic acid pyrimidines of H.Ep. #1 cells in tissue culture was studied in a medium containing thymidine as a reverser of growth inhibition. MATERIALS AND METHODS 5-Fluorouracil, 5-fluorouridine, and 5-fluoro-2'deoxyuridine were synthesized and purified by the Hoffman-La Roche Co. (4). Thymidine, cal cium thymidylate, deoxyuridine, uridine, cytidine, uracil, cytosine, and thymine were purchased from the California Foundation for Biochemical Re search. 5-Methyldeoxycytidine was synthesized by the Synthetic Organic Section, Sloan-Kettering Institute (7). Thymidine labeled with tritium by catalytic exchange and having a specific activity of 320 fiC/foaole was purchased from the Schwarz * These studies were aided by research grants from the National Institutes of Heath (CY 3328) and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AT (30-1) 910). t Present address: Squibb Institute for Medical Research, New Brunswick, N.J. Received for publication February 14, 1958. Laboratories. Thymidine-2-C14 was prepared from thymine-2-C14 (Volk Laboratories, Chicago, Illi nois) and thymidine in the presence of an E. cdi extract (22) and had a specific activity of 0.50 /ic/jumole. Orotic acid-6-C14 (New England Nu clear Co.) had a specific activity of 2.5 /iC/jumole. Tissue culture methods.—Stockcultures of a human cervical carcinoma, H.Ep. #1 (19), were maintained in bottles on Eagle's medium containing 10 per cent horse serum (5). Four- to 6-day stock cultures were trypsinized (21) by con tinuous, gentle agitation with 0.05 per cent trypsin (Difco 1:250) at 37°C. for 5 minutes. Between 20,000 and 50,000 cells, as determined by replicate hemocytometer counts, were added in triplicate to 60-mm. petri plates containing 4 ml. of the above medium. After incubation for 24 hours, the appropriate concentrations of inhibitor and reverser (sterilized by passage through Millipore filters) were added and the plates incubated for 7 days. Renewal of medium and addition of compounds were repeated after 4 days. Incubation was carried out in a humidified chamber at 38°C. in an atmosphere of carbon dioxide adjusted so as to maintain the medium at pH 7.6. Growth measured as total protein was determined (after triple washing to remove medium and nonadhering cells) by the colorimetrie method of Lowry et al. (16), as modified by Oyama and Eagle (20). To determine the degree of inhibition and subsequent reversal, growth in the control plates (no additions) at 7 days was taken as 100 per cent, with protein values at 24 hours representing zero growth. Control plates exhibited a 6- to 9-fold increase in total protein during the 7-day incubation period. DNA determinations.—The experiments summarized in Table 3A were designed to measure the uptake of tritium labeled thymidine into DNA of growing cells; IO4 to IO5 cells were added to 10 ml. of the above medium in 100-ml. dilution bottles (surface area 44 sq. cm.). The medium was replenished, and the compounds were added after 24 and 96 hours. The experiments were terminated after 7 days, at which time the bottles were rinsed twice with saline. The DNA determinations were carried out by the method of McIntire and Sproull, with precipitation of DNA by salmine and solution of the purines and pyrimidines by hot acid-salt solution (18). Aliquota containing approximately 50 ng. of the DNA-salmine precipitate were transferred to aluminum planchéis(20 sq. cm.) and counted in a windowless gas-flow counter. The specific activities obtained in this manner are listed in Table 3A. The DNA-salmine precipitate could be dissolved in 0.4 N NaOH and repiecipitated without a signifi cant change in the amount and specific activity. 730 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 1958 American Association for Cancer Research. RICH et al.—Inhibition of H.Ep. fi Cells by 5-Fluorouracil Spécifia activity of nucleic acid pyrimidines.