Download - NYU Tandon School of Engineering

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Evolution of human intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Artificial general intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Philosophy of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup

History of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Behavior analysis of child development wikipedia , lookup

Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Theory of reasoned action wikipedia , lookup

Neuroethology wikipedia , lookup

Neuroeconomics wikipedia , lookup

Artificial intelligence for video surveillance wikipedia , lookup

Observational methods in psychology wikipedia , lookup

Behaviorism wikipedia , lookup

Trans-species psychology wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
PRESS OFFICE • 15 MetroTech Center, 6th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201
For Immediate Release:
Contact: Kathleen Hamilton
Thursday, January 16, 2014
718-260-3792/mobile 347-843-9782
[email protected]
UNDERSTANDING COLLECTIVE ANIMAL BEHAVIOR
MAY BE IN THE EYE OF THE COMPUTER
International Research Team Headed by NYU’s Maurizio Porfiri Demonstrates Breakthrough in Machine
Learning
No machine is better at recognizing patterns in nature than the human brain. It takes mere seconds to recognize the order in a
flock of birds flying in formation, schooling fish, or an army of a million marching ants. But computer analyses of collective
animal behavior are limited by the need for constant tracking and measurement data for each individual; hence, the
mechanics of social animal interaction are not fully understood.
An international team of researchers led by Maurizio Porfiri, associate professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at
NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering, has introduced a new paradigm in the study of social behavior in animal species,
including humans. Their work is the first to successfully apply machine learning toward understanding collective animal
behavior from raw data such as video, image or sound, without tracking each individual. The findings stand to significantly
impact the field of ethology— the objective study of animal behavior—and may prove as profound as the breakthroughs that
allowed robots to learn to recognize obstacles and navigate their environment. The paper was published online today in
Scientific Reports, an open-access journal of the Nature Publishing Group.
Starting with the premise that humans have the innate ability to recognize behavior patterns almost subconsciously, the
researchers created a framework to apply that instinctive understanding to machine learning techniques. Machine learning
algorithms are widely used in applications like biometric identification systems and weather trend data, and allow researchers
to understand and compare complex sets of data through simple visual representations.
-more-
A human viewing a flock of flying birds discerns both the coordinated behavior and the formation’s shape—a line, for
example—without measuring and plotting a dizzying number of coordinates for each bird. For these experiments, the
researchers deployed an existing machine learning method called isometric mapping (ISOMAP) to determine if the algorithm
could analyze video of that same flock of birds, register the aligned motion, and embed the information on a low-dimensional
manifold to visually display the properties of the group’s behavior. Thus, a high-dimensional quantitative data set would be
represented in a single dimension—a line—mirroring human observation and indicating a high degree of organization within
the group.
“We wanted to put ISOMAP to the test alongside human observation,” Porfiri explained. “If humans and computers could
observe social animal species and arrive at similar characterizations of their behavior, we would have a dramatically better
quantitative tool for exploring collective animal behavior than anything we’ve seen,” he said.
The team captured video of five social species—ants, fish, frogs, chickens, and humans—under three sets of conditions—
natural motion, and the presence of one and two stimuli—over 10 days. They subjected the raw video to analysis through
ISOMAP, producing manifolds representing the groups’ behavior and motion. The researchers then tasked a group of
observers with watching the videos and assigning a measure of collective behavior to each group under each circumstance.
Human rankings were scaled to be visually comparable with the ISOMAP manifolds.
The similarities between the human and machine classifications were remarkable. ISOMAP proved capable not only of
accurately ascribing a degree of collective interaction that meshed with human observation, but of distinguishing between
species. Both humans and ISOMAP ascribed the highest degree of interaction to ants and the least to frogs—analyses that
hold true to known qualities of the species. Both were also able to distinguish changes in the animals’ collective behavior in
the presence of various stimuli.
The researchers believe that this breakthrough is the beginning of an entirely new way of understanding and comparing the
behaviors of social animals. Future experiments will focus on expanding the technique to more subtle aspects of collective
behavior; for example, the chirping of crickets or synchronized flashing of fireflies.
Porfiri’s collaborators include NYU School of Engineering post-doctoral fellow Pietro DeLellis (visiting from University of
Naples Feredico II, Italy), research scholar Giovanni Polverino and undergraduate student Gozde Ustuner; Nicole Abaid,
assistant professor of engineering science and mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Simone
Macri of the Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience at Istituto Superiore di Sanità in Rome; and Erik M. Bollt,
professor of mathematics at Clarkson University.
This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation.
The NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering dates to 1854, when the NYU School of Civil Engineering and
Architecture as well as the Brooklyn Collegiate and Polytechnic Institute (widely known as Brooklyn Poly) were
founded. Their successor institutions merged in January 2014 to create a comprehensive school of education and
research in engineering and applied sciences, rooted in a tradition of invention, innovation and entrepreneurship.
In addition to programs at its main campus in downtown Brooklyn, it is closely connected to engineering
programs in NYU Abu Dhabi and NYU Shanghai, and it operates business incubators in downtown Manhattan
and Brooklyn. For more information, visit http://engineering.nyu.edu.
###
Note to editors: To download images or video, visit http://dam.poly.edu/?c=1300&k=96ae381b43