• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Transaction Management Overview
Transaction Management Overview

... Each transaction must leave the database in a consistent state if the DB is consistent when the transaction begins. • DBMS will enforce some ICs, depending on the ICs declared in CREATE TABLE statements. • Beyond this, the DBMS does not really understand the semantics of the data. (e.g., it does not ...
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSACTION PROCESSING
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSACTION PROCESSING

... should appear to be executed in isolation; that is, their final effect should be as if each transaction was executed alone from start to end.  Durability: Once a transaction is committed, its changes (writes) applied to the database must never be lost due to of subsequent failure  Enforcement of A ...
Why Not Store Everything in Main Memory? Why use disks?
Why Not Store Everything in Main Memory? Why use disks?

... "shared resources" and there are "users". SHARED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT deals with how the system can insure correct access to shared resources among concurrently executing transactions? All answers seem to come from traffic control! (traffic intersections, construction zones, driveup windows). WAITING ...
Data base management system
Data base management system

... dependencies, Closure set of dependencies & attributes, Irreducible set of dependencies, Introductions to normalization, decomposition, FD diagram, First, second and third normal forms, Dependency preservation, BCNF, Multivalued dependencies and fourth normal form, Join dependencies and fifth normal ...
Read Dirty to Me: SQL Server Isolation Levels
Read Dirty to Me: SQL Server Isolation Levels

... Repeatable Read ◦ Pessimistic ◦ Rows locked as they are read ◦ Rows remain locked until transaction ...
Decentralized Database
Decentralized Database

... An example is the Internet Domain Name System (DNS) - a generalpurpose distributed data query service chiefly used on the Internet for translating hostnames into Internet addresses. (Handout on this on the intranet) ...
Overview of Databases and DBMS
Overview of Databases and DBMS

... • Pertinent to people who use the data • Might or might not be of interest to other ...
Study Guide for Mid
Study Guide for Mid

... Index, unique index – what are these and when would they be used in the design of a database? Multi-valued attributes – what are they and how can they be included into a database design (2 alternatives) Derived attributes – what are they and what is the tradeoff that needs to be considered with resp ...
HYPER Database System
HYPER Database System

... like Amazon or Würth or Otto Versand. In addition, the benchmark incorporates the query suite of the TPC-H benchmark – rewritten for the TPC-C database schema. Thereby, the two most prominent benchmarks for OLTP (TPC-C) and for OLAP (TPC-H) run in parallel on a single HyPer installation and produce ...
Slide 1
Slide 1

... set of concurrent transactions is guaranteed to produce the same result as executing those same transactions one at a time in some (unspecified) serial order. • Commit (normal termination) is the operation that signals successful end-of-transaction. Any updates made to the database by the transactio ...
A Closer Look
A Closer Look

... • Transaction aborted by system – Execution cannot be made atomic (a site is down) – Execution did not maintain database consistency (integrity constraint is violated) – Execution was not isolated – Resources not available (deadlock) ...
Overview of Transaction Processing Systems
Overview of Transaction Processing Systems

... – A deposit transaction that increments the balance by the wrong amount maintains the integrity constraint balance  0, but does not maintain the relation between the enterprise and database states ...
A Closer Look
A Closer Look

... – A deposit transaction that increments the balance by the wrong amount maintains the integrity constraint balance  0, but does not maintain the relation between the enterprise and database states ...
dbms . ppt - Department of Computer Science at CCSU
dbms . ppt - Department of Computer Science at CCSU

... • Transaction: a set of operations that takes the database from one consistent state to another • Solving the concurrency control problem: making transactions atomic operations (one at a time) • Concurrent transactions: serializability theory (two-phase locking), read lock (many), write lock (one). ...
Database Systems
Database Systems

... With effect from the Academic Year 2015-16 IT 312 DATABASE SYSTEMS Instruction per week Duration of End - Semester Examination End - Semester Examination Sessional Credits ...
Transaction Management Overview
Transaction Management Overview

... Steal approach: the changes made to an object O by a transaction T may be written to disk before T commits. This arises when the buffer manager decides to replace the frame containing O by a page (belonging to a different transaction) from disk. Force approach: Force all writes of a committed transa ...
Lecture Notes - Duncan College
Lecture Notes - Duncan College

... By default, every statement you enter is treated as a transaction comprised of a single query. ...
concurrency
concurrency

... If a transaction Ti is aborted, all its actions have to be undone. Not only that, if Tj reads an object last written by Ti, Tj must be aborted as well! Most systems avoid such cascading aborts by releasing a transaction’s locks only at commit time. ...
Transaction Management (cont.)
Transaction Management (cont.)

... • If database is only inconsistent: – Need to undo changes that caused inconsistency. May also need to redo some transactions to ensure updates reach secondary storage. – Do not need backup, but can restore database using before- and after-images in ...
50401A-ENU_Powerpnt_08
50401A-ENU_Powerpnt_08

... • Grant the HR manager with the view and update rights to all the data. The management team has a requirement to generate performance metric for the sales staff. For this purpose, you are required to add a new function to the QuantamCorp HR VASE database that will import information from the CRM dat ...
Lock
Lock

... of the commands had been executed. Transaction integrity ...
Class 2 - Computer Science, NMSU
Class 2 - Computer Science, NMSU

... • Atomicity: ALL-or-NOTHING execution (a sequence of primitive commands that needs to be money – the bank takes it executed ALL or NONE). Deposit but does not increase the balance • Isolation: No two transactions should be executed Two withdrawals cannot be done at the same time. at the same time • ...
Concurrent Control
Concurrent Control

... concurrently, the nonserial schedule is called serializable if it produces the same results as a serial schedule. ...
Distributed Transactions
Distributed Transactions

... Most of the information systems used in businesses are transaction based. The market for transaction processing is many tens of billions of dollars per year Not long ago, transaction processing was only used in large ...
CSE 510 Database Management System Implementation
CSE 510 Database Management System Implementation

... Goals The purpose of this course is to study established techniques for implementing database management systems through a semester-long project and reading materials covering the classic and cuttign-edge papers in the area of database systems. Advanced concepts, such as XML and multimedia databases ...
< 1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report