* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Print - Circulation Research
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup
Aortic stenosis wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Jatene procedure wikipedia , lookup
Mitral insufficiency wikipedia , lookup
Myocardial infarction wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Heart arrhythmia wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Ventricular fibrillation wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
830 Functional Morphology of the Pressure- and the Volume-Hypertrophied Rat Heart H U N - L I N LIN, KAZIMIERAS V. KATELE, AND ARTHUR F. GRIMM Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 11, 2017 SUMMARY We studied hearts in which hypertrophy was caused by both pressure and volume overload. Pressure hypertrophy was induced by an aortic constriction; volume hypertrophy was induced by an iron-copper deficiency (anemia). The ventricular weight was increased by 34% in the pressure-hypertrophied hearts at the end of 6 weeks. The ventricular weight was increased by 54% in the volume-hypertrophied hearts at the end of 3 months. A potassium arrest-formalin fixation technique was used to produce a "diastole-like" ventricle. In the pressurehypertrophied ventricle, the ventricular wall thickness and external radii were significantly increased, whereas the valve-to-apex distance and internal radii remained unchanged. We also found that in the volume-hypertrophied ventricle there was an increase in the valve-to-apex distance, external radii, internal radii, and wall thickness. Although external and internal dimensions increased, the ventricular shape did not change significantly in the volume-hypertrophied ventricle. IN RESPONSE to elevated work loads, the heart may increase its size and shape. Since a changed geometry of the heart might be associated with a changed functional performance, the ventricular shape, lumen size, and wall thickness have to be considered. The relationships among these factors are described in the modified law of Laplace, T = PR/2S, where T is the stress on the wall, P is the transmural pressure, R is the radius of the lumen, and S is the wall thickness. Some investigators1-2 have attempted to apply the Laplace relationship to the functional morphology of the heart. Several studies :t~" discuss the relationships of cardiac geometry and functional performance in both normally growing and hypertrophied hearts. There has been difficulty in choosing an acceptable physiological reference for these comparative anatomical studies. On the basis of cineradiography of radio-opaque metal markers placed in the left ventricular papillary muscle of canine hearts, Grimm et al.a concluded that K+ arrestformalin fixation in situ produced a "diastole-like" ventricle. In the present study, morphological changes were studied in two models of hypertrophy; pressure hypertrophy (aortic constriction) and volume hypertrophy (induced by anemia). The K+ arrest-formalin fixation technique was used to establish a reference position at which the ventricular volumes, shapes, radii, and wall thicknesses were examined. From the Departments of Histology and of Physiology, Colleges of Dentistry and of Medicine, University of Illinois at the Medical Center. Chicago, Illinois. This study was partially supported by Grant A76-33 from the Chicago Heart Association and Grant RR5309-14 from the U.S. Public Health Service. This work includes material from a thesis entitled "A Physiological. Histological and Biochemical Study of the Pressure and Volume Hypertrophied Rat Heart" submitted by Dr. Lin in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at the Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. Address for reprints: Hun-Lin Lin, Ph.D., Department of Physiology. National College, Lombard, Illinois 60148. Received April 26. 