* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download chapter_5_discussion
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Genetically modified crops wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Comparative genomic hybridization wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Skewed X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Hybrid (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Y chromosome wikipedia , lookup
X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
DISCUSSION In all the varieties, the germination percentage was found to be decreased with increasing doses/concentrations of mutagens in M1. Saha (1968), Rajput (1970), Padavai and Dhanavel (2004), Singh and Kaul (2005) reported this type of effect of mutagen on germination percentage in Pisum sativum, Oryza sativa, Triticum aestivum, Glycine max and Cicer arietinum respectively. Reduction in germination percentage at higher doses of mutagenic treatments has been explained due to delay or inhibition of physiological and biological processes, necessary for seed germination which includes enzyme activity (Kurobane et al., 1979). The survival percentage also showed decreasing trend with increasing doses/ concentration of mutagens in all the varieties. Bajaj et al. (1970) reported that reduction in survival might be due to retardation or complete stoppage of metabolic functions as a result of mutagenic treatments. A considerable decrease in plant survival may be attributed to the series of events occurring at the cellular level which may affect the macromolecules and bring about a physiological imbalance in the cells as a consequence of exposure to ionizing radiation mutagens. Progressive decrease in the rate of plant survival with the increase in doses of physical mutagens has also been reported by Sudhakaran (1967) in Vinca rosea. The growth in terms of plant height, number of tillers etc. was inversely correlated with the doses of mutagens. According to Mackey (1951), Mikaelson (1968) production of growth retarding substances and inhibition of DNA synthesis had also been attributed for the growth inhibition respectively. Such results were also reported by Khan et al. (2000) in mung bean, Bajaj et al. (1970) in Phaseolus vulgaris. According to Evans and Sparrow (1961) irradiation induced growth inhibition is basically due to 54 genetic loss following the formation of chromosome aberrations. Singh et al. (2000) reported increase in plant height in urdbean whereas Das and Prasad (1978) have achieved dose dependent increase or decrease in plant height in M2 generation in Lathyrus sativus. A linear dependency of seedling height on the dosage of physical and chemical mutagens have been reported by Mikaelsen et al. (1968), Siddiqe and Swaminathan (1968) and Wang et al. (1995). A gradual decrease in average number of branches plant-1 with increasing dose of chemical mutagen over that of control was reported by Jahangirdar (1975) in Foeniculum vulgare. Joshi (1983) reported that reduction in number of branches plant-1 due to mutagenic treatment must have taken as a result of formation of less axillary buds and distribution in auxin formation and distribution coupled with chromosomal aberration. In general the average number of panicle per plant decreased with increasing doses of all the mutagen in all the varieties. It is in accordance with the report by Singh et al. (2000). Peduncle length also showed decreasing treads with the increasing doses of mutagens Chatterji et al. (2011) also reported similar trends in Papaver sominifera after induced mutagenesis. Dry inflorescence yield and husk yield were also found to be decreased with increase in doses of mutagen. Which is in consonance with the findings of Lal et al. (2000). Rajib et al. (2011) reported similar results in Dianthus caryophyllus. There was a dose dependent decrease in 100 seed weight in all varieties for all the treatments. Similar results were reported by Sharma (1991) for gamma rays, EMS and combined treatment on green gram. In majority of experiments, reduction in mean seed weight in M2 and M3 has been reported (Scossiroli et al., 1966; Singh et al., 2000). The reduction in mean seed weight may be due to higher frequency of mutations with persistent negative effects for yield contributing traits. Waghmare and Mehra (2000) 55 achieved considerably increased mean seed yield in M3 after gamma ray and EMS treatments in Lathyrus sativus. The yield, as such, is a complex manifestation of large number of genes involved in physiochemical processes of the plant system. Induced mutations can contribute to the physiological efficiency of the plant for grain yield by generation of more favorable correlations between various yield components (Waghmare and Mehra, 2000). Based on study of various morphological parameters, variety GI-1was found to be more sensitive for mutagenic treatment. Varietal differences were also