Survey

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

no text concepts found

Transcript

high standard deviation (0.5) also has the greatest probability of failure (shown by the area under the curve less than 1). The case with the lower factor of safety has a lower probability of failure. This is due to the standard deviation being much smaller for the lower factor of safety which could demonstrate less variability in the embankment. This shows that it is important to adopt a reliability index or probability of failure design standard rather than achieving a certain factor of safety alone. Figure 8.6: Comparison of two situations with different means and distributions of factor of safety (Christian, Ladd, Baecher, 1994) 8.4 Acceptable probabilities of failure One of the factors attributing to the reluctance in probabilistic methods of analysis is the lack of published acceptable probabilities of failure. Whitman (2000) describes the use of probabilistic methods and quantifying risks in decision making is limited by standards for acceptable risks. Similarly to setting a standard factor of safety, there are many factors affecting the stability which are not included in either a probabilistic or deterministic analysis (for example, severe weather conditions, mining company financial issues, etc.) which make it difficult to set standard design values. Davies (2002) states that there are ââ¦no two sites that have identical foundation, tectonic, hydrogeological, tailings characteristics, operating criteria, etc.â. He refers to the following axiom: ââ¦tailings impoundments are not automobiles and cannot be mass producedâ¦â. Each embankment is ultimately different, they vary in location, construction techniques, soil properties, type of tailings, governing 93