• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Link to Slides
Link to Slides

... ◦ I - stands for isolation, the fact that each transaction must appear to be executed as if no other transaction is executing at the same time. ◦ D - stands for durability, the condition that the effect on the database of a transaction must never be lost, once the transaction has completed. ...
View File
View File

... Advantage ...
SQL/SyBase Programming
SQL/SyBase Programming

... Locking Since many users may be trying to access the same data simultaneously the DBMS has a locking mechanism which locks data which is in use. This provides a solution to concurrency problems which would arise if locking were not available. ...
Distributed Database
Distributed Database

... Put the data in a distributed data dictionary Specifies the location from where to get the data and process components DBMS translates between nodes with other DBMS (using middleware) Consistency of data (via multiphase commit protocols) Global primary key control Scalability, security, concurrency, ...
ppt - EECS Instructional Support Group Home Page
ppt - EECS Instructional Support Group Home Page

... • E.g. Each CS186 student can only register in one project group. Each group must have 3 students. ...
Case Study V: Help Desk Service
Case Study V: Help Desk Service

... – Consider the existence and types of indexes on the tables. – Estimate the number of index blocks accessed. – Estimate the number of data pages accessed. ...
MTH101: Calculus I
MTH101: Calculus I

... ISE305: Database Systems Contents: The main objective of this course is to provide students with the background to design, implement, and use database management systems. Topics Include: Evolution of database management systems; Relational Data Model and Relational Algebra; Entity Relationship Model ...
Concurrency and Transaction Management in an Object Oriented
Concurrency and Transaction Management in an Object Oriented

... 2-Phase Locking Protocol (2PL): Best known locking protocol for guaranteeing serializability ...
Link to Slides
Link to Slides

... and optimizations useful for one site can be exported to others. It is easier to treat such a network as a single central database system. ...
Lecture Note 9
Lecture Note 9

... Deadlocks • Condition that occurs when two transactions wait for each other to unlock data • Possible only if one of the transactions wants to obtain an exclusive lock on a data item – No deadlock condition can exist among shared locks ...
What is a Transaction? - CSE341DatabaseSystems
What is a Transaction? - CSE341DatabaseSystems

...  Names of objects affected by the transaction (the name of the table)  “Before” and “after” values for updated fields  Pointers to previous and next transaction log entries for the same transaction The ending (COMMIT) of the transaction ...
NewSQL Introduction - H
NewSQL Introduction - H

... – H-Store merged with Horizontica (Spring 2008) – VoltDB forked from H-Store (Fall 2008) – H-Store forked back from VoltDB (Winter 2009) ...
Distributed Databases
Distributed Databases

... What can we do? A single query from a Manufacturing client on local database mfg can retrieve joined data from the products table on the local database and the dept table on the remote hq database.  For a client application, the location and platform of the databases are transparent. ...
Digital Library Architecture
Digital Library Architecture

... Architectural considerations • Real-time service during scheduled hours + batch processing overnight • Combine information from several databases • Database consistency after any type of failure two-phase commit reload from checkpoint + log detailed audit trail • How will transaction errors be avoi ...
Concurrency control and recovery
Concurrency control and recovery

... • 2 phase locking: • if T wants to read an object, it first obtains an S lock. • If T wants to write an object, it first obtains an X lock. • If T releases any lock, it can acquire no new locks. • Recall: all this is done transparently to the user by the DBMS. • 2PL guarantees serializability! • Why ...
slides01
slides01

... Efficient data management (faster than files) Large amount of data High reliability Information sharing (multiple users) DBMS Users: – E-commerce companies, banks, airlines, transportation companies, corporate databases, government agencies, … – Anyone you can think of! ...
Concurrency Control
Concurrency Control

... carried out or none of them are carried out.  Consistency – property of transaction requires a transaction to be written correctly  Isolation – property of transaction requires that transaction to be run out without interference from other transaction – can be achieve by locking or timestamping  ...
Lecture Slides DBTransactions
Lecture Slides DBTransactions

... for concurrency control. The objective of the scheduler is to maximize concurrency without allowing concurrently executing transactions to interfere with one another. • Lock manager: the scheduler is sometimes called the lock manager if the concurrency control protocol is a locking based. • Recovery ...
Chapter 15 Transaction Management
Chapter 15 Transaction Management

... – Tow or more transactions each wait for locks held by other transaction – Livelock ...
Operating System Support for Virtual Machines
Operating System Support for Virtual Machines

... Memory (latency) is ~6000 times faster than disk ...
Training
Training

... – Undo log records old values of all objects – Read/write logs, to check for interference ...
Object Composition and Reuse in a Distributed Multimedia
Object Composition and Reuse in a Distributed Multimedia

... implementation of our system. The database supports an easy to reuse mechanism. Objects in the two layered database hierarchy can be grouped and declared as a class, which serve as a reusable multimedia presentation subject. In the hierarchy, we use four type of links to group presentation windows a ...
Record Locking
Record Locking

... ODBC and Access Record Locking When you edit data in a linked SQL database table using ODBC, Microsoft Access doesn't lock records; instead, the rules of that SQL database govern locking. In this instance, regardless of the record-locking setting you choose for your database, Microsoft Access alway ...
Database Management issues from Hoffer - Moodle
Database Management issues from Hoffer - Moodle

... • An impasse that results when two or more transactions have locked common resources, and each waits for the other to unlock their resources Figure 11-12 The problem of deadlock John and Marsha will wait forever for each other to release their locked resources! ...
DBMS Functions Data, Storage, Retrieval, and Update
DBMS Functions Data, Storage, Retrieval, and Update

... database in the event that the database is damaged in any way. • The process of returning the database to a ...
< 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report