reported earlier with respect to mutagen sensitivity in Lathyrus sativus (Nerker, 1977), Lens culinaris (Sharma and Sharma, 1981), Arachis. hypogea (Mensah and Odadoni, 2007) etc. Differential response of the varieties to the mutagenic concentration was reported by Wani et al. (2004) in Lens culinaris. Analysis of variance has been the most dependable statistical measure to find the mutagenic effect on the polygenes. Estimation of its parameters viz., genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV), phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV), environmental coefficient of variation (ECV), heritability (h2) and genetic advance (GA) for quantitative characters of the five varieties of Plantago ovata provided ample evidence that mutagenic treatments could alter mean values and create additional genetic variability for quantitative traits. According to many workers, it is useful in designing effective breeding programmes. In M1 and M2 generations for all the varieties and all the mutagenic treatments, genotypic coefficients of variability (GCV) were high for seed yield and husk yield. High GCV indicate that variability was primary due to genotypic difference. For maximum traits, PCV were found to be greater to that of GCV, indicating there by the importance of environmental factors, which is in consonance with finding of Singh and 56 Ghose and Gulati (2001), Mahla et al. (2003) in Indian mustard. Variability alone is not much helpful in determining the heritable portion of variation. The amount of advancement to be expected from a selection (for mutated population) can be obtained by study of genotypic coefficient of variation along with heritability (in broad sense). In the present study in general, plant height, panicle/plant, and husk yield/plant showed higher values for heritability and genetic advance. High heritability and genetic advance for a character would indicate the predominance of additive gene action on the trait and as such trait is likely to respond effectively to phenotypic selection (Johnson et al., 1955; Sheeba et al., 2003). Low genetic advance with moderate heritability was observed for several traits. Which showed that traits are most probably, governed by non additive gene action. The studies on relationship among yield and various morphological and quality characters of the plant population which influence yield and quality are of great value indeed, furnishing the plant breeder with an easy and fairly reliable means of isolating high yielding and better quality genotypes from the breeding material. In Plantago, husk yield plant-1 is considered as important morphological trait which has direct economical value. The estimates of the correlation coefficients among the various characters in all the varieties in both generations (M1 and M2) indicate that husk yield is more significantly correlated with the plant height, peduncle length, seed weight than that of other traits. Positive and significant correlation among these traits indicates that with an increase in these characters, husk yield could be increased. 57 Cytology: Cytological studies indicates that mitotic index increases with increasing doses of the mutagens, which may be as a result of accumulation of C-metaphase configuration at zero hour recovers (Badr, 1983). Dividing cells also showed different kinds of cytological anomalies. Disturbed chromosomes may be either due to, hindrance of prometaphase chromosome, or due to the effect of the tested Mutagens on spindle apparatus, by causing partial inhibition of mitotic apparatus. The inactivation by mutagens preventing them from being inserted in the spindle fibers, affecting the normal kinetics of the cellular division (Mukherjee et al., 1990). Induction of disturbed stages indicates that mutagen may be an eugenic which inhibited the spindle formation and caused c-mitosis in metaphase (disturbance). The induction of laggard chromosomes could be attributed to irregular orientation of chromosomes (Patil and Bhat, 1992). The occurrence of laggards indicated that mutagen completely or partially affect the spindle apparatus. Presence of lagging chromosome indicates complete failure of spindle apparatus. Delayed terminalization, stickiness of chromosome ends and failure of chromosome movements have lead to laggard chromosome. Magoon et al. (1958) also support the above view but they specified that this could be due the change in homology of the paired chromosome. Considerable frequencies of bridges were also observed in anaphase and telophase stages after all the treatments. It may be attributed to general stickiness of chromosomes (Haliem, 1990) or due to the formation of dicentric chromosomes as a result of breakage and reunion (El-Khodary et al., 1990). Chromosomal fragments were a type of abnormalities also found to be observed during mitotic cell division after the treatments. The induction of these abnormalities