—After decanting of the culture medium, the cells were washed twice with isotonic saline, 3 times with 2 ml. cold 0.4 N perchloric acid (PCA), and successively with 75 per cent ethanol, 95 per cent ethanol, absolute alcohol, 3:1 ethanol-ether at 40°C. (twice), and ether. The residue (weighing about 10 mg.) was incubated with 0.5 ml. of 0.3 N KOH for 18 hours at 37°C., and the DNA and protein were precipitated by cold PCA as described by Davidson and Smellie (3), washed with cold 0.4 N PCA 3 times, with alcohol, and then dried in a nitrogen stream. The supernatant containing the ribonucleotides was also evap orated to dryness. The free bases were obtained by the method of Marshak and Vogel (17). The individual bases were sepa rated by two-dimensional paper chromatography (14). After elution of the pyrimidine bases from the paper (Whatman #1), the specific activity was determined. The C14 activity was based on gas-flow counter measurements with the use of 20-sq. cm. aluminum planchéis.The concentration was 731 (Chart 1) for FUR and FUDR. However, the nucleosides were effective inhibitors at approxi mately one-hundredth the concentration of FU. Each point in Chart 1 is the average of three replicate cultures. Attempts to reverse growth inhibition by FU, FUR, FUDR.—Several compounds related to me tabolites on pathways leading to nucleic acid pyrimidines were tested for their ability to reverse growth inhibition by FU, FUR, and FUDR. Uracil, cytosine, and thymine did not reverse growth inhibition by FU, FUR, and FUDR even at a concentration 100 times greater than those of the fluorinated compounds. In Table 1, a reversal TABLE 1 CONCENTRATION OF 5-FLUOROURACIL-MICROGRAMS/ML. O.I 1.0 10.0 EFFECTOFSEVERAL COMPOUNDS ONGROWTH INHI BITIONOFH.EP.#1CELLSBYFUR ANDFUDR RATIOor CONCENTRA 100- »40 0 TION«: COMPOUND Thymidine eon Thymidylate (calcium) LEGEND + 5-FLUOROURACIL (UPPER SCALE) •5-FLUOROURIDINE O 5-FLUORO-2-DEOXYURIDINE 20- 5-methyldeoxycytidine Deoxyuridine 0.001 0.01 CONCENTRATION OF 5-FLUOROURIDINE AND 5-FLUORO-2-DEOXYURIDINE- MICROGRAMS /ML. OJ CHART1.—Growth inhibition of H.Ep. #1 cells by 5-fluorouracil (FU), 5-fluorouridine (FUR), and 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUDR). calculated from optical densities at the absorption maxima (pH 2) with an appropriate blank based on elution of a control strip of paper. The purity of each pyrimidine was checked by the measurement of optical density ratios at different wave lengths. Preliminary experiments demonstrated that the adenine and guanine had less than 1 per cent of the specific activity of the pyrimidines. When thymidine-C14 was used as precursor, the cells were digested with 0.4 N NaOH as described above (18). The RNA was hydrolyzed to ribonucleotides in this manner, and the DNA plus protein was precipitated with 70 per cent PCA. Only DNA thymine was isolated. This procedure yielded the results listed in Table 3B. RESULTS Inhibition by FU, FUR, FUDR—It is evident from Chart 1 that FU, FUR, and FUDR are potent inhibitors of H.Ep. #1 cells. Essentially complete growth inhibition was observed at 1.0, 0.01, and 0.01 Mg/ml of FU, FUR, and FUDR (80, 0.4, and 0.4 X IO-'M), respectively. There was relatively little difference in the toxicity data Uridine CoiipocND INHIBITOB 1 10 100 1 10 100 1 10 100 REVERSALor OBOWTHINHIBITION FUR (4X10-'«) FUDR (4X10-'M) — — — - +* + + + + — + + 1 10 100 1 10 100 Cytidine 1 10 100 * Tests are referred to as + when the cell growth reached 30 per cent of the growth in the control cultures. test is scored minus or plus if the net protein in crease after 7 days is less than or greater than 30 per cent, respectively, of the net protein in crease in the control cultures. The four compounds that reversed the growth inhibition by FUDR are, in order of decreasing activity: thymidine, thymidylate, 5-methyldeoxycytidine, and deoxyuridine. These four deoxyribose-containing com pounds did not reverse the growth inhibition by FUR, while the ribosides uridine and cytidine did reverse at levels 100 times the concentration of FUR. The compounds in Table 1 did not reverse the growth inhibition by FU. Since the concentration of deoxyuridine re quired to reverse FUDR inhibition was 100 times the concentration of thymidine necessary to ac- Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 1958 American Association for Cancer Research. 