1976; accepted for publication May 27, 1977. Methods Sprague-Dawley male albino rats were used. PREPARATION OF ANIMALS Volume Hypertrophy Volume hypertrophy was induced by the method of Korecky and French9. Young rats were made anemic by an iron-free diet (milk powder). Initial body weights ranged from 50 to 60 g (20 days after weaning). These rats were subdivided into three groups. Experimental Group. These rats were fed iron- and copper-free milk powder and distilled water. Control Group. These rats were fed the same iron- and copper-free milk powder plus a supplemental solution of ferrous sulfate (1 mg/liter) and cuprous sulfate (0.1 mg/ liter) as their water source. Normal Group. These rats were fed regular rat chow and tap water. The rats were studied after 3 months of this dietary regime. To confirm that the rats were anemic, the hematocrit was measured in most cases. Blood was withdrawn from the right renal vein into a heparinized capillary tube for centrifugation. After 15 minutes at 2500 rpm, the hematocrit was read from a hematocrit scale. Pressure Hypertrophy Pressure hypertrophy was induced by a subdiaphragmatic aortic constriction according to the method of Grimm et al.10 Initial body weights ranged from 200 to 250 g. The rats were subdivided into three groups. Experimental Group. The abdominal aorta was constricted below the diaphragm and above the kidneys with a size 0 silk ligature. The degree of constriction was predetermined by placing a thin metal rod next to the aorta and tying the ligature tightly around both rod and aorta until the aorta was completely occluded. The 1.1 mm diameter rod then was withdrawn. This diameter, which was now presumably the diameter of the aorta, MORPHOLOGY OF HYPERTROPH1ED RAT HEART/L/n el al. induces hypertrophy. Under these conditions, the radius of the aorta was reduced to about one-fourth normal. In several of the rats, the blood pressure was measured from both the left carotid artery and the abdominal aorta below the ligature. Sham-Operated Control Group. These rats were subjected to the same surgical procedure, but the ligature was tied loosely around the aorta. Normal Group. These rats were not subjected to any surgical procedure. All three groups were maintained under identical conditions for 6 weeks. EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 11, 2017 Rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) and the abdominal aorta was cannulated distal to the renal intraperitoneal arteries. A polyethylene cannula was advanced into the thoracic aorta and approximately 4-5 ml of heparinized isotonic saline (9.0 g NaCl, 5000 units heparin/liter) were injected slowly. Subsequently, 5 ml of a heparinized isotonic KC1 solution (11.5 g KC1, 5000 units heparin/liter) were injected quickly into the aorta via the cannula and produced immediate cardiac arrest. After cardiac arrest, the KC1 solution, at a pressure of 100 mm Hg, was perfused through the aorta for 2 minutes. Subsequently, 10% formalin was perfused through the aorta for 2 hours at a pressure of 100 mm Hg. The inferior vena cava was transected distal to the renal veins 0.5-1.0 minute after the start of the formalin perfusion. This permitted a continuous flow of the fixative through the vascular system and prevented extensive tissue distension. Approximately 500 ml of 10% formalin was perfused through each rat during the 2 hours of fixation. It must be emphasized that all the above procedures were carried out with the chest closed. In previous studies in which intraventricular pressure was measured concurrently during these procedures, there was no evidence of aortic insufficiency. The well-fixed hearts were removed and the atria carefully trimmed away. The paired ventricles were postfixed in 10% formalin for an additional 30 minutes and then placed in distilled water for 30 minutes to remove excess formalin. The fixed ventricles were infiltrated with progressively increasing concentrations of gelatin solutions at 47°C. The hearts were kept in a 2% gelatin solution for 24 hours, a 5% solution for 48 hours, and a 10% solution for a minimum of 72 hours. A minute quantity of thymol was added to the gelatin solutions to serve as a fungicide. This gelatin infiltration technique was used to minimize the distortions produced by dehydration which occurs in many histological embedding methods. Transverse sections fifty fim thick were cut using an American Optical Spencer sliding microtome. The sections were mounted on a glass side with glycerin-gelatin. These techniques have been described." Photographs (35-mm Kodak Panatomic X film) were taken of each section using a Leitz photostat. Eight- to 831 10-fold enlargements were printed on Kodak F-4 high contrast print paper. A steel millimeter ruler was placed next to the section so that the precise magnification could be calculated. The