
MATH10040: Chapter 0 Mathematics, Logic and Reasoning
... Thus, in everyday language, the contrapositive of the statement The square of an odd number is odd is the statement If the square of an integer is even then the integer itself is even. These two statements are entirely logically equivalent. 2.9. Proof by Contradiction. A contradiction is a statement ...
... Thus, in everyday language, the contrapositive of the statement The square of an odd number is odd is the statement If the square of an integer is even then the integer itself is even. These two statements are entirely logically equivalent. 2.9. Proof by Contradiction. A contradiction is a statement ...
Notes - IMSc
... We start with r = 2 and give two proofs: one an inductive argument, and another an explicit upper bound on R(`; 2). We want to show that given (`1 , `2 ), R(`1 , `2 ) exists. Proof 1. From P4 we know that R(`, 2) = R(2, `) = `. Inductively, assume that R(`1 −1, `2 ) and R(`1 , `2 −1) are well-define ...
... We start with r = 2 and give two proofs: one an inductive argument, and another an explicit upper bound on R(`; 2). We want to show that given (`1 , `2 ), R(`1 , `2 ) exists. Proof 1. From P4 we know that R(`, 2) = R(2, `) = `. Inductively, assume that R(`1 −1, `2 ) and R(`1 , `2 −1) are well-define ...
Notes on Combinatorics - School of Mathematical Sciences
... Proof Let Se and So be the sums of the even and odd binomial coefficients respectively. Then Se + So is the sum of all the binomial coefficients; in other words, Se + So = 2n . If we put x =−1 in the one-variable Binomial Theorem, we obtain n n ∑ (−1)k k = (−1 + 1)n = 0. Now in this sum, the even ...
... Proof Let Se and So be the sums of the even and odd binomial coefficients respectively. Then Se + So is the sum of all the binomial coefficients; in other words, Se + So = 2n . If we put x =−1 in the one-variable Binomial Theorem, we obtain n n ∑ (−1)k k = (−1 + 1)n = 0. Now in this sum, the even ...
On the Representation of Numbers in a Rational Base
... In this paper1 , we introduce and study a new method for representing positive integers and real numbers in the base pq , where p > q > 2 are coprime integers. The idea of nonstandard representation systems of numbers is far from being original and there have been extensive studies of these, from a ...
... In this paper1 , we introduce and study a new method for representing positive integers and real numbers in the base pq , where p > q > 2 are coprime integers. The idea of nonstandard representation systems of numbers is far from being original and there have been extensive studies of these, from a ...
Lecture Notes on Primality Testing
... by computing aR , a2R , a4R , · · · , a2 R = an−1 (all mod n). Each term in this sequence is the square of the previous one, and (assuming that a fails the Fermat Test, in which case we would be done anyway) the last term is 1. Thus if the first 1 in the sequence is preceded by a number other than − ...
... by computing aR , a2R , a4R , · · · , a2 R = an−1 (all mod n). Each term in this sequence is the square of the previous one, and (assuming that a fails the Fermat Test, in which case we would be done anyway) the last term is 1. Thus if the first 1 in the sequence is preceded by a number other than − ...
Chapter 12 - Princeton University Press
... We give complete details for the k = 1 case, and provide a sketch in the next subsection for general k. According to [HW], note on Chapter XXIII, the theorem for k = 1 was discovered independently by Bohl, Sierpiński and Weyl at about the same time. We follow Weyl’s proof which, according to [HW], ...
... We give complete details for the k = 1 case, and provide a sketch in the next subsection for general k. According to [HW], note on Chapter XXIII, the theorem for k = 1 was discovered independently by Bohl, Sierpiński and Weyl at about the same time. We follow Weyl’s proof which, according to [HW], ...
Document
... for solving a specific type of problem. It has the following features: 1. Finiteness: An algorithm must always terminate after a finite number of steps. 2. Definiteness: Each step of an algorithm must be precisely defined; the actions to be carried out must be rigorously and unambiguously specified ...
... for solving a specific type of problem. It has the following features: 1. Finiteness: An algorithm must always terminate after a finite number of steps. 2. Definiteness: Each step of an algorithm must be precisely defined; the actions to be carried out must be rigorously and unambiguously specified ...
Logic and Proof Book Chapter - IUPUI Mathematical Sciences
... The first chapter of this book focused on how to determine the truth values of compound statements and how to determine whether an argument is valid; however, the methods learned thus far are often incapable of describing many of the statements in mathematics. Consider the following sentence x is a ...
... The first chapter of this book focused on how to determine the truth values of compound statements and how to determine whether an argument is valid; however, the methods learned thus far are often incapable of describing many of the statements in mathematics. Consider the following sentence x is a ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.