732 Voi. 18, July, 1958 Cancer Research complish reversal, it seemed desirable to compare the two systems with respect to the type of re versal involved. Accordingly, a series of concen trations of each compound was tested against two concentration levels of FUDR. The two upper curves in Chart 2 represent the reversal of FUDR growth inhibition by thymidine at inhibitor levels differing by a factor of five. Their similarity indicates that, over this FUDR range, the reversal depends simply on the concentration of thymidine in the medium and is not dependent on the reverser-inhibitor ratio. The two lower curves represent reversals by deoxyuridine. A fivefold increase in the FUDR level required an approximately fivefold increase THYMIDWE-MICROGRAMS/ML. Dß THYMIDINE (UPPER SCALE) O« DEOXYURIDINE I LOWER SCALE) RNA-pyrimidines was not appreciably affected by the presence of FUDR. In the absence of the exogenous thymidine, this concentration of FUDR would have caused complete growth in hibition. The tracer studies with the use of precursor thymidine are summarized in Table 3. In Part A, thymidine-H3 was used in four experiments over a period of about 1 month. The results in the last column express the increased specific activity of the DNA formed in the presence of FUDR and thymidine as compared with the nor mal medium augmented only by thymidine. Since the precursor is incorporated predominantly into the DNA-thymine, these results reflect the ratios of the DNA-thymine specific activities. In Part B, thymidine-C14 was used and the DNA-thymine measured directly. The average deviations listed in Table 3 indicate significant biological variations in the replicate cultures used. The results of all these experiments demonstrate a two- to fourfold TABLE 2 EFFECTOFFUDR ONTHEINCORPORATION OFOROTIC ACIDINTOTHE NUCLEICACIDPYRIMIDINES OFH.Ep. #1 CELLS Specific activity counts/nrin/>imoleX 10"' ~T 40 60 OEOXYURIDINE-MICROGRAMS/ML CHART2.—Effect of thymidine and deoxyuridine on the growth of H.Ep. #1 cells in the presence of two concentrations of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUDR). in the deoxyuridine level to maintain the same percentage of growth (relative to control cultures). This calculation was made using the ordinate at 40 per cent of control growth. The lower curves could not be carried to 100 per cent of control growth, since deoxyuridine at sufficiently high concentrations becomes growth-inhibitory under these conditions. The results of a second study of the reversal action of thymidine and deoxyuridine yielded results essentially equal to those plotted in Chart 2. Tracer studies.—The specific activities of the nucleic acid pyrimidines of H.Ep. #1 cells grown in a medium containing thymidine in the presence and absence of FUDR and with orotic acid-C14 used as precursor are listed in Table 2. In the presence of FUDR, the DNA-thymine specific activity was depressed in two experiments by a factor of 4.9 (Exp. A) and by 5.4 (Exp. B.), respectively. In the latter experiment, the FUDR concentration was increased fivefold. The utiliza tion of the orotic acid for DNA-cytosine and the A. Thymidine in medium (Mg/ml) FUDR in medium (iig/ml) DNA Thymine Cytosine RNA Uracil Cytosine B. Thymidine in medium (ng/ml) FUDR in medium (Mg/ml) DNA Thymine Cytosine RNA Uracil Cytosine 1 1 0 0.1 4.72 6.25 9.8 6.4 0.97 7.0 9.0 7.6 1 Ratio 4.9 0.9 1.1 0.84 05 5.4 6.25 10.0 7.0 1.00 6.35 14.8 10.3 5.4 1.0 0.68 0.68 increased utilization of exogenous thymidine in the formation of DNA when the inhibitor is added to the medium, in the presence of the revers ing agent. DISCUSSION The growth inhibition data in Chart 1 demon strate in the mammalian cell the increased in hibitory effect of the riboside or deoxyriboside as compared with the pyrimidine base. This effect has been noted by Schindler and Welch in the case of 6-azauracil and its riboside with Sarcoma 180 cells used in tissue culture (24). The inhibition data for FUR and FUDR are roughly equivalent. The reversal studies discussed below indicate dif ferences in mechanisms of growth inhibition. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 1958 American Association for Cancer Research. RICH et al.