• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Maintenance.of..................... Association.Rules.Using. Pre
Maintenance.of..................... Association.Rules.Using. Pre

... association rules and avoiding the above-mentioned shortcomings when new transactions are inserted. Examples include the FUP algorithm (Cheung et al., 1996), the adaptive algorithm (Sarda & Srinivas, 1998), and the incremental updating technique based on the concept of negative border (Feldman, Auma ...
Document
Document

... Arcs: There is an arc from Ti to Tj if they have conflict access to the same database element X and Ti is first; ...
Document
Document

...  Atomicity. Either all operations of the transaction are properly reflected in the database or none are.  Consistency. Execution of a transaction in isolation preserves the consistency of the database.  Isolation. Although multiple transactions may execute concurrently, each transaction must be u ...
Chapter 16 - Computer Information Systems
Chapter 16 - Computer Information Systems

... 7. Add secondary index on attributes that could result in an index-only plan. 8. Avoid indexing an attribute or relation that is frequently updated. Avoid indexing an attribute if the query will retrieve a significant proportion of the tuples in the relation. 9. Avoid indexing attributes that consis ...
THE DATABLITZ™ MAIN-MEMORY STORAGE MANAGER
THE DATABLITZ™ MAIN-MEMORY STORAGE MANAGER

... Figure 3. Throughput as a Function of Operations per Transaction this. For sufficiently large transactions, the commit overhead is an insignificant fraction of overall execution time and thus the throughput curve levels off. The figure shows that the low-level hash-index interface offers roughly a f ...
Infobright Enterprise Edition
Infobright Enterprise Edition

... “Within one month [of installation], the whole ting was paid for. Within 10 months, when everyone else’s business was decreasing, ours was tripling. While the industry went down 50% [due to recession], we tripled our business, and in the worst economy in history.” ...
A Closer Look
A Closer Look

... Result: Database state no longer corresponds to real-world state, integrity constraint violated. ...
John Hawkins - Research Presentation
John Hawkins - Research Presentation

... Runs on the Java Virtual Machine, which allows it to be run on almost any machine in the modern world. Has APIs written in C / C++, Ruby, PHP, and Java Because of its use of HTTP, can be easily distributed across multiple machines. ...
+ Database Consistency
+ Database Consistency

... A deposit transaction that increments the balance by the wrong amount maintains the integrity constraint balance  0, but does not maintain the relation between the enterprise and database states ...
Chapter 10 - Emunix Emich
Chapter 10 - Emunix Emich

...  Property of a Connection object ...
job description
job description

... Reporting into the Deputy COO, the successful Database Development Director will be responsible for supporting the development of a multi-million pound product portfolio across multiple business units. This exciting strategic and tactical role will provide leadership for the database development tea ...
20160425145340assignment_week_7
20160425145340assignment_week_7

... USE THE AdventureWorks2012 database for the following: 1. Use sp_configure to grant the first parameter to all users by default, show advanced options and run reconfigure. Use sp_configure to change the maximum lock settings from 0 to 20000 using the locks option and run reconfigure. Copy and paste ...
Transactions in Oracle
Transactions in Oracle

... • Autonomous transactions are independent transactions that can be called from within another transaction • An autonomous transaction lets you leave the context of the calling transaction • You can call autonomous transactions from within a PL/SQL block by using the pragma AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION. ...
CH9
CH9

...  A shared lock is issued when a transaction wants to read data from the database and no exclusive lock is held on that data item. ...
Transaction Management
Transaction Management

... Keep track of all transactions that update the DB If failure occurs, information that was stored here will be used for recovery It is triggered by ROLL BACK statement, program abnormal termination, or system failure ...
transaction
transaction

... A (possibly concurrent) schedule is serializable if it is equivalent to a serial schedule. Different forms of schedule equivalence give rise to the notions of: 1. conflict serializability 2. view serializability Simplified view of transactions  We ignore operations other than read and write instruc ...
Transactions - Computer Information Systems
Transactions - Computer Information Systems

... Isolation - Actions are not visible to other transactions until it is committed. Data used during execution of transaction cannot be used by second transaction until first one is completed, i.e. transaction’s updates concealed until after commit. Durability (permanency)- Indicates the permanence of ...
Standard Module - Using Databases Module Summary
Standard Module - Using Databases Module Summary

... Standard Module - Using Databases ...
IC52C4: Introduction
IC52C4: Introduction

... challenges ...
S-Store: Streaming Meets Transaction Processing
S-Store: Streaming Meets Transaction Processing

... which has no such trigger support in its PE. • Serializing transaction requests severely limits H-Store’s performance where as S-Store uses a “streaming scheduler” which can activate the next transaction directly within the PE and can prioritize these triggered transactions ahead of the current sche ...
transaction
transaction

... • 2PL is most common, but has an considerable overhead due to deadlock management, especially in case of conflicts • time stamps: concurrency control is done on the affected object, and hence is a very nice strategy in distributed systems and in the case of few conflicts • optimistic methods: effici ...
What Are Locks?
What Are Locks?

... Transactions ensure that multiple data modifications are processed together or not at all The transaction log ensures that updates are complete and recoverable Transactions use locks ...
進階資料庫系統 課程綱要表 課程名稱: (中文) 進階資料庫系統 (英文
進階資料庫系統 課程綱要表 課程名稱: (中文) 進階資料庫系統 (英文

... Database Security and Authorization ...
Chapter 1 What is a Database? What is a Database Management
Chapter 1 What is a Database? What is a Database Management

... System Requirements (con’t) ...
Technical Report I
Technical Report I

... necessary to have a backup copy and to keep a log of transaction activity Before a transaction can commit, its activity records must be written to the log. Logging can impact response time, since each transaction must wait for at least one stable write before committing. Logging can also affect thro ...
< 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report