right and left ventricular luminal areas were measured from each print with a K & E 620022 compensating polar planimeter. The papillary' muscles or trabeculae carneae were excluded in the determination of the ventricular lumen. In order to test the reliability of this method, five prints were developed under the same magnification and were measured by means of this polar planimeter. The coefficient of variation (sD/mean) of the repeated measurements of the area was 0.3%. This value includes the errors in the developing and processing procedures, individual judgment in the measurements and the accuracy of the readings from the planimeter. This value established an acceptable level of reliability for this technique. The mean left ventricular internal or luminal radius per section was derived from the cross-sectional areas by making the Amplifying assumption that the left ventricular lumen is circular and solving the standard equation: A = 7rr2, for r, where A is the cross-sectional area measured by the planimeter. The left ventricular free wall thickness was calculated for each section as the difference between the derived mean left ventricular internal or luminal radius and the directly measured left ventricular external radius. Values are given as means ± SD. A one-way analysis of variance (Anova)12 was used to compare the differences for the same parameter among and between the groups. Results VOLUME HYPERTROPHY As seen in Table 1, the ventricular weight in the volume-hypertrophied group was significantly increased in comparison to the control and normal groups. There were significant increases in the mean right ventricular volumes and the mean left ventricular volumes in the volume-hypertrophied group. The valve-to-apex distance also was significantly increased in the volume-hypertrophied hearts. The interanl radii, external radii, and wall thicknesses are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1. The data show that, at the 80%, 60%, and 40% levels of the valve-toapex distance, these parameters were significantly increased in the volume-hypertrophied hearts with respect to the control and the normal groups of hearts. The mean external radius of the hypertrophied hearts at the 60% valve-apex level was 6.13 ± 0.28 mm. In the control and normal hearts, the mean radii were 5.07 ± 0.32 and 5.21 ±0.11 mm, respectively. The latter two groups were not statistically different, when corrections were made for the absolute differences in the size of the rats (see Table 2). The external radius in the hypertrophied hearts was statistically greater. The mean internal radius in the volume-hypertrophied left ventricle at the 60% valveapex distance was 3.42 ± 0.11 mm, whereas it was 2.95 ± 0.36 mm in the control group and 2.69 ± 0.16 mm in CIRCULATION RESEARCH 832 VOL. 41, No. 6, DECEMBER 1977 TABLE 1 Ventricular Dimensions in the Volume-Hypertrophied, Control, and Normal Groups of Rats Volume hypertrophy Body weight (g) Ventricular weight (mg) Calculated ventricular weight ( m g) Right ventricular volume (cm:') Left ventricular volume (cm3) Valve-apex distance (mm) 239.0 (n 1309 1431 ± = ± ± 52.7 5) 254 163 Control 367.5 (n 851 833 ± = ± ± 26.3 6) 95 121 Normal 440.0 (« 964 955 ± = ± ± P value <0.01 18.7 6) 113 76 <0.01 <0.01 4.33 ± 1.04 3.58 ± 0.69 1.46 ± 0.04 2.08 ± 0.55 2.59 ± 0.70 1.26 ± 0.04 2.63 ± 0.35 2.41 ± 0.01 1.30 ± 0.00 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 5.40 ± 0.16 2.99 ± 0.10 2.43 ± 0.13 4.78 ± 0.21 2.73 ± 0.37 2.05 ± 0.17 4.78 ± 0.10 2.46 ± 0.11 2.32 ± 0.07 <0.01 6.13 ± 0.28 3.42 ± 0.11 2.72 ± 0.29 5.07 ± 0.32 2.95 ± 0.36 2.12 ± 0.16 5.21 ± 0.11 2.69 ± 0.16 2.52 ± 0.27 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 5.26 ± 0.33 2.87 ± 0.11 2.38 ± 0.36 4.55 ± 0.20 2.53 ± 0.26 2.01 ± 0.17 4.83 ± 0.22 2.39 ± 0.08 2.44 ± 0.30 <0.01 <0.05 3.97 ± 0.26 1.59 ± 0.10 2.59 ± 0.64 3.50 ± 0.05 1.53 ± 0.13 1.97 ± 0.16 4.05 ± 0.06 1.71 ± 0.28 2.34 ± 0.34 NS NS 80% External radius (mm) Internal radius (mm) Wall thickness (mm) NS* 60% External radius (mm) Internal radius (mm) Wall thickness (mm) Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 11, 2017 40% External radius (mm) Internal radius (mm) Wall thickness (mm) 20% External radius (mm) Internal radius (mm) Wall thickness (mm) Values are expressed as mean ± SD. NS = not significant. the normal group. Values for the