
Propositional Statements Direct Proof
... , because a/2 = ab . But we said definition, so b is even. Since a and b are both even, a/2 and b/2 are integers. and 2 = a/2 b/2 b/2 a a before b is in its simplest form and cannot be reduced. We just reduced b by a factor of 2, so this is a contradiction. X ...
... , because a/2 = ab . But we said definition, so b is even. Since a and b are both even, a/2 and b/2 are integers. and 2 = a/2 b/2 b/2 a a before b is in its simplest form and cannot be reduced. We just reduced b by a factor of 2, so this is a contradiction. X ...
Course Notes 5.3 Applications of Number Theory
... The problem of determining whether a given integer is a prime may be very difficult. This fact is both interesting mathematically and useful in coding theory. Fermat’s little theorem provides some help in working with prime numbers and provides the basis for many probabilistic primality tests. We wi ...
... The problem of determining whether a given integer is a prime may be very difficult. This fact is both interesting mathematically and useful in coding theory. Fermat’s little theorem provides some help in working with prime numbers and provides the basis for many probabilistic primality tests. We wi ...
PART II. SEQUENCES OF REAL NUMBERS
... In discussing sequences the subscript notation is much more common than functional notation. We’ll use subscript notation throughout our treatment of analysis. Specifying a sequence There are several ways to specify a sequence. 1. By giving the function. For example: ...
... In discussing sequences the subscript notation is much more common than functional notation. We’ll use subscript notation throughout our treatment of analysis. Specifying a sequence There are several ways to specify a sequence. 1. By giving the function. For example: ...
Arithmetics on number systems with irrational bases
... k=−N xk β is called the β-fractional part of x. If N ≤ 0 we set fp(x) = 0, for N > 0 we define fp(x) = N, i.e. fp(x) is the number of fractional digits in the β-expansion of x. Note that x is in Zβ if and only if fp(x) = 0. If β ∈ Z, β > 1, then Fin(β) is closed under the operations of addition, sub ...
... k=−N xk β is called the β-fractional part of x. If N ≤ 0 we set fp(x) = 0, for N > 0 we define fp(x) = N, i.e. fp(x) is the number of fractional digits in the β-expansion of x. Note that x is in Zβ if and only if fp(x) = 0. If β ∈ Z, β > 1, then Fin(β) is closed under the operations of addition, sub ...
A survey on Interactive Theorem Proving
... Invent a new way of doing mathematics “in front of a computer”. Wang - Towards mechanical mathematics, 1960 ... the writer believes that perhaps machines may more quickly become of pracical use in mathematical research, not by proving new theorems, but by formalizing and checking outlines of proofs, ...
... Invent a new way of doing mathematics “in front of a computer”. Wang - Towards mechanical mathematics, 1960 ... the writer believes that perhaps machines may more quickly become of pracical use in mathematical research, not by proving new theorems, but by formalizing and checking outlines of proofs, ...
3.1.3 Subformulas
... does not meet the third condition in Definition 3.8. At the end of Section 3.1 I would like to comment on the use of parentheses in propositional logic formulas. In arithmetic expressions not all parentheses are usually written. For example, we often write 14 ÷ 2 + 5 × 3 instead of ((14 ÷ 2) + (5 × ...
... does not meet the third condition in Definition 3.8. At the end of Section 3.1 I would like to comment on the use of parentheses in propositional logic formulas. In arithmetic expressions not all parentheses are usually written. For example, we often write 14 ÷ 2 + 5 × 3 instead of ((14 ÷ 2) + (5 × ...
x - El Camino College
... As you may have noticed from the examples so far, the complex zeros of polynomials with real coefficients come in pairs. • Whenever a + bi is a zero, its complex conjugate a – bi is also a zero. ...
... As you may have noticed from the examples so far, the complex zeros of polynomials with real coefficients come in pairs. • Whenever a + bi is a zero, its complex conjugate a – bi is also a zero. ...
Explicit formulas for Hecke Gauss sums in quadratic
... of theta series associated to number fields. A formula similar to the one in the theorem, but for general Gauss sums associated to arbitrary rational binary quadratic forms was proved in [SZ89, §4, Theorem 3]. It is possible (though not completely obvious) to deduce our main theorem from the formula ...
... of theta series associated to number fields. A formula similar to the one in the theorem, but for general Gauss sums associated to arbitrary rational binary quadratic forms was proved in [SZ89, §4, Theorem 3]. It is possible (though not completely obvious) to deduce our main theorem from the formula ...
Class Notes Day 31: Intro to Series
... Geometric series are among the simpler with which to work. We will see that we can determine which ones converge and what their limits are fairly easily. ...
... Geometric series are among the simpler with which to work. We will see that we can determine which ones converge and what their limits are fairly easily. ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.