—Inhibition of II.Ep. The growth inhibition caused by FUDR (0.1 and 0.5 ¿ig/ml) was completely prevented by approximately 0.5 fig of thymidine/ml (Chart 2). These results suggest that the FUDR is block ing the formation of metabolites containing the thymine moiety and leading to DNA thymine. The decreased incorporation of orotic acid-C14 into DNA-thymine in the presence of FUDR (Table 3) demonstrates a specific interference with this pyrimidine ¿moiety,since the other nucleic acid pyrimidines are affected only to a slight extent. This site of action of the fluorinated py rimidines has been reported by Heidelberger et al. and by this laboratory (6, 9-11) for experiments in which uptake of the labeled precursor was fi Cells by 5-Fluorouracil 733 1), together with its dependence on the FUDR concentration (Chart 2), suggests a competitive mechanism at a level leading to the formation of the thymine-moiety. The studies of Friedkin and Kornberg have indicated that this may be at the level of deoxyuridine-5-phosphate (8). Heidelberger et al. have suggested that the primary metabolic block for FU, FUR, and FUDR may involve this methylation step (10). However, the inability of thymidine to reverse the growth inhibition by FU and FUR (Table 1), even at a concentration 100-fold in excess of that required to reverse the same level of FUDR inhibition, strongly suggests that FU and FUR are producing metabolic blocks essential to growth, in addition TABLE 3 EFFECTOFFUDR ONTHEINCORPORATION OFTHYMIDINEINTOTHE DNA OFH.EP. #1 CELLS A. PRECURSOR:THTumniE-H' Eip. no. 1 2 3 4 Activity in medium Days of incubation with labeled precursor 0.1 0.01 0.01 0.1 6 8 5 1 DNA (counts/min/Vg) Thymidine* Thymidine alone +FUDH 1530±150f(2)î 30 ± 7 (3) 168± 5(2) 100± 16(3) 417±33 ±33 (2) 13+ + 0.3(3) S6± 8 (3) 31 + 13 (3) B. PRECURSOR: THYMIDINE-C" DNA-thymine specificactivity (counts/min//<mole X10-') Thymidine Thymidine +FUDH alone Relative activity 3.7§ 2.3 3.0 3.2 Relative activity 0.002 6 15.0±3 (2) 7.2± 1.2(2) 2.1 * FUDR, 0.1 /ig/ml; thymidine, 1 tig/mi. t Av. deviation for replicate cultures. i No. of replicate cultures. §Ratio of averages in preceding columns. studied over a relatively short period. The results presented in Tables 2 and 3, however, were ob tained during a several-fold increase in total DNA. The increased incorporation of precursor thymi dine into DNA-thymine in the presence of FUDR demonstrates that at least part of the reversal mechanism involves direct utilization of the ex ogenous thymidine for DNA-thymine. The reduced effectiveness of thymidylate as compared with thymidine (Table 1) may indicate the necessity for dephosphorylation prior to utili zation by the cell for incorporation into DNA thymine (15). The reversal by 5-methyldeoxycytidine suggests that this compound may be utilized in pathways leading to DNA-thymine in mammalian cells. Cohen and Barner (2) have recently shown that a thymine-requiring strain of E. coli can utilize 5-methyldeoxycytidine to fill its thymine-requirement and permit normal growth. The hundred-fold excess of deoxyuridine required to reverse the growth inhibition by FUDR (Table to the "methylation block" suggested for FUDR inhibition. These additional sites probably involve the formation of F-containing pyrimidine ribonucleotides, nucleotide di- and tri-phosphates, coenzymes, and the incorporation of the F-uracil moiety directly into RNA, as demonstrated by Heidelberger (9, 11). The inability of any of the compounds in Table 1, as well as the pyrimidine bases themselves, to reverse the growth inhibition by FU further suggests the presence of multiple sites of growth inhibition. A significant difference between these reversal studies and the results of Scheiner et al., with L. leichmanii (23), is the failure of the pyrimidine bases to reverse growth inhibition by FU, FUR, and FUDR in H.Ep. #1 cells. These observations are in accord with the relatively poor utilization in mammalian cells of the pyrimidine bases, as compared with their corresponding nucleosides (1, 13). The tracer study results described in Tables Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 1958 American Association for Cancer Research. 