latter two groups again were not statistically different, but the internal radius of the volume-hypertrophied left ventricle was significantly greater. The wall thickness at the 60% valve-apex distance Interior Exterior Volume Hypertrophy Control Normal Valve lOO-i 80- 60- o 40- 20- Apex 0 2 3 4 Radius (mm) FIGURE 1 Mean left ventricular shape in the pressure-hypertrophied groups of rats (in absolute values). Solid lines drawn through mean radii of all groups. Vertical bars denote 99% confidence limits of mean radii of all groups. was also significantly greater in the volume-hypertrophied hearts. In terms of these results, the volume-hypertrophied left ventricle seems to increase its size by increasing in all three dimensions. An attempt was made to normalize the data by dividing the external and internal radii by the valve-to-apex distance. These results are shown in Table 2. After normalization, there was no real difference among the three groups. In the volume hypertrophy study, hematocrits were determined on renal venous blood of most of the rats (Table 3). The mean hematocrit in the volume-hypertrophied group was significantly lower than in the control and normal groups. The rate of aortic pressure development was significantly higher in the anemic rats than in the control and normal groups. The mean aortic blood pressure of the anemic rats was significantly lower than that in the other groups. PRESSURE HYPERTROPHY The body and ventricular weights and right and left ventricular volumes are shown in Table 4. The ventricular weights were significantly greater in the pressure-hypertrophied group than in the sham-operated or normal group. The right and left ventricular volumes were not significantly different among the three groups. As shown by the valve-to-apex distances in table 4, the longitudinal axes also were not significantly different. The external and internal radii and wall thicknesses of the left ventricle are shown in Table 4 and Figure 2. The external radius of the pressure-hypertrophied hearts was MORPHOLOGY OF HYPERTROPHIED RAT HEART/Lin et al. 833 TABLE 2 Normalized Left Ventricular Dimensions in the Volume-Hypertrophied, Control, and Normal Groups of Rats (Ratio of Radii: Valve-Apex Distance) Volume hypertrophy Control Normal P value Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 11, 2017 Valve-apex distance (mm) 1.46 ± 0.04 1.26 ± 0.04 1.30 ± 0.00 <0.01 80% ER/V-A IR/V-A WT/V-A 3.71 ± 0.11 2.03 ± 0.12 1.68 ± 0.04 3.79 ± 0.06 2.20 ± 0.24 1.63 ± 0.19 3.68 ± 0.08 1.89 ± 0.08 1.78 ± 0.07 NS NS 60% ER/V-A IR/V-A WT/V-A 4.19 ± 0.15 2.34 ± 0.13 1.85 ± 0.16 4.02 ± 0.14 2.34 ± 0.23 1.68 ± 0.25 4.01 ± 0.08 2.07 ± 0.12 1.95 ± 0.21 NS NS NS 40% ER/V-A IR/V-A WT/V-A 3.70 ± 0.23 1.97 ± 0.31 1.73 ± 0.31 3.60 ± 0.08 2.01 ± 0.16 1.60 ± 0.16 3.71 ± 0.17 1.89 ± 0.19 1.91 ± 0.19 NS NS 20% ER/V-A IR/V-A WT/V-A 2.71 ± 0.17 1.07 ± 0.06 1.64 ± 0.17 2.78 ± 0.08 1.22 ± 0.12 1.55 ± 0.12 3.11 ± 0.04 1.31 ± 0.21 1.80 ± 0.25 <0.01 NS Values are expressed as mean ± SD; ER = external radius; V-A WT = wall thickness; NS = not significant. significantly greater at the 80%, 60%, and 40% levels. However, there were no significant differences among the three groups at the 20% level. When the internal radii were compared at the 80%, 60%, 40%, and 20% levels of the valve-to-apex distance, no significant differences were found. The wall thickness in the pressure-hypertrophied group was substantially thicker than in the shamoperated and normal hearts (Table 4). In order to distinguish the shapes of the left ventricles among the pressure-hypertrophied, sham-operated, and normal groups, the data from Table 4 are plotted in Figure 2. The shapes of the normalized internal radii were quite similar within the three groups (99% confidence limits are given at each point). However, the normalized external radii of the pressure-hypertrophied ventricle were substantially greater at 80%, 60%, and 40% of the valve-to-apex distance. As expected, the shapes were very similar for the sham-operated and nor- valve-to-apex distance; 1R = internal radius; mal ventricles. The wall thickness in the hypertrophied ventricle was greater than in the sham-operated and normal groups at the 80%, 60%, and 40% levels. Discussion The weight of the paired ventricles of the pressurehypertrophied hearts was increased by 34% above that of the sham-operated