indicates the mutagenic capacity and 58 clastogenic action of the mutagens on the chromosome which is now regarded to affect the chromosomal DNA (Grant, 1978 and Chauhan and Sundaraman, 1990). Unseparated anaphase (delay of separation) was observed which could be due to stickiness (Abdel-Hamied, 1995). Stickiness was more frequent chromosomal abnormality, found at all the doses of mutagenic treatments, in all the varieties. Stickiness has been attributed to the entanglement of inter-chromosomal chromatin fibers that leads to sub-chromatid connection between chromosomes (Klasterska, 1976). The presence of stickiness in the chromosomes reflected highly toxic effects, it was irreversible and might lead to cell death ( Liu et al., 1995). The mutagens might have affect the physiological properties of DNA and proteins, and form complexes with phosphate groups of nucleotides of the nucleic acids causing inhibition in protein synthesis (Karlik et al., 1980). In contrast, Patil and Bhat (1992) suggested that, stickiness is a type of physical adhesion involving mainly the proteinacious matrix of chromatin material. The results also indicate that mutagenic treatments induced large range of chromosomal abnormalities in PMCs of all the varieties. Out of these anomalies, chromosomal stickiness was most common; this may be due to depolymerization of nucleic acid caused by mutagenic treatment or due to partial dissociation of nucleioprotein and alteration in their pattern of organization (Bhat et al., 2005). Fragmentation was more frequently reported in γ-rays treatments. Breakage of chromosomes due to gamma radiation treatment was reported earlier by New Combe (1942). Sax (1941) thought that the breaks induced in chromosomes after irradiation might be due to a change in molecular constituents of chromosomes. Higher exposure which caused a permanent breakage effects, had been, invariably lethal to the cell. Dubnin (1964) opined that the frequency of breakage must be much higher than visible 59 after irradiation, this being attributed to a single break followed by the rejoining of the broken ends, leaving no indication of the original breakage. Sparrow (1966) concluded that if irradiation was carried out at the early interphase stage, the degree of reunion would be increased and this would result in bridge and ring formation. Multipolar movement of chromosomes, unorientation of univalents and bivalents and appearance of lagging chromosomes, suggested the spindle disturbances due to mutagenic treatments. Presence of acentric lagging fragments and micronuclei indicated that the former has given rise to the latter, leading to the degeneration as has already been reported by earlier workers (Biswas and Bhattacharya 1975). Multivalents, observed at metaphase I may be the outcome of complex translocation. Syndiploid PMCs or PMCs with extra chromosomes were also observed which are in agreement to report of Raghuvanshi and Singh (1979) in Impatiens balsamina. Presence of acentric lagging fragments and micronuclei indicated that the former has given rise to the latter, leading to the degeneration as has already been reported by earlier workers(Biswas and Bhattacharya 1975). The chiasma frequency per Chromosome however was decreased continuously, as the dose rate was increased. In Phalaris, Prasad and Godward (1969) also noted that there was slight reduction in the number of chiasmata per cell due to irradiation. Patil (1968) noted that gamma rays induced aneuploidy in Arachis hypogea. Conclusively, the results show that though the percentage of chiasma frequency per chromosome, continuously decreased, as the dose rate was increased but pollen fertility remained unaffected in treated plants, showing the normal meiotic behaviour of chromosomes. The karyotype analysis, varieties of Plantago ovata showed the presence of diploid chromosome number 2n =8. Karyotypes are one of the parameters by which 60 authentic identification of a specimen is possible, since varieties usually possess the same chromosome numbers and major chromosomal differences do not exist among different varieties of a species. The karyotype of all the considered varieties showed almost similar trends but mild variation is also exist. In addition to similarity in the karyotype, TF% and arm ratio values of each chromosome pair were not significantly different conferring that they belong to the same species and have a close relationship. Although, on the basis of morphological criteria, varieties can be distinguished from each other but at the chromosomal level, both remain undistinguished. These facts indicate that external morphological variations in this species occurred independently of the chromosome variations and that the morphological differences between varieties are caused by several genes. These findings further indicate that all varieties differ morphologically but cytotaxonomically have no marked variation (Kolar, 2012). 61