• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Database Management System Module Title: CAP 364 Module ID
Database Management System Module Title: CAP 364 Module ID

... characteristics. Recovery techniques, Concurrency control techniques: Serializability, Deadlock, Locking schemes, Time-stamp ordering, Multi-version, Optimistic techniques; DB security; Distributed databases; Distributed DBMS, Data fragmentation and replication, Distributed transactions management. ...
DBMS functions
DBMS functions

... a checkpoint record is written into the log periodically at that point when the system writes out to the database on disk the effect of all WRITE operations of committed transactions recovery manager decides at what intervals to take a check point in minutes or number of committed transaction checkp ...
Course flyer
Course flyer

... ...
Database System Concepts, --Silberschatz Korth, Sudarshan, -
Database System Concepts, --Silberschatz Korth, Sudarshan, -

... database growth in the hands of database administrators (DBAs) and other specialists. Databases have been in use since the earliest days of electronic computing. Unlike New systems which can be utilized to widely unlike databases and needs, the vast maturity of more previous systems were tightly rel ...
PCS204 ADVANCED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Course Objective: L
PCS204 ADVANCED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Course Objective: L

... Course Objective: To learn the advanced concepts of database information and management and its implementation for assessment of understanding the course by the students Transaction Processing and Concurrency Control Techniques: Introduction to Transaction Processing, Properties and states of Transa ...
presentation source
presentation source

... Locking Since many users may be trying to access the same data simultaneously the DBMS has a locking mechanism which locks data which is in use. This provides a solution to concurrency problems which would arise if locking were not available. ...
CMP 206: Principles of Database Management System
CMP 206: Principles of Database Management System

... UNIT4: Transaction processing concepts: Transaction processing system, schedule and recoverability, Testing of serializability, Serializability of schedules, conflict & view serializable schedule ,Transaction processing in distributed database fragmentation, locking, Protocols for distributed databa ...
Slides 01 - University of California, Irvine
Slides 01 - University of California, Irvine

... Distributed commit protocols (2 classes) – 2-phase, 3-phase, presumed nothing, presumed abort, presumed commit – Various incarnations – distributed, centralized, hierarchical. ...
Concurrency Control - High Point University
Concurrency Control - High Point University

... • Pessimistic scheme – at least two users going for same resource, one gets there first and locks the object until they are done. • Optimistic scheme – use when likely one user will access field at a time. At transaction commit, make sure one has accessed the field since your transaction began via t ...
1 What is ...? 2 Features of Modern Database and TP Systems 3
1 What is ...? 2 Features of Modern Database and TP Systems 3

... What is database? A collection of data items related to some enterprise stored on some storage media. (our interest: stored on computer); Database can either be centralized or distributed. Database Management System (DBMS) databases. ...
Diapositive 1
Diapositive 1

... management; Transactions: concepts, characteristics. Recovery techniques, Concurrency control techniques: Serializability, Deadlock, Locking schemes, Time-stamp ordering, Multi-version, Optimistic techniques; DB security; Distributed databases; Distributed DBMS, Data fragmentation and replication, D ...
< 1 ... 60 61 62 63 64

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report