group. This value is somewhat less than that reported (50%) by Spann et al.13 for the pressure-hypertrophied cat right ventricle, but it is higher than that reported by Grimm et al.10 and Kerr et al.14 The mean carotid blood pressure of the rats with hypertrophied hearts was 136 ± 7.5 mm Hg, whereas the mean carotid blood pressure was 102 ± 1.8 mm Hg in the sham-operated rats. Carotid blood pressure increased by 34%, a value identical to the increase in ventricular weight. Though the evidence may suggest that the enlargement of the pressure-hypertrophied ventricles compen- 3 Relationship of Hematocrit, Mean Aortic Pressure, and Pulse Rate in Volume-Hypertrophied, Control, and Normal Rats TABLE Volume hypertrophy Control Normal P value 20.0 ± 3.0 (10) 47.9 ± 5.9 (9) 50.6 ± 3.7 (9) <0.01 Rate of pressure development (mm Hg/sec) 996 ± 142 (7) 506 ± 67 (8) 608 ± 65 (4) <0.01 Mean aortic pressure (mm Hg) 71 ± 15 (9) 97 ± 9 (7) 96 ± 8 (6) <0.01 Pulse rate (beats/min) 308.6 ± 24.6 (5) 255.5 ± 19.1 (4) 299.7 ± 14.5 (4) <0.05 Body weight (g) 230.8 ± 54.0 (12) 278.8 ± 14.7 (9) 385.6 ± 25.9 (9) <0.01 Hematocrit (%) Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Numbers in parentheses denote the number of observations. CIRCULATION RESEARCH 834 VOL. 41, No. 6, DECEMBER 1977 TABLE 4 Ventricular Dimensions in the Pressure-Hypertrophied, Sham-Operated, and Normal Groups of Rats Body weight (g) Ventricular weight (mg) Calculated ventricular weight ( m g) 3 ) Right ventricular volume (cm Left ventricular volume (cm3) Valve-apex distance (mm) Pressure hypertrophy Sham operated Normal P value 405.5 ± 18.1 (10) 1202 ± 14] 1259.7 ± 165 410.0 ± 12.9 425.0 ± 17.6 NS (4) (8) 896 ± 76 817 ± 16 922 ± 30 892 ± 131 <0.01 <0.01 3.24 ± 0.99 3.89 ± 0.87 1.32 ± 0.10 2.11 ± 0.50 3.15 ± 0.36 1.25 ± 0.05 3.14 ± 1.36 3.85 ± 1.80 1.33 ± 0.04 NS NS NS 5.75 ± 0.22 3.21 ± 0.33 2.53 ± 0.51 4.70 + 0.26 2.77 ± 0.04 1.93 i 0.23 4.89 ± 0.04 2.92 ± 0.12 1.97 ± 0.17 <0.01 5.96 ± 0.26 3.42 ± 0.38 2.54 ± 0.35 5.07 ± 0.19 3.16 i 0.16 1.91 ± 0.16 5.12 ± 0.02 2.99 ± 0.01 2.13 ± 0.01 5.36 ± 0.10 2.88 ± 0.28 2.48 ± 0.33 4.63 ± 0.23 2.73 ± 0.16 1.90 ± 0.13 4.70 ± 0.15 2.60 ± 0.14 2.10 ± 0.07 <0.01 4.03 ± 0.26 1.67 ± 0.31 2.36 ± 0.24 3.63 ± 0.50 1.76 ± 0.44 1.87 ± 0.09 3.82 ± 0.13 1.64 ± 0.07 2.18 ± 0.06 NS NS 80% External radius (mm) Internal radius (mm) Wall thickness (mm) NS <0.01 60% Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 11, 2017 External radius (mm) Internal radius (mm) Wall thickness (mm) <0.01 NS <0.01 40% External radius (mm) Internal radius (mm) Wall thickness (mm) NS <0.01 20% External radius (mm) Internal radius (mm) Wall thickness (mm) sated for the increased resistance, the influences of other likely important factors such as time-wall stress probably should be considered. In the volume-hypertrophied hearts, ventricular weight increased by 54% above the control value (Table 1). The hematocrit was decreased by about 42% and the mean Interior Valve lOO-i Apex Exterior o Pressure Hypertrophy A Sham Operated Normal 0 1 2 3 4 Radius (mm) FIGURE 2 Mean left ventricular shape in the volume-hypertrophied groups of rats (absolute values). Solid lines drawn through mean radii of all groups. Vertical bars denote 99% confidence limits of mean radii of all groups. <0.01 aortic blood pressure was much lower in the rats with volume-hypertrophied hearts than in the controls. The rate of aortic pressure development was increased substantially in the rats with volume-hypertrophied hearts. This increase is probably the result of factors such as the decreased mean aortic pressures and the decreased viscosity of the blood. The functional morphology of the heart in terms of its radius, volume, wall thickness, pressure, and tension, etc., has been a subject of interest. Since the above parameters are changing constantly during each cardiac cycle, a major difficulty exists in selecting an acceptable reference position from which morphological comparisons may be made. It has been shown that a potassium-arrested-, formalin-fixed dog heart is indeed a "diastolelike" heart.8 The gelatin-embedding techniques used in the present study produce relatively little distortion. In previous work using living isolated papillary muscles, K+ arrest and formalin fixation produced only minimal changes in sarcomere length.15 In addition, the thorax was not opened