
The law of large numbers and AEP
... Where does this lead: data compression Typical sequences occur most of the time. Therefore, one way to perform data compression is to only provide efficient codes for the typical sequences, and other (less efficient) codes for the non-typical sequences. Since there are ≤ 2n(H+) sequences (n) in A ...
... Where does this lead: data compression Typical sequences occur most of the time. Therefore, one way to perform data compression is to only provide efficient codes for the typical sequences, and other (less efficient) codes for the non-typical sequences. Since there are ≤ 2n(H+) sequences (n) in A ...
Revisiting a Number-Theoretic Puzzle: The Census
... box whose dimensions are the elements of the corresponding triple. The product condition implies that these boxes have the same volume (which is the given CTN), while the sum condition implies that the boxes have the same perimeter (which is four times the magic sum). The volume being a census-taker ...
... box whose dimensions are the elements of the corresponding triple. The product condition implies that these boxes have the same volume (which is the given CTN), while the sum condition implies that the boxes have the same perimeter (which is four times the magic sum). The volume being a census-taker ...
Induction
... But this directly contradicts the fact that P(m − 1) =⇒ P(m). It may seem as though we just proved the induction axiom. But what we have actually done is to show that the induction axiom follows from another axiom, which was used implicitly in defining “the first m for which P(m) is false.” We note ...
... But this directly contradicts the fact that P(m − 1) =⇒ P(m). It may seem as though we just proved the induction axiom. But what we have actually done is to show that the induction axiom follows from another axiom, which was used implicitly in defining “the first m for which P(m) is false.” We note ...
Keys GEO SY14-15 Openers 2-5
... Corresponding Angles transversal, then each pair of CO Corresponding Angles/|| Lines so that each pair of CO s is , Postulate (CO s Post.) s is . Postulate (CO s/|| Lines Post.) then the lines are ||. Theorem 3.1 If 2 || lines are cut by a Theorem 3.5 If 2 lines are cut by a transversal so Alt ...
... Corresponding Angles transversal, then each pair of CO Corresponding Angles/|| Lines so that each pair of CO s is , Postulate (CO s Post.) s is . Postulate (CO s/|| Lines Post.) then the lines are ||. Theorem 3.1 If 2 || lines are cut by a Theorem 3.5 If 2 lines are cut by a transversal so Alt ...
power series
... Thus if = 0, then = 0 < 1, and the series converges (absolutely) for all real x. If 0 + , then the series converges when | x | 1 and diverges when | x | > 1. That is, an xn converges when | x | 1/ = R and diverges when | x | > 1/ = R. If = + , then for x 0 we have = + ...
... Thus if = 0, then = 0 < 1, and the series converges (absolutely) for all real x. If 0 + , then the series converges when | x | 1 and diverges when | x | > 1. That is, an xn converges when | x | 1/ = R and diverges when | x | > 1/ = R. If = + , then for x 0 we have = + ...
The distribution of quadratic and higher residues, (1)
... be recalled that the proof of P~LYA’S inequality, though not very difficult, depends on the use of Gaussian sums; and VINOGRADOV’S proof of his own inequality, though elementary, is not altogether simple In 5 3 we give estimates for &, the least kth power non-residue (mod@, when k is fixed and p is ...
... be recalled that the proof of P~LYA’S inequality, though not very difficult, depends on the use of Gaussian sums; and VINOGRADOV’S proof of his own inequality, though elementary, is not altogether simple In 5 3 we give estimates for &, the least kth power non-residue (mod@, when k is fixed and p is ...
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO MODAL LOGIC Introduction Consider
... Note the interconnections implied by this table. For example, any formula that is K-valid ought to be valid in all these systems, since its truth relies on no particular frame structure. Similarly, what is true in B will be true in S5, since the former is identical to the latter with the exception o ...
... Note the interconnections implied by this table. For example, any formula that is K-valid ought to be valid in all these systems, since its truth relies on no particular frame structure. Similarly, what is true in B will be true in S5, since the former is identical to the latter with the exception o ...
Discrete Mathematics Project part II
... Therefore, you start with 60 mice total (n), and 22 mice (k) are to be chosen to be in the first subset (Drug A). So, Drug A= C(60, 22) Since the first combination has taken away 22 mice from the entire set (n), the second subset (Drug B) only has 38 mice (n) in which 22 mice (k) can be chosen. So, ...
... Therefore, you start with 60 mice total (n), and 22 mice (k) are to be chosen to be in the first subset (Drug A). So, Drug A= C(60, 22) Since the first combination has taken away 22 mice from the entire set (n), the second subset (Drug B) only has 38 mice (n) in which 22 mice (k) can be chosen. So, ...
MATHEMATICAL STATEMENTS AND PROOFS In this note we
... We stress that we will not try, in this note, to say anything systematic about the much more interesting question of how to come up with good and relevant ideas to solve the given problem. (Thus, if we compare mathematics to the game of chess, then in this note we merely aim at teaching the rules of ...
... We stress that we will not try, in this note, to say anything systematic about the much more interesting question of how to come up with good and relevant ideas to solve the given problem. (Thus, if we compare mathematics to the game of chess, then in this note we merely aim at teaching the rules of ...
1 Binomial Expansion
... EMB A selection in which order does not matter is a combination. The M E R Binomial Theorem uses combinations to describe the pattern for the coefficients in a binomial expansion. Remember: ...
... EMB A selection in which order does not matter is a combination. The M E R Binomial Theorem uses combinations to describe the pattern for the coefficients in a binomial expansion. Remember: ...
dartboard arrangements
... an actual dartboard, these imply that it does not matter which number is uppermost or whether the board is reflected in a diameter. In this paper, all arrangements are permutations in A, except for a few references to the original dartboard arrangement, which we refer to as Ad . We are particularly ...
... an actual dartboard, these imply that it does not matter which number is uppermost or whether the board is reflected in a diameter. In this paper, all arrangements are permutations in A, except for a few references to the original dartboard arrangement, which we refer to as Ad . We are particularly ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.