734 Cancer Research 2 and 3 are consistent with the view that the utilization of the preformed thymine moiety is enhanced under conditions where the de ñauo pathway (from orotate) is partially blocked. Simi lar conclusions were reached from tracer studies following incubation of tumor tissue slices for 2 hours in Krebs-Ringer solution containing 0.1 per cent glucose (6). The tracer studies carried out in tissue culture in the presence of inhibitor plus reverser are of special interest, because the cells are able to multiply at approximately the same rate as in the presence of the reverser alone. The data in Tables 2 and 3 thus refer to utilization of labeled precursors in the formation of new nucleic acids. In the short incubation of slices, breis, and homogenates, the data may reflect an exchange as well as a net synthesis of nucleic acids. Consequently, tracer studies in growing cells in the presence of both inhibitor and reverser (where a suitable system can be found, such as that in Tables 2 and 3) can provide significant information on mechanisms of inhibitor action. SUMMARY The effects of 5-fluorouracil (FU), 5-fluorouradine (FUR), and 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUDR). on the growth of H.Ep. #1 human cell strain in a semisynthetic medium have been studied. FU, FUR, and FUDR produced complete inhibi tion of growth at 1.0, 0.01, and 0.01 ¿tg/ml., respectively (8 X IO"6, 0.4 X IO"7, and 0.4 X 10~7M). The complete growth inhibition by FUDR at 4 X 10~7Mis reversed by an approximately equiva lent concentration of thymidine. The extent of reversal is independent of the FUDR concen tration over a fivefold variation in the latter. These results strongly support the hypothesis that a block in the pathway leading to DNA-thymine (probably at the "methylation step") is the prin cipal cause of growth inhibition by FUDR. How ever, the inability of thymidine to reverse the growth inhibition by FU and FUR suggests that the latter are producing metabolic blocks at sites essential to growth in addition to the "methylation block" suggested for FUDR inhibition. The growth inhibition by FUDR is reversed by deoxyuridine at an approximately 100-fold excess. A fivefold increase in FUDR concentration increased by a corresponding factor the level of deoxyuridine needed for reversal. The inhibition of growth by FU could not be reversed by a 100-fold excess of thymidine, 5-methyldeoxycytidine, deoxyuridine, uridine, cytidine, uracil, thy mine, and cytosine. The specific activity of the nucleic acid pyrimi- Vol. 18, July, 1958 dines of H.Ep. #1 cells grown in the presence of FUDR plus thymidine (as reverser) was compared with cells grown in the presence of an equal con centration of thymidine alone. With labeled orotic acid, a significant depression in the specific ac tivity of DNA-thymine was observed in the pres ence of FUDR, with relatively little effect on the other nucleic acid pyrimidines. With labeled thymidine, the specific activity of the DNAthymine was increased by a factor of two to four in the presence of FUDR. These results demonstrate an enhanced utilization of exogenous thymidine under conditions in which the de novo pathway to DNA-thymine is blocked by FUDR. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The stock culture of H.Ep. #1 cells was kindly given to our laboratory by Miss L. Diamond and Dr. A. E. Moore, Virus Study Section, Sloan-Kettering Institute. Dr. L. Duschinsky, Hoffman-La Roche Co., kindly supplied samples of FU, FUR, and FUDR. The authors are indebted to Mr. Leonard Saslaw for valuable assistance in the tracer experiments. REFERENCES 1. BROWN,G. B., and RALL,P. M. Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids. In: E. CHAROAFFand J. N. DAVIDSON(eds.), The Nucleic Acids, Vol. 2, Chapter 25. New York: Aca demic Press, 1955. 2. COHEN,S. S., and BARNER,H. D. The Conversion of 5-Methyldeoxycytidine to Thymidine In Vitro and In Vivo. 3. Biol. Chem., 226:631-42, 1957. 8. DAVIDSON,J. N., and SMELLIE,R. M. S. Phosphorous Compounds in the Cell. 2. The Separation by lonophoresis on Paper of the Constituent Nucleotides of Ribonucleic Acid. Biochem. J., 62:594, 1952. 4. DTJSCHINBKY, R.; PLEVEN,E.; MALBICA,J.; and HEIDEL BERGER,C. Synthesis of 5-Fluorouracil Nucleosides. Abstr., 132d meeting, Am. Chem. Soc., p. 19C, 1957. 