nor were its contents disturbed. Thus, the present techniques appear to overcome many limitations. It should be emphasized that the technique is being used for comparative geometric considerations. The data in Tables 1 and 4 show that the geometric pattern of both the pressure-hypertrophied and volumehypertrophied ventricles are different, not only from the normal, but also from each other. The differences could be interpreted as resulting from the quite different factors involved in the induction of the two types of hypertrophy. As expressed by the Laplace relationship, the stress generated in the ventricular wall is directly proportional to the radius of the lumen and to the transmural pressure. MORPHOLOGY OF HYPERTROPHIED RAT HEART/Lm el al. Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 11, 2017 If the internal radius of the left ventricle increases, the wall stress will be proportionally increased under conditions of the same intraventricular pressures. This increase in wall stress may be compensated for by an increase in wall thickness, provided the geometry of the heart does not change; this condition is seen in the volume-hypertrophied hearts. Since the pressure-hypertrophied left ventricle pumps against an increased resistance, the wall stress must be increased to develop greater transmural pressure. In rats with pressure-hypertrophied hearts, ventricular lumen size remained unchanged. Table 4 shows that the increasing size of the pressure-hypertrophied ventricle was accompanied only by an increase in external radii, whereas the luminal and the longitudinal dimensions remained unchanged. Thus, the wall thickness and the wall thickness-to-radius ratio were significantly increased. These findings seem to agree with those of Levine et al.16 who noted that the ratio of the left ventricular diameter to wall thickness was distinctly low in patients with left ventricular pressure overload. The increase in wall thickness was equivalent to the increase in measured blood pressure. We conclude that the induced hypertrophy was able to reduce stress per unit of muscle to normal levels. On the other hand, in the volume-hypertrophied hearts, different factors were involved. The volume-hypertrophied left ventricle pumps a large amount of blood against a lower peripheral resistance. Under these conditions, both the ventricular lumen and the cardiac mass are increased. The increase in wall thickness is proportionate with the increase in luminal radius. The data presented in Table 1 are represented graphically in Figure 1 to illustrate that the cardiac size is increased both longitudinally and transversely. The volume-hypertrophied heart thus appears as a magnified normal heart. Results given in Table 2 show that there were no significant differences among the three groups of rats in terms of the shape of the hearts after data was normalized. Thus wall thickness was increased in proportion to the increase in ventricular size. The wall thickness-radius ratio remained the same. This result is very similar to those of Grant et al.17 and Grossman et al.18 for subjects with aortic insufficiency. They concluded that volume-overloaded ventricles showed eccentric hypertrophy with an increased diameter but normal wall thickness-radius ratios. It has been found that mean sarcomere length does not change from normal in either the pressure-overloaded or the volume-overloaded hypertrophied myocardium. In addition, the shapes of the length-tension curves are identical as are the tensions when normalized on the basis of grams/unit area.19 Taken together with the present study, these results suggest that the unit quality (sarcomere length-mechanics and/or contractility) of the volume-hypertrophied myocardium is unchanged. In a previous study, Grimm et al." found that over an almost 3-fold range of ventricular weights, normal cardiac growth was accompanied by an increase in linear dimensions such as valve-to-apex distance, external radius, internal radius, and wall thickness. Although these distances increase with growth, the shape of the heart remains unchanged. With normal physiological growth, the increase in ventricular volume was apparently bal- Volve nterior 835 Exterior + Grimm's Doto B Normal A Sham Operated H 0.2 0.3 04 0.5 Radius/ Height 1 0.6 FIGURE 3 Mean left ventricular shape among Grimm's normal group and normal