• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Teaching Concurrency Control and Recovery in Relational Databases
Teaching Concurrency Control and Recovery in Relational Databases

... Our contribution ...
Status - UTRGV Faculty Web
Status - UTRGV Faculty Web

... Result: Database state no longer corresponds to real-world state, integrity constraint violated. ...
Week 05 - cottageland.net
Week 05 - cottageland.net

... Wait/Die and Wound/Wait Schemes ...
CM20145 Database Design
CM20145 Database Design

...  The potential for deadlock exists in most locking protocols.  Deadlocks are a necessary evil.  Starvation is also possible if the concurrency-control manager is badly designed. For example:  A transaction may be waiting for an X-lock on an item, while a sequence of other transactions request an ...
BSE 2101 Introduction to Database Systems
BSE 2101 Introduction to Database Systems

... an application domain; (ii) Realize this model as a relational database schema; (iii) Implement this schema as a Postgre SQL application; (iv) Build an HTML/forms based (PHP) interface to a relational database; (v) Aanalyse the costs/benefits of data structures and algorithms used in the implementat ...
Functions of a DBMS
Functions of a DBMS

... • Insert: read and add records • Update: read, insert and change records • Alter/Delete: read, insert, update and delete records, change table structure ...
Transaction Management - USA School of Computing
Transaction Management - USA School of Computing

... Transaction is rescheduled Detection – Periodically test the database for deadlocks. If a deadlock is found, abort / rollback one of the transactions Avoidance – Requires a transaction to obtain all locks needed before it can execute – requires locks to be obtained in succession ...
Mobile Computing and Databases
Mobile Computing and Databases

... Tentative transactions must follow a Scope Rule: they may involve objects mastered at the mobile node originating the transaction or the base nodes. Local transactions that read/write only local data can be designed in any way. They cannot read/write tentative data. Base transactions generated by te ...
Slides
Slides

... However, it obtains shared locks before reading values and then immediately releases them; their effect is to ensure that the transaction that last modified the values is complete. Thus, 1. T reads only the changes made by committed transactions. 2. No value written by T is changed by any other tran ...
Reliability and Security in Database Servers
Reliability and Security in Database Servers

... Once in correct state, it may be possible to redo some transactions as long as there is no conflict. ...
IC52C4: Introduction
IC52C4: Introduction

... by a failure, its partial results must be undone.  The activity of preserving the transaction's atomicity in presence of transaction aborts due to input errors, system overloads, or deadlocks is called transaction ...
PE-I_ADS_syllabus
PE-I_ADS_syllabus

... will be assessed for 20 Marks on 33% of the syllabus covered (between start of the term and First Sem. Evaluation i.e. Module 1 and 2 for SE I and between SE I & SE II i.e. Module 3 and 4 for SE II). ESE (50%) – Two hours duration and will be assessed for 50 Marks and would be on entire syllabus wit ...
A + B
A + B

... transaction T2 is allowed to access the partially updated database, it will see an inconsistent database (the sum A + B will be less than it should be). T1 T2 1. read(A) ...
課程大綱
課程大綱

... Fall 2004  ...
Lecture5
Lecture5

... You can see the changes when the table is queried but, Others cannot see them when they query query your tables and, You can roll them back (discard them) if you change your mind or need to correct a mistake ...
Course Description
Course Description

... development of relational databases. The progress in database systems and applications has produced a diverse landscape of specialized technology areas that have often become the exclusive domain of research specialists. This course provides a systematic introduction to and an in-depth study on seve ...
presentation - University of Reading
presentation - University of Reading

... Allow correction of errors for characters and entire fields. Produce sensible and informative error messages, free of value judgements. Provide help information for each field. Let the user know when the input is complete, and give an opportunity for review. April 2002 ...
MS-Transactions - Rose
MS-Transactions - Rose

... Module 15: Managing Transactions and Locks ...
slides
slides

... System crashes during the transaction. Some changes made it to the disk, some didn’t. Transaction finished. User notified. But changes not sent to disk yet (for performance reasons). System crashed. ...
What is a Transaction - a.thanop somprasong (ning)
What is a Transaction - a.thanop somprasong (ning)

...  Names of objects affected by transaction  “Before” and “after” values for updated fields  Pointers to previous and next transaction log entries for the same transaction  Ending (COMMIT) of the transaction ...
COURSE OUTLINE HCS 206- MODELS OF DATABASE AND
COURSE OUTLINE HCS 206- MODELS OF DATABASE AND

...  Entity Relationship Model  Definition of key terms i.e. entity sets, relationship sets, attributes  Constraints of an ER model: mapping cardinalities; participation constraints  Keys: definition of different keys; super key; candidate key; primary key  Constructing the Entity Relationship Dia ...
Concurrency control - OOP January Trimester 2011
Concurrency control - OOP January Trimester 2011

... – Automated recovery applies a similar technique to the manual recovery, i.e. Make periodic saves of the database (time consuming operation). However, maintain a more intelligent log (called the system log or transaction log) of the transactions that have been applied. Based on the “intelligent log ...
Overview of Databases and Transaction Processing
Overview of Databases and Transaction Processing

... Late work penalty You can have one late assignment submission up to one week without any penalty. Please email me in advance when you need to use your execuse. If late excuse is not used, a penalty of 2 % per day will be assessed up to one week. No credits will be given for works handed in one week ...
www.devbg.org
www.devbg.org

... WCF services & other resource managers can be executed within the scope of distributed transaction Transactable Services In the Internet – using WS-AtomicTransaction In the Intranet - DTC, OleTransaction protocol, System.Transaction ...
Transactions
Transactions

... – e.g. sum of balances of all accounts, minus sum of loan amounts must equal value of cash-in-hand  A transaction must see a consistent database.  During transaction execution the database may be temporarily inconsistent.  When the transaction completes successfully the database must be ...
< 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report