* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download chapter 7 part 1
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 7: Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions / Theory of Hydrogen Atom/ Quantum-classical hybrid” interpretation of quantum numbers time independent, we used to have d 2 ( x ) 2m 2 {E U ( x )} ( x ) 0 2 dx if wave function is 3 dimensional 2 ( x, y, z ) 2 ( x, y, z ) 2 ( x, y, z ) 2m 2 {E U ( x, y, z )} ( x, y, z ) 0 dx 2 dy 2 dz 2 2m ( x, y, z ) 2 {E U ( x, y, z )} ( x, y, z ) 0 2 possible to consider particle in 3D box with infinite high (and thick) potential walls – impenetrable – just a model that does not really correspond to reality at wave function (evanescent wave) always leaks into barrier – chapter 6 tunneling- and may be picked up at the other side, become a traveling wave again, i.e. a particle that can move so U(x,y,z) = U(r) = 0 inside the box, 0 < x,y,z < L then 3D wave function is separable into product of three 1D wave functions 1 ( r ) 1 ( x ) 2 ( y ) 3 ( z ) putting back into rearranged time independent Schrödinger equation d 2 1 2 3 d 2 1 2 3 d 2 1 2 3 2 2 E 2m 1 2 3 dx 2 2m 1 2 3 dy 2 2m 1 2 3 dz 2 2 2 d 2 1 ( x ) 2 d 2 2 ( y ) 2 d 2 3 ( z ) E 2 2 2 2m 1 dx 2m 2 dy 2m 3 dz for a infinite square well we could write (with U(x,y,z) = 0 inside the box) 2 d 2 1 ( x ) E1 2 2m 1 dx (so all the things we had for 1D are now here three times) 2 d 2 2 ( y ) 2 d 2 3 ( z ) E 2 and E3 2m 2 dy 2 2m 3 dz 2 so E1 + E2 + E3 = E solutions for this differential equation in x are: A sin (k1x) and B cos (k1x) and linear combinations of the two, 2 where k1= 2mE1 2 only sin function can vanish at wall x = 0 as wave function has to vanish at x = L also we have sin (k1L) = sin (n1 π) where n1 is a positive integer (quantum number) an integral number of half-wavelength must fit into the box same applies to y and z, so ( r ) 1 ( x ) 2 ( y ) 3 ( z ) A sin( k1 x ) sin( k 2 y ) sin( k 3 z ) let’s see what we get if we differentiate 2 d 2 ( x, y, z ) 2 d 2 ( x, y, z ) 2 d 2 ( x, y, z ) E 2 2 2 2m dx 2m dy 2m dz remember the rules d sin( Ax 2 ) 2 Ax cos( Ax 2 ) and dx d cos( Ax 2 ) 2 Ax sin( Ax 2 ) dx we get: 3 2 2 2 2 { k1 A sin( k1 x ) sin( k 2 y ) sin( k3 z ) k2 A sin( k1 x ) sin( k 2 y ) sin( k3 z ) 2m 2m 2 2 k3 A sin( k1 x ) sin( k 2 y ) sin( k3 z )} E 2m 2 2 2 2 E (k1 k 2 k 3 ) 2m which is equivalent to 1 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 ( p p p ) ( n n n y z 1 2 3 ) = KE 2 E = 2m x 2mL with relation between wave number k1, wavelength and momentum follows px = k1 n1 L analogous relations for y and z k n 2 2 py = L k n 3 3 pz = L where ni are three quantum numbers 4 which we can summarize as 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 E ( p x p y pz ) ( n n n 1 2 3 ) KE 2 2m 2mL ni ≠ 0 so 1, 2, 3, …. ni = 0 would mean the wave function would vanish everywhere 2 and 0 , means there is no particle in the 3D box so our energy states are a function of three quantum numbers E n1n2n3 22 2 2mL ( n1 n2 n3 ) 2 2 2 two cases to be distinguished either L is the same for all three dimensions or its different for in each direction x,y,z E211 22 2mL2 ( 2 2 12 12 ) E121 E112 three states that have the same energy – called degenerate (strong language what is really meant it’s quite unusual in nature, it’s due to the so called 5 symmetry L1 = L2 = L3, it’s usually due to the symmetry of the potential (which was in our special case 0 in the box everywhere) will n1 = n2 = n3 = 1 be a degenerate energy level? no it is the ground state in idealized hydrogen atom with (3 quantum numbers) all energy levels are degenerate, in real hydrogen atom with 4 quantum numbers, there are tiny differences in energy between the levels lifting this degeneracy usually in a man made quantum system, quantum box: L1 ≠ L2 ≠ L3, so no degeneracy here, models and idealizations may be degenerate more often than the real things for probability to find particle in an infinitesimal small volume element (as a coefficient 1 or in %), P(x,y,z) dv =(x,y,x,t)2 dv assuming that wave function has been normalized P ( x, y, z, t ) 2 dxdydz 1 (by the usual procedure), ……. just kind of everything is there three times 6