and control groups in the pressure- and volumehypertrophied rats (normalized values). Solid lines drawn through mean radii of all groups. Vertical bars denote 99% confidence limits of mean radii of all groups. anced by a proportionate increase in wall thickness. For the purpose of discussion, Figure 3 incorporates data from Grimm et al.11 with data from the present study. There are no significant differences. The previously derived equation, Y(100) = 128.2 + 0.175 X (F = 53.7; P < 0.001) (r = 0.96), where Y is the left ventricular radius and X is the paired ventricular weights with a mean paired ventricular weight of 1295.1 mg for the volume-hypertrophied heart, predicts a mean radius of 3.5 mm, a value almost identical to the 3.4 mm found. In summary, the ventricular shape, wall thickness, and external radii are significantly increased, whereas the valve-to-apex distance and internal radii remain unchanged in the pressure-hypertrophied ventricle. Thus external dimensions increase while internal "luminal dimensions" remain unchanged in this type of hypertrophy. In the volume-hypertrophied ventricles, there is an increase in valve-to-apex distance, external radius, internal radius, and wall thickness; thus both external and internal dimensions increase; however, the ventricular shape does not change significantly. The volume-hypertrophied ventricle preserves a normal functional morphology. Acknowledgments We thank Betsy R. Grimm for her valuable manuscript assistance. References 1. Woods RH: A few applications of a physical theorem to membranes in the human body in a state of tension. J Anat Physiol 26: 362-370, 1892 2. Burton AC: The importance of the size and shape of the heart. Am Heart J 54: 801-810, 1957 3. Rushmer RF: Length-circumference relations of the left ventricle. Circ Res 3: 639-644, 1955 4. Hawthorne EW: Dynamic geometry of the left ventricle. Am J Cardiol 18: 566-573, 1966 5. Holt JP, Kines H, Rhode EA: Pattern of function of left ventricle of mammals. Am J Physiol 209: 22-32, 1965 836 CIRCULATION RESEARCH 6. Martin RR, Haines H: Application of Laplace's law to mammalian hearts. Comp Biochem Physiol 34: 959-962, 1970 7. Meerson F: The myocardium in hyperfunction, hypertrophy, and heart failure. Circ Res 25 (Suppl 2): 1-163, 1969 8. Grimm AF, Lendrum BL, Whitehorn WV: Cardiac muscle shortening and sarcomere lengths in the dog (abstr). Fed Proc 27: 697, 1968 9. Korecky B, French IW: Nucleic acid synthesis in enlarged hearts of rats with nutritional anemia. Circ Res 21: 635-640, 1967 10. Grimm AF, Kubota R, Whitehorn WV: Properties of the myocardium in cardiomegaly. Circ Res 12: 118-124, 1963 11. Grimm AF, Katele KV, Klein SA, Lin Hun-Lin: Growth of rat heart —left ventricular morphology and sarcomere lengths. Growth 37: 189-208,1973 12. Sokal RR, Rohlf F James: Introduction to analysis of variance. In Biometry, edited by R Emerson, D Kennedy, RB Park. San Francisco, W. H. Freeman, 1969, pp 175-203 13. Spann JF, Buccino RA, Sonnenblick EH, Braunwald E: Contractile state of cardiac muscle obtained from cats with experimentally produced ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure. Circ Res 21: 341- VOL. 41, No. 6, DECEMBER 1977 354,1967 14. Kerr A Jr, Winterberger AR, Giambattista M: Tension developed by papillary muscles from hypertrophied rat hearts. Circ Res 9: 103105,1961 15. Grimm AF, Wohlfart B: Sarcomere lengths at the peak of the lengthtension curve in living and fixed rat papillary muscle. Acta Physiol Scand92: 575-577, 1974 16. Levine ND, Rockoff SD, Braunwald E: An angiocardiographic analysis of the thickness of the left ventricular wall and cavity in aortic stenosis and other valvular lesions. Circulation 28: 339-345, 1963 17. Grant C, Greene DG, Bunnell IL: Left ventricular enlargement and hypertrophy; clinical angioradiographic study. Am J Med 39: 895904,1965 18. Grossman W, Jones D, McLaurin LP: Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. J Clin Invest 56: 56-64, 1975 19. Lin H-L: A physiological, histological and biochemical study of the pressure and volume hypertrophied rat myocardium. