
arXiv:math/0008222v1 [math.CO] 30 Aug 2000
... it modulo 26 . Their methods, as well as ours, can be used to write formulas for f modulo any power of 2, but no closed form is known. The proof of Theorem 1 will not make any use of sophisticated 2-adic machinery. The only non-trivial fact we will require is that the 2-adic absolute value extends u ...
... it modulo 26 . Their methods, as well as ours, can be used to write formulas for f modulo any power of 2, but no closed form is known. The proof of Theorem 1 will not make any use of sophisticated 2-adic machinery. The only non-trivial fact we will require is that the 2-adic absolute value extends u ...
Propositional Logic
... It is frequently necessary to reason logically about statements of the form Everything has the property p or something has the property p. One of the oldest and most famous pieces of logical reasoning, which was known to the ancient Greeks, is an example: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Ther ...
... It is frequently necessary to reason logically about statements of the form Everything has the property p or something has the property p. One of the oldest and most famous pieces of logical reasoning, which was known to the ancient Greeks, is an example: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Ther ...
even, odd, and prime integers
... possible primes among this group. In turn all the primes form a much larger group than the Mersenne and Fermat Primes. No one has been able to show whether the number of Mersenne Primes is finite or infinite. What is known from the prime number theorem is that prime numbers become quite sparse for l ...
... possible primes among this group. In turn all the primes form a much larger group than the Mersenne and Fermat Primes. No one has been able to show whether the number of Mersenne Primes is finite or infinite. What is known from the prime number theorem is that prime numbers become quite sparse for l ...
I(k-1)
... integers (or a subset like integers larger than 3) that have appropriate self-referential structure— including both equalities and inequalities—using either weak or strong induction as needed. – Critique formal inductive proofs to determine whether they are valid and where the error(s) lie if they a ...
... integers (or a subset like integers larger than 3) that have appropriate self-referential structure— including both equalities and inequalities—using either weak or strong induction as needed. – Critique formal inductive proofs to determine whether they are valid and where the error(s) lie if they a ...
Gödel Without (Too Many) Tears
... Gödel’s doctoral dissertation, written when he was 23, established the completeness theorem for the first-order predicate calculus (i.e. a standard proof system for first-order logic indeed captures all the semantically valid inferences). Later he would do immensely important work on set theory, as ...
... Gödel’s doctoral dissertation, written when he was 23, established the completeness theorem for the first-order predicate calculus (i.e. a standard proof system for first-order logic indeed captures all the semantically valid inferences). Later he would do immensely important work on set theory, as ...
Addition and Subtraction of Fractions
... SUBTRACTION makes sense only if the size of the parts is the same. This means that to subtract fractions we still find the same _________________. Note the definition and theorem on page 252. Once fraction addition and subtraction are well understood, all of us can add and subtract “easy” fractions ...
... SUBTRACTION makes sense only if the size of the parts is the same. This means that to subtract fractions we still find the same _________________. Note the definition and theorem on page 252. Once fraction addition and subtraction are well understood, all of us can add and subtract “easy” fractions ...
Brownian Motion and Kolmogorov Complexity
... A set A ⊆ N is infinitely often c.e. traceable if there is a computable function p(n) such that for all f : N → N, if f is computable in A then there is a uniformly c.e. sequence of finite sets En of size ≤ p(n) such that ∃∞ n f (n) ∈ En . ...
... A set A ⊆ N is infinitely often c.e. traceable if there is a computable function p(n) such that for all f : N → N, if f is computable in A then there is a uniformly c.e. sequence of finite sets En of size ≤ p(n) such that ∃∞ n f (n) ∈ En . ...
Integers, Prime Factorization, and More on Primes
... Proof. (1) By the Euclidean algorithm, there exist integers m, n such that ma + nb = 1. Multiplying c to both sides we have mac + nbc = c. Since a | bc, i.e., bc = qa for some integer q, then c = mac + nqa = (mc + nq)a, which means that a is a divisor of c. (2) If p - a, then gcd(p, a) = 1. Thus by ...
... Proof. (1) By the Euclidean algorithm, there exist integers m, n such that ma + nb = 1. Multiplying c to both sides we have mac + nbc = c. Since a | bc, i.e., bc = qa for some integer q, then c = mac + nqa = (mc + nq)a, which means that a is a divisor of c. (2) If p - a, then gcd(p, a) = 1. Thus by ...
Congruence and uniqueness of certain Markoff numbers
... for some rather special subsets of the Markoff numbers. The following result for Markoff numbers which are prime powers or 2 times prime powers was first proved independently and partly by Baragar [1] (for primes and 2 times primes), Button [2] (for primes but can be easily extended to prime powers) ...
... for some rather special subsets of the Markoff numbers. The following result for Markoff numbers which are prime powers or 2 times prime powers was first proved independently and partly by Baragar [1] (for primes and 2 times primes), Button [2] (for primes but can be easily extended to prime powers) ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.