5. EAGLE,H. Nutrition Needs of Mammalian Cells in Tissue Culture. Science, 122:501-4, 1955. 6. EIDINOFF,M. L.; KNOLL,J. E.; and KLEIN, D. Effect of 5-Fluorouracil on the Incorporation of Precursors into Nucleic Acid Pyrimidines. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 71: 274-75, 1957. 7. Fox, J. J.; VAN PRAAG,D.; WEMPEN,I.; DOEHR,I. L.; CHEONG,L.; KNOLL,J. E.;EIDINOFF,M. L.; and BENDICH, A. Synthesis of 5-Methylcytosine Deoxyriboside and Re lated Pyrimidine Nucleosides. Fed. Proc., 17:222, 1958. 8. FHIEDKIN,M., and KORNBERG,A. In: Symposium on the Chemical Basis of Heredity, pp. 609-14. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1957. 9. HEIDELBERGER,C.; BOSCH,L.; CHAUDHUHI,N. K.; and D ANNEBERG,P. B. Mechanism of Action of 5-Fluoropyrimidines. Fed. Proc., 16:194, 1957. 10. HEIDELBERGER, C.;BOSCH,L.; HARBEHS,E.; DANNEBERG, P. B.; and CHAUDHURI,N. K. Mechanism of Action of Fluorinated Pyrimidines. Abstr., 132d meeting, Am. Chem. Soc., p. 20C, 1957. 11. HEIDELBERGER, C.; CHAUDHURI, N. K.; DANNEBERG,P.; MOOREN,D. ; GRIESBACH, L. ; DUSCHINSKY, R. ; SCHNITZER, R. J.; PLEVEN,E.; and SCHEINER,J. Fluorinated Pyrimi dines, A New Class of Tumor-inhibitory Compounds. Nature, 179:663-66, 1957. 12. HEIDELBERGER, C.; MOOREN,D.; GRIESBACH,L.; MON- Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 1958 American Association for Cancer Research. RICHet al.—Inhibitionof H.Ep. #1 Cells by 5-Fluorouracil 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. TAG,B. J.; DUSCHINSKY, R.; PLEVEN,E.; and SCHNITZER, R. Fluorinated Pyrimidines, a New Class of Tumor In hibitory Compounds. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Research 2(8):212, 1957. HOLMES,W. L.; PRUSOFF,W. H.; and WELCH, A. D. Studies on the Metabolism of Thymine-2-C14 by the Rat. J. Biol. Chem., 209:503-9, 1954. KIT, S. The Mechanism of Doexyribonucleic Acid-Thymine Biosynthesis by Lymphatic Tissues and Tumors. Cancer Research, 17:56-63, 1957. LIEBMAN,K. C'., and HEIDELBERGER, C. Metabolism of PÅ“-LabeledNucleotides. J. Biol. Chem., 216:823-30, 1955. LOWRT,O. H.; ROSEBROUGH, N. J.; FAIR, A. L.; and RANDALL,R. J. Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 193:265-75, 1951. MARSHAK,A., and VOGEL,H. J. Microdetermination of Purines and Pyrimidines in Biological Materials. J. Biol. Chem., 189:597-605, 1951. MclNTiRE, F. C-, and SPROÃœLL, M. F. A Simple Method for Determination of Deoxypentose Nucleic Acid in Tissue Culture. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 95:458-62,1957. 735 19. MOORE,A. E.; SABACHEWSKY, L.; and TOOLAN,H. W. Culture Characteristics of Four Permanent Lines of Hu man Cancer Cells. Cancer Research, 16:598-602, 1955. 20. OYAMA,V. L, and EAGLE, H. Measurement of Cell Growth in Tissue Culture with a Phenol Reagent (FolinCiocalteau). Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 91:305-7, 1956. 21. PUCK,T. T.; MARCUS,P. I.; and CIECIUHA,S. J. Clonal Growth of Mammalian Cells in Vitro. Growth Charac teristics of Colonies from Single HeLa Cells with and without a "Feeder" Layer. J. Exper. Med., 103:273-84, 1956. 22. REICHARD,P. Utilization of Deoxyuridine and 5-Methyluridine for the Biosynthesis of Thymine in the Rat. Acta. Chem. Scandinav., 9:1275-85, 1955. 23. SCHEINER,J. M.; KOSTALEK,E.; and DUSCHINSKY,R. 5-Fluoropyrimidines as Growth Inhibitors of Microorgan isms. Fed. Proc., 16:242, 1957. 24. SCHINDLER,R., and WELCH, A. D. Ribosidation as a Means of Activating 6-Azauracil as an Inhibitor of Cell Reproduction. Science, 125:548-49, 1957. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 1958 American Association for Cancer Research. Growth Inhibition of a Human Tumor Cell Strain by 5-Fluorouracil, 5-Fluorouridine, and 5-Fluoro-2 ′-deoxyuridine−− Reversal Studies Marvin A. Rich, Janice L. Bolaffi, Joseph E. Knoll, et al. Cancer Res 1958;18:730-735. Updated version E-mail alerts Reprints and Subscriptions Permissions Access the most recent version of this article at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/18/6/730 Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal. To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 1958 American Association for Cancer Research.