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at the Medical Center, 1974 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 11, 2017 The Nature of Disappearance of Creatine Kinase from the Circulation and Its Influence on Enzymatic Estimation of Infarct Size BURTON E. SOBEL, JOANNE MARKHAM, RONALD P. KARLSBERG, AND ROBERT ROBERTS SUMMARY Continued progress in estimating myocardial ischemic injury from analysis of plasma enzyme timeactivity curves requires improved characterization of processes affecting release from the heart, transport, and disappearance from the circulation. To determine whether the true disappearance rate (ka) of creatine kinase (CK) is accurately reflected by the rate of elimination (k,,) from blood, we evaluated time-activity curves in 40 conscious dogs after induced myocardial infarction, bolus injection, or slow intravenous infusion of CK extracted from myocardium and CK harvested from plasma. The two CK preparations were compared by cellulose acetate electrophoresis, radioimmunoassay, gel chromatography, and stability in vitro. Plasma CK time-activity curves after intravenous injections of CK conformed more closely to double than to single-exponential curves (with avergage standard deviations only 42% as large), suggesting distribution in at least one extravascular compartment. Parameters of a two-compartment model obtained from the double-exponential curve provided estimates of k^ markedly greater than k,,. Calculations based on observed plasma values and these estimates of kj accounted for 2fold more CK released from the heart after infarction than that accounted for by calculations utilizing k,. The decline of plasma CK after myocardial infarction was 60% slower than the decline after intravenous injections of enzyme. The relatively slow decline after myocardial infarction appears to be due both to differences between enzyme extracted from the heart and enzyme released endogenously into plasma and to continuing release of CK from the ischemic heart relatively late after coronary occlusion. INFARCT SIZE has been estimated from plasma creatine kinase (CK) time-activity curves with a simple model attributing serial changes in plasma CK activity to release from the heart and concomitant disappearance from the circulation.'"4 However, several factors are not encompassed by this approach1-2-*~9 including: (1) potential From the Cardiovascular Division and Biomedical Computer Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine. St. Louis, Missouri. Research from the authors' laboratory was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants HL 176446, SCOR in Ischemic Heart Disease; HL 07081, Multidisciplinary Heart and Vascular Diseases; and RR 00396. Address for reprints: Burton E. Sobel, M.D., Director, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. Received January 27, 1977; accepted for publication June 1, 1977. contributions of isoenzymes of CK with different disappearance rates to plasma CK activity after myocardial infarction; (2) potential variations of the true disappearance rate of CK within the same experimental animal or patient during the interval of study; (3) the relatively poor conformity of CK time-activity curves after intravenous injection to single-exponential fits; and (4) the possibility that CK, like many other proteins, is distributed in at least one extravascular compartment. With the development of quantitative assays for CK isoenzymes, the first pitfall could be avoided by analyzing MB ('myocardial') CK time-activity curves rather than total CK curves in patients.10 In dogs, since myocardium contains only a modest amount of MB (<2%) 10 and since plasma CK activity after infarction is attributable primarily Functional morphology of the pressure- and the volume-hypertrophied rat heart. H L Lin, K V Katele and A F Grimm Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 11, 2017 Circ Res. 1977;41:830-836 doi: 10.1161/01.RES.41.6.830 Circulation Research is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231 Copyright © 1977 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0009-7330. Online ISSN: 1524-4571 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://circres.ahajournals.org/content/41/6/830 Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published in Circulation Research can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document. Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at: http://www.lww.com/reprints Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Circulation Research is online at: http://circres.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/